Exclusive: More explicit rumours about Tory Whanau – this time from Auckland councillor Maurice Williamson
'It seems to be these older, weird creepy men who speak about me but also others like that. This sexualisation of women in leadership roles is purely intended to dehumanise and reduce us in terms of character.'
Auckland Councillor Maurice Williamson spread a sexually explicit rumour about the Wellington Mayor during an Auckland Council committee meeting in 2023. Photo / Brett Phibbs
The revelation comes after the Herald obtained an email written by Wellington mayoral candidate Ray Chung in which he passed on gossip from a neighbour about Whanau having 'tempestuous' drug-fuelled sex on New Year's Eve 2022 and having 'soft pendulous breasts'.
This new rumour, like the New Year's Eve gossip, was not true, said Whanau, and was equally able to be proven false.
She said the rumours were part of highly-sexualised dialogue aimed at her – and other female politicians – to demean them and undermine their roles.
Williamson's comment was captured on the official Auckland Council recording but never made public.
The Herald has obtained the key section, in which Williamson makes reference to Whanau allegedly performing a sex act.
He has been approached for comment but is yet to respond.
The video did not capture the beginning of Williamson's comments because of meeting business, and the end of his comments were indistinct because fellow councillors were trying to shout the former National MP down.
As Williamson continued to speak, somebody at the meeting shouted: 'Maurice, Maurice, you better belt up mate'.
Independent Māori Statutory Board deputy chairman Tau Henare, who sat in Cabinet as a minister alongside Williamson in the late 90s, can be heard immediately calling a point of order.
'I actually think you should sanction that outburst. We don't have to sit here and listen to [video cuts off].'
Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau says some people try to sexualise and dehumanise women in leadership roles. Photo / Mark Mitchell
Williamson's comments appear to stem from a rumour that ran rampant in late 2023 after Whanau admitted to drinking too much on November 18 at Wellington's Havana Bar.
She later said she had a drinking problem for which she would seek help.
A rumour emerged on social media claiming a recording existed of Whanau carrying out a lewd act while at the bar.
Whanau always maintained the rumour was false, yet it persisted despite 10 witnesses and a bar manager also saying it was false.
Whanau said oppressive sexualised commentary about women leaders has increased in recent years. She said former Prime Minister Dame Jacinda Ardern, Green MP Tamatha Paul, former Labour Cabinet minister Kiritapu Allan, former Green MP Golriz Ghahraman and Auckland councillor Julie Fairey and others have been targeted.
Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau says women leaders, such as former Prime Minister Dame Jacinda Ardern (centre) and former minister Kiritapu Allan (right), have had to deal with increased sexualised commentary in recent years. Photo / Peter de Graaf
'I'm a woman in leadership, I'm progressive. I want the best for my community and I have the policies to deliver that. So what do these weird men do? They assassinate your character instead.'
Whanau said for two years she has had to put up with people calling her 'c***sucker' and saying 'she's probably in the toilets giving another blow job'.
Tau Henare called out Maurice Williamson's lewd comments immediately. Photo / NZME
She said Williamson phoned her at the time to apologise, but it seemed 'disingenuous'. She claims he talked over her and didn't tell her who he had gossiped with.
'He didn't actually let me speak,' she said.
Whanau said she was seeking legal advice on potential action against 'anyone who has helped push any of those false rumours about me' – but wanted a long-term solution.
She said part of the problem was social media sites reducing content moderation and community guidelines.
'We need to look at social media reform regulation, we need to look at the Harmful Digital Communications Act – is it strong enough? We need to look at hate speech legislation.'
Albert-Eden-Puketāpapa ward councillor Julie Fairey was at the meeting in 2023.
When Williamson started speaking, she said: 'I started making a lot of noise trying to drown it out so it's not on the recording because I knew we would then be publishing something untrue and vile and possibly defamatory.'
Fairey said the comments made her feel sick. 'A lot of us were in shock. It was completely unacceptable.' She said afterwards she needed to walk off the adrenaline.
When Auckland Council was asked for the full video it declined, saying the section in which Williamson's comments were made 'contained inappropriate and offensive content and did not relate to the business of the meeting'.
It withheld that section of the video to protect privacy and maintain 'effective conduct of public affairs' by protecting officials and others from 'improper pressure or harassment'.
The council said Williamson 'made the comment to someone outside the meeting' and did not realise he wasn't on mute. After he made the comment, a council staff member placed his connection on mute.
