Quebec government launches Bill 40 appeal to Supreme Court of Canada
Nearly two months after Quebec's highest court ruled that Bill 40 violated the rights of the English-speaking community, the François Legault government is taking its legal challenge to the Supreme Court of Canada.
The Attorney General of Quebec has requested leave to appeal to Canada's top court, according to a filing obtained by CTV News.
This means the Supreme Court could have the final say on the constitutionality of the law since it was adopted more than five years ago if the court agrees to hear the case. Quebec's English school boards have been fighting the law in court since 2020.
Last month, the Quebec Court of Appeal rendered what anglophone groups called a 'historic decision' when it struck down parts of the law, which sought to abolish school boards in Quebec and reform school governance in the province. The unanimous April 3 ruling largely upheld a 2023 Superior Court ruling that said parts of the bill violated fundamental rights under section 23 of the Charter.
Among them was a provision that had abolished school boards and replaced them with school service centres, which was later stayed in the English school system pending court challenges.
The three appellate judges agreed with the lower court ruling that stated the bill violated the rights that allow certain individuals who are not members of the linguistic minority in Quebec to vote and run in school board elections for the English-language education sector.
The government argues in its 20-page brief filed with the Supreme Court on Friday that the panel of appeal court judges erred in its interpretation of section 23 of the Charter.
Joe Ortona, president of the Quebec English School Board Association, said it is 'disappointing' that the province is taking the legal battle further after the April ruling, which he thought put the legal wrangling to bed.
'We're fully confident that we will be successful at the Supreme Court of Canada, and you know, at least we know that that'll be the end of the road, and then the government's not going to have a choice. They're going to have to respect our constitutional rights. That is the only way that this will conclude,' he said in an interview.
'They've never been able to justify why they need to overhaul governance in English language school boards, and we've maintained that they're unconstitutional. The courts have said that we're right, through and through, Francophone justices in Quebec have repeatedly agreed with us,' added Ortona, who is also the chair of Quebec's largest English school board, the English Montreal School Board, (EMSB).
When asked if the English school boards can continue spending money on legal challenges for Bill 40, he said 'school boards cannot afford to not challenge the law' in order to protect themselves from a 'hostile' provincial government.
He said most of the funding has come from private donors for years.
'The government is fighting Bill 40 with the taxpayer money of the English speaking community, of the Francophone majority, of all Quebecers, and they're the ones who really need to take a look in the mirror, and eventually, I hope that they'll come to the realization that this was never worth it,' Ortona said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Sun
an hour ago
- Toronto Sun
As Trump's trade deal deadline approaches, his tariffs face legal pushback in court
Published Jul 27, 2025 • 3 minute read U.S. President Donald Trump reacts as he plays a round of golf at Trump Turnberry golf course during his visit to the U.K. on July 27, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland. Photo by Christopher Furlong / Getty Images WASHINGTON — Donald Trump's plan to realign global trade faces its latest legal barrier this week in a federal appeals court — and Canada is bracing for the U.S. president to follow through on his threat to impose higher tariffs. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account While Trump set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to make trade deals with the United States, the president's ultimatum has so far resulted in only a handful of frameworks for trade agreements. Deals have been announced for Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — but Trump indicated last week that an agreement with Canada is far from complete. 'We don't have a deal with Canada, we haven't been focused on it,' Trump told reporters Friday. Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by the deadline. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Canadian officials have also downplayed expectations of a new economic and security agreement materializing by Friday. 'We'll use all the time that's necessary,' Carney said last week. Countries around the world will also be watching as Trump's use of a national security statute to hit nations with tariffs faces scrutiny in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Read More The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. The Trump administration quickly appealed the lower court's ruling on the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs and arguments are set to be heard in the appeal court on Thursday. The hearing combines two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One involves five American small businesses arguing specifically against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other came from 12 states pushing back on both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called Trump's tariff actions a 'massive power grab.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, is representing the American small businesses. 'We are hopeful — we can't know for sure obviously — we are hopeful that we will continue to prevail in court,' Somin said. Somin said they are arguing that IEEPA does not 'give the president the power to impose any tariff he wants, on any nation, for any reason, for as long as he wants, whenever he feels like it.' He added that 'the law also says there must be an emergency and an unusual and extraordinary threat to American security or the economy' — and neither the flow of fentanyl from Canada nor a trade deficit meet that definition. