U.K., U.S. to continue working for enduring India, Pakistan ceasefire: Lammy
'We will continue to work with the United States to ensure that we get an enduring ceasefire, to ensure that dialogue is happening and to work through with Pakistan and India how we can get to confidence and confidence-building measures between the two sides,' Mr. Lammy told Reuters in Islamabad at the end of his two-day visit to Pakistan.
Mr Lammy's remarks, which imply that the U.K. and U.S. are involved in the Kashmir issue, echo U.S. President Donald Trump's repeated messaging that his administration was instrumental in brokering a May 10 ceasefire between New Delhi and Islamabad.
The Labour Party been engaged in a resetting of ties with India and British Indians, walking back previous positions on Kashmir. In 2020, months after the Modi government mooted legal and administrative changes to Article 370 and Jammu and Kashmir, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer (who was then the country's Leader of the Opposition) had said Kashmir was a 'bilateral issue for India and Pakistan to resolve peacefully'.
The Hindu reached out to the U.K. Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) for confirmation of the U.K. government's position on Kashmir and the nature of U.K.- U.S. coordination on the recent ceasefire.
Indian government officials had said that Mr Lammy would not visit New Delhi immediately after visiting Islamabad, given India's strong emphasis of de-hyphenation from Pakistan.
Mr Lammy had spoken with External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar on May 15 and he is expected to visit New Delhi 'soon' according to a statement from the FCDO published on Friday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Air India crash: UK families await update on DNA-matched remains
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads British families, waiting for the remains of relatives aboard the London-bound Air India 171 plane that crashed soon after takeoff from Ahmedabad airport, are expecting confirmation on DNA matches after high-level India-UK government talks, their legal team has Law, which has been working with aviation experts to assist many of the families who lost loved ones in the June 12 crash, called for urgency in the process this Prime Minister Narendra Modi's UK visit last week, Downing Street had confirmed that Prime Minister Keir Starmer had discussed the Air India plane crash during their bilateral talks against the backdrop of UK media reports of mislabelling of some remains repatriated to Britain."The UK and Indian governments have held high-level talks, as a result of the international media coverage of this problem," said James Healy-Pratt, Aviation Partner at Keystone Law."It is believed that some matched DNA remains may now have been located in India. Confirmation is awaited," he 241 passengers and crew who died in the disaster included 52 British nationals, with two out of 12 caskets repatriated to the UK for last rites found to be incorrectly Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) had responded to the UK reports to stress that "all mortal remains were handled with utmost professionalism and with due regard for the dignity of the deceased"."We are continuing to work with the UK authorities on addressing any concerns related to this issue," the MEA's official spokesperson said in a statement last to estimate the scale of the issue, Keystone Law said of a sample of 12 caskets repatriated from India to the UK, two were "mislabelled, mishandled and misidentified"."Extrapolated out - with an unacceptable error rate of 15 per cent, that would suggest 40 sets of remains may have been mislabelled, mishandled and misidentified. That is a known unknown, and many of the families' loved ones have been cremated already," said month, an inquest into the deaths of some of the British passengers was opened and adjourned in London, with the process of identification overseen by the Senior Coroner under UK came as a preliminary report by the Indian Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) found that fuel to both engines appeared to have cut off shortly after engines tried to restart, but it proved too late to prevent the Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft from crashing into Ahmedabad's B.J. Medical College, claiming 19 lives on the Law called for further clarity about the transitioning of the fuel cutoff switches, and which voice was saying what on the excerpts of the Cockpit Voice Recorder."The Indian AAIB has this evidence, and has for unexplained reasons not shared this detail with the families of AI 171. The Indian AAIB cannot complain of further speculation when evidence in its possession is not released to the families on a transparent basis," said aviation lawyer also called for further details around reports of compensation being considered for impacted families by the Tata Group, owners of Air said: "There is talk of TATA setting up a (Rs) 500 crore fund for all the AI 171 families - which will provide ex gratia support (legally a gift and separate and apart from any Court ordered compensation against Air India, or indeed Boeing) of a minimum of (Rs) 1 crore per loved one lost."Families deserve to get details of that support urgently, as legal proceedings take time in India, England, and the United States."The UK's Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) has "expert status" in the Indian safety investigation and has said it is reviewing the findings of the preliminary report released one month on from the crash, on July UK-based families who lost loved ones in the crash have previously also called for a mechanism of expert representation in the India-led investigatory process into the plane crash.
