logo
German lawmaker in hot water over talks with Russian representatives

German lawmaker in hot water over talks with Russian representatives

Yahoo09-05-2025
A Social Democrat lawmaker in Germany has been forced to defend himself against criticism for taking a trip to Azerbaijan for talks with Russian representatives, which came to light after a media investigation.
"One of the principles of good foreign policy is that, even and especially in difficult times of increasing tensions, conflicts and wars, dialogue contacts in all parts of the world and also with Russia should be maintained," Ralf Stegner wrote in a joint statement with three former members of the parliament on Friday.
German media had reported on the trip to Baku which Stegner and others took on April 14.
Stegner told dpa that he was surprised at the polemical reaction, which had "no grounds."
"It's important to have contact for there to be any dialogue at all," he said.
Stegner stressed that he did not go as a government representative, but a freely elected member of parliament. It was "based on private initiative and organized and financed informally," he said.
No sensitive security information or even secret information was exchanged, he said.
The deputy chairman of the parliament's intelligence oversight panel, conservative Roderich Kiesewetter, told reporters previously that Stegner "would have to face some questions" on the visit.
A senior politician from the liberal Free Democrats, Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, demanded that Stegner be should not be allowed to remain a member of the oversight panel.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Video shows British-made fighter missiles, modified in 3 months to launch from the ground, scoring Russian drone kills
Video shows British-made fighter missiles, modified in 3 months to launch from the ground, scoring Russian drone kills

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Video shows British-made fighter missiles, modified in 3 months to launch from the ground, scoring Russian drone kills

Ukraine's air force released footage on Wednesday of UK-made Raven air defenses striking Russian air targets in at least five instances. The video features a Ukrainian air defense crew discussing their experiences with the system, and their interviews are interspersed with clips of the missile soaring into the sky to destroy Russian drones. The Raven fires what was originally the British Advanced Short Range Air-to-Air Missile, also known as the AIM-132, which is mainly equipped on the Royal Air Force's Typhoon and F-35 Lightning II fighter aircraft. However, the UK's defense ministry said in 2022 that it had transformed the missile into a version for Ukraine that could fire from a British 6×6 HMT600 Supacat transport vehicle. At the time, it was touted as a key way for Ukraine to defend itself from Russian missile strikes. The Asraam is particularly useful because it's infrared-guided and locks onto its target once launched, even in poor weather. Ground crews can fire it and relocate quickly, and they don't need to maintain a line of sight with their target. UK defense officials said in 2023 that their teams took roughly four months to make the missile ground-launched and to train Ukrainian crews to use the Raven. However, in an official video published in May, Col. Olly Todd of the UK's task force supporting Ukraine said the Raven "went from concept to delivery" within three months. "They've conducted over 400 engagements, which understand with a success rate of over 70%," Todd said. The Supacats are fitted with missile mounts taken from decommissioned UK jets, such as the BAE Hawk, SEPECAT Jaguar, and Panavia Tornado. These are classes of fighter aircraft that were retired from combat over the last two decades. Crews inside use a gamepad controller to identify targets on a screen and activate the missile's infrared lock-on system. With drones saturating the skies over Ukraine, Raven crews said in the Wednesday video that they've largely been targeting uncrewed systems, plastering their Supacat with stickers of Russian Orlan, Shahed, and Zala drones to mark every kill they scored. The Raven's launch controls feature four switches that prepare each mounted missile and a large red button for firing. A Ukrainian Raven operator speaking to the camera said crews are generally trained so all members, including the driver and commander, can replace each other if needed. According to a June statement by the UK's defense ministry, Ukraine has been supplied with eight Raven systems and is due to receive another five. The UK says that the Asraam missiles supplied to Ukraine were sitting in its inventory but were due to expire, meaning they'd have soon been marked for disposal if not sent to Kyiv. Ukraine deploys other air defense systems similar to the Raven because they combine a hybrid mix of munitions and launchers originally built for separate systems. Known colloquially as " FrankenSAMs," they include modified Soviet-era Buk M1s that can fire the American RIM-7 Sea Sparrow missile, as well as Soviet radars that pair with the AIM-9M Sidewinder air-to-air missile.

