Legal challenge over Wimbledon expansion set to be heard at High Court
Planning permission for the scheme was granted last year by Jules Pipe, London's deputy mayor for planning, who said that the proposals 'would facilitate very significant benefits' which 'clearly outweigh the harm'.
Debbie Jevans, chair of the All England Club, said at the time that the proposals would deliver 27 acres of 'newly accessible parkland for the community', and would allow the qualifying tournament for Wimbledon – currently staged at Roehampton – to be held on-site.
But campaigners say that Wimbledon Park, a Grade II*-listed heritage site, is subject to similar protections as the green belt or royal parks and that allowing development on the site would set a 'dangerous precedent'.
SWP's lawyers are set to argue that the GLA's decision failed to take into account the implications of 'restrictive covenants' on the use of the land, and that the development would cause 'deliberate damage'.
The GLA is defending the legal challenge at a two-day hearing before Mr Justice Saini, which is due to begin at 10.30am at the Royal Courts of Justice in London.
The plans were first submitted to both Merton and Wandsworth Councils, with the park straddling the boroughs, in 2021, three years after the All England Club bought out golf club members with the intention of developing the land.
After Merton Council approved the plans, but Wandsworth Council rejected them, the Mayor of London's office took charge of the application.
Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan then recused himself from the process in 2023, having previously expressed public support for the development.
The plans attracted opposition from Fleur Anderson, the Labour MP for Putney, and Richard Rees, who was previously the lead planner for the building of Wimbledon's Court One and the development of 'Henman Hill'.
Ahead of Tuesday's hearing, Christopher Coombe, a director of SWP, said: 'If this decision by the GLA is upheld and the development goes ahead, the detrimental impacts on our environment and delicate ecosystem will be devastating.
'Our community has given massive support to the campaign over four years, desperate to stop the loss of open space intended for public recreation.
'This is not just in SW19; it's happening all over London. Once built, it is gone forever, and there is very little local trust in an organisation that prides itself on fair play, but then breaks its word.
'We all love the Wimbledon championships, but don't believe the proposal is really about protecting the future of the world's best tennis tournament.
'We will continue to press (the All England Club) to reconsider their fighting stance towards our community and to join us in finding a resolution that we can all get behind.'
A spokesperson for the All England Club said: 'Our proposals will deliver one of the greatest sporting transformations for London since 2012.
'They are crucial to ensuring Wimbledon remains at the pinnacle of tennis, one of the world's best sporting events, and a global attraction for both London and the UK.
'On offer are substantial year-round benefits for our community and the delivery of significant social, economic, and environmental improvements.
'This includes more than 27 acres of new public parkland on what is currently inaccessible, private land.
'Our plans will increase the size of Wimbledon Park by a third and create spaces for people and nature to thrive.
'There will be a very significant increase in biodiversity across the site and our proposals are underpinned by more than 1,000 hours of ecological surveys, which are endorsed by the London Wildlife Trust.
'We have spoken to more than 10,000 people as part of our consultation events, and we know that the vast majority of people just want us to get on and deliver the many benefits on offer.'
A GLA spokesperson said: 'The Mayor believes this scheme will bring a significant range of benefits, including environmental, economic, social and cultural benefits to the local area, the wider capital and the UK economy.
'It will create new jobs and green spaces and cement Wimbledon's reputation as the greatest tennis competition in the world.
