Restaurant manager awarded €17k after being made redundant after becoming pregnant
A well-known hospitality group on Dublin's northside has been ordered to pay €17,000 to a former assistant manager of one of its restaurants who was made redundant shortly after notifying her manager she was pregnant.
The Workplace Relations Commission ruled that McHugh's Restaurants had discriminated against Karen Condell on grounds of gender over her dismissal from her role as assistant manager at McHugh's restaurant in Portmarnock.
Advertisement
The WRC found that it had breached the Employment Equality acts 1998-2015 in its handling of the dismissal.
The company, which also operates McHugh's restaurant in Raheny and Blackbanks bar and grill in Kilbarrack, is part of a group which also operates a number of off-licences and Centra stores.
Ms Condell claimed the redundancy cited as the reason for her dismissal was not genuine.
She told the WRC that she informed her employer in June 2024 that she was pregnant.
Advertisement
Ms Condell said she was subsequently informed by the group's hospitality manager, Paul Foley, at the end of July 2024 that the restaurant in Portmarnock would be closing but she was reassured that redeployment options would be explored.
She gave evidence that no alternative role was found for her over the period she worked out her notice.
The company said a decision was taken to close the Portmarnock restaurant on July 30th, 2024.
Mr Foley gave evidence that attempts were made to find alternative employment for affected staff.
Advertisement
He stated employees with over a year of service were subsequently offered roles elsewhere within the group but only one staff member with less than 12 months' service – a chef – was redeployed due to a specific vacancy matching their role.
Mr Foley said he had noted that 'all our hospitality businesses are worryingly slow' when asked by Mr Condell in August 2024 about another role.
He told her on August 27th, 2024 that no alternative jobs had been found.
Mr Foley said he mentioned that there might be a role in a deli although he had no authority over the group's grocery division, although he thought it might not be suitable given she was pregnant.
Advertisement
WRC adjudication officer, Breiffni O'Neill, said he was satisfied that there was prima facie evidence that Ms Condell was discriminated against as the restaurant's owner had failed to source an alternative role for her following the closure of the outlet in Portmarnock.
Mr O'Neill contrasted her situation with many of her colleagues from the Portmarnock restaurant who were not pregnant and who were given jobs elsewhere within the group.
He highlighted how the company had held no discussions with Ms Condell prior to notifying her she was being made redundant on July 30th, 2024.
Mr O'Neill said she was also not provided with any opportunity to engage in what would have been a very belated consultation process about her redundancy in advance of her termination date.
Advertisement
He specifically pointed to how she had not been asked for any input or questioned about her transferable skills, qualifications or previous experience.
Ireland
Donegal farmer who broke man's eye socket avoids j...
Read More
The WRC official noted that Mr Foley was unable to say if any other roles had become available within the group during her notice period which had not been offered to other staff from the Portmarnock restaurant.
'The respondent did not take sufficient and effective measures to avoid dismissing the complainant on the grounds of redundancy,' said Mr O'Neill.
Ordering McHugh's Restaurants to pay Ms Condell compensation of €17,000 – the equivalent of 26 weeks' pay – for the negative effects of her discriminatory dismissal, Mr O'Neill said the sanction should be 'effective, dissuasive and proportionate.'
