Silver's Options Sizzle: Are Traders Betting on a Breakout?
A notable wave of trading activity swept through several silver-linked assets in early June. Investors saw a significant jump in call option volumes for multiple silver-related equities. Call options give the holder the right, not the requirement, to buy an asset, such as a stock or ETF share, at a pre-set price by a specific date. When call volume spikes, it often signals that some traders believe the asset's price is poised to rise.
This unusual call option volume and increased investor interest in multiple stocks and ETFs at the same time warrant a closer look to see what's stirring in the silver sector.
Unpacking the Action: A Look at Specific Silver Plays
The heightened call option volume in early June varied across multiple silver-related securities, each telling a slightly different story. Separately, they tell four stories of bullish catalysts and heightened investor sentiment, but when combined, they start to reveal the bigger picture of a sector accumulating interest and investment.
iShares Silver Trust: A Price Play on Silver Bullion?
[content-module:CompanyOverview|NYSE:AG]
The iShares Silver Trust (NYSEARCA: SLV), an ETF that aims to track the price of silver bullion, saw 599,279 call option contracts traded. This volume was 57.8% above its usual average.
The high call volume may suggest that some traders expect silver prices to rebound soon or are preparing for further price fluctuations.
Because SLV tracks physical silver, this option's activity directly reflects views on the metal itself, likely influenced by broader economic news or general market coverage.
First Majestic: Mining News Ignites Options Interest?
[content-module:CompanyOverview|NYSE:AG]
First Majestic Silver Corp. (NYSE: AG), a company focused mainly on silver production, experienced a call option volume of 39,607 contracts, an 80.9% increase from its average. First Majestic's stock price has also climbed around 18% to $7.28 during the first week of June, with a high trading volume.
This mix of soaring call options, a rising stock price, and heavy trading often points to strong positive sentiment. Recent good news from the company has also likely played a role.
For instance, on May 28, 2025, First Majestic announced a significant gold-silver discovery at its Santa Elena property. This, along with strong financial results from the first quarter of 2025, could lead traders to expect more gains from the stock.
Pan American Silver: Big Deal Draws Options Traders?
[content-module:CompanyOverview|NYSEARCA:SILJ]
Pan American Silver Corp. (NYSE: PAAS), a large, diversified silver producer, recorded 9,098 call option contracts traded, up 25.7% from its average.
The company's stock price also rose, gaining nearly 10% in early June. This increased call activity, alongside positive news indicators, suggests investors are reacting well to recent company moves.
A key factor is likely Pan American's May 11, 2025, announcement of a deal to acquire MAG Silver Corp. for $2.1 billion. This strategic acquisition is expected to significantly boost Pan American's silver output and potential future earnings, which could, in turn, lift its stock price and attract optimistic options bets.
Junior Miners: High Hopes for Smaller Players?
[content-module:CompanyOverview|NYSEARCA:SILJ]
The Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (NYSEARCA: SILJ), which holds smaller silver mining and exploration companies, saw its call option volume hit 14,925 contracts. This was a striking 97.7% leap above its average, and it was also the most significant percentage increase among these assets. SILJ's price also increased by around 10% in early June.
This dramatic percentage jump in calls for SILJ points to strong speculative interest in this part of the silver market. Junior miners often have stock prices that move more sharply with silver prices.
The high option activity here suggests that some traders may be betting on substantial returns from these smaller firms if silver prices continue to climb or if positive news persists for the sector.
Beyond Options: What This Means for the Silver Market
When call option volume rises sharply across different types of silver assets, it can signal a broader increase in investor focus on the entire silver sector. Some traders may be positioning for potential price gains.
Silver's appeal comes from several areas. Demand from industries utilizing silver in green technologies, such as solar panels, electronics and the automotive sector, remains strong.
Silver is also a well-known precious metal. It is often regarded as a valuable investment that retains its value, especially during economic uncertainty or rising inflation. These core factors continue to support interest in the metal.