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘India set to become…': PM Modi after Trump's ‘dead economy' remark
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday indirectly responded to former US President Donald Trump's recent remarks labelling India's economy as 'dead,' asserting that India is poised to become the world's third-largest economy and must remain vigilant in protecting its interests amid global instability. Prime Minister Narendra Modi addresses a public meeting, in Varanasi.(PMO) Addressing a rally in Varanasi, PM Modi stressed the importance of economic self-reliance and reiterated his government's commitment to farmers, small industries, and youth employment. His remarks came just days after Trump announced a 25% tariff on Indian imports and warned of further economic penalties over India's continued trade with Russia. 'There is an atmosphere of global instability. All countries are focusing on their individual interests. India is set to become the third biggest economy in the world, and that is why India will have to stay alert as far as its economic interests are concerned,' the Prime Minister said. While Modi did not mention Trump by name, his comments were seen as a veiled retort to the US President's assertion that India's economy had "tanked" and that it relies heavily on American markets. Underscoring India's economic resilience, Modi called on citizens and the business community to support indigenous production through a renewed commitment to the 'vocal for local' movement. 'We will buy only those things that are made by Indians. We need to become vocal for local,' he urged the crowd, calling for a nationwide resolve to buy and promote 'swadeshi' products. 'Those who want the best for the country and want to see India as the third biggest economy in the world, be it any political party, should leave their differences aside and instil a resolution for 'swadeshi' products,' he added. The Prime Minister further said that the government's highest priority remains ensuring the welfare of farmers, small-scale industries, and employment generation. 'Our farmers, our small-scale industries, the employment for youth — their interest is our top priority. The government is doing everything it can in the best interest of the country. However, there are some responsibilities we have as citizens,' he said. PM Modi also made a direct appeal to India's business community, urging them to prioritize domestic products, especially in light of global disruptions. 'I also want to say to my brothers and sisters in the business community — the world is going through instability, and we should commit to selling only swadeshi goods,' he said. Earlier in the day, Modi inaugurated and laid the foundation stone for infrastructure projects worth ₹2,200 crore in Varanasi. These included the widening and strengthening of key roads, construction of railway overbridges, and improvements to both rural and urban transportation corridors — part of ongoing efforts to modernize the constituency he has represented since 2014.
Economic Times
27 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Pakistani woman deported after Pahalgam attack to get visitor's visa: MHA to J&K HC
Jammu: The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has informed the Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh High Court that it has decided to grant a visitor's visa to Rakshanda Rashid, a Pakistani woman who was deported from Jammu after the Pahalgam terror attack, prompting the court to dismiss her petition seeking nod to return to her family court, however, stated that the MHA order should not constitute a precedent in any (62), a Pakistani citizen who married Sheikh Zahoor Ahmed 35 years ago in Jammu, was deported as part of the decision taken by the Indian government to deport Pakistani nationals staying in India in the aftermath of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the home ministry, informed the court that after considerable deliberation and in light of the peculiar circumstances of this case, an in-principle decision had been made to grant a visitor visa to division bench comprising Chief Justice Arun Palli and Justice Rajnesh Oswal acknowledged this in its order. The bench further noted that Rashid can pursue the two applications moved by her regarding acquiring Indian citizenship as well as a long-term court recorded the submission of the solicitor general and noted that "once an in-principle decision is taken by the competent authority, there is hardly any doubt that, post compliance of the requisite procedures and formalities, the authority would process and accord a visitor's visa to the respondent at the earliest".The court dismissed Rashid's writ petition seeking relief from the deportation, saying that as a natural consequence, the impugned interim order loses its relevance and thus ceases to exist and July 22, Mehta requested the court to defer the proceedings to enable him to explore whether the respondent could be helped in any manner or if it was still feasible to address her response, Rashid's counsel, Ankur Sharma and Himani Khajuria, submitted that she was agreeable to the course suggested by the solicitor June 6, a single-judge bench of Justice Rahul Bharti ordered the Central government to "retrieve" passing the order, Justice Bharti observed, "This court is bearing in mind the background reference that the petitioner was having long-term visa (LTV) status at the relevant point of time, which per se may not have warranted her deportation, but without examining her case in a better perspective and coming up with a proper order with respect to her deportation from the authorities concerned, she came to be forced out." Rashid was served with a Leave India Notice on April 28 under Sections 3(1), 7(1), and 2(c) of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 1946, issued by the Criminal Investigation Department, directing her to leave the country by or before April approached the high court and sought interim relief to stay the operation of the she was issued an exit permit and escorted to the Attari-Wagah border in Amritsar by the authorities, from where she crossed over to a resident of Jammu's Talab Khatikan area, has four children who continue to reside in Jammu and daughter of Mohammad Rashid from Namuddin Road in Islamabad, entered India on February 10, 1990, via Attari on a 14-day visitor visa to visit continued to stay under an LTV granted by the authorities on an annual basis. During her stay, she revealed that she married an Indian national."It wasn't disputed either that her LTV was valid up to January 13, 2025, and she had applied for an extension on January 4, 2025. But no such extension was ever accorded," the order husband expressed happiness over the decision and thanked the court. "We are relieved... The entire family was under tension. We were suffering due to the decision (to deport her)," he said.
