Are our politicians safe from threats and 'free to lead'?
Photo:
VNP / Daniela Maoate-Cox
Online abuse has become part of the job for many politicians, MPs said at a panel this week, hosted by Manatū Wāhine Ministry for Women, marking the launch of the Free to Lead campaign.
MPs from both Labour and National spoke candidly about their experience of online harm, and how it's changing our political landscape.
Anyone who uses the internet will know that a comments section can be a pretty toxic place, perhaps even more so when the topic is politics.
Aotearoa has always prided itself on how accessible our elected officials are, but the number of dodgy, abusive, or even violent interactions experienced by MPs has quietly increased.
Thirty years ago being an elected official meant facing criticism from the media, political opponents and sometimes the odd heckler in public. These days an MP can wake up, check their phone and see a stream of negative comments, some deeply personal, even bordering on threatening.
Labour's Duncan Webb and National's Greg Fleming said that as males, their experience of abuse had rarely been personal and most attacks were on their political ideas or beliefs.
Studies both here and abroad confirm what many have long suspected - that female officials are being disproportionately targeted.
"This is a gendered issue, right?" said Webb. "And sure, I've had nasty comments and I've had incidents at markets and so on, but the power dynamics are entirely different. So I don't think it can really be compared effectively. I am not deeply affected by most of the comments I see. It's a very rare day where it really hurts. But I understand entirely that's not the case for everyone else."
National's Nancy Lu said disinformation spread online about her marriage during an election campaign, and there wasn't an obvious way to combat the claims.
"We don't have a way to fight back. It's not like I can just stand up in front of Parliament and …have a press conference [to] make it clear. ...So it got us thinking for quite some time in terms of what we do to protect ourselves - me and [my husband]. He's also in a fulltime job, our children, our family; what tools do we have to fight back? We're still searching."
Labour MP Ingrid Leary says that there's a global trend of politicians, especially women, being increasingly exposed to harm, both online and in person.
"We've had women MPs in Sri Lanka, where there have been attempts to set them on fire, we've had
a woman MP in the UK shot
. Recently, we had
Shane Jones and his wife accosted at the airport
.
"We are seeing the spillover and the normalisation of hate speech-type behaviours coming into the physical space. So all the evidence and trends would suggest that women MPs in particular are less safe than they were years ago."
So where has this new-found animosity towards lawmakers come from?
National's Greg Fleming mused that perhaps the uniquely adversarial environment at Parliament is partly to blame.
"We are, as political leaders, culture makers arguably, first and foremost. I think sometimes we have almost more effect at making culture than we do at making legislation. And I think we could do a much better job of focusing on playing the ball, not the man, because we do end up legitimising it."
Leary agreed, "I think all of us have a role to play in terms of managing our own value system and how we conduct ourselves online. …Some of the behaviours could be seen to contribute to the vitriol that is being hurled at politicians, because people don't necessarily see that some of this is theatre and is not real life."
Fleming said that this political 'theatre', increasingly referred to as toxic, acts as a deterrent to attracting the best and brightest to pursue a career in politics.
Chief executive of the Parliamentary Service Rafael Gonzalez-Montero appearing before a select committee.
Photo:
VNP / Phil Smith
Responsibility for the safety of MPs lies with the Parliamentary Service, one of the two agencies tasked with running Parliament. Chief executive Rafael Gonzalez-Montero says during his time in the role, there has been "a lot more volatility in the threat landscape, both online and in the physical world".
Currently, the Parliamentary Service liaise with the police when an MP is threatened, but Gonzalez-Montero says "it's very difficult to do anything in advance, so unfortunately we are the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff".
Bolstering the safety of MPs is something the Parliamentary Service have been working on this Parliamentary term, including providing a risk assessment service for MPs attending events in the community.
"We are always looking at ways to keep our members safe - and especially the staff that work in the electorate and community offices safe. So we've been looking around what happens all over the world, in other jurisdictions, to see what we can adopt here. We are looking at ways to help prevent even more the bullying and harassment behaviour that they are subject to online."
Gonzalez-Montero says there is a review of Parliament's wider security system on the horizon, which will include both physical and cybersecurity, to identify blind spots and potential improvements.
* RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Allegations Maori have been removed from Maori roll
Te Pati Maori said they have filed urgent proceedings in the High Court after allegations Maori have been removed or shifted off the Maori roll without their consent. A number of voters have posted online to say their electoral enrolment details have been altered or are not there at all. It comes on the eve of local election enrolment cutoff and ahead of sweeping electoral changes promised by the government. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Holly Bennett and Tim Batt Part 1
Photo: 123RF Tonight, on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Holly Bennett and Tim Batt. Starting off, the Panel discusses whether New Zealand needs it's own FBI office or not; they examine the role of the emergency mobile alert during the Russian tsunami yesterday, is three alerts too much? And they hear from a digital wellbeing expert about the move in Australia to ban under 16 year-olds from YouTube: should we follow suit in Aotearoa?

RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
Petroleum law passes, with a last minute twist
File photo. Photo: 123RF The exploration and extraction of petroleum in New Zealand will be more accessible from this week with the government's Crown Minerals Amendment Bill having received a third and final reading in Parliament this afternoon. The Bill (soon to be an Act pending Royal Assent), is the brainchild of Minister for Resources Shane Jones. It removes the 2018 law passed by the Ardern government which limited new petroleum exploration permits to onshore Taranaki. On Tuesday, the Clerk announced the commencement of the third reading of the Crown Minerals Amendment Bill, but rather than beginning that final debate, a last-minute motion from Jones meant the Bill was sent back to the committee stage in what is called a recommittal. Recommittals, although not unprecedented, don't happen all that often, and if they do occur, it's usually when a member's bill is being considered. (Member's Bills without the significant drafting resource possessed by a government are more likely to have oddities that need tidying up.) The process of returning a bill to an earlier stage enables the bill to receive further refinement. This may be necessary for several reasons - perhaps a fault or loophole has been discovered, or the government has had a last-minute change of mind regarding a specific provision. In any case, to make these changes, the bill is sent back to the Committee of the whole House stage, where amendments can be put forward. After reportedly spotting a loophole, Jones had tabled a significant amendment at 5pm on Monday which was then debated less than 24 hours later in Tuesday's recommittal. The change itself related to who pays the cost of decommissioning and cleaning up oil wells once production has ceased. The amendment paper, which was successfully included in the bill, places the power for determining who pays for decommissioning costs in the hands of the Minister for Resources and the Minister of Finance (currently Shane Jones), replacing the model of trailing liability. This is the third policy iteration within the current amendment bill. The Opposition spent most of Tuesday evening drilling into the last-minute switch, trying their best to extract answers from the Minister about why it was decided and who he had consulted with about it. To listen to some of those exchanges, click the link to the audio version of this story at the top of the page. *RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.