
Inheritance tax net catches thousands more families in a year: Here's how you CAN cut your bill
Some 31,500 families paid the much-hated death duties on a loved one's estate in 2022-23, according to the most recent tax office data available. That's compared to 27,800 the previous tax year.
A total £6.7billion was handed over to the taxman in 2022-23 - up 12 per cent on the previous year. Almost half of the estates handing over money to the Exchequer were in London and the South East.
The lowest number of taxpaying estates were in the North East, Northern Ireland and Wales, mainly due to lower house prices.
Britain's most-hated tax is already rich pickings for the Chancellor, but experts warn these latest figures – which are from the 2022-23 tax year because of the time it takes to settle an IHT liability – are just the 'tip of the iceberg'.
A combination of frozen tax thresholds and soaring asset values has already dragged thousands more families into paying death duties.
The tax is levied at a 40 per cent rate on an estate over a £325,000 threshold.
Those who leave their property to direct descendants have an extra £175,00 tax-free allowance, meaning £500,000 is exempt.
But the £325,000 threshold - known as the nil-rate band – has been frozen since 2009 which has pulled middle-income families into the tax net as their asset and property values soar in a phenomenon known as fiscal drag.
Fewer than one in 20 UK deaths resulted in an IHT charge but this is set to soar to one in ten by the end of the decade as the Treasury's net widens.
This latest data reveals a growing squeeze on grieving middle-class families – and that's before the sweeping IHT changes announced at last year's Budget come into place.
Droves of estates are anticipated to fall into the tax net in the coming years, says Ben Handley, a tax partner at accountancy firm BDO, as 'seismic changes to the regime' come into force from 2026.
'From next April, the capping of business and agricultural relief to £1million of qualifying assets will bring many business and farm owners into scope for IHT for the first time.'
And the increased burden doesn't stop there.
Not only are the thresholds frozen for an extra two years – until April 2030 – swathes of bereaved families will be pulled into the net from 2027 as unspent defined contribution pension pots will be included in an estate.
It's a move that has upended many people's retirement planning and will slash the legacy families will be able to pass on free of the much-hated duty.
Mr Handley says: 'These changes will impact around 8 per cent of estates – and add significant administrative burdens to families at a difficult time.'
The most recent data on tax receipts reveals the Exchequer has already raked £2.22billion into its coffers between April and June this year – a 6 per cent hike on last year. Annual IHT receipts are forecast to soar to £14.3 billion in 2029-30.
Ian Dyall, head of estate planning at wealth manager Evelyn Partners, explains the bulk of money handed over to the tax office is currently made by a small number of very large estates.
'Families with that level of wealth tend not to garner much sympathy but the Treasury cannot sustainably prop up the public finances by taxing the wealthiest 1 or 2 per cent forever without consequence.
'The danger with seeking further taxation of wealth at the next Budget – whether that is via capital gains tax, inheritance tax or some other mechanism – is that such households, which are often wealth and business creators in themselves and quite mobile, could get fed up and leave the country.'
How to slash your inheritance tax bill
There are ways you can hand over a legacy to children and grandchildren while keeping your hard-earned cash out of the Chancellor's clutches.
If you leave your property to a direct descendant – such as children or grandchildren – you get an extra tax-free allowance of up to £175,000. That means an easy way to prevent a huge tax bill after death is to give your home to your children.
Between a couple, that means you can pass on a £1million family home free of the death duties.
If you want to pass on any cash or material gifts, make them earlier instead of later.
This is because gifts that you give away during your lifetime are free from IHT so long as you survive for seven years after giving them.
Die within seven years and they count towards your tax-free allowance of £325,000, so they reduce the amount of your estate that can be passed on without incurring a bill.
Gifts made over your nil-rate band of £325,000 benefit could benefit from taper relief.
The closer to the full seven years you survive, the less tax your beneficiaries need to pay.
For a payment made in the last three years before death, the full 40 per cent is levied.
