Orleans Parish Sheriff to restart suspended re-election campaign
The announcement comes months after she suspended her run amid the Orleans Parish Prison escape of 10 inmates. Nine have since been recaptured and transferred to Angola Prison while Derrick Groves remains on the run.
Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry shares thoughts following FEMA Review Council meeting
Following the May 20 suspension, she said 'I cannot spend a moment putting politics over your needs. Now is the time to focus on security, accountability and public safety.'
Hutson is expected to make a formal announcement during a speech at Addis Nola at 5:30 p.m.
Also running for the position are:
Michelle Woodfork
Edwin Shorty Jr.
Earnest Lee Sr.
Julian ParkerStormy by day with Super BUCK Moon by night for Thursday
Judge Seeber bridge to fully close for repairs: DOTD
Walmart recalls about 850,000 water bottles after 2 people blinded
Three fall into water at Glacier National Park while taking photo: rangers
Iconic cereal maker WK Kellogg selling to Ferrero for $3B
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Florida woman drives 113 mph on SR-417 to pick up her dog, police say
The Brief A Florida woman was arrested for driving 113 mph on SR-417 in Orlando, telling police she was speeding to "pick up [her] dog." She was charged with dangerous excessive speeding and cited for unlawful speed. Her arrest comes as Florida enforces tougher penalties under a new "super speeder" law. ORLANDO, Fla. - A Florida woman was arrested Sunday after police clocked her driving 113 mph on State Road 417 in Orlando – over 40 mph over the road's posted speed limit. 'Was going to pick up my dog' What we know According to an Orlando Police Department arrest report, Yasiria Cachonatal, 32, told officers she was speeding because she was "going to pick up [her] dog." SIGN-UP FOR FOX 35'S BREAKING NEWS, DAILY NEWS NEWSLETTERS Police said Cachonatal was seen driving over 100 mph near Lake Nona Boulevard and did not slow down at any point. Officers eventually stopped her at a safe location along the road. She was arrested on a charge of dangerous excessive speeding and also received a citation for unlawful speed. Second arrest in Central Florida this week for excessive speeding Dig deeper The Florida Highway Patrol arrested 20-year-old Octavius Hunt on Sunday after clocking him at 155 mph on Interstate 4 in Seminole County — 95 miles over the posted speed limit. Hunt was driving a Dodge Challenger with three passengers when a trooper conducting radar enforcement spotted the car around 1 a.m. CLICK TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX LOCAL APP Hunt told troopers he believed he was only going about 80 mph as he drove to a friend's house. Troopers believe Hunt may have been trying to show off the car's capabilities. Fortunately, no one was injured. The backstory Florida recently enacted tougher laws against extreme speeding, targeting drivers exceeding 100 mph or going 50 mph or more over the posted limit. The "super speeder" law aims to curb a rise in high-speed crashes and fatalities across the state. Troopers say Hunt's case fits the very behavior the law was designed to penalize. Designed to reduce extreme speeding and prevent fatal crashes, the law now treats high-speed violations with stricter penalties — up to 30 days in jail and a $500 fine for first-time offenders. Second-time violators face up to 90 days in jail and a $1,000 fine. The Source This story about Yasiria Cachonatal's arrest was written based on information shared in an arrest report by the Orlando Police Department. Additional details regarding Octavius Hunt's arrest were provided by the Florida Highway Patrol. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
15-07-2025
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's Grok chatbot melts down – and then wins a military contract
Hello, and welcome to TechScape. This week, Elon Musk's X, formerly Twitter, saw its artificial intelligence chatbot Grok go Nazi. Then its CEO resigned. In the past three years of Musk's ownership of the social network, it feels like X has weathered at least one public crisis per week, more often multiple. Last week, Musk's artificial intelligence firm, xAI, saw its flagship chatbot Grok declare itself a super-Nazi, referring to itself as 'MechaHitler'. It made racist, sexist and antisemitic posts, which the company deleted. One example, via my colleague Josh Taylor: Grok referred to a person with a common Jewish surname as someone who was 'celebrating the tragic deaths of white kids' in the Texas floods as 'future fascists'. xAI apologized for the bot's 'horrific behavior'. Earlier in the week, Musk himself had handed down a mandate that Grok be less 'woke'. In spite of the meltdown, xAI announced