ChatGPT Voice just got more human — and it now translates in real time
For paid users, the upgrade brings noticeably more fluid, expressive and human-like speech. According to OpenAI, ChatGPT now uses subtler intonation, realistic cadence and even emotional inflection — including sarcasm and empathy.
If you've ever felt that ChatGPT sounded 'off' or too robotic, this update might change your mind.
Beyond sounding better, ChatGPT Voice is also getting a major utility boost: real-time language translation. Given that real-time translation was just announced as part of Apple Intelligence at WWDC — and ChatGPT now integrates with Siri — the timing likely isn't a coincidence.You can now ask ChatGPT to translate between languages on the fly, and it'll continue translating automatically until you tell it to stop or switch.
That means you could speak English while traveling in Brazil and have ChatGPT translate your words into Portuguese, and then listen as it translates your waiter's response back into English. No switching apps or fumbling through menus. Just an ongoing, seamless conversation powered by AI.
Whether you're traveling, navigating a multilingual workplace or just trying to learn a new language, this new translation feature could be a game-changer.
The updated Advanced Voice is available now to all paid ChatGPT users, across all markets and platforms.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Just tap the microphone icon in the message composer to activate Voice.
This builds on previous updates earlier this year that reduced interruptions and improved accent performance.
There are still a few bugs to be aware of. OpenAI says that some voices may experience slight dips in audio quality or tonal consistency, including odd changes in pitch.
In rare cases, users may also hear unintended sounds, like fake ads or random background music. OpenAI is actively working to fix these 'hallucinations' in future updates.
But overall, this upgrade marks a big step forward in making ChatGPT a more natural, useful voice assistant.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT To Explain Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' To Me Like I'm 12 — Here's What It Said
I'm no stranger to sweeping legislation. I have 30 years of combined experience covering politics and state government, advocating for healthcare and education nonprofits, and negotiating policy from both sides of the table. Discover More: Try This: However, when President Donald Trump unveiled his 'Big Beautiful Bill,' even I had to pause. What exactly is in it? What's at stake for everyday people now and in the future? I asked ChatGPT to cut through the noise and condense sprawling policy documents to provide me with a clear, emotionally neutral summary. In other words, I asked ChatGPT to explain it in a way that I would understand, as if I were a 12-year-old. Here's what it said. It's All In the Branding There's no official legislation called the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' According to ChatGPT, it's a branding phrase Trump used to signal his agenda. It includes tax cuts, deep rollbacks, and restructuring of social safety nets, carrying significant implications for energy, education, and public debt. Read Now: What Does It Mean for Average Americans? One of my first questions while reviewing any public policy, including Trump's budget bill, is how it would affect regular citizens. Same with ChatGPT. I asked how Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' would affect average Americans. It said that workers could see slightly larger paychecks if payroll taxes are reduced. However, there's a catch. 'Those same payroll taxes fund programs like Social Security and Medicare, and without a replacement funding mechanism, the long-term stability of those benefits could be in jeopardy,' ChatGPT said. 'We've seen versions of this play out before: short-term relief, long-term risk.' Healthcare on the Chopping Block For those who rely on the Affordable Care Act, it could bring significant disruption. According to ChatGPT, 'Trump has repeatedly signaled interest in dismantling parts of the ACA. That could mean higher premiums, fewer protections for people with preexisting conditions, and a market-wide ripple effect for anyone who buys insurance independently or through the exchanges.' While the bill doesn't eliminate the ACA outright, it lays the groundwork for targeted rollbacks that could weaken coverage and affordability. For millions of Americans, especially gig workers, freelancers, and early retirees, this isn't just a policy; it's a potential threat to their health and finances. Student Debt Relief Could Disappear Tucked into the Big Beautiful Bill are provisions that would unwind key aspects of the Biden administration's student debt relief efforts. While not framed explicitly as an attack on borrowers, the bill signals a sharp policy reversal, one that could shut down or restrict forgiveness programs and income-driven repayment options. According to ChatGPT, 'If you have student loans or are counting on forgiveness programs, they could disappear overnight. The bill includes a rollback of debt relief efforts and the potential return of higher interest rates for federal loans. And if you're a parent planning for college, the financial aid landscape could shift beneath your feet.' Social Security Is Fine Until It Isn't While the Big Beautiful Bill doesn't explicitly