While a higher award might well be justified in the case, he said it took into account Ms Condell's relatively short period of employment and the relatively small nature of the respondent's business.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Migrants face restrictions on social housing
A new immigration clampdown will limit access to social housing to people with strong, long-term connections to Ireland, and emergency homeless accommodation will also be restricted. Under plans due to go to cabinet in the next fortnight, social housing applicants must be lawfully and habitually resident in Ireland, meaning they must have close ties with the state, have been living in Ireland for some time and intend to stay for the foreseeable future. The government first floated the suggestions in a proposed law early last year, but later dropped the plans. It is understood that, after extensive legal advice in recent months, the measures are back on the table. The rules could spark controversy because they are likely to lead to an increase in non-Irish nationals being excluded from housing and homeless lists. Ministers will be told that the law is needed to eliminate 'ambiguity' over existing rules for non-Irish nationals who want to apply for social housing at a time of intense public and political scrutiny over housing waiting lists. Alongside the new rules, ministers are also due to approve plans to introduce similar eligibility criteria for access to homeless accommodation. This will mean that local authorities will not be required to assess households for homeless supports unless they are legally and habitually resident in the state. Local authorities currently do not have a legal basis to refuse accommodation based on legal or habitual residence. • Ministerial row stalls use of empty offices to house asylum seekers The issue of immigration and its effect on the homeless figures was previously raised by Simon Harris, the tanaiste, in an interview with The Sunday Times. At the time, the Fine Gael leader said: 'People understand the fact that homelessness numbers are heavily impacted by the fact we are seeing many people seek protection in our country, seek asylum in our country and many people come from abroad hoping to have a new future in Ireland and immigration. It has many, many pluses, but it has had a challenge there.' The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission previously raised concerns about any move to change social housing eligibility, saying it could have a 'discriminatory and disproportionate impact on ethnic minority communities, and on the most vulnerable groups in our society'. It added that applying the new habitual residence condition to social housing assistance was likely to result in criticism of Ireland by human rights monitoring bodies. Under further changes due to be signed off, there will be an independent appeals mechanism for people who feel they have been unfairly excluded from social housing eligibility. Changes to the criteria for getting homeless accommodation will be made by way of an amendment to the Housing Act 1988, which sets out what assistance can be offered by local authorities in terms of homelessness. It comes after homeless figures again reached another record high. Figures released last week by the Department of Housing show that 15,747 people were living in emergency accommodation in May, an increase of 167 people on those recorded as homeless in April. The total includes 4,844 children. At present, asylum seekers are not entitled to housing support or emergency beds. However, if an asylum seeker is granted leave to remain and has nowhere to stay, and potentially leaves direct provision, they will show up on official homeless figures. The homeless figures for May show that 3,031 adults in emergency accommodation, or 28 per cent of the overall adults, were not citizens of the European Economic Area. Separately, it has emerged that the planned delivery of almost 3,000 social homes has been delayed over value-for-money concerns. The homes were due to be built in Dublin, Wicklow, Kildare and Sligo by a consortium under the public-private partnership model. The Department of Housing said this weekend the decision 'reflects a careful consideration of the costs and taxpayer funding'.
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Banks criticised for failing SMEs with automated loan rejections
Banks are failing small firms and have created a 'void' in their services by ditching relationship managers and relying on automation to manage loan applications, according to the state body Credit Review. In a stinging report published last week, Credit Review also said that banks needed to reinvest in human expertise to offset the shrinking availability of credit in the market and compensate for tighter lending criteria in recent years. 'Bank balance sheets have shrunk and shrunk since the financial crisis but the question now is what's actually happening between banks and borrowers,' said Catherine Collins, head of the service and author of the report. 'For those it works for, automation is great. The problem we see is that for those with a more complicated business structure or model, they need some human interaction.' The report said that in many cases that came before Credit Review, which judges credit appeals brought by small businesses to loan rejections, 'considerable expertise' was required to find the appropriate solution for borrowers but banks were shifting that burden on to customers. 'There is a cost to the SME borrower of acquiring that expertise that has now been passed across by the bank who are no longer providing it to certain segments of the SME market (typically smaller borrowers),' the report said. It noted that credit advanced to non-property SMEs had fallen by 18 per cent from its pre-Covid level, due in part to the exits of Ulster Bank and KBC and the resulting lack of competition in the market. But the proportion of small businesses applying for finance each year had also fallen from more than one in three to just one in five. The lack of credit flow to indigenous small businesses has been flagged by Department of Finance officials as a potential problem for maintaining domestic demand in an economy facing grave risks from disruption in international trade and investment. Credit Review blamed the decline in the market on shortcomings in the credit application process, especially in terms of accessing expertise, how banks communicate, timeliness and flexibility. 'The responses that I see issued on bank credit decline letters remain generic, high level and unhelpful to many of the borrowers using our services,' Collins wrote. The average loan decision turnaround time of 24 days was also inhibiting small businesses from seeking bank finance, Collins said. The regulatory requirement for SME lenders is 15 days. The lack of standardisation between banks and the difficulty of switching from one to another was also a problem that limited competition and choice, she said. As a result, many businesses were now turning to alternative sources of credit from non-bank debt providers, such as invoice discounters or crowdfunders, which were in some cases subject to different regulatory requirements to banks. This segment of lenders has grown to make up more than a third of the market. Just under 60 per cent of the appeals brought to Credit Review since it was established by the Department of Finance in 2010 have been upheld. But Collins said not enough businesses were using its services, which can help firms to navigate the tricky process of accessing bank finance. 'SMEs are tricky, they require judgment calls,' she said. 'At the end of the day, you need to talk to someone. The pain is worth the gain.'
