Anduril beat 9 competitors to snag a $642 million anti-drone contract for the US Marine Corps
The 10-year contract is meant to help fight smaller drones like the exploding ones in Ukraine.
The Defense Department said Anduril was chosen out of 10 total bids.
Defense startup Anduril clinched a $642 million contract on Friday to help the US Marine Corps fight smaller drones at its bases.
Anduril's new deal is for the Marine Corps Installation-Counter small Unmanned Aircraft Systems program, which is essentially a network of anti-drone defenses for bases and facilities.
The announcement comes after Anduril scored a separate five-year $200 million agreement in November to bring counter-drone tech to the Marine Air Defense Integrated System. This mobile air defense system can be mounted on vehicles like Humvees.
Like with the MADIS, Anduril's offering for this new contract is to fight smaller drones, which the US military classifies as Group 1 and Group 2.
Such drones are typically no heavier than 55 pounds and fly at a maximum altitude of about 3,500 feet, like the exploding commercial drones used in the war in Ukraine.
When the Corps first opened its contract in April 2024, it warned of a "security capability gap" for dealing with these smaller drones at its bases.
"The sUAS threat poses unique challenges to military installations when compared to those of operational forces," the Corps wrote.
The Defense Department said on Friday that 10 companies had submitted proposals for the contract.
With Anduril scoring the deal, the department said that 80% of the work until 2035 would be done in Costa Mesa, California, home to Anduril's headquarters. The rest is expected to be performed in Washington, D.C., and other Marine Corps facilities.
The announcement did not specify what type of product or how many systems Anduril will deliver.
Press teams for Anduril and the Marine Corps did not respond to requests for comment from Business Insider outside regular business hours.
One of Anduril's main offerings for fighting smaller drones, Anvil, features a quadcopter that flies out from a portable storage box to track and crash into enemy systems. It can also be fitted with explosives to attack bigger targets.
Additionally, the company sells electronic warfare jammers called Pulsar, which it's already providing to the Pentagon as part of a $250 million deal from October.
Anduril, founded in 2017 by Oculus creator Palmer Luckey, has become a rising star in the defense industry as it emphasizes ready-made designs that can be produced at scale. In that sense, it hopes to reuse the same design to bid for multiple contracts instead of creating each one specifically for a single deal.
The firm is also working with ChatGPT-maker OpenAI and runs its products on an AI software called Lattice to survey the battlefield and identify threats.
One of its biggest scores so far is a $22 billion contract with the US Army to provide soldiers with mixed-reality goggles. The contract was originally awarded to Microsoft but later ceded to Anduril.
The firm hopes to expand quickly. In August, Anduril raised $1.5 billion to build a 5 million-square-foot factory in Ohio that it said would "hyperscale" production.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
11 hours ago
- Business Insider
NATO's big $1.4 trillion bet is seeing long-ignored air defenses coming back in a big way
NATO pledged to massively increase its air defenses as part of soaring defense spending. The aim is to rebuild a capability that the war in Ukraine has shown to be crucial but has been allowed to wither in the West since the end of the Cold War. The heads of government for the 32 members of the decades-old security alliance committed last week to investing 5% of their GDP on defense and security by 2035. The increase, based on current GDP size, could be worth more than $1.4 trillion. NATO's secretary general, Mark Rutte, said that one use for the money will be a "five-fold increase in air defence capabilities." He said the way Russia is fighting proved the need. "We see Russia's deadly terror from the skies over Ukraine every day, and we must be able to defend ourselves from such attacks," he said. Western countries reduced their ground-based air defense arsenals after the end of the Cold War as they found themselves involved in conflicts with much smaller, less powerful adversaries. This war has shown that Western stocks are insufficient. Lacking since the Cold War Western countries have been fighting foes very much unlike Russia. Air superiority has been achieved with ease, enabling ground maneuvers. There hasn't been a pressing need for weapons to shoot down enemy aircraft and ballistic missiles, except in one-off instances. The US and the rest of NATO scaled back their ground-based defenses "very substantially," Mark Cancian, a retired Marine Corps colonel who is now a senior advisor at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said. During the Cold War, as tensions skyrocketed between NATO and the Soviet Union, Western countries maintained substantial defenses. But in the aftermath, he said, "it appeared that fighter aircraft could handle any air threat, and the need for ground-based air defenses was much reduced." During Operation Desert Storm in the early 