
Will Trump's tariffs hurt Formula One's new and existing teams? It's complicated
Advertisement
Businesses worldwide are determining what to do and what will happen with these tariffs in place, and motorsport series such as Formula One are no different.
Haas Automation, which is owned by Gene Haas and is the primary sponsor of the Haas F1 Team, said in a statement earlier this week that it 'is in the process of studying the full impact of tariffs on our operations.'
A spokesperson for the Haas F1 team, however, said ahead of this weekend's Bahrain Grand Prix that there is 'no impact to the team' and insisted it is 'business as usual.'
But questions remain about what these tariffs could mean for F1 and the teams in the long term. The sporting side may largely be insulated from the impact, but could the sport be susceptible to the global financial market?
Similar to how the market is subject to change, it is unclear overall precisely how much the tariffs could impact F1 teams in the short and long run, especially considering it's unknown how long the tariffs will be in place and whether they will increase or decrease.
But here are the big questions the global sport faces as we explain the tariffs and the potential complications.
Tariffs are essentially taxes on imported goods. On March 26, the Trump administration imposed 25 percent tariffs on 'automobiles and certain automobile parts.' The president invoked Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows the president to adjust imports if 'an article is being imported into the United States in such quantities or under such circumstances as to threaten or impair the national security,' according to the statute.
The administration's March announcement stated that the automobile industry in the U.S. 'is vital to national security and has been undermined by excessive imports threatening America's domestic industrial base and supply chains.'
Advertisement
The president has claimed his tariff policy will correct years of what he sees as unfair treatment by other nations, resulting in factories and jobs coming back to the United States. While some tariffs on most countries will be subject to a 90-day freeze, automobile and auto parts tariffs are not included at this time.
As for what is impacted by the 25 percent tariffs, the list is wide-ranging.
The White House did note that the tariffs can be expanded. The 25 percent tariff on imported vehicles went into effect on Thursday, April 3, and the tariff on the automobile parts imported into the U.S. is expected to be in effect by May 3. The Trump administration previously stated that vehicles and parts that comply with the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), a trade agreement between the three countries, will be tariff-free.
The American Automotive Policy Council, which represents Ford Motor Company, General Motors and Stellantis, released a statement from President Matt Blunt on March 26 in response to the Trump administration's automotive tariffs.
Blunt said, in part, it was 'critical that tariffs are implemented in a way that avoids raising prices for consumers and that preserves the competitiveness of the integrated North American automotive sector that has been a key success of the President's USMCA agreement.'
It's worth remembering that Liberty Media, an American company, owns F1. But looking deeper into the sport, there are numerous American sponsors, an American team currently competing on the grid (Haas), another squad joining next year that will be headquartered in Indiana (Cadillac), and three races that are stateside — Miami, Austin and Las Vegas.
The supply chain is one area under considerable scrutiny, as it is not publicly known what materials and parts are shipped in and out of the United States when it comes to building F1 cars.
The tariffs could mean Cadillac and Haas, plus Ford's deal with Red Bull regarding engine supply from 2026, may be more vulnerable than other teams that are run only in Europe.
Despite Haas stating that the tariffs won't impact the F1 operation, its parent company, Haas Automation, will take a significant hit.
Haas Automation released a statement on Wednesday detailing the early impact of the tariffs, including 'a dramatic decrease in demand for our machine tools from both domestic and foreign customers.' The company subsequently cut overtime at its Oxnard, California, manufacturing plant, stopped hiring, placed 'new employment requisitions on hold,' and reduced production.
Advertisement
Haas Automation acknowledged the 'tariffs will have a significant impact' on its business but expressed optimism that the current administration would 'come up with solutions to provide relief for U.S. manufacturers.' The Oxnard plant employs 1,700 people and there are factory outlets across the country.
But there are concerns beyond the U.S market.
'Haas Automation is particularly concerned about the potential reduction of tariffs on machine tools from certain countries, such as Japan, Taiwan, and Korea, without a corresponding reduction in tariff rates for imported raw materials and components into the U.S,' the company said in its statement. Haas Automation and other similar companies use such raw materials to make their own products in the United States.
'Such a scenario would be catastrophic to the $5 billion U.S. machine tool industry, which is a key component of U.S. national security.'