What Spiking Call Volumes Say About Silver's Next Move
The notable surge in call option activity across our four assets in early June clearly shows heightened investor focus on the silver sector. This flurry of bullish bets, reflected in the increased demand for call options, suggests that a market segment is positioning for potential upward price movements in silver bullion and mining equities.
Whether driven by specific company news or broader shifts in sentiment towards precious metals, the data points to a renewed speculative interest. The significant percentage increase in call volume underscores a willingness among some traders to embrace higher-risk, potentially higher-reward scenarios within the silver space.
Ultimately, this concentrated options activity serves as a strong indicator that silver and its related securities captured significant market attention. At the same time, the direct motivations behind each trade can vary, the collective signal points towards a period of dynamic interest and re-evaluation for the silver complex.
How these expectations play out will depend on ongoing market fundamentals, company performance, and the broader economic landscape, ensuring that the silver narrative will remain one to watch.
Where Should You Invest $1,000 Right Now?
Before you make your next trade, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis.
Our team has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and none of the big name stocks were on the list.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
44 minutes ago
- CTV News
Elon Musk renews his criticism of Trump's big bill as Senate Republicans scramble to pass it
Elon Musk attends a news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, May 30, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File) WASHINGTON — Elon Musk on Saturday doubled down on his distaste for U.S. President Donald Trump's sprawling tax and spending cuts bill, arguing the legislation that Republican senators are scrambling to pass would kill jobs and bog down burgeoning industries. 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country,' Musk wrote on X on Saturday ahead of a procedural U.S. Senate vote to open debate on the nearly 1,000-page bill. 'It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' The Tesla and SpaceX CEO, whose birthday is also Saturday, later posted that the bill would be 'political suicide for the Republican Party.' The criticisms reopen a recent fiery conflict between the former head of the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency and the administration he recently left. They also represent yet another headache for Republican Senate leaders who have spent the weekend working overtime to get the legislation through their chamber so it can pass by Trump's Fourth of July deadline. Musk has previously made his opinions about Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' clear. Days after he left the federal government last month with a laudatory celebration in the Oval Office, he blasted the bill as 'pork-filled' and a 'disgusting abomination.' 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' he wrote on X earlier this month. In another post, the wealthy GOP donor who had recently forecasted that he'd step back from political donations threatened to fire lawmakers who 'betrayed the American people.' When Trump clapped back to say he was disappointed with Musk, back-and-forth fighting erupted and quickly escalated. Musk suggested without evidence that Trump, who spent the first part of the year as one of his closest allies, was mentioned in files related to sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein. Musk ultimately tried to make nice with the administration, saying he regretted some of his posts that 'went too far.' Trump responded in kind in an interview with The New York Post, saying, 'Things like that happen. I don't blame him for anything.' It's unclear how Musk's latest broadsides will influence the fragile peace he and the president had enjoyed in recent weeks. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Musk has spent recent weeks focused on his businesses, and his political influence has waned since he left the administration. Still, the wealthy businessman poured hundreds of millions of dollars into Trump's campaign in 2024, demonstrating the impact his money can have if he's passionate enough about an issue or candidate to restart his political spending. Though he was silent on Musk, Trump laid on pressure and lashed out strongly at Republican holdouts in the Senate as lawmakers spent hours taking a procedural vote during a rare Saturday evening session. He accused Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina of seeking publicity with his no vote and threatened to campaign against the senator's reelection. The legislation narrowly cleared its test vote in the Senate late Saturday evening, allowing senators to begin debate. Ali Swenson, The Associated Press