CIA review of 2016 Russia election probe finds no major flaws
CIA review of 2016 Russia election probe finds no major flaws

Politico

time6 hours ago

  • Politico

CIA review of 2016 Russia election probe finds no major flaws

'The issues that are highlighted in this report are also extremely normal,' said Harding, now director of the Intelligence, National Security and Technology program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'It's a luxury when an analyst does not have a compressed time frame.' While such reviews are not uncommon, it is rare for them to be released to the public. 'The only reason why you would be putting this out into the public domain is for political reasons,' said a former CIA analyst who was granted anonymity to speak candidly about the intelligence process. A review of the 2017 assessment was not conducted until today because 'it was too politically sensitive,' the CIA review read. After the review was released, Ratcliffe posted on X a characterization of the report that appeared to deviate from its findings. 'All the world can now see the truth: Brennan, Clapper and Comey manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals — all to get Trump,' he wrote in one post. In a second, he said that the 2016 assessment was produced in a process that was 'atypical & corrupt.' Investigations into the Kremlin's efforts to sway the 2016 presidential election and the Trump campaign's contacts with Russian officials dominated much of the president's first term in office. A special counsel's investigation led by former FBI Director Robert Mueller found no evidence that the Trump campaign sought to collude with that effort. Trump and his allies have long raged against the investigations, dismissing them as politically motivated witch hunts. The president has regularly lashed out at the outspoken former CIA Director John Brennan, who led the agency as it probed Moscow's interference efforts, revoking his security clearance in 2018 in an apparent act of revenge. Brennan did not respond to a request for comment for this story. A major flashpoint for Trump and other critics of the report was the inclusion of the Steele dossier in the annex of the 2016 intelligence community assessment — an unsubstantiated and now largely debunked report that suggested Trump had extensive entanglements with the Russians. In an extensive review of the 2016 assessment, conducted as part of its wide-ranging Russia investigation, the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2020 found no 'significant analytic tradecraft issues' with U.S. spy agencies' work. The oversight panel, which was headed at the time by Republican Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC.), also dedicated 'additional attention' to the assessment that Putin 'aspired' to help Trump. The CIA and FBI had 'high confidence' Putin aspired to help Trump, while the NSA only had 'moderate' confidence in that conclusion. The public version of the assessment released in 2017 referenced all of those judgements. The Senate panel, for its part, concluded the agencies' disagreement was 'reasonable, transparent, and openly debated.' The fourth volume of their review, which spanned more than 150 pages alone, further stated that all witnesses interviewed by the committee saw 'no attempts or pressure to politicize the findings.'

Trump allies caught off guard by Pentagon's Ukraine weapons freeze
Trump allies caught off guard by Pentagon's Ukraine weapons freeze

Politico

time7 hours ago

  • Politico

Trump allies caught off guard by Pentagon's Ukraine weapons freeze

Two other U.S. officials said Pentagon leadership did not seek any input from the State Department, the U.S. embassy in Kyiv or Ukraine envoy Keith Kellogg's team before pulling back a shipment of critical arms that were already on the ground in Poland. Some in the Joint Staff were also opposed to the halt, both officials and a person familiar with the discussions said. Both the White House and the State Department pushed back on the notion that the munitions pause caught administration officials off guard. 'This is false,' said a White House official who was granted anonymity to talk about an ongoing review. 'The president and top officials expect the DOD to regularly review aid allocations to ensure they are in line with the America First agenda.' But the official wouldn't say exactly when the president and top aides were made aware of the decision to stop the weapons shipment, saying only that they knew 'prior to the story' POLITICO published on Tuesday. Colby did not immediately respond to a request for comment on his role in the decision. In a statement sent from a White House spokesperson Tuesday evening, Colby said that the Pentagon 'continues to provide the president with robust options to continue military aid to Ukraine' while 'rigorously examining and adapting its approach … while also preserving U.S. forces' readiness.' He said the original reporting was 'an attempt to portray division that does not exist.' During a Friday briefing on Ukraine for Congress, officials from the State Department and the Pentagon made no mention of the pause and are not answering official inquiries about it, a congressional aide said. The aide added that Ukraine has a 'critical need for continued replenishment of various arms given continued Russian assault,' particularly air defense like Patriot interceptors, long-range rockets and conventional shells, which have been stopped. Across the Atlantic, European diplomats and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's team were scrambling to find out why the U.S. had abruptly frozen aid once the White House confirmed the news. Neither Zelenskyy nor the European Union received advanced notice, according to a European official and a Ukrainian adviser. The U.S. and Ukraine are working to set up a call between Trump and Zelenskyy, two people familiar with the planning said. The idea was set in motion on Tuesday as word began filtering out that the U.S. had slammed the brakes on shipments of the weapons to Ukraine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store