'An application has been made for the court to determine this matter, and it is therefore inappropriate for the mayor to comment further at this stage.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
44 minutes ago
- Times
Wimbledon line-calling system leaves spectators in dark
Amid all the frenzied debate about the accuracy and reliability of Hawk-Eye's electronic line-calling (ELC) system at Wimbledon, there has been one patently obvious flaw during its use across the tennis tour: the lack of any visual indication after a ball has landed out. Those who have sat watching matches at Wimbledon this fortnight will know the feeling that this correspondent has repeatedly experienced at the biggest tournaments around the world. The awkward two to three seconds in which you are unsure about who has just won the point because it has been difficult to hear the automated audible call, perhaps because of a loud roar from the crowd or the constant din from air-conditioning units attached to roofs. It is only when the scoreboard updates that the confusion is settled. In the bygone era of human line judges, there was no issue in this regard. Even if it was challenging to pick up the shout of 'out' from the mouths of the staff standing to the back or side of the court, confirmation would immediately follow with an outstretched arm to the side. Even balls that narrowly landed in were occasionally followed with a visual signal of both hands hanging downwards in a central position. Now, it can sometimes feel like a guessing game in which you are trying to gauge the winner of the point from the reactions of the players. It is particularly challenging for those spectators who are deaf, and it is understood that both the All England Club and the LTA — which organised the warm-up tournaments at the likes of Queen's and Eastbourne — have received letters and emails pointing this out. It is surprising that this issue has never been addressed in a system that was first tested eight years ago at an under-21 tournament titled the ATP Next Gen Finals in Milan, but safe to say it will be added as feedback to 'The List' that the All England Club famously puts together after each championships to improve on the following year. One high-ranking official here privately acknowledged to The Times that it was worth considering the potential addition of a visual 'out' display on the courtside scoreboards. There are some people who go as far as suggesting that ELC be done away with completely after several controversies here, but there is no prospect of that. Tim Henman, the normally mild-mannered former world No4 who has been a member of the All England Club's board for several years, summed up the firm and impassioned defence here of the system when he described criticism of its accuracy by the likes of Jack Draper and Emma Raducanu as 'utter garbage'. Undoubtedly, however, there are flaws to iron out in tennis's use of officiating technology. The most notable incident on Sunday during the match between Sonay Kartal and Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova highlighted this, in which Kartal clearly hit a long backhand that was not picked up by ELC. The reason for this, as the All England Club later explained, was that some of the cameras had been accidentally deactivated on Pavlyuchenkova's side of the court by a human operator. Please enable cookies and other technologies to view this content. You can update your cookies preferences any time using privacy manager. A small change was subsequently made to the system in which a manual deactivation, involving the unticking of a box, was no longer possible. In the long term, though, organisers may wish to consider allowing umpires to conduct an additional video review to clear any confusion and resolve these issues. A quick check, for example, of a replay of Kartal's backhand would have clearly shown that the ball landed long. An incident on Tuesday flagged up another potential tweak when a rally between Taylor Fritz and Karen Khachanov was brought to a sudden halt when a call of 'fault' was made after the third shot, which landed inside the lines. The reason for this was that Fritz had begun his service motion when a ballboy was still running across the court, meaning that the system considered the third shot to be the start of the point rather than the serve. Perhaps then, in future, the umpire should make sure that all ballboys and ballgirls are back in their positions before the point can get under way. The irony is that this same Hawk-Eye technology has been considered successful at Wimbledon since 2007, first as the popular challenge system alongside human line judges before becoming fully integrated this year as a live officiating tool. Twelve cameras are placed around the court to capture the movement of the ball, with the computer interpreting its location in real time. This produces a 3D representation of the court, showing the trajectory and landing point of the ball. The hub for all of this is referred to as 'The Rack Room', which is tucked away in a quiet corner of the site behind the broadcast centre. Inside are approximately 50 operators — all placed on a rota system (two hours on, one hour off) — with each court covered by eight screens at specific desks. A review official is also assigned to every court. This is the person contacted by the umpire on the old-school telephone sets when an issue arises. Installation of the system started on site in mid-May and took six weeks, involving rigorous testing to meet strict certification standards. More discreet testing had also taken place during last year's championships as a part of the wargaming process. It must be said that ELC has been used largely issue-free in tennis for some time now. Its introduction to the sport was accelerated because of the Covid-19 pandemic, which forced tournament organisers to reduce the number of personnel on site. The 2021 Australian Open was the first grand-slam tournament to adopt the system in place of human line judges and it gradually spread to other events before becoming mandatory on the ATP Tour this year. Grand-slams are outside the direct jurisdiction of the ATP, meaning that the French Open was able to continue using line judges this year. A key difference is the surface of clay, which produces ball marks on the brick dust for the umpires to quickly check in the event of any close calls. The French Tennis Federation also stated its willingness to protect a national network of line judges across all levels. The retention of this form of officiating was not without controversy, either. There were several disputed calls during the tournament, including a key moment in the final set of the men's final when a shot by Carlos Alcaraz was not called out. This could not be checked by the umpire because it happened mid-rally and the technology in use for broadcasting purposes subsequently showed that the ball was considerably long and the point should have gone to Jannik Sinner. One of the main factors behind Wimbledon's decision to introduce ELC was to avoid the risk of any controversies arising as a result of not using a system that had received the support of most players on the tour. It has always been acknowledged that it is not 100 per cent accurate, with a 2.2mm margin of error on average, but this is still considered to be far more precise than a traditional crew of line judges. While several players have questioned whether it is more inaccurate than usual here, with some suggesting this is because of grass's unique status as a natural surface, officials are privately adamant this is a myth that has gathered legs. A video released by the ATP this year showed the difficulty for the human eye in properly tracking a fast-moving ball that looked as if it had landed out, with slow-motion frame-by-frame cameras showing it had actually clipped the back of the line. It means that those calling for the well-dressed line judges to return to Wimbledon are set only for disappointment. No doubt there are flaws to be addressed and some changes to be made based on what we have seen here this fortnight, but ELC is here to stay in SW19.