cut Social Security, its structural changes to payroll taxes and entitlement spending raise serious questions about long-term funding. By lowering or eliminating certain employer-employee tax obligations, the bill could weaken the primary revenue stream that supports Social Security's solvency. ChatGPT explained: 'Reducing payroll taxes without a clear replacement funding mechanism puts pressure on programs like Social Security and Medicare. Even if benefits aren't cut immediately, the financial sustainability of those programs becomes more fragile.' For retirees and future beneficiaries alike, this isn't just theoretical. A weakened Social Security trust fund could lead to delayed payments, reduced benefits, or increased retirement age, all of which disproportionately affect low-income earners and workers with physically demanding jobs. The Real Power Play From an AI and systems-thinking perspective, the 'Big Beautiful Bill' revealed something deeper: it's not just about the policies; it's about who benefits from speed and opacity. According to ChatGPT: 'Wealthy donors and corporate lobbyists can plan for these changes before they hit. They have access, leverage, and legal teams. The average worker? They're just trying to make rent and keep the lights on.' With a degree of self-awareness, ChatGPT said. 'While AI can help decode the structure, it can't shield anyone from the real-world consequences. That's why clarity, accountability, and deliberate scrutiny still matter. Because in a system where speed favors power, the rest of us need time to see clearly, before the ground shifts beneath our feet.' More From GOBankingRates Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT To Explain Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' To Me Like I'm 12 — Here's What It Said
Android Authority
24 minutes ago
- Android Authority
This is why I use two separate ChatGPT accounts
Calvin Wankhede / Android Authority I'll admit it: I'm a bit of a recovering AI addict. While I've had mixed feelings about AI from the start, as someone who spends a lot of time lost in thought, I've found it can be a useful tool for ideation, proofreading, entertainment, and much more. Recently, I've started scaling back my usage for reasons beyond the scope of this article, but for a while, I actually had two paid ChatGPT accounts. I know what you're thinking, and you're right, it's a bit excessive. Still, in some cases, it really can make sense to have two accounts. Would you ever consider having two AI accounts at once? 0 votes Yes, it's smart to seperate business and personal. NaN % Yes, but only if it's two different AI tools. NaN % No, it's a waste of resources and I get by fine with what I have. NaN % Other (Tell us in the comments) NaN % It all started when I found myself constantly hitting usage limits for my personal projects and entertainment, leaving me in a lurch when I needed AI for work-related tasks. For those who don't know, the ChatGPT Plus tier has different limits depending on the model. Some like the basic GPT 4o are virtually unlimited, while others have a firm daily or weekly count. For example, GPT 03 lets you send 100 messages a week, while 04-mini-high gives you 100 messages a day, and so 04-mini gives you 300 a day. I tend to rely the most on 03 and 04-mini-high outside of basic stuff like editing, because it is actually willing to tell you that you're wrong, unlike many of the other models that are people-pleasers to the extreme. Realizing I was blowing through my message limits long before the week was up, I immediately started considering my options, including adding a Gemini subscription instead of ChatGPT. Truthfully, I had tried both before and always found myself coming back to ChatGPT, so the decision was basically made for me. At that point, I began manually migrating some of my old chats over to the new account, basically copying and pasting core logs so ChatGPT and deleting records from my original mixed-use account. As a freelancer, my goal was to make sure anything related to clients was separated from my personal projects, which were mostly entertainment or experimental (like messing around with the API and similar tools just to learn). It wasn't even just about the limits. I found this separation helpful for more than just avoiding blowing through my limits on the wrong thing. As you might know, ChatGPT can learn your preferences. It's not exactly learning or memory in the traditional sense, but instead it basically creates an abstract pattern of your communication styles and preferences. Let's just say my way of talking about personal matters is very different from my professional voice. Lots of cursing and the like. After splitting my usage, I noticed that ChatGPT actually became better suited for the specific tasks I was performing on each account, as it understood my preferences for each use case a little better. That's probably an oversimplification of how ChatGPT works, but you get the idea. These days, I no longer pay for two accounts since I don't rely as heavily on ChatGPT or any AI tool anymore, but it's useful to keep my old logs around, and so I still have a ChatGPT Plus account for business and another free account that is for personal use. This way, I also retain the option of renewing my paid subscription if my usage habits change again in the future. How do you sign up for two accounts, and is this a TOS violation? Calvin Wankhede / Android