US trade organisations commend Trump's comments on sneaker and T-shirt production
A joint letter – signed by the American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA), Council of Fashion Designers of America (CFDA), Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America (FDRA), Sports & Fitness Industry Association (SFIA) and U.S. Fashion Industry Association (USFIA) – has said Trump was 'absolutely right' in stating that his tariffs on imports from other countries were not intended to help scale up the domestic footwear and apparel industry.
Speaking to reporters last week, Trump responded to a speech by treasury secretary Scott Bessent earlier in April, who said that the US does not need a 'booming textile industry'. Trump agreed with Bessent's comments, and noted that his tariff policy was instead aimed at promoting the domestic manufacturing of tanks and technology products.
'I'm not looking to make T-shirts, to be honest. I'm not looking to make socks. We can do that very well in other locations. We are looking to do chips and computers and lots of other things, and tanks and ships,' Trump told reporters in New Jersey. Call for reduction in tariff burden on apparel and footwear sector
While the letter addressed to Trump expresses gratitude for acknowledging 'real-world challenges' the fashion and textiles industries face, the organisations underlined that these sectors 'have operated under a substantial tariff burden — the highest of any sector', for decades.
The average tariff rate on consumer goods sits at just over 2 percent, contrasting the average apparel and footwear tariff rates, which exceed 14.5 and 12 percent, respectively. 'These costs ultimately fall on American families, limiting those families from participating in essential activities such as work, recreation, sports, and fitness, all activities that support mentally and physically healthier Americans and help boost the US economy,' the letter notes.
It continued: 'As much as our members would love to manufacture more footwear and apparel in the US, closer to our US consumers, it is simply not feasible to do so at scale right now due to significant supply chain, labor, and cost constraints. Tariff policy cannot overcome these obstacles, especially when it is imposing new costs on existing manufacturers in our industry.'
The organisations are thus calling on Trump to adopt a 'pragmatic framework that reduces the tariff burden on footwear and apparel, increases high-value jobs for US workers, and provides relief to hardworking American families'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
4 minutes ago
- Metro
Trump 'told his name appears multiple times' in Epstein files'
President Donald Trump was reportedly told by his administration that his name appears in the Jeffrey Epstein files multiple times. US Attorney General Pam Bondi informed Trump in a White House meeting in May that his name is in the Justice Department documents on the late sex offender, senior administration officials told The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday. Trump learned that the 'files contained what officials felt was unverified hearsay about many people, including Trump, who had socialized with Epstein in the past', according to the report. 'Many other high-profile figures were also named.' The meeting, which included Bondi's deputy Todd Blanche, happened weeks before the Justice Department and FBI announced that 'no incriminating 'client list'' existed and that they would not be releasing the files they previously promised to disclose. An administration official quickly shot down the report. 'This is nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media,' said White House spokesman Steven Cheung in an email. Bondi and Blanche on Wednesday stated that 'nothing in the files warranted further investigation or prosecution, and we have filed a motion in court to unseal the underlying grand jury transcripts'. 'As part of our routine briefing, we made the President aware of the findings,' they said. When asked last week if Bondi told him his name appears in the Epstein files, Trump told an ABC News reporter: 'No, no.' He claimed that the files were 'made up by' former FBI Director James Comey and the Obama and Biden administrations. The Journal report comes a week after the newspaper published a story alleging that Trump sent Epstein a letter for his 50th birthday in 2003 with text framed by the outline of a naked woman, at the request of the disgraced financier's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell. Trump has vehemently denied penning the letter and on Friday filed a defamation lawsuit against The Journal, the two reporters who wrote the story, and the publisher. More Trending On Wednesday, the House Oversight Committee also ordered Maxwell, a convicted sex offender, to testify before them on August 11. Maxwell is expected to provide her deposition at the Federal Correctional Institution in Tallahassee, where she is serving a 20-year sentence her role in conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse and exploit underage girls. 'While the department undertakes efforts to uncover and publicly disclose additional information related to your and Mr. Epstein's cases, it is imperative that Congress conduct oversight of the federal government's enforcement of sex trafficking laws generally and specifically its handling of the investigation and prosecution of you and Mr. Epstein,' states the cover letter of the subpoena to Maxwell. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Two women killed after rubber rings plunged down waterfall named MORE: Should we all be more boomer? Reader says boomers hold the most political sway MORE: Idaho killer locks gaze on victims' families as they face 'evil' in dock
Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump floats spectacular name change for AI after admitting he 'can't stand' current term
President Donald Trump attended an artificial intelligence summit on Wednesday, even as he revealed to the audience of eager tech moguls he was not a fan of the name. 'Around the globe, everyone is talking about artificial intelligence,' Trump said. 'Artificial. I can't stand it, I don't even like the name.' As the audience stared wordlessly at the president, he suggested they change the name. 'I don't like anything that's artificial so can we straighten that out please?' Trump asked. 'We should change the name.' As some in the audience laughed in response, Trump continued, 'I actually mean that.' 'I don't like the name artificial anything, because it's not artificial its genius. It's pure genius,' he said, indicating he would prefer the name 'genius intelligence' better than 'artificial intelligence.' President Trump spoke after the White House released it's AI Action Plan on Wednesday, which detailed the administration's efforts to boost the development and innovation of the technology. The document recommends that Trump streamline regulations and permitting to allow companies to build massive data centers and energy sources quickly to help accelerate the industry. It also recommends that the administration promote the export of American AI models abroad to help dominate the spread of the technology. The plan also stresses the administration's determination to enshrine the rights of free speech into artificial intelligence models, warning that the federal government would only contract with companies with AI models 'free from top-down idealogical bias.' During his speech, Trump announced he was getting rid of Biden's executive order which outlined a preference preference for companies who prioritized DEI programs and climate goals. 'We're getting rid of woke,' Trump said triumphantly, adding that, 'It's so uncool to be woke.' He said his goal was to root out 'partisan bias' or idealogical agendas from tech companies and artificial intelligence models such as 'critical race theory' which he described as 'ridiculous.' 'The American people do not want woke Marxist lunacy in the AI models and neither do other countries,' Trump said. 'From now on the US government will only work with AI that works with truth.' Trump acknowledged the dangers of artificial intelligence, but described the race with China and other countries on the technology as one the United States had to win. 'This technology brings the potential for bad as well as for good, for peril as well as for progress but the daunting power of AI is not going to be a reason for retreat from this new frontier,' The president signed two executive orders at the summit, joking he would not sign the executive order with an auto-pen, in a dig to his predecessor former President Joe Biden. 'Good luck because the race has just begun and we're going to win it,' he said to the tech executives as he exited the event.
