‘Cartelisation': CCP imposes Rs155 million fine on poultry hatcheries
'The CCP took suo motu notice of cartelisation in the Day-Old Chick (DOC) market and initiated a comprehensive inquiry. The inquiry found that major hatcheries — including Sadiq Poultry, Hi-Tech Group, Islamabad Group, Olympia Group, Jadeed Group, Supreme Farms (Seasons Group), Big Bird Group, and Sabir's Group — engaged in coordinated price-fixing, in violation of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2010,' CCP statement read.
According to the CCP, the hatcheries formed a cartel and discussed prices in a WhatsApp group called 'Chick Rate Announcement,' administered by a senior official of Big Bird Group.
'Dr Shahid, Marketing Manager Big Bird Group, coordinated the daily price updates. He sent the next day's prices every day through phone texts or WhatsApp messages to the group members.
CCP slaps Rs25m fine on Hyundai for misleading Tucson launch offer
'Dr Abdul Karim, Chairman Hatchery Affairs Committee of the Pakistan Poultry Association (PPA), and Major (R) Syed Javaid Hussain Bukhari, Secretary General of PPA, were also part of the group.
'Group members actively discussed and shared next-day prices for approximately 198 times, in the years 2019 to 2021. The Price-Sensitive Information was exchanged 108 times via text messages and 87 times through WhatsApp,' the commission said.
The CCP further said that senior officials of the Poultry Association present in the group never stopped the sharing of price information, thereby facilitating the collusion.
'The cartel regularly announced uniform DOC rates for Punjab, and with minor freight adjustments, also influenced rates in Multan and Karachi.
'Between March 2020 and April 2021, the price of DOCs rose by 346%, from Rs17.92 to Rs79.92 per chick, contributing heavily to broiler meat price inflation.'
'Cartelisation': CCP issues show cause notices to International Steel & Aisha Steel Mills
According to the CCP, the Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2010 prohibits collusive arrangements to fix prices, control supply, or restrict production.
'Such practices damage competition in the market. Trade associations are meant to help develop their sectors, not to share price-sensitive information or facilitate cartelisation. Price-fixing through associations is a serious market distortion and an exploitation of consumers. Prices must be determined by free demand and supply forces.'
The CCP also noted fresh complaints that hatcheries are again engaging in collusion. Prices of day-old chicks have recently surged up to Rs230 per chick, while the fair market rate should be around Rs78 per chick.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
CCP raids premises of 2 leading fan manufacturers, their association in Gujrat
ISLAMABAD: The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has conducted search and inspection of the premises of two leading electric fan manufacturers and their industry association in Gujrat, amid strong suspicions of cartelization and price fixing. The enforcement action was carried out as part of an ongoing investigation into potential violations of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2010, which strictly prohibits agreements or practices that have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or reducing competition. Acting under Section 34 of the Act, three CCP teams comprising duly authorized officers entered and searched the business premises of the undertakings. The teams secured documents, pricing records, and digital evidence relevant to the enquiry. The Enquiry Committee examined three years of pricing data and obtained circulars issued by the industry association to its member undertakings. These circulars contained coordinated announcements of price increases for different fan variants. Moreover, price lists collected from various brands revealed strikingly similar pricing patterns, including: Multiple manufacturers revising prices on identical dates. Price differences between standard ceiling fan models being as low as 0.05%. In several cases, competing brands charging and revising exactly the same prices for certain variants. These consistent and uniform pricing practices raise strong concerns of collusion and a prima facie violation of Section 4 of the Competition Act. The fan industry holds significant importance in Pakistan's economy, and CCP remains vigilant in monitoring the sector to ensure that consumers are protected from artificially inflated prices and anti-competitive conduct. The CCP is mandated under the Competition Act, 2010 to promote free competition across all sectors of the economy, enhance efficiency, and safeguard consumer interests against practices such as price fixing, collusion, and abuse of market power. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
CCP raids fan makers, industry body over suspected price fixing
The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has raided the premises of two leading electric fan manufacturers and their industry association in Gujrat over suspected cartelization and price fixing practices, according to a statement. The enforcement action, conducted under Section 34 of the Competition Act, 2010, is part of an ongoing investigation into possible violations of Section 4 of the Act, which prohibits agreements or arrangements that restrict competition. According to the CCP, three teams of authorised officers searched business premises and seized documents, pricing records, and digital evidence deemed relevant to the inquiry. The Commission's Enquiry Committee reviewed three years of pricing data and obtained circulars issued by the industry association to its member companies. These circulars, it said, contained coordinated price hike announcements for various fan models. Beating the heat, cutting the cost: How inverter fans have taken over the market Price lists collected from multiple manufacturers revealed unusually similar pricing patterns, raising concerns of possible collusion. In several instances, competing brands revised their prices on the same dates, while the price difference between standard ceiling fan models was as little as 0.05 percent. In some cases, rival companies were found charging and revising identical prices for specific fan variants. 'These practices raise serious concerns of collusive behaviour and a prima facie violation of Section 4,' the CCP noted. The Commission emphasized that the electric fan industry plays a significant role in the national economy, and any attempts to artificially inflate prices or undermine competition will be addressed firmly. CCP is mandated under the Competition Act to ensure free competition across sectors, enhance economic efficiency, and protect consumers from anti-competitive practices such as price fixing, collusion, and abuse of dominance.
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
Sindh Ombudsman finds KE CEO guilty of harassment, orders removal
Listen to article The Sindh Provincial Ombudsman has ordered the immediate removal of K-Electric's Chief Executive Officer, Moonis Alvi, and imposed a fine of Rs2.5 million after finding him guilty of workplace harassment. The order came in response to a complaint filed by Mahreen Aziz Khan, a former consultant and the company's first female CxO since its corporate restructuring began in 2009. The complaint, lodged in November 2020 under the Protection Against Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act, 2010, accused Alvi of harassment and creating a hostile environment. In his verdict, Justice (retd) Shahnawaz Tariq, who presided over the case, stated that Alvi had committed harassment and caused psychological distress to Khan and her team. Also Read: Pakistan launches new remote sensing satellite from China 'Accused No.1 Moonis Abdullah Alvi has committed harassment, created hostile environment and caused mental agony at the workplace to the complainant Mahreen Aziz Khan and her team,' the ruling said, citing Section 2(h) of the Act. The Ombudsman ordered Alvi's removal from service under Section 4(ii)(d) of the Act and directed him to pay the fine within one month. In case of non-compliance, the verdict allows for the seizure of his movable and immovable assets, and the blocking of his national identity card and passport. Three other individuals — Rizwan Dallal (Chief People Officer), Col (R) Wahid Asghar (Chief of Security), and Khalid Rafi (Board Member, HR Committee) — were also named in the original complaint but were discharged due to lack of evidence. 'In the absence of direct evidence, the allegations against the three co-accused could not be substantiated,' the ruling said. In a statement shared on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), Alvi expressed disappointment with the ruling. I have always upheld the values of integrity and dignity in professional interactions, and I deeply believe in fostering safe and inclusive workplaces for all. The recent verdict is deeply distressing to me. While I respect the legal process and the institutions that (1/4) — Moonis Alvi (@alvimoonis) July 31, 2025 'I have always maintained professionalism and integrity in all workplace relationships,' he said. 'The recent verdict is extremely distressing. I respect the legal system, though the outcome does not reflect the reality of my experience.' Alvi added that he is reviewing the decision with legal advisors and intends to appeal.
