Review into cancellation of Manchester play avoids ‘deeper accountability'
The play had been due to run at the Royal Exchange theatre in Manchester in September last year but was pulled in a dispute over one of the production's songs, which referenced transgender rights and contained the phrase 'free Palestine'.
The review, which was partially published last week by the theatre found that management had not censored Stef O'Driscoll's production, but admitted 'significant systemic organisational and leadership failures' at the venue.
Stage Directors UK (SDUK), which is the trade union for stage directors, choreographers and movement directors, was highly critical of the report's findings.
'The claim that the cancellation of A Midsummer Night's Dream was not censorship but a failure of leadership is a false distinction that avoids deeper accountability,' SDUK co-chairs Pooja Ghai and Matthew Dunster said.
'Leadership failure does not exist in a vacuum – it is shaped by the very systemic pressures that lead to censorship in the first place. The inability to support artists in politically charged moments is, in itself, a form of silencing.'
They added that the events at the Royal Exchange were part of a 'wider pattern of institutions failing to stand firm in the face of political and ethical discomfort'.
The criticism from SDUK follows similar statements from the arts union Equity, which said the review 'fell short' of addressing issues and should have been accompanied by a full apology.
A statement from the union read: 'We are disappointed that the review appears to fall short of addressing some of these issues, and that it does not include a public apology to the workforce for the failings of leadership. The review seemingly does not include a clear statement confirming that no culpability for the cancellation sits with the theatre workers engaged to create and work on the show, and this is a significant misstep.'
The fallout from the review has been swift. The Royal Exchange's CEO Stephen Freeman resigned in the aftermath, citing 'personal reasons linked to the impact of the last few months', adding he was 'comforted that the report has concluded that censorship was not at play'.
But the organisation is under pressure to go further as critics argue the handling of the cancellation and review has damaged trust between the theatre and its audience.
The issue dates back to September last year when the play, a modern retelling of the Shakespeare classic set in contemporary Manchester, was abruptly put on pause.
The first few performances of the play were pulled, with ticket holders told that the shows had been axed due to 'technical issues' and cast injury.
However, the entire run was later cancelled, with the theatre, one of Manchester's most important cultural venues, saying the decision came after a 'number of issues with the production'.
The Manchester Evening News reported at the time that the source of the dispute was a song in the play.
According to the newspaper the theatre had asked for the song, which involved the audience, to be removed, but the director, Stef O'Driscoll, with the support of the cast, insisted it should stay. Other reports suggested that there was friction over a spray-painted 'free Palestine' slogan, which formed part of the set.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘What if everyone didn't die?' The queer, Pulitzer-winning, happy-ending Hamlet
When he was still in his 20s and studying for a master's degree in acting, James Ijames was advised to take a swerve away from all things Shakespearean. His tutors thought his southern accent, the product of an upbringing in North Carolina, was not conducive to declaiming Elizabethan verse. Believing them, he did just one professional Shakespeare production in 10 full years of treading the boards. Now Ijames is righting that old wrong, although he does not see it quite that way. Fat Ham, his latest drama, is based on Hamlet and features a queer protagonist called Juicy, who is commanded by the ghost of his murdered father to avenge his death. Significantly, Juicy hails from a Black American family in North Carolina. 'The thing I kept hearing over and over,' he says, 'was that my regionalism – the slowness of my southern accent – would make it difficult for me to do Shakespeare. I did avoid it for those reasons. That's a little bit of what's in this. I wanted to take this thing I was told I couldn't access and see if I could make it work for me.' It worked all right. Fat Ham was feted on Broadway, winning a Pulitzer prize and amassing five Tony award nominations. Next month, the play is coming to the Royal Shakespeare Company in Stratford-Upon-Avon for its European premiere. Ijames, a playwright with more than 15 dramas under his belt, conceived the idea eight years ago, as he gravitated back to Shakespeare. An easy-going presence with a calm, donnish air, Ijames now makes a robust case for his right to Shakespeare. 'I was raised in a Black Southern Baptist church that reads the St James Bible every Sunday,' he says, speaking via Zoom. 'So I grew up reading Elizabethan English. Yet I was told the way I spoke would prevent me from being able to do that, when I had seen people speak this language with ease and eloquence my whole life. It just rocked my world, at a later age, to realise it belonged to me. So it was a real revelation working on this play.' Ijames has not only embraced Shakespeare but played fast and loose with this most definitive of his tragedies. There are new names, rearranged storylines, with most of the big soliloquies written out. 'I can't compete with those,' he explains. 'I can't be in the room with 'To be or not to be'. That existential crisis won't look that way in my characters.' It's a bold move, not least because of an unconventional programme in the Oregon Shakespeare festival not so long ago, with plays including references to slavery and non-binary actors cast in various roles. Nataki Garrett, the festival's artistic director, received death threats. 