Rubio leading negotiations with Bukele on returning migrants
The disclosure, made in Monday court filings, is no guarantee the Trump administration will secure the return of a man known only in court documents as Cristian, who was deported in spite of court-ordered protections.
But it strikes a less aggressive tone as the Trump administration has otherwise resisted efforts to comply with various court orders requiring them to return migrants who were wrongly removed.
The filing notes Rubio's long-standing relationship with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele.
'Based on his deep diplomatic experience with El Salvador and the secretary's familiarity with political and diplomatic sensitivities in that country, he is personally handling the discussions with the government of El Salvador regarding persons subject to the court's order detained in El Salvador,' the State Department said in a statement included in the filing.
It adds that Rubio has 'read and understands this court's order and wants to ensure the court he is making prompt and diligent efforts' to comply.
Cristian was the second publicly reported case of someone mistakenly deported to El Salvador.
The 20-year-old Cristian was among those who entered the U.S. as an unaccompanied minor, part of a lawsuit that protected him and others from removal while they were permitted to seek asylum.
In another case, Salvadoran man Kilmar Abrego Garcia was sent to a prison in the country despite a 2019 order from an immigration judge protecting him from being removed and sent to his native country.
In that case, the Trump administration has resisted a Supreme Court order to return the man, saying the directive to 'facilitate' his return requires only sending a plane to receive him should El Salvador wish to release him.
Bukele has said he will not release Abrego Garcia.
In a third case, the Justice Department has said it is working to return a Guatemalan man who was deported to Mexico, despite having previously been raped and extorted in the country.
In court filings last week, the administration said it was arranging for him to come back to the U.S. on the return leg of a deportation flight.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
32 minutes ago
- Fox News
Should Josh Allen be ranked over Patrick Mahomes despite 0–4 playoff record against him? Fox News Video
All times eastern Special Report with Bret Baier Fox Business in Depth: Red, White and Blue Collar/Dagen McDowell Fox Business In Depth: "Reenergizing America" FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: President Trump expected to sign "Big Beautiful Bill" at Fourth of July picnic


Fox News
32 minutes ago
- Fox News
Will a team be hitting the jackpot with Dame Lilliard? Fox News Video
All times eastern Special Report with Bret Baier Fox Business in Depth: Red, White and Blue Collar/Dagen McDowell Fox Business In Depth: "Reenergizing America" FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: President Trump expected to sign "Big Beautiful Bill" at Fourth of July picnic

Wall Street Journal
33 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Justice Sotomayor Endorses a Judicial Mutiny
Are lower courts obliged to heed rulings from the Supreme Court? The answer seems obvious, but not to some judges and apparently not to two members of the Supreme Court. That's the news in Thursday's 7-2 Court rebuke to a federal judge who failed to heed its earlier stay on his preliminary injunction. On June 23 the Supreme Court stayed federal Judge Brian Murphy's April 18 injunction on the Trump Administration's plan to deport to South Sudan eight men convicted of violent crimes. The order lets the Administration resume sending illegal migrants to countries other than their own, pending appeal on the legal merits to the First Circuit Court of Appeals. A few hours later Judge Murphy announced the eight men were still protected from removal by an order he issued modifying the original injunction. The men are currently held at a military base in Djibouti. The order 'remains in full force and effect notwithstanding today's stay of the preliminary injunction,' Judge Murphy said. That sure looks like willful resistance to a Supreme Court order, and the Administration sought a 'clarification' from the Justices. On Thursday they left no doubt. 'Our June 23 order stayed the April 18 preliminary injunction in full,' the Court said in an unsigned order. 'The May 21 remedial order [by Judge Murphy] cannot now be used to enforce an injunction that our stay rendered unenforceable.'