One thing anti-corruption investigation into Brittany Higgins' $2.4m payout didn't reveal
This morning, the National Anti-Corruption Watchdog took out the trash.
What did the long-running corruption investigation into the Albanese Government's decision to award the payout find after years of demands that it investigate?
'There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official,'' the NACC found.
'There is therefore no corruption issue.'
In other words, claims that the Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus or the Albanese Government acted improperly were unfounded.
Of course, citizens remain free to question the size of the payout, or argue that Senator Linda Reynolds, who was not present at the mediation despite her requests to attend, should have been granted greater taxpayer-funded rights to legally dispute the claim.
As an aside, the Albanese Government did agree for taxpayers to pay for her lawyers to refer Brittany Higgins' payout to the NACC.
Senator Reynolds' legal team is also arguing in the Federal Court that she was forced to run a defamation action in WA against Ms Higgins because of the Commonwealth's conduct in relation to the payout.
But there was no evidence, according to the NACC, of corruption or improper behaviour in the decision to award Ms Higgins the compensation in 2022.
'Documents produced showed that decisions made in relation to the settlement were based on advice from independent external solicitors and experienced senior and junior counsel,'' the statement said.
'Initial advice was received during the period of the Liberal-National Coalition government, before the May 2022 election.
'There was no material difference in the updated legal advice later provided to the new Labor government. Nor was there any identifiable difference in approach to the matter before and after the change in government.
'There was no inappropriate intervention in the process by or on behalf of any minister. The then Attorney-General approved the settlement in accordance with the Departmental advice.'
Mediation in one day 'unexceptional'
According to the NACC, The Commonwealth engaged in mediation consistent with Departmental advice that was informed by legal advice,'' the statement says.
'That the mediation conference itself was concluded within a day is unexceptional,'' the NACC said.
'It was the culmination of a process which took approximately 12 months. None of this is unusual for a non-litigated personal injury claim.
'A critical consideration during the settlement process was avoiding ongoing trauma to Ms Higgins.'
Settlement amount
'The settlement amount was less than the maximum amount recommended by the external independent legal advice,'' the statement says.
'There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official.
'To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. There is therefore no corruption issue.'
What the NACC didn't say
And in the thousands of words written on this saga it's worth noting something the NACC did not mention when shooting down the conspiracy theories.
The Morrison Government engaged in the exact same process when it agreed to payout $600,000 to former cabinet minister Alan Tudge's former press secretary and ex-lover Rachelle Miller in 2022.
He wasn't interviewed. He was never asked about her claims as part of the final payout negotiations and he wasn't invited to the mediation.
And that's the point. These settlements are not a finding of fact. They are not about making admissions about what did or did not occur.
You can criticise the process by all means, but you can't say the Morrison Government didn't do the same.
They are not a workplace investigation - not that many of them are much better.
They are essentially 'go away' money that the government pays to people when it makes an informed decision that their claim could cost millions more if it is litigated.
Payment made on no admission basis
To understand the $2.4 million payout to Ms Higgins, it is important to understand a few things that are often forgotten in the thousands of words written on the matter.
First, the claim was not solely based on the alleged rape. She alleged the two Liberal Senators exacerbated a 'toxic and harmful' working environment, subjected her to 'victimisation, ostracism' and pressured her not to discuss the assault.
Her former employers, Linda Reynolds and Michaelia Cash, utterly reject those claims and do not concede for a moment they are true.
Nor does news.com.au assert they are true, only that they were made in a legal document subsequently published by the Federal Court.
Crucially, neither did the Albanese Government despite making the payment.
In making the settlement the government made 'no admissions'. It's hard to understand for the layperson, but the best way to describe it is 'go away' money.
It's probably not surprising however that many people would assume a pay out of such magnitude meant something had gone wrong or that the government was admitting they did something wrong.
In other words, the government's lawyers and insurers are making a judgment call about the likelihood of a successful case, how much damages would be paid and crucially how much the legals would cost.
Inevitably, in fighting a case like this, it could cost taxpayers millions more than the payout alone.
But the payout was never a finding of fact on those claims.
Brittany Higgins herself was rebuked by Justice Lee in the defamation case for not understanding this and what the deed actually said.
Linda Reynolds suing Brittany Higgins
It's abundantly clear however that Ms Higgins' former employer, Linda Reynolds remains aggrieved and affronted by the process.
She's now suing Ms Higgins for defamation over some social media posts in WA. The trial concluded in September but there's no judgment on that matter yet.
