Nifty IT index bleeds 18% YTD: Can H2 spark a turnaround in fortunes of IT stocks?
However, despite the gloomy backdrop, there is growing optimism about a turnaround in the second half of the year. Improved Q1 earnings, stable macro indicators, and renewed technology demand may pave the way for a gradual but selective recovery, believe analysts.
Market participants have begun to identify early signs of a turnaround in India's IT industry. Om Ghawalkar, Market Analyst at Share.Market, noted that India's top IT players — Infosys, TCS, Wipro, and HCL Tech — delivered encouraging results in Q1 FY26, signalling improving demand conditions and operational stability.
India's top IT services firms delivered single-digit revenue growth in April-June, capping off a mixed, somewhat-sobering quarter as macroeconomic instability and geopolitical tensions weighed on global tech demand and delayed client decision-making. Management commentary painted a mixed picture. While caution prevailed, industry CEOs emphasised cost optimisation, vendor consolidation, and opportunities in AI makeovers. An overview of Q1 report cards of Indian IT giants shows year-on-year revenue growth ranging from 0.8 per cent (for Wipro) to 8.1 per cent (HCL Technologies).
Nuvama Institutional Equities expects the demand environment to remain challenging for the next one-two quarters due to macro uncertainty. "However, we remain positive on medium-to-long-term outlook, as technology debt is very high for enterprises, which will warrant revival in spending as macro improves," Nuvama said in its report post-Infosys' results, that concluded the Q1 earnings season for Tier-1 IT services firms.
Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump on Wednesday declared a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, and announced an unspecified penalty for its close ties with Russia for defence and energy, ahead of the August 1 deadline. In a press statement, Trump referred to India as a 'friend' but argued that it imposes some of the highest tariffs on US goods and continues to enforce non-tariff barriers that are "unreasonable."
The IT sector, even though not directly impacted by the tariffs, as service exports to the US are not directly subject to levy, will be likely face an indirect impact, analysts opined. They believe that anticipated weakness in the US demand and broader macroeconomic headwinds could still weigh on business.
IT majors with substantial US revenues may underperform, but the declines are likely to be less pronounced than those seen in manufacturing exporters, said Mayank Jain, Market Analyst, Share.Market.
However, independent market analyst Sandip Sabharwal believes IT could emerge as a contra bet. "It is possible that in the near term, Indian IT companies which have been beaten down could become contrarian performers as the rupee decline directly adds to their profitability," Sabharwal said in a post on social media platform X. A weak Indian rupee bodes well for IT companies as they earn most of their revenue in US dollar, providing them with currency tailwinds.
Vishnu Kant Upadhyay, AVP - Research & Advisory at Master Capital Services, believes that while the IT sector continues to face short-term headwinds, it is on course for a meaningful rebound in the latter half of 2025. Growth in exports, employment, and innovation will be key drivers.
He advised investors with a medium to long-term horizon to start accumulating fundamentally strong IT stocks. India's cost competitiveness, a large skilled talent pool, and high R&D intensity should continue to underpin long-term growth.
However, Siddharth Tyagi, Research Analyst at INVasset PMS, said a broad-based recovery may be unlikely, but select IT players with operational resilience, diversified clientele, and digital strength could outperform. 'The worst of the margin pressures seems behind us,' he pointed out, noting normalising attrition, softening subcontracting costs, and potential currency tailwinds for exporters. He said investor focus will remain on guidance, large deal wins, and commentary around sectoral demand in upcoming results.
Trivesh D, COO of Tradejini stated that while GenAI adoption offers long-term promise, current valuations for large-cap IT names leave little room for near-term outperformance. 'This is a market for selective positioning. Investors need to closely track demand trends and be patient,' he advised.
Upadhyay of Master Capital Services said Infosys remains a steady performer and has the potential to benefit from the evolving tech landscape. Meanwhile, Siddharth Tyagi, Research Analyst at INVasset PMS, said Wipro offers the best risk-reward setup currently, with Infosys and HCL Tech looking attractive at lower levels. TCS remains fundamentally sound but may need a stronger demand catalyst to break out.
Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump thinks he's winning on trade, but America will lose
More than 100 days after President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day", the new global trading order is becoming clear. It is a system of imperial preference. Canada has angered the president, partly by planning to recognise Palestine as a state, and so it faces a duty of 35%. Because Mr Trump reckons that exporters unfairly cheat America, on July 31st he said he would impose 'reciprocal" tariffs on many trading partners, ranging from 10% to 41%. Meanwhile, in order to ward off tariff threats the European Union, Japan and South Korea have all struck deals with Mr Trump, where they promise to open their markets and invest hundreds of billions of dollars in America, in return for levies on their exports of 15%. A seductive idea is settling in that America is winning from all this. The president has, after all, got his biggest trading partners to make deals that are closer to his demands than theirs. Financial markets have shrugged off higher duties, the real economy shows little sign of damage and all the time tariff revenues are rolling in. But that thinking is deeply misguided. The game is not over. And it is one that America cannot win. For all the crowing about how Trump Always Chickens Out, the president has pressed forward with tariffs. America's effective tariff rate is due to rise to 18% on August 7th, according to the Yale Budget Lab, nearly eight times the prevailing rate last year, and back to levels last seen in the Depression. The way MAGA paints it, this is a triumph for Mr Trump, because America's trading partners are eating higher tariffs, helping US Customs rake in nigh on $30bn in revenues a month. Unfortunately, that idea is gaining currency even outside America. Soon after the EU struck its deal with Mr Trump, opponents in European capitals lamented the fact that the bloc would have to pay. This is a fundamental misunderstanding of trade economics. Years of experience show that tariffs do not harm the sellers of goods as much as they harm the buyers. The more the president raises tariffs, the more his own compatriots will be deprived of choice at low prices. Even though foreign suppliers are lowering their prices more steeply than after Mr Trump's first-term tariffs, analysts at Goldman Sachs reckon that fully four-fifths of tariff costs have so far been borne by American firms and consumers. Just ask Ford, or GM: the carmakers reckon they paid $800m and $1.1bn in tariff costs, respectively, in the second quarter of this year alone. What of the muted economic and financial market reaction so far? The IMF has raised its projections for both global and American economic growth this year, compared with forecasts it made in April. Although it has fallen since Mr Trump signed his order, the S&P 500 remains nearly 12% higher than it was on Liberation Day; the dollar, though down, has strengthened in recent weeks. The answer is that the economy is being buffeted by various forces, including heavy stockpiling before tariffs came into effect—delaying the pain, but not eliminating it—as well as an extraordinary boom in artificial-intelligence-based capital spending. According to Renaissance Macro Research, capital investments in AI have contributed more to America's gdp growth in the past two quarters than all of consumer spending. Partly propelled by this, stockmarkets have gone from strength to strength. Perhaps, too, investors believe that companies will adapt to higher tariffs. The incentive to route trade through places with relatively low duties will be strong—even though Mr Trump has vowed to punish such 'trans-shipment" with tariffs of 40%. An uncomfortable dynamic has also set in: because investors think that the president will eventually chicken out, they are emboldening him to press ahead. As he does so, however, the long-term costs to the economy will mount. In the name of fairness Mr Trump is discarding a multilateral system in which tariffs were charged on the same goods, regardless of where they came from. In its place is a bilateral system where products can face differential rates depending on their origin. These new rates are not just higher; they are subject to ceaseless bargaining over almost any issue. Just this week, those issues included the Brazilian courts' pursuit of a Trump ally and a border war between Thailand and Cambodia. Because tariff policy is set by one man alone, the bargaining will be subject to lobbying and presidential whim. Because of who he is, Mr Trump will consider exemptions when he is next flattered, and threaten duties when he is next displeased. American shoppers will pay the price. Once they were spoilt for choice, as both domestic and foreign producers competed to sell to them. Now the companies that succeed will do so not only because they are the most innovative, but also because they are the cleverest at playing the system. And remember that a ratchet effect is at work here. When—or rather, if—future presidents want to restore tariffs to their original level, they will be met by furious lobbying from American firms that got used to sheltering behind tariff barriers and have thereby become uncompetitive in world markets. Everything about this is harmful. And, whatever Mr Trump says, nothing about it is fair.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
This Week in Explainers: Can India do without Russian oil amid Trump threats?