1990s, the US took control of the skies, and aircraft largely had free rein in the later wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the main threat being to low-flying aircraft, helicopters in particular. Ed Arnold, a European security expert with the Royal United Services Institute, said that Europe depioritized air defense at the end of the Cold War "because the types of missions that the Europeans were doing were, for example, overseas where you only needed a small sort of section of it to be able to protect your forces in the field." Retired Air Commodore Andrew Curtis, an air warfare expert with a 35-year career in the Royal Air Force, said that there had been "an element of complacency" in recent decades, but also an element of trying to prioritize what was needed when defense budgets shrank as countries felt safer in the post-Cold War era. Russia's war against Ukraine, which followed earlier acts of aggression, suggests the world has changed. But, Curtis said, the West has to some extent been "asleep at the wheel." The problem now, Justin Bronk, an air power expert at RUSI, explained, is "that NATO faces a significant shortfall in ground-based air defense systems, both in terms of number of systems, but also particularly ammunition stocks for those systems." Russia shows they're needed Rutte warned earlier this month that NATO needs "five times as many systems to defend ourselves," and described the speed Russia was reconsituting its military as "threatening." Many European countries have warned Russia could attack elsewhere on the continent and are watching closely to see what weaponry and tactics it needs to be ready. The volume and variety of air attacks against Ukraine have thus made air defenses a top takeaway. Russia can launch hundreds of drones and missiles in a single day, and NATO's air defense networks are not well designed to deal with these kinds of strike threats, like exploding Shahed-136 drones backed by ballistic and cruise missiles. Western countries need more defenses, as there are just so many air attacks. "Even if only 10% get through, that still does a lot of damage," Cancian said. Cancian said innovations in this war, like drones being used more than in any other conflict in history, point to evolutions in warfare that make having strong air defenses more necessary than ever before. Nations aren't just facing planes. It's aircraft, missiles, and drones, all able to bring destruction. And the solutions need to be layered to address threats within their cost range. For instance, high-end Patriot interceptors worth millions of dollars aren't meant for cheap drones worth thousands. Former Australian Army Maj. Gen. Mick Ryan, a warfare strategist, said that countries have to find "a balance" between the expensive systems like the Patriot or the THAAD system, both made by Lockheed Martin, and lower-end systems. Ukraine, for example, uses AI-controlled systems equipped with machine guns to stop some smaller drones, and the US military has been experimenting with air-launched rockets as drone killers. "It's not just all about the exquisite, expensive, and highly capable systems. You also need some of those lower-end systems," the former general said, adding that the last three years have not only shown how important air defenses are, but also "that the array of threats that air defenses have to deal with has broadened." Smaller weapons used in missile attacks, weapons like drones, can "saturate and overwhelm an air defense system" — a tactic Russia has employed. For the West, Europe in particular, the new emphasis on bolstering critical air defenses and the push to spend more aren't optional. "It's not a choice. You absolutely have to do this," Ryan said. It'd be impossibly expensive to protect everywhere, but the West will need to sort its priorities, balancing front-line demands with the protection of civilians in cities, something Ukraine has grappled with throughout the war. Arnold said that "the biggest change, now as Ukraine is seeing, is you also need air defense to protect your civilians, all of your critical national infrastructure, and your forces in the field. So it's absolutely critical." NATO's new defense spending will be huge: No member currently spends that new 5% target, and many spent just over or below 2% in 2024, according to NATO's own estimated figures. But spending doesn't automatically solve the problem. There is a big production backlog with many systems, and increasing production capacity takes years, industrial revitalization, and workforce expertise, much of which has been diminished with time, leading to a hollowing out of the defense industrial sector. Bronk said fixing this "is much more a question of building production capacity at every stage in the supply chain as rapidly as possible as part of a crisis response rather than just spending more money." More production capacity is needed for interceptors. More money and big orders help, though, by giving industry confidence to invest more in facilities and processes, but there has to be sustained investment. Rutte pledged that NATO's increased spending would also be used on "thousands more tanks and armoured vehicles" and "millions of rounds of artillery ammunition," but that many plans are classified.
