logo
Radar video shows moment Southwest flight avoided mid-air crash with Hawker Hunter- Watch

Radar video shows moment Southwest flight avoided mid-air crash with Hawker Hunter- Watch

Hindustan Times26-07-2025
A Southwest Airlines flight descended 475 feet rapidly after taking off from Burbank Airport in LA County to avoid a mid-air crash with a Hawker Hunter military aircraft on Friday. A video of the Southwest Airlines flight on the aircraft tracking website Flightradar24 showed the moment the flight plunged to avoid the crash. Representational image.(AP)
Here's the radar video of the Southwest flight 1496:
The flight took off from the Burbank Airport near Hollywood in Los Angeles County at noon on Friday. As per flight tracking data, the two flights came within less than two miles horizontally and a few hundred feet vertically, before the Southwest flight descended from 14,100 feet to 13,625 feet, within a span of a few seconds.
When the two aircraft came close to each other, an alert was set off by the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS), which enabled the pilots on the Southwest Airlines flight to descend rapidly and avoid a collision.
Also read: Who is Estes Carter Thompson III? American Airlines flight attendant jailed for filming girls
The Los Angeles Times published an expert analysis on the incident, where they determined that if the pilots on the Southwest flight had not taken action, the two aircraft could have collided within 20 seconds.
"Southwest is engaged with the Federal Aviation Administration to further understand the circumstances," the airlines said in a statement. "No injuries were immediately reported by Customers, but two Flight Attendants are being treated for injuries.
"We appreciate the professionalism of our Flight Crew and Flight Attendants in responding to this event. Nothing is more important to Southwest than the Safety of our Customers and Employees."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Three Killed After Private Plane Crashes Off Monterey Bay In California
Three Killed After Private Plane Crashes Off Monterey Bay In California

News18

time4 days ago

  • News18

Three Killed After Private Plane Crashes Off Monterey Bay In California

The crash site was approximately 300 yards (about 275 metres) off the coast of Point Pinos in Monterey County. Three individuals on board a small private aircraft were found dead after the plane crashed into the waters off Monterey Bay, California, as reported by Associated Press. According to the US Coast Guard, the victims were located unresponsive on the morning of Sunday, July 27. Emergency crews had responded to the scene the night before, shortly after the crash occurred. The aircraft involved was identified as a Beech 95-B55 Baron, a twin-engine light plane. It departed from San Carlos Airport at 10:11 pm local time. However, the flight was abruptly cut short, with its final recorded location logged near Monterey at 10:37 pm, according to flight tracking platform Flightradar24. The plane bore the tail number N8796R. The crash site was approximately 300 yards (about 275 metres) off the coast of Point Pinos in Monterey County. Witnesses reported hearing the sound of the aircraft's engine revving, followed by a loud splash in the water. Debris from the aircraft was later spotted floating near the shoreline, as reported by KSBW-TV. Following the initial reports, the US Coast Guard, in coordination with local fire departments and law enforcement agencies, launched an immediate search and rescue operation using both boats and helicopters. At around 3:00 am, the first individual was discovered on the water by a Coast Guard boat crew. Later, divers located the other two missing passengers inside the submerged wreckage between 6:30 am and 9:30 am. 'At the time of recovery, all three individuals were unresponsive," said Petty Officer Ryan Graves in a statement to the Associated Press. 'In this case, unresponsive means no signs of life. However, it is the coroner's office and Sheriff's office that officially determine death." The three victims were later identified as Steve Clatterbuck, 60, James Vincent, 36, and Jamie Tabscott, 44. James and Jamie were local residents of Monterey. The exact cause of the crash, as well as the sequence of events leading up to the incident, remains under investigation. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) will lead the inquiry into the accident. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! Location : California, USA First Published:

‘More careful than colourful'—ThePrint's reporting on the Air India crash put facts first
‘More careful than colourful'—ThePrint's reporting on the Air India crash put facts first

The Print

time5 days ago

  • The Print

‘More careful than colourful'—ThePrint's reporting on the Air India crash put facts first

