Sacco seeks to join legal fight over Lackawanna County commissioner vacancy
Sacco, represented by attorney Paul Walker, filed Thursday in Lackawanna County a petition to be allowed to intervene in the case. A judge has not yet ruled on whether to allow Sacco to enter the case.
If allowed to become a party in the pending litigation started by Commissioner Bill Gaughan and the county over the vacancy, Sacco also will file a motion for a 'protective order' against what she sees as Gaughan and the county orchestrating 'false news stories' about her actions as former director of the county Department of Economic Development.
County Commissioner Bill Gaughan rebuts comments made by Commissioner Chris Chermak following the public comment portion of the Lackawanna County commissioners meeting at the Lackawanna County Government Center in Scranton on Wednesday, March 19, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
Sacco's petition is the latest development in the now-paused process of replacing former Democratic Commissioner Matt McGloin and the political war it has ignited. Gaughan and the county challenge the Home Rule Charter process that had the Lackawanna County Democratic Committee picking three candidates to forward to county judges, who then would select one of the three.
County Commissioner Matt McGloin speaks during the Lackawanna County Commissioner reorganization meeting at The Government Center in Scranton.
The Gaughan/county challenge claims the charter is trumped by Pennsylvania Rule of Judicial Administration 1908 of 2019, that says the county court — not a political party — shall receive applications from any interested candidates for the position. Following Rule 1908 would effectively remove the Lackawanna County Democratic Committee from the process of filling McGloin's seat for the nearly three years remaining on his unexpired term.
Meanwhile, Republican Commissioner Chris Chermak opposes the county's participation in the litigation and also has filed in court a legal action called a praecipe to remove the county as a party to the case.
Now, Sacco wants in on the litigation, claiming her interests are not adequately addressed by either Gaughan/the county or Chermak because neither of them 'can fully assert her unique stake as the highest-scoring nominee facing personal reputational attacks, necessitating her direct participation' in the case, her petition argues. If allowed to enter the case directly, she would back the Home Rule Charter/county Democratic committee process that made her the top finalist, and also would file a separate motion for a protective order against Gaughan/the county 'from orchestrating false news stories about (her) in the local press.'
Sacco says she is proud of her record and 'unafraid of legitimate scrutiny,' but Gaughan and his 'agents have gone beyond what is reasonably expected, orchestrating a smear campaign' to sink her nomination. Furthermore, documents obtained by journalists were 'routine grant applications' processed by Sacco when she was county economic development director and were 'improperly handed to the press with an accompanying false narrative that the documents somehow evidence unethical conduct or insider dealing' by her, according to her petition.
In response to such claims in Sacco's petition, Lackawanna County Solicitor Don Frederickson issued a statement Friday saying: 'To the extent that Lackawanna County is being accused of 'leaking' information to the press, this accusation is completely false and not based in reality. Any information which the county has provided to the press is public information which any citizen and taxpayer is entitled to receive. At no time was any confidential or privileged information relating to any employee or former employee disseminated by the county government.'
Court scheduling for filing of briefs and hearing arguments will extend the case to April 22. If she is not allowed to intervene, 'this case will be alive in the press for three more weeks,' during which her reputation and character could be further impugned by reporting about her county-employment actions and current job working for the State Workers Insurance Fund, according to her petition.
Sacco's petition also claims:
• The Gaughan/county petition for Rule 1908 is 'frivolous' and affects her 'legally enforceable interest … to pursue the appointment that she rightfully and humbly seeks;' and it's 'a pretext to delay' her appointment in order to 'conduct a negative public relations campaign against (her).'
• The Home Rule Charter process has been followed many times over the years, including most recently regarding Edward Staback filling a Democratic vacancy and Bruce Smallacombe filling a Republican vacancy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
3 minutes ago
- The Hill
Mamdani says he wouldn't use ‘globalize the intifada' term: Reports
New York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani said he wouldn't use the phrase 'globalize the intifada' and would discourage others from using it as he faces scrutiny over his unwillingness to fully denounce the expression, multiple outlets reported. Mamdani, a state Assembly member who pulled off an upset victory to win the Democratic primary for mayor, has received significant criticism over the past month for comments he made during an interview in which he avoided condemning the phrase that has been a lightning rod throughout much of the Israel-Hamas war. In June, he said the phrase can have different meanings to different people, and he hears from the phrase a 'desperate desire for equality and equal rights in standing up for Palestinian human rights.' He has also said he wouldn't use the term itself, and no instances have come to light of Mamdani using it. But three people familiar with Mamdani's comments in front of a group of business leaders on Tuesday told The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal that he said he wouldn't use it and doesn't believe others should use it either. The outlet reported that the meeting included 150 executives at a closed-door event hosted by the Partnership for New York, a group of members representing banks, law firms and corporations. The phrase has received widespread attention since Hamas's Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel that claimed 1,200 lives. Pro-Palestinian activists have maintained the phrase only refers to liberation for Palestinians to have the right to their own state and doesn't endorse calls for violence. Meanwhile, pro-Israel supporters and many Jews recall the first and second intifadas that took place in Israel in the 1980s and 2000s in which Palestinians engaged in protests against Israeli occupation. Some were peaceful while others weren't, and many people died on both sides. Mamdani told those in attendance on Tuesday that some see the term as expressing solidarity with Palestinians, but others view it as calling for violence against Israel, the Times reported. The Hill has reached out to Mamdani's campaign for comment. Mamdani's comments come as he tries to coalesce support as the Democratic nominee. He hasn't yet received endorsements from top New York Democrats like House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand. All of them have been critical of Mamdani's defense of the term and called for him to reassure Jewish New Yorkers that he will represent them too. Mamdani is taking part in a breakfast on Wednesday in Washington with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and is expected to meet with Jeffries this week. The Democratic nominee is facing a multi-candidate field in the general election, including former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, whom he defeated in the primary. Cuomo announced Monday that he is running as an independent, alongside Mayor Eric Adams who's also running as an independent, Republican Curtis Sliwa and independent Jim Walden.