Councillor Richard Hills, chairman of the meeting, ruled Williamson withdraw his remarks and apologise and asked councillors to stop discussing the matter. He also asked the council chief executive to review the incident.
A council spokeswoman said they found 'no further action was appropriate because a direct apology, verbal and in private, was given soon after the incident and Mayor Whanau, through her office, had advised that she did not seek any further action be taken'.
The spokeswoman said training was now provided for online meetings.
David Fisher is based in Northland and has worked as a journalist for more than 30 years, winning multiple journalism awards including being twice named Reporter of the Year and being selected as one of a small number of Wolfson Press Fellows to Wolfson College, Cambridge. He joined the Herald in 2004.
Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Speedway racing death: Coroner says police ‘destroyed' evidence after Stephen Penn crash
Stephen Penn with his wife Vanessa Penn. Penn was wearing a lot of safety gear, including a helmet and a hybrid restraint designed to protect a driver's head and neck on impact. In a coroner's report obtained by the Herald, Coroner Heidi Wrigley noted there was 'potentially important evidence that was not available to this inquiry'. That included the helmet. Wrigley said police photographed it, then 'destroyed it without carefully inspecting it'. Wrigley added the hybrid restraint also wasn't provided, and 'it is possible that it was disposed of inadvertently after being taken from the scene with other items of Mr Penn's safety equipment'. 'The unavailability of the helmet and hybrid has prevented any effective independent expert consideration of whether there was some issue with either of those pieces of safety equipment which contributed to Mr Penn's death,' Wrigley wrote. 'Accordingly, this is a possibility I cannot rule out.' The tragedy happened at Robertson Prestige International Speedway, located at Palmerston North's Central Energy Trust Arena. Photo / File Wrigley added 'the significant movement' of Penn's head upon impact with the rival car and concrete wall 'could be indicative of some issue with the Hybrid and/or his helmet'. She said the evidence was of 'poor quality' which meant she was unable to identify potential problems with his gear. Why police 'disposed' of helmet Inspector Ross Grantham, Manawatū Area Commander, told the Herald police were not 'given the opportunity to be heard on this matter' before Wrigley released her findings. That meant they were unable to explain to the coroner why the helmet was disposed of. Grantham said Wrigley only asked for photographs of the helmet for her inquiry, not the helmet itself. Inspector Ross Grantham claims police were not asked for the helmet – only photographs of it. Photo / Mark Mitchell 'Police held Mr Penn's helmet for some months following his fatal crash,' he said. 'During that time, the coroner had requested additional photos of the helmet, which police provided. At this time a decision was made to dispose of it, as it was no longer considered necessary to retain it for evidential purposes.' Grantham said police 'noted' the findings into Penn's death. 'On behalf of NZ Police, I extend my deepest sympathies to his family and loved ones,' he said. Stephen Penn in action at the Robertson Prestige International Speedway in car No 59P. Were proper safety checks done? Wrigley's written findings said 59P had undergone a Speedway New Zealand (SNZ) scrutineering and safety check process and been cleared. But 'the scrutineer's certificate does not make it clear whether Mr Penn's helmet and other safety gear was checked,' it says. The box on the scrutineering certificate addressing that was unmarked. Speedway bosses: 'It is not possible to eliminate all risk' Wrigley wrote in her findings how Penn's vehicle struck a competitor before being 'propelled' into the outer concrete wall of the racetrack. An emergency response team rushed to his car, but he died within it soon after the crash. A later examination of the Superstock vehicle by a SNZ scrutineer 'identified no pre-existing faults that could have contributed to the crash'. Speedway racing has inherent dangers, regardless of how safety-conscious drivers and teams are. A post-mortem report stated the blunt force head injury suffered by Penn was 'immediately unsurvivable'. As part of her inquiry, Wrigley had access to footage of the crash taken from various cameras including one inside 59P. 'I find that the cause of the crash which resulted in Mr Penn's fatal injury was him driving into the rear of a competitor's car as part of a legitimate Superstock Team race strategy to manoeuvre the car out of his way,' Wrigley wrote. 'The forces involved in this collision resulted in Mr Penn losing control of his Superstock 59P which was diverted into the concrete wall on the outside of the racetrack. 'The front right, then left rear, of the Superstock 59P crashed into the wall. At least one of these three impacts was responsible for Mr Penn's fatal head injury.' Wrigley wrote how Superstock Team racing came with 'inherent risk of serious injury even when appropriate safety precautions are followed.' The New Zealand SuperStock Teams Championship is one of the biggest events on the Kiwi speedway calendar. Photo / Sportsweb Photography SNZ general manager Aaron Kirby wrote in a report to the inquiry that Penn's death was an 'unfortunate accident' that had followed typical 'aggressive' Superstock teams racing. 'Mr Kirby advised that while Speedway NZ strives to achieve the highest level of safety possible, it is not possible to eliminate all risk,' Wrigley wrote. 