Three committees complain of ‘inadequate consultation' over welfare reforms
The letter, sent by the Scottish Parliament's Social Justice and Social Security Committee together with the Equality and Social Justice Committee of the Welsh Senedd and the Northern Ireland Assembly's Committee for Communities, comes as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is facing a rebellion from Labour MPs against the proposed changes.
We, alongside @nia_communities & @seneddequality, have jointly written to @leicesterliz, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, to share our concerns about a lack of meaningful engagement on proposed changes to the UK benefits system.
Read the letter: https://t.co/IKT4qGa4cy pic.twitter.com/EtDHwTU5Hw
— Social Justice and Social Security Committee (@SP_SJSS) June 25, 2025
A Commons vote on the plans to squeeze sickness and incapacity benefits is due to go ahead on Tuesday, despite 120 Labour MPs having publicly backed a move to block the legislation.
Meanwhile, the Work and Pensions Secretary was told there are 'significant concerns' about the Government's changes.
The letter from the three committees told how the 'economic backdrop' for many of those claiming disability benefits is 'already extremely challenging'.
And the committees added that the payments people receive 'are not symptomatic of a 'broken' system, but make a significant contribution to their health and wellbeing'.
They told Ms Kendall they were 'agreed that inadequate consultation and engagement by the UK Government with stakeholders and the devolved institutions has contributed to this sense of concern'.
Representatives from the committees added: 'In addition, the lack of robust data and jurisdiction-specific impact assessments presents significant challenges for our three committees to effectively scrutinise potential impacts.'
Here they insisted they have been 'constrained by the lack of quality information'.
They added: 'Our committees fully support the stated ambition that 'no-one should be consigned to a life on benefits just because they have a health condition or a disability, especially when they're able to and want to work with the right support in place'.
'However, in order to contribute meaningfully to the reform process, committees and citizens must be fully informed and offered every opportunity for meaningful engagement.'
The UK Government has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
I know why Rachel Reeves cried at PMQs – and it's a frightening scenario for our country
RACHEL REEVES was crying at PMQs last week. What was significant was that it was in full public view, on the floor of the House of Commons. 4 4 She seemed hot and bothered. The atmosphere in the house, particularly in the summer, can be oppressive and the chamber of the Commons is not a comfortable place, even at the best of times. To my mind, however, Reeves was under a different kind of pressure. The waterworks on display from her this week were more about the future than the past. Her plan to cut spending by reforming welfare has been sabotaged. She will have to find more money. This includes £1.5billion to pay for Labour's winter fuel U-turn. Sheer helplessness And a £4.5billion gap after Sir Keir Starmer ditched plans to cut disability benefits. Coupled with sluggish growth, we all know what is coming. In the words of Fagin's song from the musical Oliver!, she will 'have to pick a pocket or two', entirely legally of course, to make the sums add up. Kwasi speaks out after being sacked & reveals he 'fled' after being ousted The impact of high immigration, low growth and already high taxes means that we can barely afford to pay for our welfare state. Her crying, I am sure, was a sign of the frustration she feels in her job. I did the job for some short turbulent weeks and I know the feeling of helplessness that it often entails. There is the feeling of being besieged. In politics, you are never in control of events, but the sense of sheer helplessness often does occur when you are in a senior position. At times like that, you have to adopt the old English 'stiff upper lip', in my view. Senior figures have to hold things together, when things are getting sticky. Nobody was better at that than our late Queen. She never cried, never got teary or outwardly sentimental, even under the most extreme provocation. Yet, as I saw Reeves on the front bench on Wednesday, I totally understood her predicament. The left-wing backbenchers in her party despise her. They haven't even bothered to conceal their contempt. They want her out. Left-wing outrage is now being expressed by the creation of a new party. Jeremy Corbyn has said 'there is a thirst for an alternative ' and 'a grouping will come together'. Time will tell if any of Labour's left wing — the usual awkward squad — actually join Corbyn's 'grouping'. Now Zarah Sultana, another left-wing firebrand MP, is going to join. For all these types, Reeves is the scapegoat for everything they think is wrong with Labour in power. For hard-left MPs, Reeves and Keir Starmer stand for nothing. There is no love lost between them and the Labour leadership. In addition to the trouble from the Left, we read that some of Reeves's Cabinet colleagues have been briefing against her. She had warned them on Tuesday that tax rises in the autumn budget will be needed to cover the costs of the welfare U-turn. While the Institute for Fiscal Studies says she could be facing a £30billion black hole. Clearly, the welfare climbdown has made Angela Rayner more powerful. Reeves's position is obviously