
NZ Taxpayers' Union-Curia poll reveals nearly half of Kiwis oppose automatic citizenship for Cook Islands
Thirty percent of the 1000-person sample supported Cook Islanders retaining citizenship, 46 percent were opposed and 24 percent were unsure.
The question asked:
The Cook Islands government is pursuing closer strategic ties with China, ignoring New Zealand's wishes and not consulting with the New Zealand government. Given this, should the Cook Islands continue to enjoy automatic access to New Zealand passports, citizenship, health care and education when its government pursues a foreign policy against the wishes of the New Zealand government?
Taxpayers' Union head of communications Tory Relf said the framing of the question was fair.
"If the Cook Islands wants to continue enjoying a close relationship with New Zealand, then, of course, we will support that," she said.
"However, if they are looking in a different direction, then I think it is entirely fair that taxpayers can have a right to say whether they want their money sent there or not."
But New Zealand Labour Party deputy leader Carmel Sepuloni said it is a leading question.
"It asserts or assumes that we have hit a dead end here and that we cannot resolve the relationship issues that have unfolded between New Zealand and the Cook Islands," Sepuloni said.
"We want a resolution. We do not want to assume or assert that it is all done and dusted and the relationship is broken."
The two nations have been in free association since 1965.
Relf said that adding historical context of the two countries relationship would be a different question.
"We were polling on the Cook Islands current policy, asking about historic ties would introduce an emotive element that would influence the response."
New Zealand has paused nearly $20 million in development assistance to the realm nation.
Foreign Minister Winston Peters said the decision was made because the Cook Islands failed to adequately inform his government about several agreements signed with Beijing in February.
Sepuloni, who is also Labour's Pacific Peoples spokesperson, said her party agrees with the Government that the Cook Islands had acted outside of the free association agreement.
"[The aid pause is] an extreme response, however, in saying that we don't have all of the information in front of us that the government have. I'm very mindful that in terms of pausing or stopping aid, the scenarios where I can recall that happening are scenarios like when Fiji was having their coup."
In response to questions from Cook Islands News, Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown said that, while he acknowledged the concerns raised in the recent poll, he believed it was important to place the discussion within the full context of Cook Islands' longstanding and unique relationship with New Zealand.
"The Cook Islands and New Zealand share a deep, enduring constitutional bond underpinned by shared history, family ties, and mutual responsibility," Brown told the Rarotonga based paper.
"Cook Islanders are New Zealand citizens not by privilege, but by right. A right rooted in decades of shared sacrifice, contribution, and identity.
"More than 100,000 Cook Islanders live in New Zealand, contributing to its economy, culture, and communities. In return, our people have always looked to New Zealand not just as a partner but as family."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
4 days ago
- RNZ News
Oral Questions for Thursday 31 July 2025
Questions to Ministers Hon CARMEL SEPULONI to the Minister for Women: Does she stand by her statement, "My top priority as Minister for Women is to support women to economic empowerment because not only does it give women more choice, but it has a ripple effect on families, communities, and the economy"; if so, is fair pay critical to economic empowerment? SCOTT WILLIS to the Minister for Energy: What actions, if any, has he taken to reduce power bills for energy consumers, and how much have power bills reduced on average, if at all, as a result of these actions? Dr HAMISH CAMPBELL to the Minister of Health: What recent announcements has he made about strengthening primary care? Hon BARBARA EDMONDS to the Minister of Finance: Does she stand by all her statements and actions? PAULO GARCIA to the Minister of Local Government: What announcements has he made about increasing transparency in local government? Hon Dr AYESHA VERRALL to the Minister of Health: Does he stand by his statement that he is ensuring "nurses have the resources they need to provide access to timely, quality healthcare"? HANA-RAWHITI MAIPI-CLARKE to the Minister for Social Development and Employment: What, if anything, is she doing to address the 10 percent decrease in filled jobs for 15- to 19-year-olds since June 2024? TODD STEPHENSON to the Prime Minister: What is the Government doing to reduce spending? Hon WILLOW-JEAN PRIME to the Minister of Education: Does she agree with Erica Stanford, who said in 2023 that she was "committed to more" pay for existing teachers; if so, how is one of the lowest pay offers ever, as reported by RNZ, being "committed to more"? STEVE ABEL to the Minister of Agriculture: What steps, if any, is he taking to guard against perceived influence by the dairy lobby on freshwater policy? RIMA NAKHLE to the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs: What recent announcements has the Government made to support Kiwis at the checkout? Hon GINNY ANDERSEN to the Minister for Social Development and Employment: Does she stand by her statement, "The Government is creating the conditions where jobs are created, absolutely", and would 184,000 New Zealanders have left the country in the past 18 months if this was the case? To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.


Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
Are Our Pints Too Pricey? Tamatha Paul Thinks So
The New Zealand Taxpayers' Union is backing Wellington Central MP Tamatha Paul in calling for cheaper beer, arguing a $5 pint is only possible by cutting alcohol excise taxes. Taxpayers Union spokesman Rhys Hurley said: "The price of a pint has increased by a total of 20.6 percent through excise alone in just four years, before even accounting for inflation." "Not only is this causing further inflation but it is hampering hospitality's recovery from the lows of Covid lockdowns. Many businesses are on their last legs, if they haven't fallen over already." "Instead of trying to slap more taxes and restrictions on the majority who safely consume alcohol, how about properly targeted interventions on those causing harm?" "Paul has obviously seen the damage the tax has done to her electorate and the lack of people able to afford and enjoy a night out. It's time for the government to cut the booze tax and stop punishing people for enjoying themself."