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. The White House has said the Trump administration is legally using powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address America's 'national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking.' There have been 18 amicus briefs — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — filed in support of the small businesses and states pushing against Trump's tariffs. Two were filed in support of the Trump administration's actions. Brent Skorup, a legal fellow at the Washington-based Cato Institute, said the Trump administration is taking a vague statute and claiming powers never deployed by a president before. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The Cato Institute submitted a brief that argued 'the Constitution specifies that Congress has the power to set tariffs and duties.' Skorup said there are serious issues with the Trump administration's interpretation of IEEPA. 'We don't want power consolidated into a single king or president,' he said. It's expected the appeals court will expedite its ruling. Even if it rules against the duties, however, they may not be immediately lifted. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this.' There are at least eight lawsuits challenging the tariffs. Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties. Sports Columnists Sunshine Girls Sunshine Girls Toronto & GTA
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
U.S. politics threaten to complicate Canada's co-hosting of 2026 World Cup
OTTAWA — With less than a year to go until the 2026 World Cup, political tensions and U.S. policy threaten to pose problems as Canada, the United States and Mexico prepare to co-host the tournament. Article content Next year's FIFA World Cup will be the biggest ever, with the three countries hosting a record 48 teams. Between June 11 and July 19, they will play 104 matches, most of them in the U.S. Article content Article content Article content With millions of fans expected to cross borders to attend the games, U.S. President Donald Trump's harsh immigration policies — which include travel bans on some countries, immigration raids and mass deportations — are generating anxiety. Article content 'This is all being driven by the United States. And we're entirely the guilty party here,' said Victor Matheson, a professor at College of Holy Cross in Massachusetts who specializes in sports economics. Article content 'You could have significant immigration problems with fans and players going across borders.' Article content The U.S. has travel bans in place for 12 countries and restrictions in place for seven, and is considering banning travellers from another 36 countries. Article content Though there are exemptions for athletes, staff and families, the unpredictability of Trump's administration means no one knows for certain what kind of rules might be in place by the time the tournament starts. Article content Economist Andrew Zimbalist, who wrote a book on the economics of hosting the World Cup, said Trump has the ability to make it difficult for people to travel, but it's not clear whether he will actually do so. Article content Article content 'I think probably Trump himself might not have the answers because … he responds very impetuously to changes in his environment,' he said. Article content Concerns about visas or political opposition to Trump might lead some soccer fans to decide not to attend at all, while others opt to attend the games in Canada instead, Zimbalist suggested. But he also pointed out that the quarter, semifinals and final are all taking place in the U.S. Article content A spokesperson for Canadian Heritage said Canada could see a million international visitors during the tournament. Article content 'Given the tri-national nature of the event, it is anticipated that international and domestic travellers will move back and forth between Canada and the United States. The focus will continue to be on the flow of movement, the safety of travellers and the security of the borders,' the spokesperson said. Article content A spokesperson for the Canada Border Services Agency said the agency is working closely with federal government departments, host cities and FIFA 'in the safety and security planning for this international event.'
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Ontario's Halton Region shutting down heritage division, getting rid of 30,000-item historical collection
Social Sharing Ontario's Halton Region is shuttering its heritage services department and will soon start trying to get rid of around 30,000 historical items, including photographs, tools, natural history specimens, archeological finds, art and the Halton County archives. The region is hoping local lower-tier municipalities and organizations such as the Royal Botanical Gardens, Conservation Halton and the Halton Regional Police Service will take the items in order to keep them in public hands, but says anything it can't rehouse will be up for public auction – a move heritage advocates, including a consulting firm hired by the region, say can be unethical and degrade public trust. Halton Regional Council voted July 9 to "cease delivering heritage services" by the end of this year and to "deaccession" its collection. The vote was held in a closed session, following staff and consultant reports from the past year that indicate region staff have supported this idea for some time. The move is a sharp turn from the vision in the region's five-year operational plan endorsed in 2021, which included $8 million for a new "heritage centre" for the department that was never built. "Regional staff will implement a process for dispersing the collection – that is, removing these items from the region's ownership and responsibility," stated a confidential staff memo that came before council that day, which was later made public by the region. "Regional staff will make every effort to continue public ownership of the items and to keep the items located within