Haas Automation also detailed that machine tools are essential parts of the American manufacturing infrastructure.
It's worth noting that Haas Automation also has a significant Chinese market and the tariff standoff between the U.S. and China continues to escalate. China increased its tariffs on America to 84 percent and Trump responded on April 9 by increasing the tariff on imports from the Asian country to 145 percent.
The natural question arising from this concerns what it means for the Haas F1 operation, its development plan and recruiting process. According to Haas, there's no change to those areas.
To an extent, the team saying it's business as usual seems correct for now, as the F1 operation is an independent company under the Haas umbrella. But F1 teams are generally marketing vehicles for companies, such as Aston Martin or Red Bull. It raises the profiles of businesses and car manufacturers globally, which was the primary reason Gene Haas decided to enter F1 in 2016.
Advertisement
Earlier this year, Haas F1 team principal Ayao Komatsu revealed this season will be the first that Gene Haas hasn't had 'to put his money in' to help the team's budget, thanks to additional prize money earned last year and new sponsorship cash from Toyota. Haas and the Japanese car manufacturer announced a technical partnership in 2024.
But not all of the car manufacturers in F1 are involved in the U.S. market.
Renault hasn't sold cars stateside since the 1980s, making these tariffs less of a worry when funding its F1 team (Alpine), beyond overall additional financial constraints amid the turbulent global economy.
These two American car manufacturers are entering F1 next season in different capacities.
Ford has a strategic partnership with Red Bull to build engines under the new regulations from 2026 until at least 2030. According to the car manufacturer, it provides 'expertise in areas including battery cell and electric motor technology as well as power unit control software and analytics.'
The engine, though, is being built in Milton Keynes, England, with Red Bull keeping a majority of the development in-house at its Red Bull Powertrains division.
Meanwhile, General Motors is entering the F1 scene with its Cadillac brand becoming the 11th team on the 2026 grid, and the team will operate from three locations — Silverstone, England; Fishers, Indiana; and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Cadillac F1 headquarters will be in Fishers, Indiana, but its European base will be at Silverstone — and that facility is already up and running. Operating within 'Motorsport Valley' in the UK and using a customer Ferrari engine in its early years on the grid could provide Cadillac with some insulation from the tariffs. However, Cadillac has remained firm about being an American motorsports team.
It remains to be seen what the potential impact could be on these operations, if there is any at all. The future health of the U.S. automobile industry could influence matters. Ford and Cadillac have yet to respond to The Athletic's request for comment.
F1 has been here before relatively recently and in similar circumstances.
The current global market slump echoes the decline from the Global Financial Crisis of the late 2000s. Back then, in response to severe ensuing financial constraints, several major car manufacturers pulled out of their team-owning F1 commitments (Honda, BMW, Toyota) or reduced their stake in a squad (Renault).
Advertisement
As mentioned, F1 team ownership or sponsorship models are huge marketing strategies for car manufacturers. Such initiatives, therefore, come under threat – if not cancelled outright, as 2008-2009 showed – if companies are forced to make major budget cutbacks.
In some markets specific to F1, the automotive industry was already suffering significantly even before tariffs joined the agenda. For instance, Germany, which has one team entry from Mercedes and will get another with Audi joining in 2026. Audi owner Volkswagen only reached a late deal to avert major factory closures and forced layoffs in Germany in late 2024 after a huge drop in profits, via an agreement to cut more than 35,000 jobs over the coming years to 2030.
Luxury car brands involved in F1 are also under significant pressure from the 25 percent tariffs on imported cars coming into the U.S, plus the similar tariff coming on importing car parts. Ferrari, for instance, has committed to absorbing the tariff-related costs for three of its models sold in the U.S. – the Ferrari 296, SF90 and Roma – but warned that to stay on track for its financial targets in 2025, prices for its other cars will go up by 10 percent.
While Ferrari is the only team that has competed in F1 since the world championship began in 1950 and is worth so much that its continued participation is considered generally fixed, these numbers illustrate the problems facing the Italian team and nearly all its rivals right now when margins are threatened.
Plummeting stock prices are also relevant to Liberty Media, which owns F1's commercial rights, and the Formula One Management company that runs the championship. Both are traded primarily on the Nasdaq stock exchange as FWONA and FWONK.
