Professor: Migrants Cost Millions, Are Seeking 'Revenge' On Europe
Not only must Poland refuse mass migration due to the societal costs, but the country also simply cannot afford it. Due to this reality, there can be no compromise over mass immigration, says Polish professor and lawyer Witold Modzelewski, who works at the University of Warsaw.
In a conversation on the FMC27NEWS YouTube channel, Prof. Witold Modzelewski said he can provide a conservative estimate of how much each migrant costs Poland per day, which he said is 150 Polish zlotys (PLN), or €35 per day.
'If we chose an assimilation policy – assimilating those who choose us and we agree to have them here – then in today's reality it is not just about mere food. After all, these people need to be provided with a place to stay…. they need to be covered by a state umbrella financing the so-called security services. If we were to assume the reality of today's cost, it is an estimated PLN 150 per day. However, this is an underestimate,' said Prof. Modzelewski.
However, in other countries like Germany, these cost estimates are far higher, in part due to the higher cost of living.
Modzelewski may also not be factoring in social welfare, medical costs, integration courses, and education into his estimate.
🇵🇱 Migrants in Poland enjoy billiard and table tennis competitions to celebrate the International Day of Tolerance.The men from countries like India, Iraq, Iran, and Sri Lanka then received free burgers, Belgian fries, and soft drinks at the asylum center in Lesznowola. pic.twitter.com/ddWMUo1ed0 — Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) November 28, 2024
As the professor pointed out, this amount concerns direct expenses, and there would also be indirect expenses.
'Who can we take from to finance it? There is no one to take from. Therefore, let's put this problem aside as one we cannot afford and as one we will not participate in,' the professor stated.
He said that even if they can assume that Polish society would like to take on part of the costs of supporting migrants for humanitarian reasons, Poland cannot afford it.
Prof. Modzelewski emphasized that Poland bears no responsibility for the criminal colonial past of 'Old Europe.' He pointed out that the people who are currently inhabiting Europe through generational transmission 'want to take revenge.'
'Their rebellion is today, but the motive is the past. And we cannot participate in this,' said the professor.
'We have nothing in common with the colonial past of the old West and let's not look for anything in common. If someone wants to drag us into collective responsibility for those crimes, for centuries of objective wrongs, then we have to say 'no.''
Germany could send up to 70,000 migrants to Poland per year, according to a Polish MP.@DariuszMatecki filmed the new massive migrant center near the Polish border. Germany "can't cope with the migration problem."The solution? Send them to Poland and other EU nations. pic.twitter.com/b0Ak8fctgn — Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) February 21, 2025
According to Polish publication Do Rzeczy, 'although mainstream media does not show it, a wave of protests is growing in Poland against the transfer of illegal immigrants from culturally alien regions – Africa and the Middle East – from Germany to our country. The lack of consent of Poles to open borders for mass migration is clearly shown by all polls.'
Poland is expected to received hundreds of thousands of migrants over the coming years due to the EU migration pact, which obligates member states to accept migrants.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
2 days ago
- Daily Tribune
NATO agrees ‘historic' spending hike
AFP | The Hague US President Donald Trump took a victory lap at NATO's Hague summit yesterday, joining leaders in reaffirming the 'ironclad' commitment to protect each other after allies agreed to his demand to ramp up defence spending. The unpredictable US leader appeared keen to take the plaudits as he secured a key foreign policy win by getting NATO's 32 countries to agree to meet his headline target of five percent of GDP on defence spending. In a move that will provide reassurance to allies in Europe worried over the threat from Russia, Trump signed off on a final leaders' declaration confirming 'our ironclad commitment' to NATO's collective defence pledge that an attack on one is an attack on all. 'It's a great victory for everybody, I think, and we will be equalised,' Trump said of the new spending commitment, ahead of the summit's main session. Diplomats said that behind closed doors Trump insisted there was no greater ally than Washington and urged others to spend some of the new money on US weaponry. The deal hatched by NATO is a compromise that allows Trump to claim triumph, while in reality providing wiggle room for cash-strapped governments in Europe. It sees countries promise to dedicate 3.5 percent of GDP to core military spending by 2035, and a further 1.5 to broader security-related areas such as infrastructure. Entering the meeting, leaders lined up to declare the summit's spending hike as 'historic'. NATO allies say the increase is needed to counter a growing threat from Russia but also to keep Trump engaged, with the US leader long complaining that Europe spends too little on its own defence. Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever said: 'As Europeans, we should realise that our long break from history is over.' The continent needed to take responsibility for its own security 'in a very difficult time', added De Wever.