But any gifts made four to five years ago face a 24 per cent charge, while those made five to six years before your death have a 16 per cent IHT rate.
Those given six to seven years ago are charged at 8 per cent. Make payments sooner rather than later to lessen the chance that your loved ones will foot a huge 40 per cent tax bill.
Plus, you can make the most of your gifting allowances to pass on wealth tax-free while you are still alive.
Everyone gets a £3,000 annual gift allowance, which is exempt from their estate.
Plus, if you didn't use this year's allowance you can carry it forward to the next tax year, but it can't be carried forward any further.
This means a couple could give away up to £12,000 completely free of IHT in one tax year. The seven-year rule does not apply here, so if you die within that period of making these gifts there is still no IHT payable.
You can also give away an unlimited number of small gifts up to £250, so long as you haven't used another IHT allowance on the same recipient.
Another nifty trick to reduce the tax bill on your estate is to make a tax-free gift to someone getting married or entering a civil partnership.
You can give £5,000 to a child, £2,500 to a grandchild or great-grandchild and £1,000 to anyone else.
But these gifts need to be made 'in consideration of' a marriage or civil partnership so payments must be made just before it takes place and not after.
Growing numbers of families are also considering putting life insurance policies into trust to pay any potential tax bill.
These pay out to your loved ones when you die and if they are placed correctly into trust they are treated as if they are not part of your estate – and therefore free of inheritance tax.
You can appoint one or more beneficiaries who will be paid the full policy sum when you die.
However, this can be a costly planning tool and may come with risks.
For example, you may forfeit the cover if you stop paying the premiums at any point.
Once you start paying it, it can be difficult to increase your cover should your IHT liability rise. Seek expert advice before going ahead.
Arguably the most generous allowance is known as gifts out of normal expenditure, where you can gift an unlimited amount of money.
However, there are strict criteria you must meet. The payment must be regular, out of income and must not affect your standard of living - and you must keep good records.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
a minute ago
- Telegraph
Former Dragons' Den star stripped of MBE over string of unpaid bills
A former Dragons' Den star has been stripped of her MBE after it was ruled she was in contempt of court. Julie Meyer, a 58-year old venture capitalist, was handed a six-month suspended prison sentence after she repeatedly failed to submit documents and attend hearings relating to £200,000 in unpaid legal fees. The Cabinet Office's recently published list of individuals who have forfeited the honour since August 2023 says Meyer was stripped of the MBE for 'bringing the honours system into disrepute'. She is one of two women on the list, the other being Paula Vennells, the former Post Office chief executive who forfeited her CBE over her handling of the Horizon IT scandal. Meyer, who was born in the US, was awarded the MBE in the 2011 Queen's Birthday Honours list for services to entrepreneurship. She was one of two new Dragons chosen for an online version of the BBC Two show in 2009, and was appointed as Lord Cameron's enterprise adviser in 2010. However, in 2022 she became embroiled in a legal fight with Farrers, a law firm who once represented the late Queen Elizabeth II. A warrant was then issued for her arrest after she failed to turn up to court on Feb 14 that year. Meyer said she had been unable to travel from her home in Switzerland due to conjunctivitis and not having received a Covid vaccine. But a judge ruled her medical evidence was not grounds to avoid attending the court hearings in person. It was claimed she owed Farrers almost £200,000, which represented her in a court case in Malta. The High Court heard she failed to pay Julian Pike, a partner at Farrers, £197,000 after claiming the firm had provided a poor standard of service which had been worth about £50,000. Mr Justice Kerr labelled Meyer a 'selfish and untrustworthy person'. He said: 'I am satisfied there is every prospect that the defendant will continue to flout orders of the court unless coerced into obeying them.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: Viktor Gyokeres' surprise move, ten days before Swedish star completed £70m Arsenal transfer