In a statement released today, Ms Reynolds said she was bitterly disappointed with the decision.
'My primary concern has always been how the Commonwealth could possibly settle unsubstantiated and statute barred claims made against me, alleging egregious conduct on my part without taking a single statement from me or speaking to me at all,' Senator Reynolds said.
'The effect of the conditions was that I had no personal legal representation at the mediation and no opportunity to defend the serious and baseless allegations against me.'
In her third day of witness testimony in her defamation case against Ms Higgins last year, she slammed Attorney General Mark Dreyfus over his handling of the former Liberal staffer's Commonwealth compensation claim.
She accused him of trying to 'freeze' her out of the settlement process and said Mr Dreyfus denied her a chance to address Ms Higgins' criticism of the Senator's conduct in the wake of the alleged Lehrmann rape.
'I was utterly outraged because this was going to be finally my opportunity to defend against these allegations … which in my mind were utterly defendable,' she told the court.
'To be told my defence would be no defence, as you can see here, I was not to attend the mediation and not to make public comments about the mediation or the civil claims against me … I was outraged.'
'I could see immediately what the Attorney-General was trying to do, which is why I referred it to the National Anti-Corruption Commission,' she said.
Ms Higgins's lawyer Rachael Young SC later told the court that Ms Higgins was 'the survivor of a serious crime which has affected every aspect of her life, including serious impacts on her mental health'.
In the WA Supreme Court, the barrister said Senator Reynolds had disputed the merit of Ms Higgins's $2.4 million Commonwealth compensation payment and leaked details of that settlement to a newspaper, despite being told it was confidential information.
'The senator engaged in a course of conduct to disrupt and undermine the credibility and reliability of her former employee,' Ms Young said.
'That's why we say it's harassment.'
That suggestion was fiercely denied by Ms Reynolds in the proceedings, with her legal team telling court she had kept her promise not to attack Ms Higgins at a great cost to her physical and mental health.
Ms Higgins received a $2.445m settlement in December 2022 – more than three years after she was allegedly raped by her then colleague, Bruce Lehrmann, in March 2019 in Linda Reynolds' ministerial suite.
Mr Lehrmann has always denied that there was any sexual contact, consensual or otherwise. Justice Michael Lee, on a civil basis in a defamation trial, disagreed.
Will the NACC finding and these other inconvenient facts prompt Ms Higgins pitchfork-waving critics to consider their conduct? No chance.
It will be time to shoot the messenger: the NACC.
For critics of Ms Higgins and the Albanese Government who noisily demanded this be investigated for years, it is however a case of be careful what you wish for.
The judgment is in and it's not pretty for those insisting that there was some vast conspiracy connected in the payout.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Australian
2 hours ago
- The Australian
Teen allegedly ordered hit that killed wrong target Luke Manassa
A 17-year-old has been accused of allegedly issuing the attack contract that led to the fatal stabbing of 21-year-old Luke Manassa in a tragic case of mistaken identity. Mr Manassa was allegedly stabbed after arriving with his girlfriend at a home in Driftway Dr, Pemulwuy, in Sydney's west, about 10.45pm on June 26. Despite being able to get back into his car and drive a short distance, he succumbed to his injuries and could not be revived. He died at the scene. NSW Police were told two people wearing disguises and dark clothing had attacked Mr Manassa. Luke Manassa was fatally stabbed at Pemulwuy on June 26 in a case of mistaken identity He was just 21 years old. Two boys, aged 16 and 17, were arrested in early July in Mount Druitt and South Penrith respectively and charged with Mr Manassa's murder. On Wednesday, detectives executed a search warrant in Blacktown and arrested another 17-year-old boy about 7am. He was taken to Blacktown Police Station, where he was charged with manslaughter and knowingly/recklessly direct criminal group assist crime. He was refused bail and appeared at a children's court on Wednesday. Police will allege in court the teen issued the contract to carry out the attack on another man, but Mr Manassa was targeted in a case of mistaken identity. Mr Manassa did not live at the Pemulwuy home but was known to visit the property. Police have previously said the owner of the Pemulwuy home was known to them. Luke Manassa's coffin in brought out of the Our Lady of Lebanon Co-cathedral at the close of his funeral service. Picture: NewsWire / John Appleyard Detective Superintendent Joseph Doueihi on July 4 said investigators were yet to confirm a clear motive, however mistaken identity was 'more than likely'. 