'I remember that happening,' says Ijames, 'and thinking, 'This is insane.'' Yet, he points out, Shakespeare hardly wrote from scratch: he took huge liberties with his source material, recycling older stories, borrowing from history. The 'almost scriptural quality' some attach to his texts is not something Shakespeare would have endorsed, Ijames believes. 'He was trying to evoke the audience's imagination because he knew that's where the play actually exists.' Acting, for Ijames, was a circuitous way into writing. In 2001, he says, 'they weren't really taking young people into playwriting programmes. So I went to grad school for acting. But I wrote the entirety of my career, in dressing rooms, wherever, until I'd built up enough work.' Learning about writing through acting sounds rather Shakespearean, I suggest. 'Yes,' says Ijames. 'I don't pretend to be as earth-shattering a writer as he was, but his curiosities are very similar to mine.' Evidently so: Fat Ham is warmer and more comic than Hamlet – but at its core, it is a story about fathers, sons and the cycle of violence triggered by the drive for vengeance. Except that Fat Ham's antihero struggles against the violent masculinity his father represents. 'It's perennial for me as a writer to ask, 'What does masculinity mean?' 'What does the performance of masculinity do?'' One reason he is so defined by this theme, he explains, is because he shares a name with his father. 'I'm a 'junior' – so there's a kind of ownership, an expectation of legacy, that I've lived with my whole life. As an artist, I'm preoccupied with disrupting: this notion of how a man is supposed to act at any given moment.' He wants to explore what lies beneath the ideal of masculinity that young people are fed – an ideal that requires them to stifle many components of their emotional being. 'It takes time,' says Ijames, 'to bring that stuff back to life.' Alongside Juicy in Fat Ham, there is Larry (based on Laertes) who feels a closeted queer passion for Juicy. Shame and homophobia shape their trajectories. 'Many times,' says Ijames, 'homophobia is about not wanting to face parts of yourself. I'm not one of those folks who say you're homophobic because you're actually gay – but I do think you are homophobic because you think that if you get too close to a man's body, then your body might betray you.' Ijames grew up in a large family, in the small town of Bessemer City. His father worked in truck manufacturing ('He's retired military – that type') while his mother taught elementary school ('She wanted us to be surrounded by art'). What was it like growing up queer in this household, in this corner of the south? 'I wasn't in a family that was like, 'Oh, you're gay, get out of here, you're the worst.' They said, 'Just don't get in trouble.'' And the masculinity in his family contained a 'softness', something he puts down to it being mostly comprised of women. 'They were such engines of the family that it changed us. I remember thinking I should be elegant because one of my uncles was very elegant.' What about the greater forces around him, such as the Baptist church? He tells an instructive story about a late family member called Thomas Calvin, who was a theologian. As Ijames's uncle, he believed a Christian had a simple duty: to make the world a better place. 'And that is my framework for Christianity.' Although Ijames has witnessed – and experienced – intense homophobia in churches, he still takes moral direction from the 'social justice aspect of the teachings of Jesus'. Given the changes that have swept America under Donald Trump, it is hard to escape 'strongman' notions of masculinity. Has it ever felt more toxic, more in crisis? 'Well,' says Ijames, 'that's a thing a play can't fix.' He adds, in his even way, that masculinity is hardly one single thing. 'It's a constellation of stuff. I don't feel safer with these strongmen, so what is the strength we're talking about? I don't feel more protected. I don't feel like we're somehow more powerful. I just feel like anxious people – and I'm an anxious person – are being anxious with each other.'All those alternative versions of manhood are there in Fat Ham, rubbing alongside darker elements. But there is playfulness and exuberance, too. Its characters do not seem as villainous as Shakespeare's and the ending might even be described as happy. Is Ijames deliberately creating a state that is good out of Shakespeare's rotten one? 'I was very much doing that. I was curious about what happens if we spend time figuring out what paradise looks like. What if everyone didn't die at the end? What if everyone had a place to live, enough to eat. These are questions about civilisation.' There is violence in Fat Ham and it seems implicitly bound to race and US history, but Ijames does not get into cycles of inherited violence within some Black communities. Instead, he goes down another route. 'I don't write that because I don't know how to be inside that. Joy is a thing I know in excess. It's one of the tricks of being an actor: you understand what offers pleasure to the audience because you have to do it with your whole body. I think marginalised people in general, and Black Americans in particular, are miraculous. I think we should party once in a while.' Fat Ham is at the Swan theatre, Stratford-Upon-Avon, from 15 August until 13 September
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
The Winter's Tale: A refreshing take on one of Shakespeare's trickiest plays