This Readers Editor column considers ThePrint's approach to its reporting on AI-171 and the subsequent preliminary findings of the investigation by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AIBB) released on 12 July 2025. When you're reporting on something as devastating, sensitive—and immediate—as the Air India-171 crash last month, it is crucial to remember the value of good journalism, amid the endless theories on the reasons for the accident. Good journalism requires good hygiene. That means you have to write clean copy and provide the audience with a clear picture of the events you report. You have to cut out all the frills, the speculation, the 'extras'—which might make your reporting more lively and interesting to read, but don't always give readers accurate, factual, verified information. ThePrint's coverage was descriptive but factual and based on reliable sources. When you go through the articles or watch the videos, you will notice that the reporters are being selective in their choice of words. After reading or watching most of the reporting, I'd say it was more careful than colourful. The day of crash The afternoon of 12 June was just another normal day at ThePrint. I remember that it was a Thursday because I was at ThePrint's office in New Delhi for my weekly meeting with colleagues. It was fairly quiet as afternoons go, with reporters out on assignments, and those in the office staring at the computer monitors or mobile phones. Suddenly, it came to life. I saw people rush to watch the television monitors, and as I joined them, I beheld a sea of serious faces around me. The AI-171 had crash-landed at Ahmedabad airport. Nisheeth Upadhyay, Editor News Operations, realised it was huge. 'Whenever a commercial flight crashes it is a huge deal. We knew this was a big story.' The immediate response was to put out a 'Breaking News' story with the little information available. Next was to check for an accurate reading of the flight's movements up to its fall to the ground. Since I don't work on the editorial side of operations at ThePrint, I began to feel a little redundant, and in people's way. So, I sat on the sidelines and watched. A quick edit meeting was convened and everyone present in the office came together to suggest immediate story ideas. 'We felt, instinctively, that we should report the news as it came through and could be confirmed, but also do stories that added value,' Upadhyay said. 'From the moment it happened, there was so much noise in the media and social media—everyone was playing expert. 'At ThePrint, we were clear: Be sensitive, give the information, don't analyse—just plain, simple facts and information that can be confirmed. No conjecture.'' The difficulty that arose was the lack of access to the facts of the accident—or to any immediate information from the site of the crash in Ahmedabad—ThePrint doesn't have its own correspondent in the Gujarat capital. In stepped, Rama Lakshmi, Editor, Opinion and Ground Reports, and her team to fill the void. 'We had to keep reader interest going,' said Lakshmi. She also had previous experience covering airplane crashes, which helped. 'I put on my reporter's cap and looked for different angles to the story until our reporters reached the accident spot,'' she added. The reporters in the Delhi Ground Reports team filed reports on past history and the context of the incident. From other commercial flight crashes in India and Air India's current fleet of aircraft, accounts of survivors in Ahmedabad, stories of people who suffered in similar plan crashes, to another sole survivor of an air crash, the revamp of Ahmedabad runway, and the last social media post of some victims—these were some of the early stories put out by ThePrint. Interviewing victims & tackling misinformation The most pressing concern was to get on-ground reporting from Ahmedabad. ThePrint's nearest reporting team was in Mumbai. 'We were unsure of flights taking off from Mumbai and being able to land in Ahmedabad,' recalled Manasi Phadke, Deputy Editor based in Mumbai, who reached the city the next morning. Luckily, the Delhi-Ahmedabad evening flight was on schedule, so National Photo editor Praveen Jain and Senior Correspondent Krishan Murari flew out. 'I have covered earlier air crashes—Charkhi Dadri, for example. So I knew what it was like on the ground,' said Jain. In 1996, a midair collision between two commercial aircraft over Charkhi Dadri outside Delhi killed 349 people. Krishan Murari had never reported on an air crash or any accident of this proportion. He'd reported on Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam terrorist attack in May. AI-171 presented a different challenge. 'After Operation Sindoor, coming to this, I realised you need a completely different kind of vocabulary. You have to be far more sensitive. I'd call it compassionate journalism,' he said. Praveen Jain and Krishan Murari reached Ahmedabad within 12 hours of the crash and visited the site, the hospital, and the mortuary. 'It was very hot outside, and even inside, the temperature was higher than it should have been. There was an overwhelming smell of the charred bodies,' Murari added. Together, they filed a number of stories over the next few days. Here are some of them: Meet the forensic dentist racing against time so kin of Air India crash victims can say final goodbye Air India crash: Inside Ahmedabad hospital morgue, bodies await DNA ID as doctors race against heat, time Confusion, debris & bodies at Air India crash site. Rescue worker first thought it was cylinder blast Air India crash: All 4 hostel buildings of BJ Medical College emptied amid site investigation This Air India crash eyewitness cheated death by a whisker—'a blast, then a fireball, just 200 m away' Manasi Phadke found the lack of official information to be one of the major stumbling blocks in her first few days of reporting. 'The media was the least important for them, so we had to source information wherever we could,'' she said, 'We had to be very careful, not speculate.' So, she had to piece together information. Here are some of the stories she filed: 11 DNA matches 48 hrs after Air India crash: Process of releasing victims' bodies to families begins The crash, the rescue & aftermath—Inside the first 36 hours at ground zero of Air India crash Behind the scenes of Gujarat's Air India crash response—4 IAS officers, 36 DNA experts & 230 teams Medical college's exam hall turns into DNA sampling centre. For victims' kin, it's the longest test yet After a week's search, family working in hostel mess cremates mother & 2-yr-old killed in Air India crash Phadke, Jain and Murari turned to doctors, workers, and the families of the victims. 'Families presented a challenge, a lot of them were angry. You can't just walk up to them and say, 'Kya hua?'. 'We had to be sensitive—I didn't use the camera immediately—I waited till they were at ease,' recalled Praveen Jain. As far as possible, he tried to click pictures from a distance. Even, then, one family member of a victim scolded him for taking pictures and Jain immediately apologised. Phadke said she had to make people feel comfortable before they spoke. Some like to speak – 'I am still in touch with at least one relative,' she said, adding, 'You have to talk around the subject, be conversational.' Also read: Inside ThePrint's mailbox—readers bring us praise, critique, and everything in between Unpacking investigation report Back in Delhi, Bismee Taskin, Principal Correspondent, was keeping an eye out for government communications. 'My job was to get in touch with the DGCA, the civil aviation ministry. To confirm information, verify it with at least two reliable sources,' she explained. She was also in touch with former pilots of Air India. When the preliminary report was released on 12 July, she reported it. 'Preliminary report is like an FIR,' said Taskin, 'No conclusions should be based on it. You have to wait till the final report for probable cause.' Taskin's stories, therefore, were straightforward, simply putting out what the report stated. Have a look: Air India crash spotlights 2018 advisory on Boeing switches installed with locking feature disengaged Air India crash preliminary report: A look at what fuel switches are designed to do & built-in safeguards Throughout the last month and a half, victims' families, aviation experts and the average reader want to know what brought the aircraft down? Why did it crash? There are so many technical details to it—and a lay person, with no understanding of them was prey to various theories doing the rounds. Nisheeth Upadhyay is, in his own words, an 'aviation nut''. Thus, it was possible for him to understand the complex (mal)functioning of an aircraft and to explain it in simple language. 'I was very careful not to act as an authority on the subject, just to describe what we knew had happened and to explain,'' he said, 'No aviation experting.'' On the preliminary report, which led to so much speculation and finger-pointing to pilot error in some foreign news media such as the Wall Street Journal, Upadhyay said only the final report mattered: 'There is not enough evidence to attribute blame. And so, ThePrint's line was that—there's not enough information to reach a conclusion.' I would recommend you watch his videos: they are clear, concise, and to the point, factual—without unnecessary opinion or speculation. I know I learned a great deal from them. The common thread in ThePrint's reporting—from the ground and Delhi—was to keep it simple, stick to verified facts and attribute views clearly. I have one suggestion newsrooms like ThePrint could consider: After tough assignments in the field, reporters may need some assistance in dealing with the traumas they witness. It can be overwhelming, especially for young reporters. Counselling is one option, and a few days' leave may help them cope better. Shailaja Bajpai is ThePrint's Readers' Editor. Please write in with your views and complaints to (Edited by Ratan Priya)