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Huge numbers opt out of Ireland's organ donation scheme in four days
Almost 30,000 people chose to opt out of donating their organs in the first four days of a new scheme coming into force. They added their names to the opt-out register as soon as the Human Tissue Act 2024 came into effect last Tuesday, with 29,394 listed by Friday afternoon. The new legislation means everyone in the state agrees to be a potential organ donor when they die, unless they choose to opt out instead. There are about 676 people in Ireland in need of an organ donation. If someone's organs are eligible for donation, their next of kin will first be consulted before any action is taken. If their consent is not given for the donation, it will not proceed. The national organ donation opt-out register is on the HSE website. Alan Gaffney, clinical lead for organ donation at Beaumont Hospital in Dublin, explained that only people who died in an intensive care unit on a ventilator following a brain stem or cardiac death were eligible organ donors. He said he expected the legislative change would bring about only a minimal increase in the number of donations. 'We don't expect there to be too much change within the ICU [intensive care unit] to what we normally do. The only change would be a step whereby we check the register to make sure that somebody hasn't put their name on it before we approach that family. Other than that, everything else essentially remains the same,' Gaffney said. He said the introduction of the opt-out system would not in itself lead to an increase in the availability of organs for donation. 'We don't expect it will make a difference. Spain has the highest organ donation rate in the world, [and] has been leading this for many, many years, and they are very clear about what increases organ donation rates. That is essentially having key organ donation personnel embedded in ICUs, and having an audit of all potential deaths in that ICU,' Gaffney said, adding that the national office for clinical audit was active in six hospitals across the country. The audit involves reviewing all ICU deaths to determine if somebody was an organ donor or could have been a donor. 'It's very rare to die in circumstances where you could be an organ donor. There are only around 80 deceased organ donations per year in Ireland. Because it's rare, you need to have people who are trained in the ICU to be able to detect those who could be potential organ donors,' he said. In a statement, a spokeswoman for the HSE said people could also remove themselves from the opt-out register at any time. 'The act also provides a framework for living donation and for the first time will provide a way for people who wish to donate a kidney to someone they don't personally know, the opportunity to do so [known as non-directed altruistic donation],' she said. Maureen O'Donnell, chief executive of the Irish Lung Fibrosis Association, said it was critical that the wider system of carrying out transplants was examined after the changes. 'We hope that it will result in more organs being available for transplant to patients who desperately need them. Lung fibrosis patients represent the largest pool of lung transplant candidates now that cystic fibrosis can be controlled through medication and we have many patients on the transplant list who are called into the hospital multiple times, only to return home disappointed because there wasn't a match,' she said. Colin White, national advocacy and projects manager at the Irish Kidney Association, noted that Wales introduced an opt-out system in 2015, which was then implemented by the rest of the UK. 'It hasn't been a massive game-changer in terms of the bottom line,' White said, adding that only 1 per cent of all deaths were in circumstances where organ donation was possible. 'This doesn't suddenly open up a massive pool that wasn't accessible before.'