As with so much of this developing tariff story, the full implications can't yet be known.
F1's Europe-centric operations should, in any case, provide a degree of insulation from the specific market impacts of tariffs, given that the teams build their cars at source. The competitors are also in a much stronger financial state than during the Global Financial Crisis.
Advertisement
Much of this has to do with how F1's cost cap rules have contributed to inflating teams' worth north of $1 billion, for all squads. This limits spending on car design and production to $135 million for all teams bar Haas, which has a lower limit of $120 million as it outsources much of this process to other companies. The rules are an attempt to create competitive parity between the teams.
At the very least, this is a topic that is not going to disappear fast.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
All work and no play: House heads out while Senate eyes skipping summer break
WASHINGTON – The House of Representatives has fled Washington for their annual August recess, but the Senate may be stuck sweltering at work. Both houses of Congress typically take a month off each summer, with many returning to their districts and visiting with constituents. This year, House members were sent home a day early, amid tensions over the Trump administration's refusal to release records from sex offender and former Trump friend Jeffrey Epstein's case. Meanwhile, senators have at least one more week before they go on break. But as legislative business hits a series of delays and major deadlines loom, President Donald Trump is pushing the upper chamber to stay in town. Either way, both chambers have a tall order waiting for them in September if they want to keep the government doors open. House heads home Following the Justice Department's announcement that they had found no evidence of an Epstein list of sex work clients or proof of other conspiracy theories such as the claim that the disgraced financier did not really commit suicide in 2019, Trump has been at odds with some of his high-profile supporters. Democrats and some Republican lawmakers have called for the release of documents related to Epstein's case. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Kentucky, is spearheading bipartisan legislation to force the Justice Department's hand on the matter. Pressure to address the scandal prompted House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, to cut members loose a day early. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Florida, called it a 'chicken move.' 'And so irresponsible,' she told USA TODAY. 'We have a lot of work to do to take care of people.' 'Because they are afraid to buck Donald Trump, they cancel half of the session week and go home for six weeks?' she added. 'I don't (know) what the hell they ran for Congress for, but I ran for Congress to make people's lives better.' Now, lawmakers are heading home, where voters could press their representatives on the issue. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, who said he'll be spending a good portion of his recess visiting and campaigning with colleagues in other areas, said he wouldn't be surprised if questions on Epstein come up. 'Constituents ask all of kinds of questions,' he said. 'But when I was back home a week or so ago, and we were at the pizza place in Urbana, Ohio, people were coming up to me just excited. 'President Trump's doing great. Thanks for the big, beautiful bill' ... It was all positive.' Senators could stick around Senators are set to wrap up their schedule in Washington on Aug. 1. But some would rather forego the break. 'I'm for staying and doing what we need to do,' Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Alabama, told USA TODAY. 'They pay us to work. They don't pay us to go home and sit for a month.' Congress has until Sept. 30 to pass a series of appropriations bills or a temporary funding extension in order to avoid a government shutdown. That major task, along with a backlog of nominations by Trump for the Senate to confirm, has the president calling for the chamber to keep working and Majority Leader John Thune, R-South Dakota, considering it. 'We're thinking about it,' Thune told Axios on Monday. The decision would be a tough sell to many senators, on both sides of the aisle, who have a fondness for their time back home. Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Georgia, said that along with meeting voters, he will be spending the weeks away with his children in Georgia. Asked about the possibility of recess being canceled, Warnock said, 'That's above my pay grade.' Working hard or hardly working Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Nebraska, said she is doing what she usually does during recess, which is travel by car across the state, with her husband at the wheel, visiting communities and constituents. House members, who have since left the city, say they won't be slacking over August. Members of Congress will return to their district offices, often holding events, meeting with constituents and discussing legislative business from afar. Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-South Dakota, said when asked if he had any fun recess plans, 'Uh, no. Working.' Tennessee's Republican Rep. Tim Burchett offered a similar response. 'I'll do more work when I'm home than I do up here,' he said, adding jokingly, 'These two-hour work weeks up here wear me out.'


