
Dangerous Drumnadrochit dog's owner loses appeal against conviction
Janet MacFarlane's canine, Diego, attacked the worker through a gap in the gate of her home in Drumnadrochit, on April 14 2023.
Inverness Sheriff Court heard how the man needed stitches after the incident. She was charged with having a dog dangerously out of control following proceedings in September 2024.
Sheriff Sara Matheson ordered Diego to be muzzled and kept on a lead and muzzled when in a public place – she also ordered MacFarlane to pay Diego's victim £600.
The conviction prompted MacFarlane's legal team to go to the Sheriff Appeal Court in Edinburgh, where they argued that the judge failed to follow the correct legal tests in her decision to convict MacFarlane.
The Sheriff Appeal Court heard that if Sheriff Matheson had followed the correct interpretation of the law, MacFarlane would have been acquitted.
But in a written judgement issued by the court on Wednesday, Sheriff Principal Aisha Anwar KC, rejected defence arguments and upheld the conviction.
Sheriff Principal Anwar, who sat with colleagues Appeal Sheriff Iain Fleming and Appeal Sheriff David Young KC, said their colleague had acted correctly.
She added: 'We shall… refuse the appeal.'
During proceedings, the delivery driver, who wasn't named in the judgement, told the court that when he arrived at the property the dog was initially called away by MacFarlane's husband.
He said he did not notice the dog returning as he passed the parcel over to MacFarlane – but it was at this point that he was bitten through a gap in the gate.
In evidence, the man recalled: 'I said to the lady: 'Your dog had just bitten me and she shrugged and walked away.''
The court heard that the entrance to MacFarlane's property featured three signs warning visitors about the four-legged residents, including one that said: 'Beware of the dog, it may bite, you have been warned.'
She said six-year-old Diego was a 'beautiful, good-natured dog' who had 'never bitten anybody'.
'He is a more laying on his back with his belly getting tickled kind of dog,' she added.
MacFarlane confirmed she had installed wire to block the gaps in the fence since the incident.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Appeal court decision has raised questions over liabilty claims
Andrew Gilmour expects further guidance will follow as cases addressing the issues proceed Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Every day, members of the public enter offices, shops, supermarkets, restaurants and gyms. An issue that has arisen of late is how the Scottish courts deal with accidents caused by the condition of something in such premises that is defective. In the case of McCormack v Fitness Limited, the Sheriff Appeal Court provided guidance on how to analyse and determine whether an occupier of premises containing defective items should be liable for such an accident. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It has long been a feature of Scots Law that in certain circumstances, the maxim res ipsa loquitor could apply to an accident. The claimant should establish that the thing which caused damage was under the defender's management and control, and that the accident was of a type that does not ordinarily occur if proper care is taken. An inference of negligence is then accepted only if the defender can offer no explanation consistent with absence of fault on their part. Andrew Gilmour is a Partner, Horwich Farrelly In McCormack, the claimant was injured by a ragged edge on the outer rim of a weight plate in a gym that cut his hand when he tried to place it onto a shoulder press machine. How the damage to the plate occurred was unknown. At first instance, the court decided that res ipsa loquitor applied to the accident circumstances and found for the injured party. The view taken was that the gym owner could not provide a reasonable explanation for how the accident occurred without negligence. The court held the gym owner had exclusive management of the premises, controlling access by way of membership and subscriptions. The owner employed staff on reception and on the gym floor. Seeking to place a weight plate onto a machine should not ordinarily cause injury to a user. There was no evidence of any inspection of the plate on the morning of the accident and no faults were recorded. However, the appeal court decided the court had erred in focusing over the control exerted over the gym premises, rather than the weight plate itself. The court was bound to consider and decide the question in this way, as if there was no control over the thing that caused the accident, then res ipsa loquitor did not apply and liability would not be established. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The court had regard to the well-established observation that the principle only applied where the incident suggests negligence on someone's part and, because of exclusive management and control in the defenders at the time when the negligence occurred, it can be presumed it was the defenders who were negligent. In this case, the free weights and shoulder press machine were not in the exclusive control of the gym. The gym was open to members of the public who had a membership or subscription to use the premises. Those members had free use of the weight plates during the course of their exercise. Therefore, the appeal court overturned the decision and absolved the gym from any liability, as the exclusive management and control over the weight plate had not been established. The decision raises questions about exclusive management and control of items in premises. Does the presence of members of the public mean that few items in the premises could be under such control? When should a claimant seek to establish a case based on a failure to take reasonable care, rather than risking establishing that res ipsa loquitor applies? A number of cases are addressing this issue and no doubt further guidance will follow.