US President Donald Trump has threatened India with a 'penalty' for buying Russian crude. As bilateral trade talks continue, America has imposed a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports. But what are India's options? All this and more in our weekly wrap read more India is staring at a 25 per cent tariff on its goods exported to the United States. Announcing higher rates for India than more than 50 other countries, President Donald Trump has also threatened New Delhi with a 'penalty' for buying Russian crude. The Indian government has confirmed that the three terrorists killed in Operation Mahadev were behind the Pahalgam terror attack. Hashim Musa, the reported mastermind of the April 22 massacre, was among those killed by Indian security forces in a joint operation this week. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Nisar, an Earth-observation satellite built by India and the US, was launched into space. The mission will study minute changes on the Earth's surface. Here's all this and more in our weekly wrap from India. 1. The US imposed 25 per cent tariffs on Indian imports from August 1. American President Trump has been railing against India's 'high tariffs' and the massive trade deficit between the two countries. Trump's high tariffs against India come even as New Delhi and Washington continue to negotiate a bilateral trade deal. As the taxes on Indian goods imported to the US come into effect, Americans will face the brunt immediately. India's GDP could also take a hit. We take a look at the impact in this report. 2. Trump has threatened a 'penalty' tariff on India for buying Russian crude oil. The US president has so far failed to achieve a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. India has maintained a neutral stance in the war and continued to buy discounted fuel from Moscow despite pressure from the West. Russia accounted for just 0.2 per cent of India's imports of crude oil before the Ukraine war began in February 2022. Today, India is among the top buyers of Russian oil. How did this shift happen? And can India do without Russian crude? Here's our report. 3. The week that the Parliament held a discussion on Operation Sindoor, reports came that three terrorists who carried out the Pahalgam attack had been killed. Home Minister Amit Shah told the Parliament that those killed were indeed the Pahalgam attackers and this was established with the aid of forensic and ballistic tests. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He also confirmed that all three terrorists were Pakistani citizens, who were killed in Operation Mahadev, a joint effort by the Indian Army, Jammu and Kashmir Police and Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF). The encounter between the security forces and the terrorists took place in the upper reaches of Dachigam Forest, which is in Srinagar's Harwan area. Read our report to know more. 4. Nisar, or Nasa-Isro Synthetic Aperture Radar, was launched into a 747 km sun-synchronous polar orbit this week. It lifted off from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre in Sriharikota, Andhra Pradesh, onboard Isro's GSLV Mk-II rocket. Weighing 2,392 kilos, Nisar was jointly developed by Isro and Nasa. It has two frequencies — Nasa's L-band and Isro's S-band, which will equip the mission to observe changes more accurately than any other satellite. Nisar will scan the globe every 12 days, providing detailed images of the Earth's surface. We take a look at what makes it special. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 5. A special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court announced its verdict in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, acquitting all seven accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit. The explosion near Bhikku Chowk in Maharashtra's Malegaon town had killed six people and injured 101 others. Pragya Singh Thakur has been acquitted in the Malegaon blast case. File Photo/PTI The Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) had arrested the accused nearly 17 years ago. However, all have been out on bail for years. The special NIA court has now acquitted all the accused. But why? Here's our detailed report. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 6. An elderly woman accused of the murder of her husband had recently gone viral after her video defending herself in a courtroom with the help of science surfaced. Mamta Pathak, 65, made headlines again this week after the Madhya Pradesh High Court upheld her life sentence for killing her husband by electrocution. Dr Neeraj Pathak was found dead at his Loknathpuram house in Madhya Pradesh's Chhatarpur in April 2021. But how did the police arrest his wife, a former chemistry professor? Why did she murder her husband? Here's our story. This is all we have for you this week. If you like how we analyse news, you can bookmark this page. PS. In a highly rare pregnancy, the foetus of a woman in Uttar Pradesh is growing in her liver instead of the uterus. Read this report to know more.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
Why India is a spoke in the Trump-Xi wheel