Gulf Insider
6 days ago
- Gulf Insider
Belgian Nationalist Given 12 Month Suspended Sentence
Belgian conservative-nationalist Dries Van Langenhove has again been sentenced on appeal to one year in prison as a suspended sentence for what the judge said were violations of the Racism and Negationism sentence stems from racist memes that were not even posted by him, but by members of a group chat he administrated seven years sentence was delivered today by the Court of Appeal in Ghent, although Van Langenhove does not accept the sentence, and the case now goes into cassation. On X, Van Langenhove simply wrote, 'Guilty. 12 months in jail. Madness.' Guilty. 12 months in jail. Madness. — Dries Van Langenhove (@DVanLangenhove) June 20, 2025 He later clarified upon receipt of the written verdict that the custodial sentence 'appears to be a suspended sentence,' which he suspects is 'most likely because the prisons in Belgium are literally full of illegal migrants.' 'Most people don't realize that the end result of such a sentence is the same. One politically incorrect tweet can now put me in jail. One meme sent by someone else in a group chat I am in can turn the suspended sentence into an effective one. This suspended sentence is the gravest form of censorship they could pursue and an effective way to kill activism,' he added. I just received the written verdict. It's very long so it will take time to analyse everything, but the 12 month prison sentence appears to be a suspended irony is that I have been fighting against mass migration for well over a decade now, and it has gotten me a… — Dries Van Langenhove (@DVanLangenhove) June 20, 2025 Last year, Van Langenhove was sentenced to a one-year prison sentence and a fine of €16,000. He would also be sentenced to be deprived of his right to stand for election for a maximum term of 10 years, but he appealed this verdict in a lower court. Van Langenhove ran a chat in 2018, but a broadcast from Pano news outlet showed how members exchanged thousands of potentially racist and sexist messages. This included several hundred memes or internet cartoons. Van Langenhove contended they were jokes and indicated he did not post anything himself. Seven members of the group chat faced criminal prosecution. Notably, the case in a country like the United States would have never gone to trial due to freedom of expression enshrined in the constitution. However, Belgium and a range of EU countries have not only beefed up hate speech laws but are also using them to prosecute political dissidents and anti-immigration activists, with Van Langenhove now one of the most high-profile targets. After several delays, the Court of Appeal in Ghent delivered its sentence today. Van Langenhove was convicted of violations of the Racism and Negationism Act, but the court argued that since the facts date from seven years ago, they merit a lighter sentence. The one-year prison sentence is fully postponed, and the fine is still €16,000. Van Langenhove will also not be deprived of his civil rights. 'It is a black day for free speech, for Flanders, and for Europe,' said Van Langenhove when he came out. 'Me, my family, and my environment have been terrorized for humor in a private chat group for seven years. Unfortunately, the court never wanted to listen to me, even now.' The court, however, found that Van Langenhove cannot use humor as a defense 'if the real intention is to incite hatred.' 'In the private Facebook and Discord group, by the way, not only jokes and cartoons were sent, but also many other, ordinary messages that show that Shield & Friends (the chat group's name) apparently and repeatedly proclaimed discrimination and racism.' The court argued that even though Van Langenhove did not send the messages, he was responsible. 'He didn't have it removed, even though he had the option to do so,' said the Court. It rejected that VRT journalists manipulated the content of the messages, which Van Langenhove claimed. The Court of Cassation will now review the legality of the judicial decisions, but will not examine the facts themselves. In most cases, the court determines whether the trial should be repeated. 'If necessary, I will then go to the European Court,' said Van Langenhove. 'I certainly don't give up the fight.' Van Langenhove was on trial with five other defendants, who will receive 80 hours of work and fines of €1,600. However, two others will be sentenced to three years in prison with deferment. One defendant who expressed regret was convicted, but his term will be suspended under separate conditions. The case has been broadly watched as a litmus test on free speech conditions in Europe, with the European model focusing less on freedom of speech and more on controlled speech, especially on issues related to race, sex, and immigration. Furthermore, questions have been raised about how access was obtained to the chat group in the first place, with allegations that a hack attack was conducted. Also read: Belgian Cyclist Completes Epic 9-Country Journey To Perform Hajj In Mecca