Daily Mirror
4 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Three German Shepherds launch 'pack attack' as woman left needing plastic surgery
The horror attack involving three German Shepherd cross dogs took place in a public field and left the victim with multiple wounds to her hands and fingers which required plastic surgery A dog owner has been warned she could be jailed after her three German Shepherd cross dogs launched a savage attack on another woman in a public field. Sarah Pike, 51, from Exeter, appeared before Exeter Magistrates' Court, where she admitted being the owner in charge of dogs dangerously out of control that caused injury. The attack happened at Exwick playing fields in December, and left the victim with multiple bite wounds to her hands and fingers. She later required plastic surgery. The prosecutor described it in court as a 'pack attack', telling magistrates that the three dogs - named Zac, Storm, and Nala - had acted together during the incident. Pike also pleaded guilty to two additional charges of being in charge of dogs dangerously out of control on the same day. She was told she could face up to six months in custody. Following the incident, the three dogs were seized by police, and two other dogs - previously in Pike's care - were euthanised after separate attacks on 'other dogs and humans', the court heard. District Judge Angela Brereton told the hearing that an expert report would now be prepared to assess the temperament of the dogs. A destruction order may be made depending on the outcome. Pike is due to be sentenced in September. Last month, a dog latched onto a woman's face in Liverpool and left her needing 20 stitches after what began as a seemingly innocent gesture on a night out. Mum Cody Davies had been out with a friend when she stopped to stroke a dog, which she described as a "pitbull type". Within seconds, it jumped up and bit her in the face. The 31-year-old said she was left with "blood pouring" from the wound and that she was lucky not to lose her lip following the attack on Mathew Street at 1am on Sunday, June 29. Cody, from Port Sunlight, was taken to Aintree Hospital from the city centre where she received 20 stitches to her face. Following the attack, the mum urged others to not approach dogs unless they're certain they are safe. "I feel terrible and I feel so sad. I love my dogs and this dog was just playing with its owner in the street so I went over to stroke it," Cody told the Liverpool Echo. "When I went over, the woman didn't say anything about not approaching them but when I did, it jumped up and bit my face. I was running around with my hands covering my face and blood pouring from my face. "No taxis would take me because I was covered in blood and thankfully someone rang an ambulance for me."


The Sun
4 days ago
- The Sun
Horrifying pics of the aftermath of head-on crash that left five dead including father and son
SHOCKING photos were revealed after five people were killed in a fiery car crash near San Diego. The car accident, which involved three vehicles in total, sent one vehicle down a ravine on Friday. 6 6 6 6 Two of the victims were father Marcial Rivera, 59, and son Emmanuel Rivera, 32. The pair were on their way to work at a landscaping company when the crash happened. "I know that my daddy's in a better place, but this is very hard," Ana Rivera, one of the father's daughters, said in a tearful interview with KSWB-TV. Tesla video footage showed a truck on the wrong side of the road ramming into two other trucks head on, including the their vehicle, the outlet said. A police release reported that the car"crossed over into oncoming traffic at a high rate of speed." Officials said that the occupants of all three cars had been killed. Photos show the disturbing scene of cars completely destroyed with burnt vegetation nearby. The collision caused a fire, which sparked on brush nearby. The fire burned half an acre before it was put out by emergency crews. "Both were hardworking men doing what they always did — working to support their families," the family's GoFundMe said. Teenage motorbike rider, 14, dies in horror crash with car as cops launch probe "This unimaginable loss has left both families in deep grief. We are raising funds to help cover funeral and memorial expenses, and to support the young children left behind." Emmanuel's girlfriend is five months pregnant, the station reported. He was also the father to a 7-year-old. "His loss has left a huge hole in our hearts and in the lives of his young family," the fundraiser read. The Rivera family's full GoFundMe statement " In Loving Memory of Marcial & Emmanuel Rivera On the morning of July 18, 2025, our family experienced a devastating tragedy. Marcial Rivera and his son Emmanuel Rivera tragically lost their lives in a five-car collision on State Route 67 while driving to a job site. Both were hardworking men doing what they always did—working to support their families. Marcial was a devoted husband, father of five, and a proud grandfather. He was a true family man who found joy in bringing everyone together. Whether it was for a family dinner or a special occasion, he made sure everyone felt loved and connected. He also had a strong faith and was active in serving his church and community. Emmanuel was following in his father's footsteps—hardworking, loving, and responsible. He leaves behind a 7-year-old child and another baby on the way. His loss has left a huge hole in our hearts and in the lives of his young family. This unimaginable loss has left both families in deep grief. We are raising funds to help cover funeral and memorial expenses, and to support the young children left behind. Any contribution, no matter how small, will help ease the financial burden during this heartbreaking time. If you are unable to donate, please consider sharing this page to help spread the word. From the bottom of our hearts, thank you for your support, prayers, and love." Source: GoFundMe Marcial had been married to wife Regina for 35 years, with five children. "He was a true family man who found joy in bringing everyone together. Whether it was for a family dinner or a special occasion, he made sure everyone felt loved and connected," his family said. Almost $6,500 had been raised for its $20,000 goal, with over 120 donations as of Wednesday afternoon. "Any contribution, no matter how small, will help ease the financial burden during this heartbreaking time," the GoFundMe read. "If you are unable to donate, please consider sharing this page to help spread the word." The other three victims were not identified by police. 6 6