‘Pakistan firm sought Pahalgam satellite images, how did you miss that?' Kanimozhi rips into Modi govt
Taking part in the Lok Sabha debate on Operation Sindoor and Pahalgam terror attack, she further asked how the Centre missed the fact that a US company had been getting repeated requests for maps of Pahalgam and one of the companies making these requests was from Pakistan—a newsbreak by ThePrint.
New Delhi: In a blistering attack on the Modi government over the security lapse in Pahalgam, DMK MP Kanimozhi Tuesday asked why no action was taken when the Intelligence Bureau (IB) and Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW) had alerted about suspicious activity and terrorists attempting recce in the area.
The follow-up to this investigation with US court documents also confirmed that even before being taken on as a partner officially, the owner of the Pakistani company, Obaidullah Syed, was found to be selling satellite images to government agencies in Pakistan involved with the country's nuclear weapons programme.
'Why did we let it slip? A US company was getting repeated requests for maps of that place and one of the companies which were making requests was from Pakistan, that should have raised a red flag. How did you miss that? You can't keep talking about Operation Sindoor and make us forget all these questions. This is a failure of your government to protect the people,' Kanimozhi said in the House, asking the government to focus on today and not look back at the past all the time.
She also questioned the government's handling of recent terror incidents and accused it of deflecting accountability.
The DMK MP also hit back at Bharatiya Janata Party's critique of the opposition while countering Union Home Minister Amit Shah, who had implied that the opposition parties are less patriotic.
'We have never failed the nation. The DMK was the first to take out a rally in support of the defence forces and stood with the government during the all-party meeting,' she asserted.
Kanimozhi also slammed the government for not apologising for such attacks in the past. 'You have not even learnt humility; the Prime Minister (Manmohan Singh) during the 2008 Mumbai attacks apologised to the country,' she said.
'What has the Vishwaguru (global leader) learnt from these terror attacks? Vishwaguru has not learnt any lessons. He has not taught anything,' Kanimozhi said, questioning the Modi government's vision.
She also questioned the BJP government over not initiating any action against the Madhya Pradesh minister who insulted Colonel Sofiya Qureshi.
The DMK MP said no while no one wants war but 'we have to be prepared'. 'Where are we?' she asked.
She also questioned the absence of global support over the Pahalgam attack. 'Do you have no friends, no friendly neighbours to condemn a country which is sponsoring terrorism against India?'
The DMK MP also criticised the government for functioning through what she termed as an 'extension government'. 'This is an extension government. All bureaucrats, leaders, everyone is on extension. The RAW chief on extension, the CBI (chief) on extension, ED (head) on extension. Don't you trust the next line of leadership?' she asked.
(Edited by Tony Rai)
Also Read: 3 terrorists who carried out Pahalgam attack killed in Op Mahadev: Home Minister Amit Shah to Lok Sabha
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Will urge Centre to ban single use plastic lighters: EPS
Tuticorin: AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K Palaniswami on Friday promised matchbox manufacturers that he along with BJP state president Nainar Nagenthran will appeal to the central govt to impose a complete ban on single-use plastic lighters, which is a threat to the industry. EPS held a meeting with matchbox manufacturers and Kovilpatti Kadalai Mittai manufacturers in Kovilpatti in Tuticorin. He recalled that it was the AIADMK that ensured that GST on matchboxes was reduced from 18% to 12%. "As per the demand made by a lot of matchbox manufacturers, we will definitely raise the issue with the Centre and ensure a complete ban on single-use plastic lighters. AIADMK will always fully support Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) and bring policies for their growth," he said. Addressing his 'Makkalai Kappom, Thamizhagathai Meetpom' campaign later in the evening at Kovilpatti, Ottapidaram, and Tuticorin, EPS reiterated that AIADMK and BJP will work like a double-barrelled gun for the benefit of the people. "DMK is clearly afraid of the BJP-AIADMK alliance. We are two separate parties with separate principles/ideologies, but still we can be in an alliance. DMK says all parties in their alliance have one principle. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like How Much Does a Bali Vacation Really Cost? Liseer Learn More Undo If so, then why not become one single large party?" he asked. In Kovilpatti, EPS was joined by Nainar Nagenthran, and the two briefly walked together, accompanied by their respective party flags. Addressing the campaign, Nagenthran referred to EPS as 'former and future chief minister of Tamil Nadu'. He added that the alliance of BJP and AIADMK was natural, and emphasised that, as Union home minister Amit Shah said, the NDA in Tamil Nadu will be under the leadership of EPS.