Gulf Insider
18-06-2025
- Gulf Insider
Senior Citizens Moved Out Of Housing Complex In Germany To Make Way For Refugees
The German city of Bargteheide has scrapped plans to demolish a senior citizens' residential complex on Nelkenweg after vacating all residents, opting instead to house asylum seekers in the building. Former residents had been told the building was uninhabitable and were forced to relocate. However, following an inspection, just five units will undergo renovation, while the remainder will be used as-is by the new arrivals. As reported by Abendblatt, Mayor Gabriele Hettwer defended the decision, saying all cost-related issues had been resolved and that a full renovation was unnecessary. 'The costs for the removal of mold and other renovation measures are manageable,' she said, noting that a preliminary building application would determine whether the entire complex could eventually be used. The move, however, has drawn sharp criticism from members of the SPD parliamentary group, who had supported the original eviction of elderly residents on the grounds that the buildings were unfit for habitation. 'I have seen for myself what a bad condition the buildings are in,' said SPD council member Andreas Bäuerle. His colleague Jörg Rehder added, 'The decision has an unpleasant taste.' 🇩🇪 Senior citizens living in an apartment complex in the German town of Bargteheide were told to leave their homes because the building was to be after they've all moved out, it transpires the building won't be demolished after asylum seekers are… — Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) June 15, 2025 He pointed out that while the city directly financed the relocations of elderly tenants, it now appeared eager to move refugees into the same housing it had deemed unsuitable. CDU council member Sven Meding dismissed the SPD's concerns as political posturing. 'I sometimes wonder if it's election campaign again. Should we accommodate the refugees in tents?' he asked. 'The apartments on Nelkenweg are well habitable.' It would appear that no one on the municipal council had an issue with the fact that the elderly residents were not welcomed to return to their homes following the building's inspection, and it would now hold asylum seekers. Many former residents had expressed their desire to remain in their homes. 'I feel very comfortable here and have lived here for 20 years,' senior citizen Frieda Miller told SHZ previously. 'I'm good here, here I have my home, my flowers, a nice apartment that I can pay for.' 'The apartment is really well designed, everything can be reached from here, and there is also a lot of nature. I would like to stay here,' added fellow resident Dagmar Pardubitzki. Mayor Hettwer stated that the use of the complex is temporary but refused to give a timeframe. She added that the city was deliberately creating more refugee housing than currently needed, to prepare for potential increases in migration. 'The developments are currently declining because the regulations at the borders are stricter,' she said. 'But it is like looking into a crystal ball to estimate the flows of the day after tomorrow.' Although only 40 additional places were technically required, the Nelkenweg complex provides 104. According to the mayor, this allows the city to better absorb any unexpected influxes. Supporters of the plan also point to challenges with other housing providers, who resist open-ended rental agreements and frequently let leases expire to retain flexibility over their properties. In contrast, the Nelkenweg site offers immediate and potential long-term availability. The city council ultimately voted in favor of the measure, with support from the CDU, Greens, and WfB. The SPD cast the only three votes against. Relocation or eviction of elderly tenants to make room for migrants is not new across Germany. In 2023, Remix News reported how a Berlin nursing home had closed its doors to its residents after signing a new contract to accommodate refugees. Similarly, in Lörrach, the city's municipal housing association evicted dozens of long-term residents , many of them senior citizens, to accommodate migrants. When the public protested against the decision, the city's council published a statement claiming that demonstrations were led by right-wing extremists and called for a 'fight against the right.'