'Speedway NZ's position is that all reasonable and practicable precautions were taken on the day of the crash to ensure Mr Penn was compliant with Speedway NZ rules.' WorkSafe had earlier looked at Penn's death but deemed it would not investigate, saying: 'Speedway / car racing has a high risk [of] accident or injury. Initial enquiries found [that Speedway NZ] had adequate controls at the time of the accident.' Stephen Penn's family In a written statement to the Herald, Penn's family said they were 'happy with the coroner's findings that they have ruled it a tragic freak accident'. The family hoped the findings would 'end any speculation or unfounded assumptions' regarding the accident. Penn had a 'huge passion' for speedway. 'Growing up around racing meant the love for motorsport was in his blood,' the family said. The speedway community rallied around the Penn family after Stephen Penn (inset) died in a racing crash. 'Within speedway, he aspired to be part of a team where he could do his part in assisting them to the finish line.' His loved ones stressed he never compromised on safety. 'Knowing that speedway was a dangerous sport, safety was the absolute top priority when Stephen raced,' they said. 'What happened to Stephen has not impacted our love for the sport and we are happy that this also has not hindered the continuation of Teams Champs.' In a post in SNZ's June newsletter, the sport's governing body described the driver as a 'great ambassador' for speedway. Flanked by Kyla and Vanessa Penn, Kaelin Mooney holds the Stephen Penn Rookie of Teams Champs trophy named in honour of the late driver. Photo / Troy Adamson SNZ wrote that since the tragedy occurred it had 'assisted the coroner with documentation and evidence requests relating to the incident and the sport itself'. The organisation said its 'first priority' had been towards Vanessa and his two daughters. 'The family wish to have it conveyed that Stephen's death was a freak and tragic accident, a result of doing something he truly loved.' Kind-hearted Kiwis donated $96,101 to the Penn family via a Givealittle page created after the racing death. The Penn family told the Herald the support they received would never be forgotten. 'We would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone that supported us through this tough time,' they said. 'During this time, we saw the speedway community come together as a family and showed people that this is not just a sport but a passion. 'Lastly, thanks to everyone that keeps his legacy alive and not letting this affect their love for the sport which Stephen would have wanted.' Neil Reid is a Napier-based senior reporter who covers general news, features and sport. He joined the Herald in 2014 and has 33 years of newsroom experience. Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Business case flawed: Brooking
The release of a "flawed" business case means more information is needed before Labour decides whether it would dump the planned Waikato Medical School, a Dunedin MP says. Last Monday, Health Minister Simeon Brown announced Cabinet had approved $82.85 million in government funding to build the country's third medical school at the University of Waikato — the institution was expected to contribute more than $150m to the project. Dunedin MP Rachel Brooking, of Labour, said she was "very sceptical" about figures used by the government to make its decision. The project's detailed business case was made public on Friday evening, part of a document dump which revealed the cost of producing GPs at the graduate-entry Waikato medical school would be $50 million a year cheaper than at the existing medical schools at Otago and Auckland universities. "The business case has really been written with an outcome in mind and not traversed all of the options, and that's just bad decision-making," Ms Brooking said. "It's bad way to make use of taxpayers' money, and it seems that in general, this all will cost more." She said the "flawed" business case would have consequences for the Otago Medical School: "those are difficult to predict exactly". However, Labour had "no plans at the moment" to dump the medical school, Ms Brooking said. "The issue is that we don't think the business case is credible. "So we'll keep asking questions about that and try and make any assessments on good information when we're in a position to do so." Taieri MP Ingrid Leary said "the so-called business case is really just a public relations document, given the outlandish assumptions and comparators". In a statement last Monday, Mr Brown said the project was an innovative model "that supports our focus on strengthening primary care, making it easier for people to see their doctor — helping Kiwis stay well and out of hospital". Waikato University would begin construction on new teaching facilities later this year. A full cost-benefit analysis was presented to Cabinet before any proposal was finalised, as part of the National-Act New Zealand coalition agreement, he said. Green MP Francisco Hernandez said the government's cost-benefit analysis used to "ram through" the Waikato Medical School made assumptions revealing the "lack of objectivity". Mr Hernandez said the document "falsely assumed" Otago and Auckland universities could not have negotiated a four-year rural graduate programme similar to Waikato University's proposal. "This assumption enables the government to claim that Waikato University will train medical students 'cheaper' because Waikato is assumed to have a four-year programme," he said. The government had also assumed Waikato University was more likely to produce GPs "even though Otago and Auckland could have also done a rural graduate programme". "Fundamentally, these flawed assumptions stem from the government's failure to run a transparent tender process from the start," Mr Hernandez said. "Rather than putting out an open tender to every university in New Zealand, they gave Waikato University a sweetheart deal." He called for the government to "be up front and honest about the actual costs" of the project and release the full agreement with Waikato University with all relevant advice. "The government's failure to rule out further handouts or to release the actual agreement raises questions on whether there were further sweetheart deals negotiated behind closed doors in the agreement that might end up with the taxpayer bailing out Waikato University."