Axios
3 minutes ago
- Axios
Mike Johnson signals break with Trump on Epstein
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Tuesday joined the chorus of Trump-friendly voices urging the administration to release files related to notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The big picture: President Trump has urged his rattled base not to "waste [t]ime" over the case, but the Justice Department and FBI's conclusion that Epstein died by suicide in 2019 and had no "client list" has driven a wedge within the MAGA world. "He's dead for a long time. He was never a big factor in terms of life. I don't understand what the interest or what the fascination is," Trump told reporters Tuesday when asked about his supporters' focus on the case, which he described as "pretty boring stuff." Democrats have swiftly seized on that rift, attempting to force their GOP colleagues to choose between the White House and its angry faithful. Republicans on Tuesday rejected a Democratic procedural maneuver aimed at forcing the DOJ to release Epstein-related documents, dismissing the effort as a partisan ploy. Driving the news: Despite his party rejecting Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna's (Calif.) measure, Johnson told conservative podcaster Benny Johnson he's "for transparency" in an episode released Tuesday afternoon. "It's a very delicate subject, but we should put everything out there and let the people decide it," he said. Johnson added that Attorney General Pam Bondi, who Trump has defended as she becomes a main target of MAGA rage, "needs to come forward and explain" the confusion she created by claiming in an interview that a list of Epstein's clients was sitting on her desk. What he's saying: "I'm anxious to get this behind us," Johnson added. Yes, but: Bondi on Tuesday said, "Today our memo speaks for itself, and we will get back to you about anything else." David Schoen, a former attorney for Epstein, said on NewsNation's "Cuomo" Tuesday that he doesn't believe a "client list" exists, noting, "That wasn't Jeffrey Epstein." Between the lines: Axios' Marc Caputo reports that the Trump administration is considering at least three ways to mitigate the backlash that's erupted over an issue of high importance to many in his base. But in the meantime, Democrats are turning up the volume on the Epstein mess and are promising future votes. Zoom out: Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), whose relationship with the president has long been contentious, announced Tuesday that he would launch an effort to use a long-shot procedural tool to bypass House leadership and force another vote on the matter. The discharge petition would require 218 lawmaker signatures. "We all deserve to know what's in the Epstein files, who's implicated, and how deep this corruption goes," Massie wrote on X. "Americans were promised justice and transparency." The resolution, cosponsored by Khanna, would require Bondi to "make publicly available in a searchable and downloadable format" materials in possession of the DOJ (including the FBI and U.S. Attorneys' Offices) connected to Epstein within 30 days of the measure's enactment. The bottom line: Even as Trump tries to quell the conversation about a man he described as "somebody that nobody cares about," the fallout is haunting the president's team, Axios' Marc Caputo reports. The divide is music to Democrats' ears — literally, in the case of Rep. Hank Johnson's (D-Ga.) musical plea to release the Epstein files — allowing them to lean into a "more is more" strategy of fighting back against Trump, per Axios' Andrew Solender. And even key Trump allies, like Johnson, don't seem to be harmonizing with the administration.
UPI
3 minutes ago
- UPI
Senate set for final vote on $9B DOGE cuts with necessary votes
Director of the Office of Management and Budget Russell Vought speaks to the press after attending the Senate Republican caucus luncheon at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday. He announced the Senate is ready to pass a bill that will codify DOGE cuts of $9 billion. Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo July 16 (UPI) -- The U.S. Senate has the votes to pass a bill that would codify congressionally approved appropriations cuts made by the Department of Government Efficiency. The bill would cut $9 billion in spending. Two Republican senators fought back on sticking points of AIDS funding and tribal-area public radio stations. The GOP resolved the issues to gain the votes. Three GOP senators voted against the bill: Susan Collins, R-Maine; Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska; and Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. The final number for both earlier votes was 51-50, with Vice President J.D. Vance casting the tie-breaking votes. The Senate will gather this morning to vote on amendments, then will have a final vote this afternoon. The bill will still have to pass the House of Representatives then move to President Donald Trump for final approval. The bill had originally planned to cut $9.4 million in spending, but Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., worked out a deal to redirect Interior Department funds to help about 28 radio stations in 14 states that broadcast to tribal lands. The stations are at risk because of $1.1 billion in cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. They provide vital emergency warnings to those areas. Several other GOP senators held out on the $400 million cut that they believed would hurt the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, created by President George W. Bush. A rescission package was created by Russell Vought, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, to stop cuts to the PEPFAR program. Murkowski said the rescissions package sets a precedent that undermines the authority of Congress. "We're lawmakers. We should be legislating. What we're getting now is a direction from the White House and being told, 'This is the priority. We want you to execute on it. We'll be back with you with another round,'" she said. "I don't accept that. I'm going to be voting no." Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., called the bill a "down payment" on reducing the size of the federal government. "What we're talking about here is one-tenth of 1% of all federal spending," he told reporters.