Viktor Gyokeres reportedly set up a company in London almost two weeks before his move to Arsenal was finalised. The Gunners' interest in the prolific Swede had been obvious from the start of the summer window, but negotiations over a deal went on for weeks. Amid interest from rivals Manchester United, the delays must have left Arsenal supporters wondering whether they'd ever finalise a deal, let alone complete a transfer in time for next season. But it seems for the man himself the move was never in-doubt, as Gyokeres registered a new London-based promotions company 10 days before he signed on the dotted line on July 26, according to The Times. The company was registered on July 16 and is expected to handle the striker's image rights income. Its title, VG9 Productions Ltd, takes inspiration from Gyokeres' initials and the number he wore during his two seasons at Sporting Lisbon. It was thought that the Swede would have preferred the No 9 at Arsenal - currently occupied by Gabriel Jesus - but later expressed his desire to follow in the footsteps of Thierry Henry with No 14. After completing his £64m move last weekend, Gyokeres jetted off to Asia to meet his new team-mates on their pre-season tour of Asia. His debut came on Thursday against rivals Tottenham Hotspur, with the frontman afforded 20 or so minutes off the bench as he builds his fitness ahead of the new season. Arsenal begin their campaign with a difficult away fixture at Old Trafford on August 16. He signs with a heap of expectation on his shoulders after slotting home an incredible 97 goals in 102 appearances in Lisbon. The Gunners' longing for a proven frontman has been well- documented amid the struggles of Gabriel Jesus since his move from Manchester City. Mikel Arteta expressed his delight that he and club officials finally got their man last week, saying: ''We're absolutely delighted to welcome Viktor Gyokeres to the club. The consistency he has shown in his performances and availability have been outstanding, and his goal contributions speak for themselves. 'Viktor has so many qualities. He is a quick and powerful presence up front, with incredible goalscoring numbers at club and international levels. 'He brings a clinical edge with a high conversion rate of chances into goals, with his intelligent movement in the box making him a constant threat. 'We're excited about what Viktor brings to our squad and are looking forward to start working with him. We welcome Viktor and his family to Arsenal.' Sporting Director Andrea Berta added: 'We are so pleased with the excellent deal we have completed to bring Viktor Gyokeres to the club. 'Viktor is an exceptional talent and has consistently demonstrated he has the qualities and winning mentality required of a top-level centre-forward. 'His physicality, intelligence and work ethic make him a perfect fit for our vision. We are confident Viktor will have a major impact on the pitch and become an important figure in our dressing room. Welcome, Viktor!'


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves admits Labour has ‘disappointed' people while in government
Rachel Reeves admits Labour has 'disappointed' people while in government. The politician said she understood that being Chancellor meant making unpopular decisions. She told an audience at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival that Labour had got the balance right between tax, spending and borrowing. But she said that balancing the books meant making tough decisions, even if the are unpopular. Appearing on the Iain Dale All Talk fringe show, she said: 'The reason people voted Labour at the last election is they want to change and they were unhappy with the way that the country was being governed. 'They know that we inherited a mess. They know it's not easy to put it right, but people are impatient for change. 'I'm impatient for change as well, but I've also got the job of making sure the sums always add up – and it doesn't always make you popular because you can't do anything you might want to do. You certainly can't do everything straight away, all at once.' Ms Reeves pointed to Labour's £200 million investment in carbon capture in the north east of Scotland, which she said was welcomed by the industry. At the same time, Labour's windfall tax, she said, was not liked by the sector. 'I can understand that that's extra tax that the oil and gas sector are paying, but you can't really have one without the other,' she said. Defending Labour's record, she said her party had the 'balance about right'. 'But of course you're going to disappoint people,' she added. 'No-one wants to pay more taxes. 'Everyone wants more money than public spending – and borrowing is not a free option, because you've got to pay for it. 'I think people know those sort of constraints, but no-one really likes them and I'm the one, I guess, that has to sort the sums up.' Ms Reeves said Labour had to deliver on its general election campaign of change, adding that her party did not 'deserve' to win the next election if it does not deliver the change it promised.