NZ Herald
13 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Auckland woman horrified council tried to take rough sleepers' tents, sleeping bags
'You can visibly see it, if you're walking around the streets. There just seems to be a lot more people [who] have come into hard times." A few days later, Scott was walking past, when workers exited an Auckland Council van with black rubbish sacks and started collecting the belongings. She said the men who slept there were absent, but had stashed the tents and sleeping bags in a small pile under the shelter. 'They had found the place where the people had stashed all their warm stuff to sleep in and they were pulling it down out of its place. I walked straight up to them and said, 'Do not take their stuff - what are they going to do? They've got nothing else to keep them warm and it's been freezing this week'.' Scott said the council workers left without taking the rough sleepers' belongings, but she was horrified they had tried to collect it. 'It's upsetting and I don't know what the answer is, but taking people's stuff from them is definitely not the answer,' she said. 'Imagine coming back from your day and you're about to bed down to sleep on some concrete stairs, and someone's taken your last warmth or barrier for that. 'I just think it's cruel.' Auckland Council compliance manager Adrian Wilson said there rough sleepers had no designated areas to store belongings and the council was exploring possibilities for this. He said council staff would seize items when they were not removed and 'anything of value, including tents, sleeping bags and personal items are stored'. The council retained such items for six months, if they were not claimed. 'Council staff make every effort to identify the owner of any property left unattended. They initially leave notices requiring the individual to remove their items.' Auckland Council compliance manager Adrian Wilson. Photo / Marika Khabazi / RNZ Social services have warned of worsening poverty, due to economic hardship. On Tuesday, Auckland Council's Community Committee will discuss a report that updates the number of homeless living on Auckland's streets. The number of homeless people rose to 809 in May this year - a 90% increase since last September. This followed the release of the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development's latest Homelessness Insights Report, which showed 14 percent of people leaving emergency housing were likely homeless. The council report identified two key risks in response to the data provided by outreach services. Increased rough sleeping, resulting in additional costs being incurred to engage, monitor and connect to social services. Acknowledging the council's role in homelessness, and continued co-ordination and investment into the sector that supports those suffering homelessness would manage the situation, but not fully mitigate it. Increased unmet mental health needs, potentially creating perceptions of unsafe environments in public spaces and within public facilities. It said continued advocacy to central government for increased resourcing to support the needs was an ongoing need. Auckland Council received more than 500 requests from the public related to rough sleepers in the past 10 months. Head of community impact Dickie Humphries said these ranged from concern about a person's welfare to reporting bylaw infringements and blocked doorways. He said the increase in rough sleepers was concerning. 'We are here to make sure that the city in this region is a thriving city for all and Auckland is experiencing homelessness [that] is the antithesis of that vision, so we find it very concerning. 'The causes are complex, and what we're hearing from our agencies and what our observations are, is worsening social and economic conditions for people, but that is felt most acutely for those who are already quite vulnerable or on the margins.' He said the council was working with social service organisations to respond to concerns from residents and actively patrol the city. 'We do have constraints on our resources and the best way to make inroads on this is to do it together. 'No one institution, no one organisation can solve this alone, so [getting] more value out of our offer here from Auckland Council to the region will come through the partnerships that we have.' - RNZ