on Monday that it had won a contact of up to $200m with the US Department of Defense along with other major AI developers. The deal is for developing and implementing artificial intelligence tools for the agency. This contract may be the most blatant example of Musk flexing his newfound connections in government that the public has seen yet. Despite Grok's flailing and incendiary output, xAI has been rewarded alongside firms that have demonstrated far superior control of their AI products. Other companies in the group of contract winners, which include Google, OpenAI and Anthropic, have demonstrated the viability of their chatbots and implemented robust guardrails against offensive output. All three firms make public commitments to safety testing. Grok, by contrast, has made headlines repeatedly for its controversial and offensive output, as in May when it ranted about 'white genocide' in May, echoing Musk's own talking points. Musk's most notable comments on his AI's safeguards have been that they are too restrictive. My colleague Nick Robins-Early points out that xAI is reaching for revenue and investment anywhere it can get it: The DoD's contract will give xAI a boost of revenue as it seeks to compete with more established AI developers like OpenAI, which is led by Musk's former associate turned rival, Sam Altman. Musk has been heavily promoting xAI and attempting to use other parts of his tech empire to support its future, including having SpaceX invest $2bn into the startup, allowing it to acquire X, formerly, Twitter, and announcing on Sunday that Tesla shareholders will vote on their own investment in xAI. The world's richest person seems to be growing desperate as a result of the turmoil roiling his kingdom. He has said he will form an independent political party. xAI is pursuing financial Jenga. Tesla's sales are plummeting; its wobbly Robotaxis are under investigation. SpaceX's giant rockets keep exploding after liftoff. Nick Robins-Early again: Musk has found himself embroiled in controversy outside of X in recent months. His political alliance with Donald Trump, which began during the 2024 campaign and resulted in Musk's appointment as a special government employee and the creation of the so-called 'department of government efficiency', imploded in June in full public view. The tech tycoon has committed to starting an independent political party. Meanwhile, Tesla, the source of the majority of Musk's wealth, has seen its sales fall precipitously in response to his political activities, with prospective buyers and current owners alike shying away from the controversial CEO. SpaceX, Musk's rocket company, has struggled with its latest rocket, the massive Starship, which has repeatedly exploded after liftoff. On Wednesday, X's CEO, Linda Yaccarino, announced she would step down from her role at the social network. It was the day after Grok went Nazi. My colleagues Johana Bhuiyan and Nick Robins-Early assessed Yaccarino's tenure: In two years, Yaccarino has had to contend with the unpredictability of Musk, ongoing content moderation and hate speech issues on the platform, increasingly strained relationships with advertisers and widespread backlash her boss received for his role in Donald Trump's administration. Her response in some cases was to remain silent; in others, she chose to defend the company. Through it all, however, experts say it was clear Yaccarino was the chief executive in title only. Rather than become a destination for mainstream talent, a streaming powerhouse or the 'everything app' that Yaccarino promoted, X has largely become a megaphone for Musk to air his grievances, boost and then feud with Trump, and promote his companies. Far-right influencers, porn spambots and meme accounts proliferate, while many media outlets have deprioritized the platform or left it altogether. Misinformation and extremism are rampant, sometimes coming from Musk himself. When Yaccarino was hired, the Guardian published a story headlined 'Linda Yaccarino: does Twitter's CEO have the most difficult job in tech?'. The article describes the obstacles facing Yaccarino at the start of her tenure, which she never overcame. Two years later, we can say with certainty that she did have the most impossible job in tech: reining in Musk. My colleague Kari Paul reported in 2023: Musk promised to bring in a new CEO – a position he himself described as a 'painful' job that anyone would be 'foolish' to take on. When Yaccarino was appointed as the company's first female CEO, there was much talk about her standing on a 'glass cliff' – a concept that has emerged through research positing that women are more likely to be promoted to higher positions when companies are in crisis and failure is more likely. Much of her success, analysts said, would depend on how much Musk was willing to share control. The chaotic nature of the X announcement for some has dashed the hope that Yaccarino can clean up Musk's mess. Twitter has been in a downward spiral since Musk took over, grappling with a $13bn debt burden and a massive exodus of advertisers – historically the company's main source of income. Twitter is looking for new revenue streams, and the 'everything app' could be a path to doing so. 