White House uses viral Jet2holidays meme to promote ICE deportations
The clip showing people wearing handcuffs being ushered out of cars and onto planes by officials, is paired with the uplifting beat of Jess Glynne's "Hold My Hand" and the equally cheery voiceover of actor Zoe Lister, advertising Jet2's packages.
"When ICE books you a one-way Jet2 holiday to deportation. Nothing beats it!," a message on the official White House X and Instagram accounts read.
ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) is a federal law enforcement agency which has been ramping up immigration raids under the Trump administration.
Federal agents have expanded these raids to everyday locations, including hospitals, creating fear among communities, with the crackdown prompting violent protests in Los Angeles last month.
Lister has expressed her disappointment at her voice being used to promote ICE's work, writing on her Instagram story: "What can be done about @whitehouse using @jet2pics sound and my voiceover to promote their nasty agenda?"
ITV News has contacted Jet2, Jess Glynne and Zoë Lister for comment.
While the White House has not appeared to comment on this specific clip, it has recently responded to wider criticisms of its social media strategy, which includes the use of AI generated images, trolling and memes.
"Nowhere in the Constitution does it say we can't post banger memes," it wrote on its X account earlier this month.
The controversy follows a sudden rise in the use on social media of the voiceover and music used in Jet2's advert.
The ad's audio has been paired with clips on social media platforms, including Instagram and TikTok, and has even been sampled by DJs in clubs.
The ad featuring Jess Glynne's Hold My Hand, has often been used for footage of calamitous situations on holidays gone wrong.
For example, it's been used for a video on TikTok viewed over 1.8 million times showing a woman almost drowning in a pool and having to be saved by lifeguards, and for clips of people fighting and being arrested on planes.
The advert is often used ironically to contrast Jet2's idyllic depiction of its holidays with chaotic or disappointing.
Zoe Lister, who performed the voiceover live at a DJ set by Capital Breakfast's Chris Stark, opened up to the Radio Show about how "completely nuts" it has been to go viral.
"The last few months have just been ramping up, and the videos are getting funnier. I thought it just was just like, 'it's got British appeal, you know, we've got a good sense of humour', but then there's Americans, like 'hey I love your voiceover'."
In a video on her Instagram profile, Lister, who played the role of Zoe Carpenter in Hollyoaks from 2006 to 2010, said she has also been getting messages from fans in Brazil, Canada, Algeria, and the Philippines. Someone has even made a Chinese version of the voiceover.
The 43-year-old voice actor told the Sun: "I'd never in a million years think that that this was going to be the thing to go viral.
"We're all just really enjoying it because it's just silly, it's stupid joy, and that's what we all need."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘First Amendment has limits': Tom Homan insists that Mahmoud Khalil will be deported
Donald Trump's border czar is adamant that Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil will still be deported from the country despite several court rulings that have kept the Palestinian activist out of detention. A federal appeals court on Wednesday rejected a request from the Trump administration to re-arrest Khalil and keep him in immigration detention center while he continues to challenge the government's attempts to remove him from the United States. Homan says the administration will continue to appeal. 'We got radical judges just trying to stop the Trump administration from doing our job and enforcing the law,' he told Newsmax on Thursday. He claimed there is 'only one ending' to Khalil's case: 'We detain him and deport him, but regardless, he will be deported.' That same day, the immigration court judge overseeing his case voided her earlier ruling that allowed the government to deport him. Khalil, a prominent student activist against Israel's war in Gaza, was stripped of his green card and arrested in front of his then-pregnant wife in their New York City apartment building on March 8. He was then sent to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center in Louisiana, where he was held for more than 100 days and forced to miss the birth of his child. Trump administration officials have accused Khalil of 'antisemitic activities,' allegations Khalil and his legal team have flatly denied. Officials concede that Khalil did not commit any crime, but Secretary of State Marco Rubio has sought to justify Khalil's arrest by claiming that Khalil's presence in the country undermines foreign policy interests to prevent antisemitism. Khalil and his legal team argue his arrest and detention — and attempted removal from the country, which is currently blocked by court order — are retaliatory violations of his First Amendment right to freedom of speech and his Fifth Amendment right to due process of law, among other claims. 'Look, First Amendment rights have a limitation, too,' Homan told Newsmax. 'He did a lot of bad things. We're going to hold him accountable. He will be deported.' On June 11, a federal judge granted Khalil's release from ICE detention on bail while legal challenges against his arrest and threat of removal from the country continue in both federal and immigration courts. New Jersey District Judge Michael Farbiarz ruled that the administration had unconstitutionally wielded the law against Khalil, whose 'career and reputation are being damaged and his speech is being chilled,' the judge wrote. The government has 'little or no interest in applying the relevant underlying statutes in what is likely an unconstitutional way,' Farbiarz added. 'Mahmoud spent 104 days in detention as punishment for speaking out for Palestinian rights,' ACLU senior staff attorney Noor Zafar said in a statement after this week's appeals court ruling. 'That is time with his family that he will never get back, but this decision affirms that he will remain free and that the government cannot pursue his removal based on the likely unconstitutional foreign policy charge as his case moves through appeal,' she added. 'We will not stand by and allow the government to weaponize immigration law to suppress lawful political speech.' Khalil's attorneys have also argued that the administration's secondary basis for his arrest and removal — allegations that he lied in immigration paperwork — are similarly retaliatory and violate his First Amendment and Fifth Amendment due process rights. The White House continues to insist that Khalil can still be deported on those grounds. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson told The Independent on Friday that 'Khalil was given the privilege of coming to America to study on a student visa he obtained by fraud and misrepresentation.' 'Despite the lower court judge's wishes to the contrary, the executive branch has the lawful authority to take actions that will protect America's foreign policy interests and promote the overall welfare of the public,' she added. 'The Trump Administration looks forward to ultimate victory on the issue.'