The emergence of India as a significant economic and military power is a complication in the G2 global power duopoly read more No one likes an impoverished former colony becoming the world's fourth-largest economy. At Independence in 1947, India had a minuscule GDP of Rs. 2.70 lakh crore. By the end of 2025, India's GDP is projected by the IMF to be Rs. 360 lakh crore ($4.19 trillion). This would make India not only the world's fourth-largest economy but also, at an annual growth rate of 6.5 per cent, the world's fastest-growing major economy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD All of these rankles in two global capitals: Washington and Beijing. US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are resigned to battling each other in a long, drawn-out Second Cold War. The emergence of India as a significant economic and military power is a complication in this G2 global power duopoly. Trump's punitive tariff rate of 25 per cent on Indian exports, along with an unspecified penalty for buying oil and military equipment from Russia, reflects Washington's angst. India's economy is still too small—one-fifth China's size and one-seventh America's—to be an immediate concern to either. But both know that, over the next decade, India will be the only country outside the G2 that can swing the balance of global power between the US-led West and the China-led East. India is therefore in the awkward position of being both an ally and a threat to the G2. The recent thaw in India's relations with China is aimed at lowering the bilateral temperature between Beijing and Delhi. China is meanwhile quietly pleased at the tension between the US and India over trade tariffs. Washington has pivoted away from India in Trump's second term. It wants to keep India in the Western camp but is annoyed at India's independent streak over foreign and trade policy. The tariff attack is meant to place pressure on India to toe its geopolitical line. Russia is a red flag. Legislation imposing 100 per cent secondary sanctions on India for buying Russian crude will come up before the House of Representatives when it reconvenes in September. But saner minds in Washington know that India can easily replace the 2.1 million barrels of oil it buys per day from Russia with crude from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and South America. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As India's Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri said, India bought just 0.1 per cent of its total crude from Russia before 2022. It can go back to near-zero again. The world is awash in oil as demand in China tapers amid its move towards green fuels. The US and China, as they contest global supremacy well into the 2030s, have both tried to weaken India's resolve. China infiltrated across the Line of Actual Control (LAC) on multiple occasions before opting for a more calibrated strategy after India exhibited military force. Significantly, Beijing did not block the UN Security Council's condemnation last week of Pakistani terror group TRF (an LeT offshoot). The UNSC, using strong language, said the TRF was responsible for the Pahalgam attack. Future world order? In his new book The Once and Future World Order, Amitav Acharya, distinguished professor of international relations at American University in Washington, DC, argues that the US-led Western world order was a continuation of older world orders—including civilisations in India and China. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Acharya says that as the West declines, the 'Rest' will form a multiplicity of global power blocs. That does not align with the US-China construct of a G2 world. While Washington and Beijing are discomfited by a rising India, some commentators in India downplay the decline of the West that Acharya accurately portrays and underplay the rise of the Rest. For example, C Raja Mohan, distinguished fellow at the Council of Defence and Strategic Research, wrote in The Indian Express on July 30: 'Acharya's critique of Western dominance is compelling, but not all aspects of the Western legacy can or should be discarded. The Enlightenment ideals of the 17th and 18th centuries—reason, scepticism, science, individual liberty, and secularisation of society away from religious dominance—are at the very foundation of Western primacy in the last three centuries." 'If the East wishes to lead in shaping the world order, it must engage these ideals critically and constructively. Any notion that the East can rise by short-circuiting these values is an illusion. It only delays and derails the effort to rise. The battles against political, religious, and other absolutisms remain to be fought and won in the East. Until then, a rising East will not present an alternative model—only a different and less attractive one. The profound internal contradictions within and across the East will continue to keep it well behind the West.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This is the sort of commentary Western institutions use to buttress their own thesis of Western supremacy in a Trump-led world. In Raja Mohan's article, the West is lauded for its 'reason, scepticism, individual liberty, and secularisation of society' without a word (beyond the solitary reference to 'exploitation') pointing out the other contributory factors for the West's rise: rapacious colonialism, the transatlantic slave trade, and extra-territorial invasions. All occurred after the Age of Enlightenment. Acharya's conclusions of a 'multiplex' global order might be an old idea wrapped in a new cover, but it stays honest to the history of the West and the Rest. The rise of China, for example, is inevitable. So is India's over a longer period. The two Asian powers may meanwhile reach a modus vivendi over the next few critical years. By 2035, the combined GDP of China ($30 trillion) and India ($8 trillion) will equal the estimated US GDP at the time ($38 trillion). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The G2 could then morph into a G2+1 before becoming a full-fledged G3. It is not a prospect either Washington or Beijing relishes. The writer is an editor, author and publisher. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