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Trump trade war: Alcohol sales dropped after provinces pulled U.S. products
An employee removes American wines from an SAQ liquor store in Montreal on Tuesday, March 4, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Christinne Muschi Alcohol sales are down this year in Canada amid persisting economic uncertainty and a collapse in imports of beer, wine and spirits from the U.S. As U.S. President Donald Trump's global trade war marches on, provincial boycotts of American alcohol have begun to reflect in sales figures -- all amid a third financial crisis in five years for Canadian consumers. The available data show declining sales for alcohol of all kinds this year, compared to the same time in 2024 — down more than $100 million across six provinces in the last quarter alone. 'The consumer is just feeling very fragile,' said CJ Hélie, president of Beer Canada, a trade association for beer makers, in a Thursday interview. 'People are just pulling back on discretionary spending, and we're seeing that big-time. Real softness in the market.' With provincial retailers halting American alcohol purchases and pulling bottles from shelves earlier this year, Statistics Canada (StatCan) data show that in April, roughly $3 million in U.S. wine entered the country, down 94 per cent from $54 million for the same month in 2024. 'We are deeply concerned that U.S. tariffs on imported spirits from Canada and Mexico will significantly harm all three countries and lead to a cycle of retaliatory tariffs that negatively impacts our shared industry,' reads a joint statement from North American spirits industry groups on the eve of the trade war in February. 'Our industries have thrived due to the level playing field established across our borders.' While U.S. beer imports have seen a less pronounced decline, they also make up a fairly small portion of the Canadian market. 'In some cases for generations, some of these iconic American brands have been made in Canada,' Hélie told 'Your Bud Lights, your Michelobs, your Pabsts … they're made in Canada, almost all from Canadian grains, in our plants.' Beer Canada noted in a February release that of all the beer consumed nationwide last year, 88 per cent was made in Canadian breweries. Hélie says that for beer, the trade war's impacts have been most pronounced in the manufacturing process, where aluminum tariffs threaten to make it far more expensive to produce the billions of cans filled at plants each year. '[Brewers] saw this coming; they stockpiled as much as they could,' he said. 'We haven't seen that price spike yet, into the price of beer into the marketplace. But if you're thinking Labour Day, this isn't resolved … it's going to be catastrophic for lots of brewers.' Meanwhile, Canada has historically been the world's number-one buyer of American wines, accounting for roughly a third of the U.S. export market last year. But for the month of April 2025, data compiled by the American Association of Wine Economists shows that figure fell to just four per cent, following the steepest decrease in purchases among America's top 15 buyers. On the other end of the transaction, American wines accounted for one in every five bottles (20 per cent) purchased at Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) stores in early 2024, but by the same time this year, that proportion had dropped to 15 per cent, losing the U.S. its top spot for import sales. 'Wine firms here in the U.S. thought that a tariff on (imported) goods, including wine from Canada, would be a boon, but it has turned out the other way around,' said Karl Storchmann, executive director of the American Association of Wine Economists, in an interview with BNN Bloomberg last week. 'Canada pulled the plug.' Sales down across Canada Early numbers show declining alcohol sales across provincial retailers. Shortfalls in the opening months of 2025 range from roughly a tenth of a percentage point in New Brunswick, to eight per cent in Newfoundland and Labrador. In Quebec, the liquor control board attributed a recent trend toward lower sales including a $90-million drop last fiscal year at government and specialized network stores to 'changes in customers' shopping habits.' The latest numbers come from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024-25, which varies by province, but generally ran from January to March, this year. Of the six provinces with available data, Nova Scotia was the only jurisdiction showing increasing sales, though the province's board notes that the total volume sold is still down nearly two per cent between last year and the year before that. Since March, the province says it has held roughly $14 million in U.S. products in storage, rather than selling it, and that sales for products made in Nova Scotia have grown nearly 14 per cent in that time. The Yukon