weaker. It is obvious that Reeves is a totally isolated figure within the Labour Party. Reeves's weak position is made worse by the fact that the prospects for the economy and taxes remain grim Kwasi Her position is similar to the school swot shunned by her peers in the playground. She provokes their antagonism and distrust. She is entirely dependent on the goodwill and patience of the PM. I know how that feels. Based on my personal experience, I think Starmer would be mad to get rid of her. Such a move would merely shorten his shelf life. His critics within Labour would feel emboldened to come after him. Yet I can tell you Prime Ministers, under extreme pressure, can do crazy things. He may well yet kick her to the kerb. Reeves's weak position is made worse by the fact that the prospects for the economy and taxes remain grim. Failing to get the welfare bill through in its original form means the £5billion savings won't materialise. Taxes, she has hinted, will have to go up. Nobody knows which taxes will go up, but increases are on the way. All this pressure, and the prospect of more challenging days ahead are clearly weighing on the mind of the Chancellor. I know what the pressure feels like. I never felt like crying but we all deal with pressure differently. I won't condemn her for her tears. 'Doom loop' It's the substance of what they are doing and the tax-and-spend policies which I object to. There doesn't seem to be an end in sight. More spending and higher taxes. When she was in Opposition, Reeves spoke about the 'doom loop' we faced as a country. Low growth accompanying high spending and even higher taxes. Rinse and Repeat. That's the doom loop. A world where Britain spirals downwards, economically, to reach a point where living standards decline. Even Reeves knows in her bones that higher taxes will kill our prospects for economic growth, for greater prosperity. It is this frightening scenario, I suspect, which caused the teary outburst from the Chancellor. 4
Sky News
29 minutes ago
- Sky News
Reform UK MP James McMurdock comes out fighting as rivals gloat
On Thursday, Reform UK's Zia Yusuf was gloating that a hard-left party led by Jeremy Corbyn meant the odds of Nigel Farage becoming PM had narrowed further. But now that James McMurdock's self-suspension over "business propriety" allegations means Reform UK is down from five MPs to four - again - it's Reform's rivals who are gloating. "Does Farage think he [McMurdock] is fit to be an MP?" demanded Labour's chair, Ellie Reeves, while the Conservatives claimed: "Reform are perpetually in chaos…" Despite garnering 14.3% of the votes in the general election a year ago, Mr Farage's party won just five seats. Then there were four, after Rupert Lowe was ousted in March. Then, after Sarah Pochin's triumph in the Runcorn and Helsby by-election in May, it was five again. And now it's four again. For now, at least. A defiant Mr McMurdock is fighting back and says he only removed the party whip from himself as a precaution and to protect Reform UK. "All my business dealings [have] always been conducted fully within the law and in compliance with all regulations," he wrote on X on Saturday. The Sunday Times claims he took out £70,000 of loans during the pandemic under a government Bounce Back scheme through two companies he owned. The paper claims one had no employees and neither filed accounts, a violation of the Companies Act, and he failed to declare one of the directorships in the MPs' register of interests. This is not the first controversy for Mr McMurdock, whose 39th birthday was last Saturday, since he became an MP a year ago. It has been a difficult 12 months for him. He was, in fact, never meant to become an MP. He was what's known in political jargon as a "paper candidate", picked at the last moment to fight a seat held by the Tories with a majority of nearly 20,000. But Basildon South and Thurrock East voted 73% for Brexit, one of the highest margins of the 2016 referendum, so perhaps a shock win for Reform UK shouldn't have come as a surprise. After a marathon recount, Mr McMurdock won by just 98 votes, with Labour second and the former Conservative MP Stephen Metcalfe, who'd held the seat since 2010, third. Before long it emerged that aged 19 he was imprisoned for a week for assaulting a former girlfriend. He's admitted it's the "biggest regret of my life". And Mr Farage has revealed: "He wasn't vetted." The Reform UK leader has also claimed his party was "stitched up" by a firm it contracted to vet candidates. Now Mr McMurdock is claiming he's been stitched up - by The Sunday Times. He's also come out fighting against the allegations, insisting "appropriately qualified professionals had reviewed all activity" and confirmed compliance with the law. And he rebutted the paper's charge that he failed to declare a directorship in the MPs' register of interests. He says he completed his entry with the support of the parliamentary authorities. That hasn't stopped Labour demanding an inquiry by the parliamentary committee for standards. After all, we've seen Sir Keir Starmer at PMQs in recent weeks taking every opportunity to attack Reform UK. In Reform UK's defence against vetting lapses, it's claimed that an insurgent party is bound to attract mavericks. But amid the heady talk of a Reform UK government at the next election, Mr Farage has a cunning plan. He's now talking about following Gordon Brown's example and recruiting GOATS, a "government of all the talents". Mr Brown appointed former CBI boss Digby Jones and Lord West, the former First Sea Lord.