The Spinoff
6 days ago
- The Spinoff
Windbag: Why the Taxpayers' Union endorsed this Green Party policy
They say politics makes strange bedfellows, and there are few stranger pairings than this. Wellington is the remnant of a failed startup. The New Zealand Company, which established the city, was a for-profit enterprise with a clear business model: sell land to wealthy people, and use the proceeds to bring working-class people to New Zealand for free. In theory, the mix of capital and labour would work in perfect harmony: founding businesses, working the land, and creating a functioning economy that would improve everyone's property values. So what went wrong? There are many factors, but one of the most important was absentee landlords. Many investors stayed in London, hoping the value of their land would increase due to the work of others, while contributing nothing themselves. The New Zealand Company brought more labourers than could be employed by independent businesses, so it had to provide them with work, which eventually drove the company to bankruptcy. From the very beginning of British-style property ownership in Aotearoa, land banking has been one of our biggest problems, dragging down productivity and hindering the growth of our cities. It's still the case today. There are empty lots and surface car parks in the centre city, underdeveloped sections in city-fringe neighbourhoods, and a single family owns almost all of Wellington's remaining greenfield land. The Wellington Green Party is targeting this issue with a policy to change the rates system to be based on land value rather than the current combination of the capital value of buildings and land. Several other councils have already adopted land value rates, including Nelson, New Plymouth, Napier and Whangarei. The Greens found an unlikely ally in their campaign last week when the policy was endorsed by the Taxpayers' Union – which even the Taxpayers' Union seemed surprised by. 'The Greens are right on this one,' executive director Jordan Williams said in a statement. 'Taxing land, rather than housing and development on land, creates the right incentive of avoiding land banking or not putting land to its most productive use, such as housing.' Williams went even further than the Greens' policy, calling for local government minister Simon Watts to embrace land value rates nationwide, saying he 'should reach over the aisle and grab this phenomenal policy'. Alex Baker, the Green-ish mayoral candidate who isn't officially endorsed by the Greens, is also campaigning on a switch to land value rates. This story in The Post implies it's suspicious that Baker and the party could have come up with the same idea separately. It's not. Land value taxes are the big current thing in the Yimby movement. Henry George is Sabrina Carpenter for online urbanists. 'The current setting is inefficient,' Baker told The Spinoff. 'It discourages capital investment, business, new houses and intense developments and encourages the accumulation of under-utilised land. I simply want to change to a system that is more efficient. The long-run impact of that is improved housing supply, which will mean rents come down and quality lifts, which will attract more people and bring down rates.' The alliance between Wellington's Greens and the free-market TPU is rare, but it's not the first time it has happened. The TPU was strongly supportive of the zoning reforms in last year's District Plan, which were led by Wellington's progressive councillors. This ability to form cross-partisan consensus is one of the things that has made the Yimby movement so successful. The TPU sees zoning reform as giving more property owners more rights to develop their land, and land value rates as an economic incentive to do so. The Greens see it as a way to improve housing supply, quality and affordability. The motivations might be different, but the outcomes are the same. 'The TPU-Green coalition is exactly where I see myself as a candidate,' Baker said. 'It's a free-market change. A more efficient tax. But it will result in change, which is something that conservatives who don't want the city to grow or improve will always be against. I expect over time the business community will get aligned with me, because no amount of taking a blunt axe to the council will improve outcomes for the city.' The two conservative councillors who have put up their hands for mayor, Ray Chung and Diane Calvert, both oppose a switch to land value rates. Calvert said debating rates reform was 'like moving deck chairs while the ship takes on water. The real problems run deeper and we need to fix those first. Chung told The Post the policy was 'built on a false ideology that anyone who gets ahead should pay more' – which is not an accurate analysis of how land value rates work. The TPU specifically called out Chung in its statement. 'It is sad to see Ray Chung further disgrace himself by coming out against this policy. We'd urge him to reconsider and put policy ahead of partisanship,' Williams said. Andrew Little, who is widely considered the frontrunner in the Wellington mayoral race, said he was open to the idea. 'Land value-based rates is an idea worth considering,' Little told The Spinoff. 'We can also use rates loading to incentivise better land use, and we should do so to make sure Wellington gets proper housing density in key areas.' Baker is claiming Little's soft support as a victory. He doesn't believe Little would be talking about land value rates if it weren't for his and the Greens' policy. Baker said he entered the race after Tory Whanau left because he felt someone needed to drive the debate from the progressive side. 'I wasn't seeing anything from any other candidates that indicated they would turn things around,' he said. Wellington City Council considered a switch to land value rates last year as part of its rates review, but basically decided to put the idea in the too-hard basket. In the short term, that's probably a fair approach. It's looking increasingly inevitable that a Wellington supercity will be back on the table soon. Porirua and Hutt City voters will both vote in non-binding referendums on amalgamation at this year's election, and the region's chief executives seem to be largely united on the idea. It probably doesn't make much sense for Wellington City Council to upend its rating system right now, given the likelihood of such a major restructure in the next few years. But with the possibility of major reform happening soon, this is the perfect time to have the debate.