
Farmer Satisfaction With Banks Better
"It's good to see things are improving but farmers' trust in their banks is still fragile," Federated Farmers banking spokesperson Richard McIntyre says.
"Where farmers have given positive feedback in the survey, it's usually about their individual managers, not bank policy.
"When those individual staff leave, that trust can erode quickly."
Nearly 700 farmers responded to the May survey, with 60% of them 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' with their bank.
That's up from 53% in Federated Farmers' November 2024 survey but well shy of the 80% peak rating recorded in 2017.
"It's helped that over the last year banks have been grilled by the select committee inquiry on banking competition that Federated Farmers pushed for," McIntyre says.
"There has been a lot of scrutiny and banks have definitely been feeling the pressure, so it's good to see them start to lift their game as a result."
In the survey, 61% of farmers rated their bank's communication as good or very good - the best result since 2020.
Just on 18% of farmers said they were feeling undue bank pressure, down from 24% six months earlier and the lowest rating recorded since 2018.
"Many farmers said bank pressure has eased over the past six to 12 months, with some noting their bank had become more understanding or backed off earlier demands," McIntyre says.
"However, for those still under pressure, the situation remains serious.
"A few farmers shared difficult stories with us, including being forced out of farming altogether."
One farmer said: "We've sold the farm. If the bank had been more understanding, things might have been different."
The survey shows interest rates on farm mortgages have also eased by about 1% since late 2024 to an average of 6.52%.
"Even so, we're still very concerned that, compared with average residential mortgage interest rates, farm mortgage interest rates are around 0.92% higher - and were about 1.12% higher late last year," McIntyre says.
From 2016 until 2021, the margin of difference hovered between about 0.6% and 0.35%.
"These don't seem like big differences, but when total agricultural lending is around $61 billion, a 1% margin difference puts $600 million of extra interest costs on the sector each year.
"It's crazy how much more money farmers are having to shell out to the banks in interest payments.
"Part of the problem is the unnecessarily conservative Reserve Bank capital requirements, and the recent decision to review those settings is very welcome," McIntyre says.
"What we desperately need as well is stronger competition among banks in the rural sector. That would really help lower costs for farmers and drive better bank performance."
In the open comment section of the May survey, many farmers said they were still paying far too much in interest.
Several expressed frustration that banks were quick to hike rates, but slow to pass on savings when the OCR falls.
"OCR drops come through like a feather. Increases hit like a brick," one said.
The May survey also found that just under 20% of farmers said their bank has inquired about their farm's emissions profile or environmental footprint as part of loan requirements.
Westpac and ASB were much more likely to ask such questions, at 32% and 40% respectively.
"Federated Farmers' view is that our democratically elected Government is the correct body to be setting emissions and environmental policy, not banks," McIntyre says.
"Farmers are closely watching what's happening with Bills passing through Parliament, promoted by MPs Andy Foster and Mark Cameron, that would rein in banks' ability to make lending decisions on non-commercial grounds."
Foster's proposed law would prohibit banks from refusing loans or services purely for environmental or emissions reasons. May survey responses show 70% of farmers support such a law (18% oppose, 12% unsure).
Other key findings from the survey:
Farm Debt Levels: 84% of farmers surveyed have a mortgage. The average mortgage in the survey was $4.7 million, compared to $4.4 million six months ago.
Overdraft Use Declining: Only 76% of farms now have an overdraft facility, down from 88% a decade ago.
Overdraft Limits: Average overdraft limits have risen to $349,000. Arable farms saw the largest increase (from $500k to $718k).
Overdraft Interest Rates: Rates have dropped. The average is now 9.0%, down from 10.0%. Rabobank offers the lowest (7.3%), while BNZ remains highest (9.7%).
Efficiency Concerns: 19% of farmers feel their bank isn't allowing them to structure debt as efficiently as possible - down slightly from 23% in November. Rabobank and ANZ performed best; Westpac performed worst.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Spinoff
a day ago
- The Spinoff
When the Facts Change: To cut or not to cut?