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘We promised change but people aren't feeling it yet': Labour rues poor first year
In a stiflingly hot room at a health centre in East London, as he announced the government's 10-year plan for the NHS on Thursday, Keir Starmer was confronted with a brutal assessment of his first year in power. 'You've U-turned on your reforms, your MPs don't trust you, and markets worry that you've lost resolve on fiscal discipline. It's the epitome, isn't it, of sticking-plaster politics and chaos that you promised voters you would end?' a television journalist asked. Initially, Starmer avoided answering the question, but he eventually addressed the fall-out from his government's chaotic handling of its welfare bill. 'I'm not going to pretend the last few days have been easy: they've been tough,' he admitted. 'I'm the sort of person that then wants to reflect on that, to ask myself what do we need to do to ensure we don't get into a situation like that again, and we will go through that process. But I also know … that we will come through it stronger.' The jubilant crowds of flag-waving supporters that greeted the prime minister as he arrived in Downing Street on 5 July 2024, daring to hope for a brighter future after 14 long years under the Conservative party, felt like a very long time ago. Senior members of Starmer's inner circle now quite openly admit that their first year in power has not gone as expected. 'I always knew it would be hard, but I think I was probably quite naive about just how hard it would be,' one said. 'We had a difficult fiscal inheritance and there was this sense in the country that everything was broken. We promised change but people aren't feeling it yet. And they're not in any mood to give us the benefit of the doubt,' a cabinet minister added. Despite all the political misjudgements such as early gloominess over the economy when the country needed to feel hope, unforced errors over issues such as the winter fuel cuts and freebies and a party base unsettled over cuts to international aid and the welfare system, it is too simplistic to suggest that it has all been bad. Decisions to raise the national minimum wage, improve workers' rights, build more affordable housing and cut NHS waiting lists have all been popular. Even more starkly 'Labour' policies such as nationalising the railways, introducing VAT on private schools fees and threatening water firm bosses over sewage have been well received. But the government, slumping behind Nigel Farage's Reform UK in the polls and with Starmer's own personal approval ratings tanking, hasn't got the credit. Labour strategists keep themselves awake at night trying to work out where it went wrong, and what they can do about it. So for all the reflection on the year gone by, the focus has now inevitably turned to what comes next. 'We're only 12 months in: if we can learn not just from what we've got right but also from what has not, then we still have time to get it right,' one No 10 source said. Starmer talks of a decade of national renewal, his assumption being that Labour will win a second term, and that he'll still be at the helm of the party. But not everybody shares that view. Even though the odds are still – despite everything – of Labour being the largest party. Some ministers believe they should focus on the first five years instead, as a way of injecting some urgency. Backbench MPs, many with small majorities and fearful of what the next election could bring, are pushing to make the most of what time they have. They may recoil when asked about a reset, but No 10 political strategists do acknowledge there will be a 'next phase' that allows Starmer to move on from his difficult first year and get the government on to a steadier footing. They believe the prime minister needs a big unifying message that allows him to make ideological arguments – akin to the way Tony Blair used 'modernise'. The theme of the strategy will be 'fairness' – a word that peppered Starmer's speech on the NHS on Thursday, and which they hope they can use in a provocative way and use to pick political battles. 'It's an invitation to make proper arguments,' an aide said. In his autumn conference speech and the run-up to the crucial political test of next May's local elections, Starmer will be able to argue there has been an imbalance in the economy or in previous political priorities that he will now set about to change. At the heart of it, Labour wants to speak to a pervasive feeling in the country that no matter how hard you work, nothing improves, and life gets tougher and tougher. Fairness, they argue, provides a platform to argue that big decisions – choices such as VAT on private schools or workers' rights reforms – were the right things to do. But also small ones such as investments in crumbling local heritage, which has become such a symbol of decline. It was an argument, strategists believe, that could have been made much better, to make the case for cuts to winter fuel and the dysfunctional state of the welfare system. Crucially, aides hope the message will resonate right across the Labour coalition, bringing together progressives to the left of the government and the more socially conservative voters who were the focus of the last election. 