Boston Globe
a few seconds ago
- Boston Globe
Bondi facing Democratic calls to testify following report she told Trump he was in Epstein files
Sen. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, responded to the report by calling on Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'We need to bring Bondi and Patel into the Judiciary Committee to testify about this now,' Schiff said Advertisement The Justice Department declined to comment on the report but issued a joint statement from Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche saying that investigators had reviewed the records and 'nothing in the files warranted further investigation or prosecution.' 'As par of our routine briefing, we made the president aware of the findings,' the statement said. The mere inclusion of a person's name in Epstein's files does not imply wrongdoing and he was known to have been associated with multiple prominent figures, including Trump. Advertisement Over the years, thousands of pages of records have been released through lawsuits, Epstein's criminal dockets, public disclosures and Freedom of Information Act requests. They include a 2016 deposition in which an accuser recounted she spent several hours with Epstein at Trump's Atlantic City casino but didn't say if she met Trump and did not accuse him of any wrongdoing. Trump has also said he once thought Epstein was a 'terrific guy' but they later had a falling-out. White House spokesman Steven Cheung on Wednesday said the reports were 'nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media.'


Boston Globe
a few seconds ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration plans to give AI developers a free hand
Advertisement The report signals that the Trump administration has embraced AI and the tech industry's arguments that it must be allowed to work with few guardrails for the United States to dominate a new era defined by the technology. It is a forceful repudiation of other governments, including the European Commission, that have approved regulations to govern the development of the technology. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up But it also points to how the administration wants to shape the way AI tools present information. Conservatives have accused some tech companies of developing AI models with a baked-in liberal bias. Most AI models are already trained on copious amounts of data from across the web, which informs their responses, making any shift in focus difficult. On Wednesday afternoon, Trump delivered his first major speech on AI, a technology that experts have said could upend communications, geopolitics and the economy in the coming years. The president also signed executive orders related to the technology. Advertisement 'We believe we're in an AI race,' David Sacks, the White House AI and crypto czar, said on a call with reporters. 'And we want the United States to win that race.' The changes outlined Wednesday would benefit tech giants locked in a fierce contest to produce generative AI products and persuade consumers to weave the tools into their daily lives. Since OpenAI's public release of ChatGPT in late 2022, tech companies have raced to produce their own versions of the technology, which can write humanlike texts and produce realistic images and videos. Google, Microsoft, Meta, OpenAI, and others are jockeying for access to computing power, typically from huge data centers filled with computers that can stress local communities' resources. And the companies are facing increased competition from rivals such as Chinese startup DeepSeek, which sent shock waves around the world this year after it created a powerful AI model with far less money than many thought possible. The fight over resources in Silicon Valley has run alongside an equally charged debate in Washington over how to confront the societal transformations that AI could bring. Critics worry that if left unchecked, the technology could be a potent tool for scammers and extremists and lay waste to the economy as more jobs are automated. News outlets and artists have sued AI companies over claims that they illegally trained their technology using copyrighted works and articles. Trump previously warned of China's potential to outpace American progress on the technology. He has said that the federal government must support AI companies with tax incentives, more foreign investment and less focus on safety regulations that could hamper progress. Advertisement President Biden took one major action on artificial intelligence: a 2023 executive order that mandated safety and security standards for the development and use of AI across the federal government. But hours after his inauguration in January, Trump rolled back that order. Days later, he signed another executive order, 'Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence,' which called for an acceleration of AI development by US tech companies and for versions of the technology that operated without ideological bias. The order included a mandate for administration officials to come up with 'an artificial intelligence action plan,' with policy guidelines to encourage the growth of the AI industry. The administration solicited comments from companies while it considered its plan. OpenAI called for the administration to expand its list of countries eligible to import AI technologies from the United States, a list that has been limited by controls designed to stop China from gaining access to American technology. OpenAI and Google called for greater support in building AI data centers through tax breaks and fewer barriers for foreign investment. OpenAI, Google, and Meta also said they believed they had legal access to copyrighted works like books, films and art for training their AI. Meta asked the White House to issue an executive order or other action to 'clarify that the use of publicly available data to train models is unequivocally fair use.' The plan released Wednesday did not include mentions of copyright law. But it did outline a wide range of policy shifts, divided into moves that the administration said would speed up the development of AI, make it easier to build and power data centers and promote the interests of American companies abroad. Advertisement This article originally appeared in