Scottish Sun
26 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Labour's plan to recognise Palestine even if Hamas does not release hostages SLAMMED by families of captives
A statement issued by the families' lawyers said the conditions for recognising a Palestinian state would be assessed in late-September DEAL SHOCK Labour's plan to recognise Palestine even if Hamas does not release hostages SLAMMED by families of captives Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) HOSTAGE families blasted Labour's plan to recognise Palestine — after being told failure to release loved-ones will not stop the move. At a Foreign Office meeting, the relatives of four British-linked captives were told the UK would press ahead with state recognition even if Hamas terrorists refuse to free any of the 50 it still holds. Sign up for the Politics newsletter Sign up A statement issued by their lawyers Adam Rose and Adam Wagner KC said the conditions for recognising a Palestinian state would be assessed in late-September. But it added: 'It was made obvious to us at the meeting that, in deciding whether to go ahead with recognition, the release or otherwise of the hostages would play no part in those considerations.' They warned the UK's new position would not help 'and could even hurt' hostages. They said PM Sir Keir Starmer's plan 'appears to be to put pressure on the Israelis only to reach a deal'. It abandons efforts to press both sides, they add. Sir Keir outlined the route to recognising a Palestinian state this week. He was met with outrage by hostage families and concern from Jewish community leaders. Emily Damari, 29, who was held in Gaza and released in January, called it a 'moral failure'. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump vowed to 'get people fed' in Gaza after sending envoy Steve Witkoff to tour a US-backed aid site in Rafah. Hamas agrees to release 10 hostages as terror group issues ceasefire red lines after Trump pressured Israel to end war
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US appeals court indiciates it might declare Trump's birthright citizenship order unconstitutional
Donald Trump's order restricting birthright citizenship appeared on Friday to be headed toward being declared unconstitutional by a second federal appeals court, as judges expressed deep skepticism about a key piece of the US president's hardline immigration agenda. A three-judge panel of the Boston-based first US circuit court of appeals sharply questioned a lawyer with the federal justice department as to why they should overturn two lower-court judges who blocked the order from taking effect. Those lower-court judges include one in Boston who last week reaffirmed his prior decision to block the order's enforcement nationally, even after the US supreme court in June curbed the power of judges to broadly enjoin that and other policies. The San Francisco-based ninth US circuit court of appeals last week became the first federal appeals court to hold Trump's order as unconstitutional. Its ultimate fate will likely be determined by the supreme court. Eric McArthur, a justice department attorney, said on Friday that the citizenship clause of the US constitution's 14th amendment, which was ratified in 1868 after the US civil war, rightly extended citizenship to the children of newly-freed enslaved Black people. 'It did not extend birthright citizenship as a matter of constitutional right' to the children of people in the US without documentation, he said. But the judges questioned how that argument was consistent with the supreme court's 1898 ruling interpreting the clause in United States v Wong Kim Ark, long understood as guaranteeing American citizenship to children born in the US to non-citizen parents. 'We have an opinion by the supreme court that we aren't free to disregard,' said David Barron, the chief US circuit judge who like his two colleagues was appointed by a Democratic president. Trump's executive order, issued on the Republican's first day back in the Oval Office on 20 January, directs agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of US-born children who do not have at least one parent who is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a 'green card' holder. Every court to consider the order's merits has declared it unconstitutional, including the three judges who halted the order's enforcement nationally. Those judges included Leo Sorokin, a US district judge in Boston, who ruled in favor of 18 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia, who had swiftly challenged Trump's policy in court. 'The supreme court has repeatedly recognized children born to individuals who are here unlawfully or who are here on a temporary basis are nonetheless birthright citizens,' Shankar Duraiswamy, a lawyer for New Jersey, argued Friday. The 6-3 conservative majority US supreme court on 27 June sided with the administration in the litigation by restricting the ability of judges to issue so-called universal injunctions and directing lower courts that had blocked Trump's policy nationally to reconsider the scope of their orders. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion But the ruling contained exceptions, allowing federal judges in Massachusetts and New Hampshire and the ninth circuit to issue new decisions stopping Trump's order from taking effect nationally. The rulings on appeal to the first circuit were issued by Sorokin and the New Hampshire judge, who originally issued a narrow injunction but more recently issued a new decision in a recently-filed class action blocking Trump's order nationwide. Separately, in an immigration-related ruling on Friday, US district Judge Jia Cobb in Washington DC blocked the Trump administration from fast-tracking the deportation of potentially hundreds of thousands of immigrants who were paroled into the country under humanitarian programs during Joe Biden's presidency. Cobb said it served the public interest to put on hold the Department of Homeland Security's expedited removals for those who entered with temporary parole rather than cause irreparable harm to immigrants by allowing them.