Liquor Corporation told CTV News that U.S. imports made up 3.6 per cent of net sales in the territory between January and May of this year, down from 5.4 per cent for all of 2024. And in British Columbia, where Premier David Eby described his March order to pull U.S. products as a response to "escalating threats from south of the border," wholesale net sales of American alcohol are down three per cent for whisky, 23 per cent for wine and nearly 60 per cent for beer. Meanwhile, according to an emailed statement from the province's Liquor Distribution Branch, this April and May have seen 'increased customer interest and demand for products made in Canada.' While U.S. alcohol remains available under some circumstances, and imports have resumed in parts of the country, a 25 per cent tariff remains in effect on wine, spirits and beer crossing into Canada. The trade war isn't the only factor in decreasing alcohol sales. StatCan notes that, on a per-litre basis, they've been on the decline for years, even before Trump's return to the White House. Between the 2019-20 and 2023-24 fiscal years, alcohol sales revenue only grew by around two per cent annually, on average, even as prices per-bottle have risen, the agency notes. By volume, sales fell 3.8 per cent last year, in what a March release from StatCan called a "historic" drop. 'This was the largest volume decline ever recorded since Statistics Canada began tracking alcohol sales in 1949,' it read. To Hélie, recent declines are a sign that consumers have been reacting to years of economic challenges, from a massive drop in out-of-home dining amid COVID-19 restrictions, to the inflationary spike that followed as customers returned to restaurant tables — what he calls 'menu shock.' 'I'm going to go (from) $80 to $95 (for a night out), but that $95 meant I also had to cut out either the dessert, or the coffee, or the extra beer,' he said. 'We've seen that in the numbers, for sure.' With files from BNN Bloomberg's Jordan Fleguel
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Some people question FIFA World Cup benefits, while Eby says Vancouver could host more matches
Social Sharing Premier David Eby says B.C. is able to host more than the seven 2026 FIFA World Cup matches planned for Vancouver, even as questions mount over transparency and the tournament's economic benefits. B.C. organizers announced on Tuesday that the cost estimate of hosting the games increased to between $532 million and $624 million. That's up from a 2024 estimate of between $483 million and $581 million. B.C.'s government justified the cost increase, saying the matches — part of the tournament being co-hosted by the U.S. and Mexico — will lead to more than one million additional out-of-province visitors between 2026 and 2031, generating more than $1 billion in additional visitor spending. But an economist and a pollster are questioning the benefits for B.C. Meanwhile, Eby said the province would be eager to take on more of the World Cup matches if any are reassigned from other host cities. His remarks come amid growing concerns around the U.S. as a co-host nation. Human rights organizations, including Human Rights Watch, have raised "grave concerns" about the tournament being held there, and questions have surfaced over whether international fans will face barriers due to U.S. immigration policies. Eby made the comments Friday while answering questions from reporters at a signing ceremony at the Musqueam soccer field near Southwest Marine Drive, where the provincial government, the City of Vancouver, and three local First Nations formalized their agreement to co-operate on hosting duties. "Additional games in British Columbia would not only be possible, but they would be incredibly welcome," Eby said. "We've actually written to FIFA to say if for whatever reason they need to move games from any other locations, British Columbia stands ready to host," he said. "We can move quickly. We have an amazing team and we are ready to host additional games here in this beautiful province." Eby added many of the big expenses for hosting the FIFA World Cup like upgrades to B.C. Place Stadium are already being paid for and won't increase if more games are added. "In terms of the budget, a lot of the costs for FIFA are fixed costs related to upgrades ... which means that additional games bring in additional ticket revenue, additional revenue for the province," he said. But a pollster says the economic benefits of the tournament may not be known for decades, given some of the files from the organizing committee of the 2010 Vancouver Olympics are still sealed. "I understand the frustration completely, because here we are almost a couple of decades out of the Vancouver Winter Olympics and we don't have a full accounting of what happened," said Mario Canseco, the president of the polling firm Research Co. WATCH | Canseco says uncertainty contributing to rising costs: Global