B.C. launches $5M public safety program to crack down on street crime
The province says the new Community Safety and Targeted Enforcement (C-STEP) program will give police more tools to respond to street crimes, including shoplifting, theft and property damage.
Minister of State for Community Safety and Integrated Services Terry Yung, a former Vancouver police officer, said the program was a result of listening to communities and police around the province.
1:49
Vancouver police hosts forum on retail crime
'We heard loud and clear what they wanted, and street-level crime such as theft, robbery, undermining businesses and making it sometimes untenable for them to be around. For so long it has been going on and this is not acceptable,' he said.
Story continues below advertisement
The initiative comes as concerns about street crime and disorder make headlines around the province.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Earlier this week, the City of Williams Lake said it was considering declaring a state of emergency to deal with the problem, while residents of Nanaimo have staged repeated rallies over what they say is spiralling public disorder.
Retailers have also reported upticks in violent shoplifting incidents, with London Drugs recently saying it was considering shuttering its location on the edge of Vancouver's Downtown Eastside.
The program is being administered by the RCMP, which opened to funding applications from police agencies around the province two weeks ago.
1:50
Williams Lake considers state of emergency over crime, disorder
The province says C-STEP funding will be available to support increased police patrols targeting street crime like open drug use and trafficking, disturbances and public intoxication, and to work with businesses and social services on co-ordinated plans to pre-emptively address street disorder.
Story continues below advertisement
'We are not going to be prescriptive in where the funding is going to go, We want the police agencies to come up with operational plans, requests, and expect a matrix to find out where this money is going to address the most pressing challenges facing them on the street level,' Yung said.
He said the program will supplement the existing Specialized Investigation and Targeted Enforcement, which targets repeat violent offenders.
The program is being welcomed by business groups and the B.C. Association of Chiefs of Police.
1:49
Maple Ridge safety concerns following baseball bat assault
'This initiative reflects a clear recognition of the urgent public-safety challenges facing downtown cores, including the growing impact of non-violent and repeat offenders on small businesses,' said Jane Talbot, president and CEO of the Downtown Vancouver Business Improvement Association.
'Any step forward is important, and we see this as a significant and encouraging move in the right direction.'
Story continues below advertisement
Asked if the money would be enough to tackle property crime across the province, Yung described the $5 million as a 'beginning investment.'
He added that the province continues to advocate for 'meaningful bail reforms' promised by Prime Minister Mark Carney's new Liberal government.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
12 hours ago
- Global News
Carney says Trump's multiple objectives demand ‘nimble' trade talk strategy
Prime Minister Mark Carney says as he continues to negotiate a new security and trade deal with the U.S., he's staying 'nimble,' as he says Canada's southern neighbour has 'multiple' objectives for its talks with various countries, including what could benefit its revenue and budget. 'When the person you're dealing with, the country you're dealing with has multiple objectives, jumps around a bit and you've got to be nimble,' Carney told Global News' Joel Senick in a one-on-one interview at the Calgary Stampede. Carney said from his perspective, U.S. President Donald Trump is juggling several factors, ranging from China to trade to the country's overall finances. 'Some of it's strategic competition with China. Sometimes it's just whether or not they can have a trade balance,' he said. 'Some of it's about revenue, for their budget, and of course it's jobs for workers, (and) also issues around the border.' Story continues below advertisement The prime minister's comments come only a few days after trade talks restarted between the two countries following Trump's brief termination over Canada's digital services tax, which the federal government announced last Sunday it had been rescinded. On Monday, Carney told reporters rescinding the tax was part of a 'bigger negotiation,' though he did not elaborate or say if Canada had received anything in exchange. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the tax would have been a 'deal breaker' for any trade deal and that he appreciated the removal by Canada. 5:12 How close is Mark Carney to striking a deal on tariffs with U.S. President Donald Trump? Questioned on the removal of the tax on Saturday, Carney said it also happened at 'basically the same time' as a series of other taxes being taken off the table by other countries as part of a broader G7 plan. Story continues below advertisement He did not specify what taxes, but following the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alta., Canada's Department of Finance announced the G7 had agreed the U.S. would be exempt from applying a 15 per cent minimum corporate tax rate. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The move appeared to be a counter to U.S. plans to apply a so-called 'revenge' tax on other countries that would impose taxes on companies with foreign owners, as well as investors from countries judged as charging 'unfair foreign taxes' on U.S. companies. Pressed further on how Carney is approaching negotiations with Trump, the prime minister said the 'best thing in a negotiation' is that people know what the other party is trying to achieve. 'We're looking out for the jobs of Canadians not just today, but in the longer term and making it clear to the president, but also Americans that there's tremendous opportunity for us working together,' Carney said. The two countries set a goal at the end of the G7 to reach a deal within 30 days, specifically July 21, a date that remained in place even after the brief disruption earlier this week. 2:13 Canada making progress on lifting interprovincial trade barriers: report But as negotiations continue, it also provides a 'tremendous opportunity' for Canadians to build together — a sentiment Carney has repeated multiple times, including during the federal election campaign. Story continues below advertisement 'Whether it's building conventional energy, pipelines to tidewater, whether it's building SMR (small modular) reactors, building artificial intelligence, life sciences, all these things, we can give ourselves far more than any trading relationship, even a trading relationship with the United States,' he said. Building has been a key element for the federal government, with its major projects bill becoming law last week. Bill C-5, which gives Ottawa the power to fast-track projects intended to boost the national economy by sidestepping environmental protections and other legislation, also includes efforts to reduce federal barriers to internal trade. The goal under the bill is to approve such projects within two years. Trump and Carney's goal of reaching a deal by July 21 is swiftly approaching, and while he spoke about the objectives Trump has with his trade talks, the prime minister said they're looking at two things to help Canadian workers and the economy in those discussions. 'The first is, of course, access to the U.S. market, access we have as closely as possible as we do have today under current trading arrangements. It won't be exactly the same but as close as possible,' he said. 'But also stability; stability and greater certainty. That's worth a lot, because that anchor will help us decide which projects we're going to do as a country and how we're going to move forward.' Story continues below advertisement —with files from Global News' Joel Senick
Global News
13 hours ago
- Global News
Iran's Supreme Leader attends ceremony in first public appearance since Iran-Israel war started
See more sharing options Send this page to someone via email Share this item on Twitter Share this item via WhatsApp Share this item on Facebook Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei attended a mourning ceremony on the eve of Ashoura on Saturday in his first public appearance since the Iran-Israel war started. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The absence of Khamenei suggested heavy security status for the Iranian leader, who has final say on all state matters, before possible strikes by Israel. More to come.
