logo
City Council considers study on feasibility of rebuilding or moving obelisk

City Council considers study on feasibility of rebuilding or moving obelisk

Yahoo27-02-2025
The City Council unanimously voted to approve spending $100,000 from the city's general fund for a study assessing the feasibility of rebuilding or moving the Soldiers' Monument at Wednesday's City Council meeting.
The study was directed from an October resolution passed by the council in a 5-4 vote. Originally intended to explore the feasibility of moving the obelisk to the Santa Fe National Cemetery, the resolution was later modified to direct the city manager to explore the feasibility of moving it to any new location or rebuilding it on the Plaza without taking any further action.
Constructed in 1867 in honor of Civil War Union soldiers, the obelisk has long been controversial because of a plaque also honoring soldiers who died in battles with 'savage Indians' during the same period. The word 'savage' was chiseled away in 1974 and on Indigenous Peoples Day in 2020 the monument was partially toppled by protestors.
Less than two months after the October resolution's passage, state District Court Judge Matthew Wilson rendered his decision in a lawsuit the Hispanic fraternal organization Union Protectiva de Santa Fe filed against the city in 2021 seeking for the monument to be rebuilt.
Wilson's Dec. 19 ruling required the city to remove the box that had been surrounding the base of the obelisk since it was torn down within 30 days and to either rebuild the obelisk within 180 days or to follow a little-used process outlined by the State Historic Preservation Office.
City Attorney Erin McSherry has said previously her understanding of the ruling also includes the option that the city take no further action after removing the box.
The city decided not to appeal Wilson's ruling and in January removed the box surrounding the obelisk and cleaned it of graffiti but had not taken any other action until now.
Wednesday's vote was to allocate funding for the study but was not an approval of an actual contract, which is still in the process of being negotiated. A request for qualifications was published on the city's website earlier in the year and received one response, city spokesperson Regina Ruiz wrote in a Wednesday email.
'There wasn't a robust response to that but there is a firm that's been identified that's capable of doing that work," City Manager Mark Scott said Wednesday.
A scope of work document states the study would include conducting a structural assessment of the obelisk and use that to determine the "services, timelines, and costs" required to rebuild it to either a "like or similar condition" to its pre-2020 state or its pre-2020 condition without the "savage Indians" plaque. It would also evaluate the feasibility and costs of moving the monument to the National Cemetery or another location, "including all logistics or minimizing damage" and to summarize all the findings in a written report.
At a Feb. 19 Quality of Life committee meeting, Scott said the contract is still being negotiated and the scope of work will include some type of public engagement process.
In response to a question at the committee meeting, he said his understanding is that the study can be completed within 60 to 90 days. Its unclear if the city would be penalized if the city did ultimately decided to rebuild the obelisk but did so past the 180 day limit.
"There is an understanding that timing is very critical," he said.
On Wednesday, Scott said the study will likely cost less than $100,000 but that future actions would likely cost much more.
"We don't believe that the initial work is going to cost that much, maybe even as little as half that much, but we don't know where it goes," he said.
At the committee meeting, several councilors said they would like to have either a special meeting to discuss the obelisk or to receive a presentation at a regular council meeting regarding the city's options, something Scott said he will accommodate.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democratic PAC launches fund going after Texas GOP for redistricting
Democratic PAC launches fund going after Texas GOP for redistricting

The Hill

time3 hours ago

  • The Hill

Democratic PAC launches fund going after Texas GOP for redistricting

A House Democratic super PAC is looking to raise tens of millions of dollars to challenge Texas Republicans next year as the GOP looks to redraw congressional maps in the state in a bid to offset losses in the 2026 midterms. House Majority PAC announced on Monday that it's creating a Lone Star Fund that is vying to 'raise upwards of $20 million' to target gerrymandered GOP House districts if Texas Republicans redraw their lines. The super PAC noted it's using a multi-pronged approach, including advertising efforts to reach low-propensity voters, growing its recruitment fund and investing more in targeting Hispanic voters. President Trump is looking to gain five House seats in Texas, with legislators convening in Austin for a special session that will address redistricting, among other items. Midterms have historically been unkind to the president's party in power, and Republicans are bracing for a challenging election cycle next year. 2024 Election Coverage Texas's move to reconsider its House lines has prompted blue states to leave the door open to initiating similar moves. California is so far the only state weighing two different options for moving forward with redrawing their own lines in response to Texas. Ohio is the only state that was expected to do redistricting this year, given the maps they used in 2022 did not have bipartisan support. Republicans are hoping to net several seats from new maps there. Redrawing maps, however, raises the likelihood of endangering incumbents in other nearby districts, particularly if one party is overly aggressive in trying to redraw the maps.

ICE protests planned in NYC as Trump administration challenges sanctuary laws
ICE protests planned in NYC as Trump administration challenges sanctuary laws

CBS News

time10 hours ago

  • CBS News

ICE protests planned in NYC as Trump administration challenges sanctuary laws

Protests against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in New York City are being planned following the release of video showing conditions inside the facility at Manhattan's federal immigration building. Organizers said they plan to protest twice on Monday, first at noon outside ICE detention centers, immigration courts and federal buildings, like Federal Plaza, before another round of protests in the evening. Last week, the New York Immigration Coalition provided video showing what looks like the inside of an ICE processing center at 26 Federal Plaza. Members of Congress have been trying to access the area for weeks after hearing complaints alleging detained immigrants have been held there for days in deplorable conditions. ICE has maintained that the facility is not a detention center and is only used for temporary processing. Organizers of the protests, which are planned in New York and other major U.S. cities, stressed they do not want any violence during the demonstrations. Monday's rallies are also being planned as Mayor Eric Adams seeks changes to the city's sanctuary laws amid a Justice Department lawsuit filed last week aiming to strike them down. Adams said he supports the sanctuary laws protecting undocumented immigrants, but he believes modifications are needed to go after people who commit crimes. The mayor is facing stiff resistance from the City Council though, as members seek to stop him from expanding the role of federal immigration agents in the city. Federal officials have been particularly upset that the City Council went to court to stop an executive order issued by Adams to allow ICE agents work on Rikers Island, where they could identify undocumented immigrants who may be in the country illegally and have have committed crimes.

Zeelanders will choose six finalists for City Council on Aug. 5
Zeelanders will choose six finalists for City Council on Aug. 5

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Zeelanders will choose six finalists for City Council on Aug. 5

During the upcoming primary election Aug. 5, residents of Zeeland will narrow candidates for City Council from seven to six. Among the seven candidates, one — Glenn Kass — is an incumbent. Councilman Jim Broersma didn't file for re-election, and Councilman Richard Van Dorp III is running unopposed for mayor, since current Mayor Kevin Klynstra isn't seeking re-election himself. There are also six newcomers vying for seats: Andrew Bult, Kylee DeBoer, Ericka Humbert, Amy Langeland, Hillery McAlpine and Rebecca Perkins. Kass was first elected in 2007 and has been re-elected three times. Langeland is a member of the Zeeland Cemetery and Parks Commission, and Perkins serves on the Zeeland Planning Commission. More: Zeeland City Council approves key rezonings for Mead Johnson expansion, modernization The top six vote-getters will square off for three open seats in November. The Sentinel will issue a questionnaire to those candidates after Aug. 5. — Cassidey Kavathas is the politics and court reporter at The Holland Sentinel. Contact her at ckavathas@ Follow her on X formerly known as Twitter @cassideykava. This article originally appeared on The Holland Sentinel: Guide: Zeelanders to choose finalists for City Council on Aug. 5 Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store