uncertainty may be contributing to FIFA World Cup costs, says B.C. pollster 4 days ago Duration 1:36 Polling done by Canseco over the last few years has revealed general support for hosting the World Cup, but the pollster noted that many people "had a bad taste in their mouths" over the Olympics' legacy in the city. Canseco noted that the hundreds of millions being spent on the World Cup come amid a time of economic uncertainty in the province, given the U.S. tariff threat and rising inflation. "FIFA tends to be just as secretive as the Olympic Committee, if not more so," the pollster said. "So it's going to be tough to actually look at all of these numbers at the end of the World Cup and see if it makes sense." Economist doubtful of numbers Officials have been bullish on the positive benefits associated with hosting the World Cup, with Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim likening hosting the World Cup to having 30 Super Bowls, in terms of economic benefit. An average viewership figure for each FIFA opening round game is about 360 million, compared with the approximately 115 million views the Super Bowl gets. In addition, the province has estimated 350,000 spectators will come to B.C. Place for the World Cup games. Moshe Lander, a senior economics lecturer at Concordia University, said he's skeptical over those numbers and doubts the economic benefits would amount to hosting even one or two Super Bowls. WATCH | Lander critical of how World Cup was promoted: Will B.C.'s expensive gamble hosting the 2026 FIFA World Cup pay off? 4 days ago Duration 7:27 On Tuesday, the B.C. government released an updated cost estimate for Vancouver hosting seven World Cup games in 2026, with the tournament set to cost taxpayers up to $624 million. Politicians have said the World Cup could bring in billions in revenue. But Moshe Lander, a senior economics lecturer at Concordia University, says the numbers simply don't make sense. Lander says that, given a crunch on hotel room space in Vancouver, World Cup visitors would likely displace regular tourists and cruise ship passengers that would have already been in the city at the height of summer. "That reduces the overall economic benefits substantially — not quite to zero, but pretty close to it," he told Amy Bell, guest host of CBC's On The Coast. WATCH | Is hosting the World Cup worth it? Is hosting the FIFA World Cup worth the ballooning costs? 1 year ago Duration 1:59 Toronto and Vancouver are slated to host 13 FIFA World Cup games in 2026, and the security budgets have gone up by tens of millions of dollars. Some are asking if it's worth it. Lander also says that, given what the city saw during the 2010 Olympics, locals are likely to leave Vancouver during the summer to avoid the chaos associated with hosting a large tournament. "That itself, then, reduces the benefits even further," the economist said. "So there is just no way that there's going to be $1 billion worth of economic benefits. I think that the decimal is massively in the wrong spot to the right." Entire province to benefit: minister In response to Lander's criticism, B.C. Tourism Minister Spencer Chandra Herbert said the province was using the World Cup investments to upgrade B.C. Place stadium and provide benefits into the future. "I think the economist kind of misses the point," he said on CBC's On The Coast. "This isn't all predicated on the idea of tourism during one month." Herbert said the province's investment in the World Cup was a sound one, given how jurisdictions spend hundreds of millions of dollars on advertising to grab eyeballs from across the globe. "You'd have to spend a whole lot more than we're currently spending on World Cup to generate the same interest in our jurisdiction, to get in front of people for hours at a time as they watch the game," Herbert said. "It's an ongoing tourism advertisement during the game." WATCH | Herbert defends rising cost of World Cup hosting: B.C. tourism minister defends rising cost of hosting 2026 FIFA World Cup 3 days ago Duration 10:00 On Tuesday, the B.C. government announced that the cost of hosting seven World Cup matches in Vancouver next year could rise beyond $620 million. Tourism Minister Spencer Chandra Herbert defended the cost to taxpayers, saying that the province had to "spend a penny to make a pound" and that it couldn't ask for a better tourism advertisement for all of B.C. Herbert said the World Cup was the "first step" for B.C. to market itself as a safe destination for tourists, who would then visit other parts of the province like Vancouver Island and the B.C. Interior. "I think, sometimes, you have to spend a penny to make a pound, so to speak," Herbert said. "And I think in this case, if you're looking at spending $85 [million] to $145 million in net core cost for the province ... then you [must] bear that out with the growth in tourism and the growth in interest and investment."