Authority Think you could benefit from a second account? Signing up for two accounts is easy as long as you have at least two different email addresses. For payment, I used two different credit or bank cards, though it's unclear if that's really necessary. The bigger question is if it actually okay to do this, or will your accounts get suspended for violating policy? When I first considered this, I did my research. According to the Terms of Service (TOS), there's no firm rule against having two accounts as long as you aren't purposely trying to circumvent usage limits. My first thought was, 'Well, I kind of am' — after all, running out of limits was a big part of my problem. Still, by separating accounts, I was doing more than just trying to increase my limits. By dividing business and personal/entertainment uses, I was also organizing information better, and I was making sure I didn't use up all my limits on personal stuff that would hurt my work productivity. Before, I'd burn through my limits pretty quickly on silly time-wasting stuff like writing alternate timeline fiction and other entertainment. Ultimately, having two accounts can be a bit of a gray area, but as long as you're careful about how and why you use each account, it's not technically against the TOS. For what it's worth, ChatGPT agrees — but with some caveats. As the AI explains, two accounts are fine if: Your main reason for separating is genuinely to keep business and personal activities distinct—billing, data, privacy, and not accidentally using up the business quota on personal stuff. This is a reasonable, defensible use. If you had one account and were hitting limits due to mixed usage, it's normal (and frankly smart) to create a second account for business, especially if your work depends on reliable access. As noted by the ChatGPT bot itself, the TOS is mainly aimed at stopping people from abusing the system by creating multiple accounts to stack free or paid uses, or for heavy API stacking. Reading the actual TOS seems to give the same picture as well. Could this kind of 'gray area' usage still attract attention from ChatGPT staff? Maybe, but as long as you're genuinely separating your use cases, there shouldn't be any major issues. In fact, it's common practice to create accounts specifically for business use, including for tax purposes, and so I'd wager this is probably more common than many realize.
Fox News
25 minutes ago
- Fox News
AI can simulate a teacher, but it can't shepherd a soul
Across America, education is changing at a pace few could have imagined even a decade ago. Artificial intelligence is being deployed to train machines to teach our children. School systems are embedding gender ideology and political agendas into their curriculum with little regard for parental input. At the same time, traditional values are being pushed to the margins, and our students are caught in the middle. We're witnessing a moment that demands urgent attention: Will we preserve the soul of education, or surrender it to machines and ideologies that don't know the human heart? The recent announcement that Microsoft, OpenAI and Anthropic are launching an AI-powered "teacher training academy" is a sign of what's coming. At first glance, it sounds innovative, maybe even helpful. But the deeper question is this: What is education really for? Education is not merely about delivering information. It's about shaping lives. At its best, it forms character, teaches discernment and prepares students to serve their communities with integrity. That kind of formation can't be automated. It requires a relationship. It requires mentorship. It requires people. At Southeastern University, we're not anti-technology. In fact, we're actively exploring ethical ways to use AI to serve students and improve access to learning. But we draw a clear boundary: AI can assist educators, but it must never replace them. Because no machine, no matter how advanced, can love a student, model virtue or guide a young adult toward a life of purpose. We believe every student is made in the image of God, and that shaping a soul requires more than a circuit board. The deeper danger in this shift isn't just logistical, it's philosophical. When we hand over the role of teacher to algorithms, we're also handing over the power to decide what gets taught, how it's taught and what values are emphasized. In an era where AI is already reflecting and amplifying ideological bias, that should concern every parent and educator in America. Are we prepared to let unelected tech companies, with their own worldviews and profit motives, determine how future generations learn, think and believe? This is about more than machines. It's about the mission of education itself. We must reclaim education as a deeply human, deeply moral enterprise. We must elevate teachers, not replace them. We must ensure that classrooms remain spaces where students are not just informed but transformed, not just prepped for a career, but prepared for a calling. Now is the time for Christian colleges and universities to lead boldly. We must protect the relational core of learning, model truth-seeking without compromise, and remind our nation that the formation of a soul can't be outsourced. Let's use technology, but never be used by it. Let's build an educational future that reflects the dignity of every student, and the responsibility we have to shape them with wisdom, courage and conviction.