Written in the twilight of Shakespeare's life, The Winter's Tale is regarded as a problem play with good reason. A complex study of the nature of dualism, power, transgression and forgiveness, it begins as a psychological drama but the tone shifts abruptly between acts three and four, and it becomes a pastoral romantic comedy. There's a jarring switch of locations, too: it starts in the austere Sicilian court of King Leontes before moving to Bohemia, the kingdom of his childhood friend Polixenes. The story is driven by Leontes's unplumbed absurd, baseless jealousy, which tears his family apart – before a Pygmalion-style miracle provides healing many years later. So the conundrum for any production is how to satisfyingly yoke together its inconsistencies of tone. Director Yaël Farber's take on it for the RSC – starring a brilliant Bertie Carvel as Leontes – is a valiant, nuanced and gripping tussle with that conundrum and, for the most part, succeeds in remaking the play afresh. A lot of that is achieved by suppressing the more farcical elements of the text but Souta Gilmour's sparse but striking set design is also key to Farber's vision. A huge and imposing moon-like orb hovers over the cast for most of the action and is the backdrop for the majority of Tim Lutkin's lighting design. It's an inspired combination of lighting and set because the orb is a visual metaphor for so many elements of the play – a potent symbol of the cyclical nature of the seasons and the passage of time, it also illustrates the violent passions driving Leontes's lunatic destruction of his family. It emphasises the blue-grey austerity of Leontes's court and contrasts that with a blood-moon hue in the wilder, more pagan Bohemia. It adds to otherworldliness created by composer's Max Perryment's ambient soundscape. Not all of Farber's directorial choices land their mark. Although Trevor Fox delivers the key character of Autolycus beautifully as a world-weary troubadour, the decision to render some of his commentary on the action in rhyming couplets falls a bit flat and doesn't ring as rich and true as Shakespeare's own language. Likewise, Madeline Appiah's Hermione, Leontes's much-abused wife, and Leah Haile's Perdita, his long-lost daughter, have an unfortunate habit of eliding their words, which makes them difficult to understand. The abridgement of Shakespeare's text for the Bohemia set scenes is also a tad severe but I can appreciate that it was necessary in order to smooth the transition of tone shift between Sicily and Bohemia. It's still a thoughtful and striking production that pays attention to details. And as for that famous stage direction 'exit, pursued by a bear' – this fresh, sparky take on it will take you by surprise. The happy ending of this play doesn't feel as pat as that of Shakespeare's other comedies. The strong cast ensures that its conclusion thrums with all that is left unsaid in the tentative reconciliation between Hermione and Leontes: a vision of love that is world-worn but still full of hope.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Winter's Tale review – Bertie Carvel is chilling as the RSC ramps up the thrills
Male sexual jealousy drives Shakespeare's problem play before it is smoothed over by its 11th-hour happy ending. Yaël Farber's production animates the psychological terror that King Leontes (Bertie Carvel) wreaks on his pregnant wife Hermione (Madeline Appiah), out of his unfounded suspicion that she has been unfaithful with his old friend, Polixenes (John Light). Carvel makes a convincingly deluded barefoot king, regarding himself as the vulnerable cuckold. His suspicion turns to solid belief to unleash punishment on Hermione. In its first three sombre acts, the drama plays out as a thriller, with expressionist movement and lighting. A gigantic orb of a full moon hangs over the stage (Soutra Gilmour's design is spare and striking as a whole), turning cool white or roiling red to reflect the action. Farber recently staged two Shakespeare tragedies at the Almeida: a Macbeth four years ago which was full of slow and meditative dread, and an arresting King Lear last year. This feels like a third tragedy in some ways, lugubrious in mood and with a monochrome aesthetic in the first, darker half. But there is a fuzziness to the storytelling. This modern-dress production is all smoke and shadows, unmoored from a specific time or place, so it is harder to contextualise its themes. More specifically, some scenes are vague, such as Antigonus's pursuit by a bear which is dealt with symbolically – a static figure takes off the mask to reveal herself as Hermione. It is beautiful but unclear. Tim Lutkin's lighting design turns warm in the second half, with lovely live music (lone musicians waver around the set). The usually awkward change of mood, from dark to light, works smoothly here: the play glides into a second half with Autolycus (Trevor Fox) its light-fingered highlight. But Farber seems at pains to add her own mythical layers: the figure of Time (also Fox) speak a choral ode from Brecht's The Antigone of Sophocles instead of the Oracle of Apollo, and this is opaque in its meaning. The feast in Bohemia is inspired by the ancient Greek ritual of the Eleusinian Mysteries, so the programme explains, adding that, for Farber, Hermione and Perdita 'wear the mask of Demeter and Persephone'. An interesting idea on the page, it is gnomic on stage. There is more clarity around female strength and resistance, to counter Leontes' tyranny. Aïcha Kossoko, playing noblewoman Paulina, is a powerful presence while Appiah, as Hermione, exudes pained dignity and courage alongside her bewilderment. When she testifies in court, she is a bereft mother with lactating patches on her dress after her newborn baby has been taken from her. It is an abject scene. The production never stops looking beautiful, and bustles with a wealth of original concepts, but sometimes resembles a puzzling procession. It remains an unsolved problem play, the first half – shaped so artfully as a tragedy of explosive and irrational male rage – still not quite wedded to its second. At the Royal Shakespeare theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon, until 30 August