'If she's successful, she goes down in the history books. And if not, she becomes a footnote,' said Jasmine Enberg, social media analyst at the market research firm Insider Intelligence. Sony WH-1000XM6 review: raising the bar for noise-cancelling headphones 'I was nervous to ask for your socials': why missed connection posts are making a comeback Nvidia becomes first company to reach $4tn in market value Amazon asks corporate workers to 'volunteer' help with grocery deliveries as Prime Day frenzy approaches An AI-generated band got 1m plays on Spotify. Now music insiders say listeners should be warned Musk's giant Tesla factory casts shadow on lives in a quiet corner of Germany Scientists reportedly hiding AI text prompts in academic papers to receive positive peer reviews 'I felt pure, unconditional love': the people who marry their AI chatbots Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15-07-2025
- Yahoo
ATO reveals $5.7 billion superannuation issue costing millions in retirement: 'Stamp out'
Australians are losing $5.7 billion in retirement savings each year due to employers not paying their superannuation entitlements correctly, new analysis of Australian Taxation Office (ATO) data has revealed. The huge losses have sparked calls for 'payday super' reforms to be passed when parliament returns this month. About 3.3 million Australians missed out on superannuation entitlements, averaging $1,730, in the 2022-2023 financial year, Super Members Council analysis of taxation data found. The amount of super going unpaid increased by $600 million from the previous year, with workers now losing $110 million each week. More than one million people were underpaid super in New South Wales at an average of $1,760, more than 848,000 in Victoria at an average of $1,670, and more than 679,000 in Queensland, missing out on an average $1,720. RELATED Aussie cafe owner's 'pressure' of impending $124,000 superannuation change NAB, ANZ slash interest rates as lenders move despite RBA cash rate hold: 'Not a coincidence' ATO tax return warning for 2 million Aussies over dangerous act Payday super reforms will mean employers are required to pay their employees' superannuation at the same time as their salary and wages. Under the current rules, it only has to be done quarterly. The reform, first announced in May 2023, is due to come into effect from July next year. However, it has not yet been legislated by the government. Super Members Council Deputy CEO Georgia Brumby said any delays to the law would mean less money in retirement for Australians, which means "less money to pay the bills after a lifetime of hard work". 'The sooner this legislation is introduced and passed, the more time and certainty it will give businesses and the super payment system to prepare — so all workers can get paid their super on time and in full,' she said. 'Payday super will not only stamp out unpaid super — it'll put nearly $8,000 more in the average Australian's pocket at retirement, thanks to more frequent payments and the power of compounding.'Leading accounting bodies have been calling on the government to delay the planned start date of the legislation. CPA Australia, CA ANZ and the Tax Institute said they all support the plan but have argued the July 1, 2026 date is 'unreasonable' and 'should be deferred for, ideally, 24 months, but at least 12 months'. They have argued the payment of super is more complex than wages and involves clearing houses, payment gateways and super funds. Employers will be given a seven-calendar-day deadline from the payment of wages to pay superannuation. If this is missed, they will be liable for an updated super guarantee charge which would include the shortfall, daily interest and an extra enforcement charge. In November, the ATO revealed its actions had led to $932 million in previously unpaid super reaching the retirement accounts of 797,000 employees in the past year. The ATO noted that more than 92 per cent of super entitlements were paid without the need for ATO intervention. Employees can check their super account via myGov to see what super payments have been paid into their funds. If you suspect your super hasn't been paid in full, on time and to the correct fund, the ATO recommends checking with your employer and your nominated super fund. You can report unpaid super to the ATO.