Business Insider
20 hours ago
- Business Insider
New Palmer Luckey startup Erebor set to be valued at $2B, Insider reports
Palmer Luckey, cofounder and CEO of defense tech company Anduril, is also launching anew startup called Erebor, a digital bank aimed at startups and crypto firms, Business Insider's Julia Hornstein reports. The startup is raising at least $225M at a $2B valuation, the author says, citing people familiar with the deal. Founders Fund, a venture firm run by Palantir's (PLTR) Peter Thiel, and 8VC are investing in Erebor, the author notes. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Anduril CEO Palmer Luckey's new digital banking startup set to be valued at $2 billion, sources say
Anduril CEO Palmer Luckey founded Erebor, a digital bank for startups and cryptocurrency companies. Erebor is raising at least $225 million at a $2 billion valuation, backed by Founders Fund and 8VC, sources say. Erebor's founding comes as the Trump administration embraces cryptocurrency. Anduril cofounder and CEO Palmer Luckey is launching another startup with a "Lord of the Rings"-inspired name. It already has a hefty price tag. Erebor, a digital bank aimed at startups and cryptocurrency companies, which might sound a little like the infamous Silicon Valley Bank, is raising at least $225 million at a $2 billion valuation, according to people familiar with the deal. Founders Fund, the venture firm run by Palantir cofounder Peter Thiel, and 8VC, led by fellow Palantir cofounder Joe Lonsdale, are investing in the company, the people who weren't authorized to speak publicly on the matter said. The fundraise is ongoing, and details could still change. 8VC, Founders Fund and Palmer Luckey did not respond to requests for comment. Erebor — like Luckey's Anduril as well as Lonsdale and Thiel's Palantir — takes its name from JRR Tolkien's "The Lord of the Rings." In the book, Erebor is the "Lonely Mountain," a kingdom known for its treasure. The startup recently applied for a US bank charter that would let it operate as a regulated bank. It plans to provide services such as crypto-collateralized lending to startups and crypto clients, according to documents viewed by Business Insider. Luckey founded Erebor. Jacob Hirshman, who previously worked at stablecoin issuer Circle, and Owen Rapaport, who cofounded now-acquired crypto-monitoring company Aer Compliance, will lead the bank as co-CEOs, the documents said. Mike Hagedorn, previously senior executive vice president and chief financial officer of Valley National Bank, will be the startup's president, according to his LinkedIn. Hirshman declined to comment. Rapaport and Hagedorn did not respond to requests for comment. Luckey is also the CEO of Anduril Industries, a defense tech giant he cofounded in 2017 that raised $2.5 billion at a $30.5 billion valuation in June. He also founded virtual reality company Oculus in 2012 at 19 years old and sold it to Facebook, now Meta Platforms, for $2 billion two years later. In 2016, Luckey was fired from Meta after donating $10,000 to a pro-Donald Trump meme group. (Meta and CEO Mark Zuckerberg have denied that Luckey left over his politics, and the two teamed up again in May, announcing an Anduril-Meta US military partnership.) Both Lonsdale and Thiel — who lead the venture firms backing Erebor — have supported President Trump. Thiel contributed over $1 million to pro-Trump super PACs and his 2016 campaign, according to the New York Times. Lonsdale has backed the America PAC, which supported Trump's 2024 reelection campaign, the Financial Times reported. In the first few months of his second term, Trump made moves to support the crypto industry, like creating a strategic bitcoin reserve and appointing venture capitalist David Sacks as Crypto Czar. And Wall Street interest in crypto is on the rise after Circle's IPO in June. Shares in Circle are up over 113% since its public market debut as of the Wednesday close. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