What caused American Airlines flight's wheels to catch fire, forcing evacuations at Denver airport
What caused American Airlines flight's wheels to catch fire, forcing evacuations at Denver airport

Hindustan Times

time27-07-2025

  • Hindustan Times

What caused American Airlines flight's wheels to catch fire, forcing evacuations at Denver airport

An American Airlines flight faced a dramatic incident at Denver International Airport (DEN) on Saturday, when its left main landing gear caught fire, prompting an emergency evacuation. Flight AA3023, bound for Miami, was on the runway shortly after takeoff when the fire was first spotted. Passengers and crew members were evacuated safely via emergency slides as smoke billowed beneath the aircraft. American Airlines flight's wheels caught on fire at Denver Airport(via REUTERS) Authorities reported one minor injury, and all 173 passengers and six crew members are accounted for, though the exact cause remains under investigation. Read More: Who is Estes Carter Thompson III? American Airlines flight attendant jailed for filming girls The incident unfolded around 2:45 PM local time when DEN first responders and the Denver Fire Department were alerted to flames emanating from the American Airlines flight's wheels. The fire also prompted a short-lived ground stop at the airport. Videos circulating online show passengers sliding out and standing on the runway amid thick smoke, with fire crews quickly extinguishing the blaze. Read More: Man offers $100 to sit in cockpit, goes on wild rant on American Airlines flight - Hindustan Times Watch American Airlines hints at cause American Airlines, in a statement, said that the aircraft 'experienced a maintenance issue' with a tire on the landing gear just before taking off. 'All customers and crew deplaned safely, and the aircraft was taken out of service to be inspected by our maintenance team,' the statement added. Read More: Radar video shows moment Southwest flight avoided mid-air crash with Hawker Hunter- Watch This follows a similar March incident in Denver, involving an American Airlines Boeing 737 engine fire. 'People still taking their sh*t in an aircraft emergency has gotta be the biggest selfish thing ever Video if American Airlines emergency at Denver today,' one person wrote on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. 'This is becoming routine for airline travel. This is American Airlines in Denver. Rear wheels blew,' another one added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store