'It perhaps (was) the wrong target … more than likely, this is a case of mistaken identity, but it's still early days before we can absolutely confirm that,' he said. Superintendent Doueihi described the attack as 'very amateurish' and said it lacked the evidence of planning typically seen in gang-related hits, including expensive getaway cars or firebombed vehicles. Mr Manassa's funeral in the week after his death was an emotional affair. His mother Theresa Manassa was photographed in tears, hugging close family and friends at the conclusion of a touching memorial attended by hundreds. Luke's mother Theresa at the close of the funeral. Picture: NewsWire / John Appleyard The end of the funeral was marked by the release of 21 white doves, commemorating Luke's 21 years, along with basketball balloons – a sport he loved. An emotional haka was led by Luke's Polynesian colleagues at Mann Group. Several police cars watched on nearby as hundreds gathered for the service. A guard of honour was formed leading to the church, made up of employees from the family business Mann Group – dressed in fluorescent orange construction shirts – and schoolchildren from nearby parishes. Police said investigations under Strike Force Hickety are ongoing. Robert White Cadet Robert got his start as an Editorial Assistant at the Daily Telegraph in 2024 before entering the Newscorp cadet program. With a background in history and law Robert has a passion for politics and crime reporting as well as telling meaningful stories. @white_robb73416 Robert White
The Australian
2 hours ago
- The Australian
Ex-Australian Army major Graeme Davidson faces court over wife's alleged drowning murder
A former Australian Army major charged with the murder of his wife after she drowned on a kayaking trip told police they were not wearing life jackets because they had been 'eaten by rats' at their old home, a court has been told. Jacqueline Davidson, 54, could not be revived after she drowned while kayaking with her husband Graeme Davidson on Lake Samsonvale, near Forgan Cove in Queensland's Moreton Bay region, on November 27, 2020. Following a protracted police investigation, Mr Davidson, 55, was arrested earlier this year while visiting from Thailand – where he now lives – and was charged with her murder. He is also facing charges of fraud and attempted fraud, which relate to allegations of trying to claim more than $1m in life insurance after his wife's death, including a sum which was not paid out. During a bail application at Brisbane Supreme Court on Thursday, defence barrister Craig Eberhardt KC said there was no evidence Jacqueline had been 'violently assaulted' in any way. While there were some minor bruises, these were consistent with CPR attempts and Mr Davidson's attempts to recover his wife's body, the court was told. Through an affidavit filed to the court, Mr Davidson described how he and his wife were '10m apart' on the water when he attempted to 'show off' by standing up on his kayak. 'Jacqueline became distressed about that and used the 'safe word' … designed to let him know that she was concerned about what he was doing,' Mr Eberhardt read from the court document. The court was told Mr Davidson saw his wife 'fall off the kayak' and he went into the water to find her – but could not see because the water was 'murky' and full of grass weeds. 'He managed to find her after some period of time, and he dragged her out,' Mr Eberhardt said. Mr Eberhardt said his client attempted to revive her and frantically yelled to get the attention of bystanders, one of whom called an ambulance. According to Mr Davidson's statement, the pair were not wearing life jackets because they had been 'eaten by rats' at their house in Bondi before they moved back to Queensland. 'There's evidence to that effect in a statement of (a woman) … she had been told prior to the death that the life jackets had been eaten by rats,' Mr Eberhardt said. After Mr Davidson's arrest, police said they would allege in court the relationship between the army major and his wife was breaking down. Mr Eberhardt told the court Ms Davidson had discovered her husband was having an affair with a woman in Papua New Guinea in 2019. He said the discovery caused significant matrimonial upset between the pair but Mr Davidson was 'committed' to staying in the relationship. There was no evidence of domestic violence between the pair. Addressing the allegations surrounding his client's life insurance claims, Mr Eberhardt said mutual policies were taken out by the Davidsons in favour of each other in mid-2020. 'There is no evidence the setting up of the insurance policies was the applicant's idea,' he said. Mr Davidson sought access to his wife's life insurance after her death but Mr Eberhardt said this was 'unremarkable' and would have been more suspicious if he had not accessed it. The court was told Mr Davidson was captured on CCTV burning 'a small number of documents' in the backyard of his home – done while one of his children was home – but this was 'not evidence of anything' as no-one knew what the documents contained. Mr Eberhardt said his client had also purchased a new car after Jacqueline's death, but submitted this had been done following discussions for some time. 'The gloss … put on this evidence simply isn't there, when you look at the actual statements,' Mr Eberhardt said. The bail application will resume on Friday. Blake Antrobus Court reporter Blake Antrobus covers Queensland courts and crime for NCA NewsWire. He began his career in journalism in 2015, migrating from Sydney's northern beaches to southwest Queensland. He has covered politics, crime, education and general news for newspapers across the state. Business Breaking News Collapsed Australian fashion label Tigerlily has emerged from a turbulent two-year period to make a dramatic retail comeback just in time for a milestone anniversary. Business Breaking News Property prices have defied interest rate pressures to reach a high, with regional areas outperforming capital cities across most markets.