'Those people are in many ways often similar in circumstances but very different in values,' one senior strategist said. 'We should be a government for all those people.' But there are some senior Labour figures, including some in cabinet and party grandees, who favour a much more explicit progressivism, to shore up Labour's own voters and take on the right when the Reform hordes are at the gates. They believe that this is much closer to Starmer's own politics and would allow him to speak and act more like himself, addressing a view held inside and outside Westminster that he often comes across as inauthentic. 'He's been dressed up in all sorts of different incarnations, as an insurgent disruptor or the hammer of the civil service, which I don't think he's felt comfortable with,' said one ally. 'I think the reason why he went out of his way to express regret over the immigration speech where he talked about an island of strangers was because it just wasn't him.' On the progressive wing of the party, where Labour is losing more votes, there is frustration about what many perceive to be leaning to the right in response to Reform UK. 'It's the wrong approach. We should acknowledge that people really care about small boats, about housing, about the cost of living, but have our own answers to those problems, not try to ape Reform,' said one senior MP. 'Authenticity is a big problem for Keir. It's much better that he goes out and makes a Labour case for what we want to do for the country.' Some in No 10 believe that it would be disastrous to pivot back to the Labour base, comparing it to Ed Miliband's '35%' strategy that aimed to unite progressives but which ultimately cost Labour the 2015 election. While Starmer is generally praised for his role on the international stage, and has strong relationships with his fellow world leaders – including, perhaps counterintuitively, Donald Trump – the same is not true of the domestic sphere. There is a strong desire within No 10 for Starmer to reconnect with voters at home, to spend more time out in the country with ordinary people, on the campaign trail, with businesses, with industry, in hospitals – and with his own MPs. 'We have got to get him off a fucking plane,' one senior aide said. 'It becomes so easy to not think too much about what is going on at home. It has been at the root of a lot of problems.' The party finds itself at a crossroads. Morgan McSweeney, Starmer's fabled chief of staff, told staff as they entered government that they could govern as insurgents and that power would make them more radical. But the pace of change has been frustratingly slow and some aides believe there must be a serious strategic turn to speed it up. Many government figures compare this moment to the turbulent aftermath of the Hartlepool byelection. Starmer tells friends that he's used to people underestimating him, that it happened back then, too, yet he proved his detractors wrong by sticking to his plan. But others are less generous. 'Nobody knows what he's thinking,' said one senior Labour figure. 'He's delegated political decision-making to Morgan. He needs to get more of a grip.' But while advisers, including McSweeney, often get the blame for the government's woes, ultimately the buck stops with the prime minister. Veterans of Labour's last time in office believe that Starmer needs to articulate a more clearly defined purpose. 'Until and unless people know what the point of this government is … then nothing else will follow,' said one. 'What does Keir actually want? What does he stand for? For all the contradictions with Tony and Gordon, you knew they were driven by ideas. It seized them. What does Keir stand for? Whatever it is, we don't know,' said a senior Labour figure. 'It's all been show not tell. He thinks that if the government delivers gradual material change that will be enough. But it's not. It wasn't for Joe Biden. It won't be for Keir Starmer either,' said one minister. Senior party figures worry that Starmer's reputation for being competent, even if that doesn't include political flair, has taken a battering over the past year, and that he needs to turn that round. 'Everybody thought he was going to be a more professional, competent version of the succession of failed Tories that we had before. But instead many people have got the sense that he's a further instalment of them,' one said. Starmer's allies vehemently reject the suggestion that he can't turn things around. 'A big drum roll and clash of cymbals and fireworks wouldn't work. Keir can win a second term, not by dancing to Nigel Farage's tune, but by doing what Labour governments do in his pragmatic, hard-headed way, trying to make this country better. That seems to me a more authentic place for him, a better place for the government.' But not everybody is as optimistic. 'I just don't know whether he'll pull it off,' one senior figure said. 'Keir is a diligent and thorough person who every day jumps out of bed and thinks what he can do for the country. He goes to bed every night dissatisfied that he's not done enough. But somehow in between those two moments something doesn't quite connect.'