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Iga Swiatek makes hay on the grass to finally reach Wimbledon's last four
Iga Swiatek smashed through her grass ceiling as she reached the Wimbledon semi-finals for the first time. The 24-year-old, a four-time French Open champion, swept aside Liudmila Samsonova 6-2 7-5 on Court One. Swiatek has never before been able to convincingly transfer her clay-court nous to the lawns of SW19. Jazda! 🇵🇱 Iga Swiatek defeats Liudmila Samsonova 6-2, 7-5 to reach her first #Wimbledon semi-final 👏 — Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 9, 2025 But after losing her Roland Garros crown last month, the Polish star looks determined to finally open her turf account. 'It feels great. Even though it's the middle of the tournament I got goosebumps after this win,' she said. 'I've really enjoyed playing this year and hopefully it's going to last as long as possible. This year I feel I can work with it.' Swiatek's previous best run was to the quarter-finals in 2023, but she says she feels more confident on the grass now. SWIATEK 🤝 SEMIS @iga_swiatek has secured her spot in the #Wimbledon semifinals after defeating Samsonova in straight sets, 6-2, 7-5! — wta (@WTA) July 9, 2025 'I still feel like in 2023 I had a great tournament, and I was playing good tennis, but it obviously wasn't enough to go further,' she added. 'This year, yeah, I mean, I feel like I developed as a player, and I had time to practice a little bit more. 'Match by match my confidence, for sure, went up so that I can use it on these Championships. 'I'm just happy with the work that I've been doing and proud of myself, yeah.' A comfortable victory means the prospect of a mouthwatering first grand slam final between Swiatek and the woman who replaced her as world number one, Aryna Sabalenka, remains on the cards. Standing in her way is Swiss 28-year-old Belinda Bencic, who has made a remarkable comeback following the birth of daughter Bella in April last year. 'I never doubted that she can't come back after pregnancy,' said Swiatek. 'She seems like she's in a good mood and she's playing well.' Samsonova, the 19th seed from Russia, was making her first appearance in a grand slam quarter-final, and it showed. She made 18 unforced errors as Swiatek raced away with the first set and back-to-back double faults gifted the eighth seed a break at the start of the second. Having lost seven straight games the 26-year-old began to swing more freely and managed to reel Swiatek back in at 4-4.
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Wimbledon diary: Queen visits Royal Box while Fabio Fognini calls it a day
Camilla was joined in the Royal Box by actor Hugh Grant – who appeared to have a bit of a doze at one point – former prime minister John Major and ex-Sri Lanka cricketer Kumar Sangakkara Another cricket star, India's Virat Kohli, was in the crowd while women's football boss Emma Hayes took in the action on Court One. Flamboyant Italian Fabio Fognini announced his retirement in the Wimbledon media theatre. The 38-year-old's final match was a memorable first-round five-setter against Carlos Alcaraz on day one. He said: 'That's the best decision, to play in the most beautiful court in the world with a guy that everybody knows. It's the perfect picture that we'll keep forever in my room.' 🗣️ "Ladies and gentlemen, when you open your champagne bottles please do not pop the cork onto the court" 😳 Champagne cork drama at #Wimbledon 🍾 — BBC Sport (@BBCSport) July 9, 2025 Play was momentarily held up in a doubles match for the most Wimbledon reason possible. Lloyd Glasspool and Julian Cash's win over fellow Briton Henry Patten and Finland's Harri Heliovaara was interrupted by a champagne cork landing on the court. A ballkid scurried on to remove the offending object while umpire Miriam Bley issued a polite verbal warning to spectators. Big-serving Ben Shelton had just sent a couple of 139mph aces whizzing past Jannik Sinner when someone in the crowd shouted 'give us 140'. The American obliged, and then some, by booming down a serve clocked at 147mph. Unfortunately, it was out. Hayes swapped the dugout for the players' box as a guest of Shelton. The former Chelsea boss is now in charge of the United States national team, for whom Shelton's girlfriend Trinity Rodman plays. A glass or two of Pimm's is certainly a step up from a plastic cup of Bovril at Stamford Bridge. It's all got a bit too much for Hugh Grant 😴😂#Wimbledon — BBC Sport (@BBCSport) July 9, 2025 'I started some fiction book by Elena Ferrante. I'm probably going to finish it – because it's short.' – Bookworm Iga Swiatek Sunny with temperatures reaching 32C, according to the Met Office.