The Hindu
32 minutes ago
- The Hindu
House of wars: on Parliament, Operation Sindoor discussion
The government and the Opposition crossed swords in Parliament during a discussion on Operation Sindoor this week. There was unanimity in praising India's armed forces, but there was little common ground beyond that. Operation Sindoor was India's military response to the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, on April 22, 2025, which claimed 26 lives. The elimination of three terrorists behind the attack, just before the parliamentary debate, helped the government's case. It told Parliament that these terrorists were Lashkar-e-Taiba members from Pakistan. The Narendra Modi government's strident approach seeks to change the behaviour of Pakistan and reassure its domestic audience. The success of this approach is debatable and the Opposition sought to put the government on the spot on both counts. A demonstrated willingness to use force against Pakistan in the event of a terrorism incident is a definitive turn in India's strategy, and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) takes pride in that. But there is no evidence yet that it is working though there has been chest thumping around it by the ruling party. The discussion in Parliament barely addressed the implications of this approach, which is being touted as the new normal. The Opposition and the government agreed on the need to punish Pakistan, and also disagreed on who would do it better. The government claimed success in meeting its objectives of launching a military operation and denied that it had acted under pressure in ending the war. Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi demanded a pointed response to repeated claims by U.S. President Donald Trump that he mediated the ceasefire but the Prime Minister evaded a direct response on it. The government contradicts itself when it says that the operation was a success, and that it is continuing. It is also exasperating to hear a party that is now in its eleventh year of uninterrupted power, blame people who passed away decades ago for any challenge that India faces now. There was little self-reflection regarding the lapses that led to the terrorism incident, and whether and how the government plans to address them. The government had sent joint teams including several MPs from the Opposition abroad to garner support for India in the aftermath of the operation, but that sign of statesmanship was a short-lived aberration, as it turns out. The world is changing rapidly and India's capacity to navigate those changes will be largely determined by its own character. Questioning the patriotism of political opponents is an easy route to take to evade tough questions, but the BJP must realise that such an approach has diminishing returns.
The Hindu
32 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Letters to The Editor — August 2, 2025
Misplaced remark U.S. President Donald Trump's remark, calling India a 'dead economy', is both inaccurate and disappointing, especially when leading global institutions continue to recognise India as among the fastest-growing major economies. That the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank have all projected India's economic stability is a clear indication of economic vitality, not decline. With a young and dynamic population — in sharp contrast to aging demographics and slowing growth in many advanced economies, India's demographic strength, combined with prudent macroeconomic policies and digital advancement, positions it as a key driver of future global growth. Mr. Trump's comments appear to be politically charged rather than fact-based. Rukma Sharma, Jalandhar, Punjab What is odious is that Mr. Trump did not stop with just announcing tariffs. He has revived the U.S's old myopic game of trying to maintain a geo-political strategic balance in South Asia by supporting Pakistan, India's war-happy neighbour. One cannot but notice the fact that Mr Trump has been upping the ante against India ever since it successfully carried out post-Pahalgam retaliatory strikes against Pakistan's terror infrastructure. That India proved its military prowess with minimum collateral damage and the use of indigenous armaments has not gone down well with the Trump administration. Nalini Vijayaraghavan, Thiruvananthapuram The cartoon (Inside pages, 'On the draw' August 1), on Mr. Trump's decision, may be a correct portrayal. The U.S. President is publicity savvy and wants to take the credit when it comes to all major global events. He wants the Nobel Prize and has shamelessly expressed his desire. He is just another politician and not a statesman. Imposing shockingly high tariffs will hurt the business of the exporters to the United States of America, which will, in turn, affect the economies of many countries. Mr. Trump does not care one bit about the sufferings of others. He is whimsical, which is a bad trait for anyone in power. Here is an elected leader who is an example of how one should not be. V. Lakshmanan, Tirupur, Tamil Nadu One cannot help notice these contrasts — ISRO and NASA have successfully launched their NISAR satellite into orbit, which highlights the power of science and cooperation, but the U.S. President seems intent on giving pinpricks to India and the Indian government. One wonders how things will play out. Dhanaraj S., Bodinayakanur, Tamil Nadu The debate in Parliament The parliamentary debate on Operation Sindoor unfolded as expected, with few surprises. The ruling party remained determined to portray the operation as an unqualified success, while key questions raised by the Opposition were left unanswered. Vital issues deserving serious deliberation such as Mr. Trump's repeated claims of brokering a ceasefire, and the alarming security lapses in Pahalgam were largely ignored. From the outset, the ruling party's reluctance to engage in a substantive debate was unmistakable. Repeated references to events under the past dispensation did little more than deflect attention from the core concerns. One can only hope that future parliamentary discussions will rise above partisan posturing and offer genuine, meaningful exchanges. V. Nagarajan, Chennai Civic responsibility India-Bangladesh relations may be strained but there are areas of policy in that country which may be worth considering in India. I recently came across a video on YouTube, on an organisation called BD Clean ( It is a platform of 50,000 volunteers who work with the aim of ensuring a clean Bangladesh and bringing about a change in mentality in the disposal of garbage. The transformation in the country has been spectacular with heavily polluted areas undergoing remarkable transformations. It is an idea that is worth emulating in Indian cities and towns. V. Subramaniam, Chennai