Global News
14 hours ago
- Global News
Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost
Barack Obama had the Affordable Care Act. Joe Biden had the Inflation Reduction Act. President Donald Trump will have the tax cuts. All were hailed in the moment and became ripe political targets in campaigns that followed. In Trump's case, the tax cuts may almost become lost in the debates over other parts of the multitrillion-dollar bill that Democrats say will force poor Americans off their health care and overturn a decade or more of energy policy. Through persuasion and browbeating, Trump forced nearly all congressional Republicans to line up behind his marquee legislation despite some of its unpalatable pieces. He followed the playbook that had marked his life in business before politics. He focused on branding — labeling the legislation the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' — then relentlessly pushed to strong-arm it through Congress, solely on the votes of Republicans. But Trump's victory will soon be tested during the 2026 midterm elections where Democrats plan to run on a durable theme: that the Republican president favors the rich on tax cuts over poorer people who will lose their health care. Story continues below advertisement Trump and Republicans argue that those who deserve coverage will retain it. Nonpartisan analysts, however, project significant increases to the number of uninsured. Meanwhile, the GOP's promise that the bill will turbocharge the economy will be tested at a time of uncertainty and trade turmoil. Trump has tried to counter the notion of favoring the rich with provisions that would reduce the taxes for people paid in tips and receiving overtime pay, two kinds of earners who represent a small share of the workforce. Extending the tax cuts from Trump's first term that were set to expire if Congress failed to act meant he could also argue that millions of people would avoid a tax increase. To enact that and other expensive priorities, Republicans made steep cuts to Medicaid that ultimately belied Trump's promise that those on government entitlement programs 'won't be affected.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'The biggest thing is, he's answering the call of the forgotten people. That's why his No. 1 request was the no tax on tips, the no tax on overtime, tax relief for seniors,' said Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. 'I think that's going to be the big impact.' Hard to reap the rewards Presidents have seen their signature legislative accomplishments unraveled by their successors or become a significant political liability for their party in subsequent elections. Story continues below advertisement A central case for Biden's reelection was that the public would reward the Democrat for his legislative accomplishments. That never bore fruit as he struggled to improve his poll numbers driven down by concerns about his age and stubborn inflation. Since taking office in January, Trump has acted to gut tax breaks meant to boost clean energy initiatives that were part of Biden's landmark health care-and-climate bill. Obama's health overhaul, which the Democrat signed into law in March 2010, led to a political bloodbath in the midterms that fall. Its popularity only became potent when Republicans tried to repeal it in 2017. Whatever political boost Trump may have gotten from his first-term tax cuts in 2017 did not help him in the 2018 midterms, when Democrats regained control of the House, or in 2020 when he lost to Biden. 'I don't think there's much if any evidence from recent or even not-so-recent history of the president's party passing a big one-party bill and getting rewarded for it,' said Kyle Kondik, an elections analyst with the nonpartisan University of Virginia's Center for Politics. Social net setbacks Democrats hope they can translate their policy losses into political gains. During an Oval Office appearance in January, Trump pledged he would 'love and cherish Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid.' Story continues below advertisement 'We're not going to do anything with that, other than if we can find some abuse or waste, we'll do something,' Trump said. 'But the people won't be affected. It will only be more effective and better.' That promise is far removed from what Trump and the Republican Party ultimately chose to do, paring back not only Medicaid but also food assistance for the poor to make the math work on their sweeping bill. It would force 11.8 million more people to become uninsured by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office, whose estimates the GOP has dismissed. 'In Trump's first term, Democrats in Congress prevented bad outcomes. They didn't repeal the (Affordable Care Act), and we did COVID relief together. This time is different,' said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii. 'Hospitals will close, people will die, the cost of electricity will go up, and people will go without food.' Some unhappy Republicans Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., repeatedly argued the legislation would lead to drastic coverage losses in his home state and others, leaving them vulnerable to political attacks similar to what Democrats faced after they enacted 'Obamacare.' With his warnings unheeded, Tillis announced he would not run for reelection, after he opposed advancing the bill and enduring Trump's criticism. 'If there is a political dimension to this, it is the extraordinary impact that you're going to have in states like California, blue states with red districts,' Tillis said. 'The narrative is going to be overwhelmingly negative in states like California, New York, Illinois, and New Jersey.' Story continues below advertisement Even Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who eventually became the decisive vote in the Senate that ensured the bill's passage, said the legislation needed more work and she urged the House to revise it. Lawmakers there did not. Early polling suggests that Trump's bill is deeply unpopular, including among independents and a healthy share of Republicans. White House officials said their own research does not reflect that. So far, it's only Republicans celebrating the victory. That seems OK with the president. In a speech in Iowa after the bill passed, he said Democrats only opposed it because they 'hated Trump.' That didn't bother him, he said, 'because I hate them, too.'