The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump signs three executive orders targeting ‘woke' AI models
Donald Trump on Wednesday signed a trio of executive orders that he vowed would turn the United States into an 'AI export powerhouse', including a directive targeting what the White House described as 'woke' artificial intelligence models. The anti-woke order is part of the administration's broader anti-diversity campaign that has also targeted federal agencies, academic institutions and the military. 'The American people do not want woke Marxist lunacy in the AI models, and neither do other countries,' Trump said during remarks at an AI summit in Washington on Wednesday. Trump also signed orders aimed at expediting federal permitting for datacentre infrastructure and promoting the export of American AI models. The executive actions coincide with the Trump administration's release of a broader, 24-page 'AI action plan' that seeks to expand the use of AI in the federal government as well as position the US as the global leader in artificial intelligence. 'Winning this competition will be a test of our capacities unlike anything since the dawn of the space age,' Trump told an audience of AI industry leaders, adding: 'We need US technology companies to be all-in for America. We want you to put America first.' The metrics of what make an AI model politically biased are extremely contentious and open to interpretation, however, and therefore may allow the administration to use the order to target companies at its own discretion. The action plan, titled 'Winning the Race', is a long-promised document that was announced shortly after Trump took office and repealed a Biden administration order on AI that mandated some safeguards and standards on the technology. It outlines the White House's vision for governing artificial intelligence in the US, vowing to speed up the development of the fast-growing technology by removing 'red tape and onerous regulation'. During his remarks, Trump also proposed a more nominal change. 'I can't stand it,' he said, referring to the use of the word 'artificial'. 'I don't even like the name, you know? I don't like anything that's artificial. So could we straighten that out, please? We should change the name. I actually mean that.' 'It's not artificial. It's genius,' he added. A second order Trump signed on Wednesday calls for deregulating AI development, increasing the building of datacentres and removing environmental protections that could hamper their construction. Datacentres that house the servers for AI models require immense amounts of water and energy to function, as well as produce greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental groups have warned about harmful increases to air and noise pollution as tech companies build more facilities, while a number of local communities have pushed back against their construction. In addition to easing permitting laws and emphasizing the need for more energy infrastructure, both measures that tech companies have lobbied for, Trump's order also frames the AI race as a contest for geopolitical dominance. China has invested billions into the manufacturing of AI chips and datacentres to become a competitor in the industry, while Chinese companies such as Deepseek have released AI models that rival Silicon Valley's output. While Trump's plan seeks to address fears of China as an AI superpower, the Trump administration's move against 'woke' AI echoes longstanding conservative grievances against tech companies, which Republicans have accused of possessing liberal biases and suppressing rightwing ideology. As generative AI has become more prominent in recent years, that criticism has shifted from concerns over internet search results or anti-misinformation policies into anger against AI chatbots and image generators. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion One of the biggest critics of perceived liberal bias in AI is Elon Musk, who has vowed to make his xAI company and its Grok chatbot 'anti-woke'. Although Musk and Donald Trump are still locked in a feud after their public falling out last month, Musk may stand to benefit from Trump's order given his emphasis on controlling AI's political outputs. Musk has consistently criticized AI models, including his own, for failing to generate what he sees as sufficiently conservative views. He has claimed that xAI has reworked Grok to eliminate liberal bias, and the chatbot has occasionally posted white supremacist and antisemitic content. In May, Grok affirmed white supremacist conspiracies that a 'white genocide' was taking place in South Africa and said it was 'instructed by my creators' to do so. Earlier this month, Grok also posted pro-Nazi ideology and rape fantasies while identifying itself as 'MechaHitler' until the company was forced to intervene. Despite Grok's promotion of Nazism, xAI was among several AI companies that the Department of Defense awarded with up to $200m contracts this month to develop tools for the government. OpenAI, Anthropic and Google, all of which have their own proprietary AI models, were the other recipients. Conservatives have singled out incidents such as Google's Gemini image generator inaccurately producing racially diverse depictions of historical figures such as German second world war soldiers as proof of liberal bias. AI experts have meanwhile long warned about problems of racial and gender bias in the creation of artificial intelligence models, which are trained on content such as social media posts, news articles and other forms of media that may contain stereotypes or discriminatory material that gets incorporated into these tools. Researchers have found that these biases have persisted despite advancements in AI, with models often replicating existing social prejudices in their outputs. Conflict over biases in AI have also led to turmoil in the industry. In 2020, the co-lead of Google's 'ethical AI' team Timnit Gebru said she was fired after she expressed concerns of biases being built into the company's AI models and a broader lack of diversity efforts at the company. Google said she resigned.