Halton." Collection includes 20 'potential Indigenous belongings' The memo says the collection includes "tools and equipment, uniforms and clothing, furniture, personal items, medical tools and equipment, communication tools and equipment, natural history specimens, archeological materials, works of art, and other miscellaneous items." It also contains about 20 "potential Indigenous belongings," such as "beaded objects, bark and quill boxes, footwear, and gloves." The region will attempt to return those items to the communities they came from, the memo states. It lists potential partners to receive items from the rest of the collection as Conservation Halton, the Halton Regional Police Service, Royal Botanical Gardens, Country Heritage Park, the Milton Historical Society, local municipalities and local libraries. "Transfers to these organizations would be strictly voluntary and will differ based on the level of interest and how items from the collection align with their individual mandate and capacity," it states. But, it adds that some items may go to auction. "There are objects in the collection that do not have a clear value or direct relationship to Halton or its heritage. In these cases, public auction may be a valid method for dispersal. Where this approach is taken, advance public notice will be provided. "Given the size of the collection and the complexity of deaccessioning and dispersal processes, it is anticipated that this will be a significant undertaking with an extended timeline." 'I am hoping that Halton valued these objects' Halton Region communications specialist Isabel Contin shared more details with CBC Hamilton about what the collection includes. She said there are: About 18,400 "objects": Tools, uniforms and clothing, furnishings, personal and medical items, communication devices, natural history specimens, archeological finds, and artworks. About 3,100 photographs. About 13,000 archival materials: Maps, documents and other materials. "The items span from the 19th century (e.g., court artifacts and family farm tools), through the 21st century (e.g., medical equipment, police service items, and items related to the COVID-19 pandemic)," she wrote in an email on Thursday. "While some items in the collection have a clear link to Halton's local heritage, many do not." As for the Indigenous items, she said Halton Region's Indigenous Relations team will be involved in their transfer "to ensure they are properly identified, respected, and ultimately returned to the appropriate communities or custodians." Halton Region sits on the treaty lands of the Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation (MCFN), and is the traditional territory of the Haudenosaunee, Huron-Wendat and Anishinabek, according to the region's land acknowledgement. Darin Wybenga, traditional knowledge and land use coordinator for MCFN, told CBC Hamilton he was unaware of the objects held by the region, and is keen to see what they are. "I am hoping that Halton valued these objects enough to keep a good record of where they obtained these things," he said on Thursday, noting there was strong likelihood some of them could belong to MCFN. He was thankful the region will reach out to first nations before auctioning the items — something he said shows progress in the relationships between Canadian institutions and Indigenous communities. "There is some consideration given to the people who might have something at stake with these objects, so that's a positive step." In the same call, MCFN councillor Erma Farrell said she hopes to arrange a meeting to see the items soon. She also noted her disappointment with the closure of the department, noting it seems several area municipalities are cutting back on support for heritage services. Heritage advocate concerned items will be 'dispersed everywhere' A consultant's report about potential options for the collection issued in April included numerous potential scenarios for the collection, with shutting down the division entirely the only one for which it found more "cons" than "pros." The Museum Collection Administration Study, written by Canadian cultural planning firm Lord Cultural Resources, notes "the Region made a commitment when accessioning an object to care for it in the public trust. "The public's reaction may be particularly negative if the matter is not communicated properly, or if a large portion of objects are not transferred to other institutions and thus are removed from the public realm," it states. It gives an example of objects from the collection that have already been transferred to the Royal Botanical Gardens, but instead of being accessioned by the RBG – which means they'd have to steward them in perpetuity – they were used as display props. That means they can be accessible to the public in way they weren't before — but the change in status removes the "requirement for permanent preservation and conservation. "As props they may be discarded when deterioration becomes an issue," the study states. It also notes that many of the agencies that the region hopes to send items to already have their own staffing, space and funding challenges, as well as narrow collections mandates that will limit what they can accept. London, Ont., heritage advocate and public history professor Michelle Hamilton has been watching the Halton process unfold, and says many in her field are shocked by how many items stand to go from the public trust to private hands through this process. "The idea that this will not lead to loss of artifacts is naive," Hamilton told CBC on Tuesday. "They would be dispersed everywhere, they'd go into private collections, and never be seen or heard from again. You're taking something that belongs to the public, you're selling it off without permission and it goes into private hands. It's just ethically wrong." Hamilton, who teaches at Western University, says it is also unethical to deaccession the collection prior to consulting the public, noting she's worried this move could start a trend. "If it happens in Halton, it's going to be a ball rolling down a hill and others will follow," she says.