Kiwibank economist Sabrina Delgado joins Bernard Hickey to assess our central bank's options leading into next week's monetary policy statement. The Reserve Bank gets another chance to cut interest rates next week. So far 2025 has seen the RBNZ make three consecutive cuts to the official cash rate, which was widely expected by economists up and down the country. But next week, for the first time this year, there's doubt. Kiwibank economist Sabrina Delgado joins Bernard Hickey on When the Facts Change this week to assess our central bank's options.


NZ Herald
3 days ago
- NZ Herald
Expectations of rate cuts boost NZ sharemarket in light trade
Expectations of Official Cash Rate cuts from the Reserve Bank later this year helped drive the New Zealand sharemarket higher in light trade. The S&P/NZX 50 closed 49.76 points or 0.4% up at 12,784.29, driven by the interest rate-sensitive stocks, with 32.7 million shares worth $111.7m trading. There were 89

1News
4 days ago
- 1News
Split your savings across banks? New $100k protection explained
New Zealand's depositor compensation scheme takes effect from today. Here's what you need to know. What's depositor compensation? The scheme is designed to help people who have money with a bank or other deposit taker, which fails. Reserve Bank enforcement and resolution director Kerry Beaumont says that's very rare. High-profile finance company failures during the global financial crisis were a "once in a generation" event. ADVERTISEMENT The scheme will offer up to $100,000 per person, per institution, for money in transaction accounts, savings and notice accounts and term deposits. What organisations are covered? Banks, finance companies, building societies and credit unions taking retail deposits in New Zealand. The big banks (file). (Source: There are about 30 organisations that the Reserve Bank lists as being covered. Branches of international banks in New Zealand are not included because they are now required to only take deposits from wholesale customers, not retail investors. Did we not have this protection already? ADVERTISEMENT There was a taxpayer-funded scheme introduced in 2008 by then-Finance Minister Michael Cullen on an opt-in basis. It was short-term and designed to give assurance to New Zealanders during a period when the financial markets were very shaky and a loss of confidence in banks could have been disastrous. The new scheme was proposed in 2019. Is this because the Reserve Bank is concerned? This scheme isn't driven by concern around any financial institution. Beaumont says it is part of improving financial stability overall. She says the likelihood of the scheme having to pay out is very low. "Failure is such a rare event." ADVERTISEMENT Reserve Bank of New Zealand (file photo). (Source: 1News) Who pays for this? The industry is paying a levy that will go into a fund administered by the Reserve Bank. Beaumont says it might be the case that some banks and other deposit takers might pass on the cost to their customers, but that's a decision for them. The amount they pay into the levy depends on their level of risk. Credit unions and building societies will pay a temporary flat levy until the new prudential regime is fully in force, in 2028. The Commerce Commission had recommended the Government not add to the burden of small operators when it sets the levy because it could be another hurdle to bank competition. ADVERTISEMENT But Finance Minister Nicola Willis said the scheme should help competition because people would be more likely to switch if they knew they were protected. Finance Minister Nicola Willis (Source: 1News) If it's $100k per person per deposit taker, am I better to spread my money? The compensation limit is $100,000 per deposit taker, so if you have accounts with a number of different banks or financial institutions, you'd be entitled to compensation in each. Someone with $100,000 in savings accounts at two banks, for example, could be compensated for the full $200,000 in the unlikely event that both banks failed. But someone with $200,000 in one bank would only be entitled to compensation for $100,000. Does it apply to KiwiSaver? ADVERTISEMENT No. KiwiSaver is a bit different in that KiwiSaver funds are held in trust by an independent supervisor. Even if your KiwiSaver provider failed, it would not affect your investments. The fund supervisor would work with the Financial Markets Authority on what to do and would probably transfer your funds to another provider. What about kids' accounts? Children will be treated as separate depositors, and entitled to their own $100,000 coverage limit, if their accounts are in their own name. If they're in the name of the parent, then they count towards the parent's $100,000. What do I have to do to be covered? Nothing. From Tuesday, July 1 the accounts you have that are captured by the scheme will be automatically covered. ADVERTISEMENT