The Australian
2 hours ago
- The Australian
ASIO chief exposes shocking cost of foreign spying on Australia
Foreign espionage is costing the Australian economy at least $12.5bn a year, with the ASIO boss warning against complacency against the 'real, present and costly danger'. The director-general of security Mike Burgess has for the first time publicly put a dollar figure on what foreign spies are costing Australia and espionage remains one of the country's principal security concerns. 'This is critical because I believe that we need to wake up to the cost of espionage – which is more than just financial,' he said in the annual Hawke Lecture at the University of Adelaide on Thursday night. 'We need to understand espionage is not some quaint, romantic fiction; it's a real, present and costly danger.' ASIO director-general Mike Burgess issued his warning delivering the annual Hawke Lecture at Adelaide University. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman Mr Burgess released a new report that ASIO developed with the Australian Institute of Criminology, to try to count the cost of espionage. The report found espionage cost the Australian economy at least $12.5bn in the 2023-2024 financial year, an estimate Mr Burgess called 'conservative'. 'This includes the direct costs of known espionage incidents, such as the state-sponsored theft of intellectual property, as well as the indirect costs of countering and responding,' he said. 'As just one example, the Institute estimates foreign cyber spies stole nearly $2bn of trade secrets and intellectual property from Australian companies and businesses in 2023-24. 'The report includes a case study where spies hacked into the computer network of a major Australian exporter, making off with commercially sensitive information. 'The theft gave the foreign country a significant advantage in subsequent contract negotiations, costing Australia hundreds of millions of dollars.' Mr Burgess said too many were complacent about the cost of espionage and urged 'all parts of our system – public and private, federal, state and local – to recognise the threat'. 'I've lost count of the number of times senior officials and executives have privately downplayed the impacts of espionage,' he said. 'I've watched corporate leaders literally shrug their shoulders when told their networks are compromised. 'I've heard sensible security measures such as taking burner phones to high-risk countries described as unreasonable inconveniences. 'Most recently, a trade official told ASIO there's no way the Chinese intelligence services would have any interest in his organisation's people and premises in China.' Russia, led by President Vladimir Putin, was singled out by ASIO boss Mike Burgess. Picture: NewsWire / POOL / AFP / Mikhail Metzel He again listed China, Russia and Iran as three of the main nations behind espionage in Australia and said Russia remained 'a persistent and aggressive espionage threat'. 'Last year, two Russian-born Australian citizens were arrested and charged with an espionage-related offence,' Mr Burgess said. 'Separately, I can confirm in 2022 a number of undeclared Russian intelligence officers were removed from this country. 'But Russia is by no means the only country we have to deal with. 'You would be genuinely shocked by the number and names of countries trying to steal our secrets. 'The obvious candidates are very active … but many other countries are also targeting anyone and anything that could give them a strategic or tactical advantage, including sensitive but unclassified information.' Mr Burgess revealed ASIO had disrupted 24 'major espionage and foreign interference' operations in the past three years alone. 'Nation states are spying at unprecedented levels, with unprecedented sophistication,' he said. 'ASIO is seeing more Australians targeted – more aggressively – than ever before.' While AUKUS and military technology secrets were targets, Australia's intellectual property and cutting edge research was also in the sights of foreign agents. ASIO director-general Mike Burgess said spies were targeting Australia's cutting edge research and technology as well as defence secrets. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman He said an overseas delegation visiting a 'sensitive Australian horticultural facility' snapped branches off a 'rare and valuable variety of fruit tree' in order to steal them. 'Almost certainly, the stolen plant material allowed scientists in the other country to reverse engineer and replicate two decades of Australian research and development,' he said. He said foreign intelligence services are 'proactive, creative and opportunistic' in their targets. 'In recent years, for example, defence employees travelling overseas have been subjected to covert room searches, been approached at conferences by spies in disguise and given gifts containing surveillance devices. 'Defence is alert to these threats and works closely with ASIO to counter them.'
