Philips' new ambient wall light is now available
Signify has officially announced its new Philips Hue Play Wall Washer light, which was previously leaked by Amazon UK earlier this month. The company has also launched its new Philips Hue AI assistant in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg, with a broader global release expected by the end of August.
Available now in Europe, the US, and Canada in a black or white finish, the Philips Hue Play Wall Washer is $219.99 for a single unit or $384.99 for a two-pack, which is slightly cheaper than the $270 for a single unit suggested in the leak. That's still quite a bit more expensive than the $89.99 Philips Hue Light Bar that offers similar functionality, but the new Wall Washer is over twice as bright, projecting up to 1,035 lumens of white or colored light.
Featuring an aluminum matte finish, the Wall Washer uses LEDs angled upwards to cast a wider dispersion of light and its intensity, brightness, and position can be adjusted using an 'intuitive 3D drag-and-drop feature in the Hue app,' so it shines exactly where you need it. It also works with the Hue HDMI Sync box and Sync apps so the light responds and complements what you're watching or listening to, and is compatible with voice assistants, including Apple's Siri, Amazon's Alexa, and Google Assistant.
First announced earlier this year, Philips Hue's new generative AI assistant creates new lighting scenes, or recommends existing ones, based on prompts that are either spoken or typed into the Hue app, like 'Give me a scene for a spooky Halloween party.' The assistant can also be used to adjust the brightness and color settings of Hue lights, while additional features like creating automations and schedules, and 'in-app support via a chatbot,' are coming 'later this year,' according to Hue.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
ASML Growth Outlook Trimmed by Bernstein Over EUV Concerns
ASML Holding N.V. (NASDAQ:ASML) ranks among the best fundamental stocks to buy according to hedge funds. Bernstein SocGen Group began coverage of ASML Holding N.V. (NASDAQ:ASML) on June 17 with a Market Perform rating and a EUR700 price target, citing issues with the company's extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography division. While acknowledging ASML's 'undisputed' superiority in EUV lithography, the company voiced concerns about the declining returns on top-of-the-line logic capital expenditures incurred by EUV lithography. In that regard, Bernstein anticipates a decline in the intensity of EUV capital expenditure. Instead of lithography, the firm predicts that new transistor architectures and advanced packaging would propel further transistor miniaturization. The firm's estimate of EUV revenue for 2030 falls 24% below ASML Holding N.V. (NASDAQ:ASML)'s own guidance. According to Bernstein, ASML's growth will be in line with that of Wafer Fabrication Equipment (WFE) at a compound annual growth rate of 7% from 2024 and 2030. The firm's revenue prediction for 2030 is 18% below the consensus and at the low end of the company's guidance range. A key player in the semiconductor sector, ASML Holding N.V. (NASDAQ:ASML) specializes in lithographic systems, which employ light to etch intricate designs on silicon wafers, a crucial stage in the production of chips. While we acknowledge the potential of ASML as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. Read More: and Disclosure: None.
WIRED
9 hours ago
- WIRED
Fairphone Has a New Plan to Get You to Care
Jun 29, 2025 7:00 AM WIRED loves Fairphone and everything it stands for—but people just aren't buying its devices, and the few who have don't need to upgrade. The Fairphone Gen. 6. Courtesy of Fairphone Fairphone has released a new phone, the Fairphone 6. The series began in 2013, and there's still nothing else quite like it, anywhere. These mobile phones are what almost all other tech is not: ethically admirable. Fairphone strives for more sustainably sourced raw materials, for better pay and better conditions for factory workers. And on your side as the end user, the phones are modular, easily repairable. Fairphone promises its new phone will get eight years of software updates, including an eyebrow-raising seven major Android system upgrades. The Fairphone 6 has 12 modular elements you can replace, from the battery and display to the speakers, camera, and USB port. Indeed, you can still buy replacement cameras and screens for the Fairphone 2, which was released in pre-Trump, pre-Brexit 2015. And Fairphones remain the only smartphones—ever—to be rated 10/10 for repairability by iFixit. Every model since the Fairphone 2 has achieved that score. Sounds great, right? But there's a big problem. It looks like hardly anyone gives a damn. People Don't Care Enough Fairphone is stuck in a rut. We know this because Fairphone is not just a pioneer of smartphones you don't feel dirty just for owning. It's unusually transparent, too. Its own reports tell us Fairphone sales have flatlined at around 100,000 a year. Put 100,000 phones in a room and it will seem like a heck of a lot. But, for context, Apple is estimated to have sold 37 million iPhone 16s in the series' first weekend, before the phones were even out. Does no one really care about sustainable tech? The answer from one analyst we talked to is kinda, yeah . 'There's really no one else who does anything kind of close to what Fairphone does from a sustainability point of view. The issue I have with Fairphone is that it's quite niche,' says Jan Stryjak, Counterpoint's European and Sustainability research lead. 'It's still not the kind of primary driver for people when it comes to buying a phone. The number one is still very much price and brand, particularly in Europe.' Fairphone isn't a household name. And while the Fairphone 6 is actually cheaper than the Fairphone 5 was at launch in 2023, at £499/€599, it has masses of price competition from companies where any ethics angle can seem, at most, little more than a marketing tick box. For less cash, you could buy a more powerful and excellent Pixel 9a, for example. The company made a concerted effort to get out of this rut in 2023, investing big in marketing and expansion. It led to a €20 million loss for that year, followed by the departure of CEO Eva Gouwens, and 2024 sales just a smidgen over 100,000, yet again. And Fairphone's much bigger rivals are going to be forced to apply at least a pinch of Fairphone-style seasoning to their phones going forward, thanks to the EU's Ecodesign Directive. This came into force on June 20. It demands five-year software support and applies stronger rules on repairability. 'I can't see any significant growth over the next few years,' says Stryjak. 'Other companies have caught up a little bit in terms of making things more durable and sustainable and repairable, and with consumers a key driver is still pricing and brand. Fairphone will have its loyal fan base, but I can't see that significantly expanding anytime soon.' 'Nobody Wants to Pull on a Dead Horse' We put to Fairphone the idea it may have to make do pootling along with this same niche audience. 'I will say it's nonsense, right?' Fairphone CEO Raymond van Eck told WIRED. 'I would never have started at a company … if we feel there is no potential. Nobody wants to, as we say in Dutch, pull on a dead horse to see if it's going to walk.' Fairphone is based in Amsterdam, and van Eck was appointed CEO in August 2024. 'In the next five years, we really have the intention to quadruple our addressable market and to take our fair share of that,' says van Eck. The company has also set a goal of 'double digit growth' just for this year. The obvious question: how? Part of Fairphone's strategy is of course seen in the Fairphone 6 itself. It has some neat ideas such as a slider that puts the phone into an Essentials mode. This pares back the interface to help you get away from the distractions of, for example, social media. There's a breezy lifestyle angle here Fairphones have arguably not had before. And fostering that was a part of the rebrand the company kicked off at the beginning of 2025, which included binning the stiff-looking, all-caps company logo of old for something a bit more friendly. The Fairphone Fix Van Eck says it's about 'changing the order' of priorities, of putting the device itself at pole position rather than the ethics it represents. 'In the end, it also is clarifying Fairphone's vision, because the rebrand gave us a more friendly, more approachable identity," he says. "It's a bit less paternalistic.' The message is that Fairphone isn't just a phone for eco warriors. And chief technology officer Chandler Elizabeth Hatton suggests that image, that classic Fairphone message, may have actually proved off-putting for some. 'When we are marketing the device, we don't lead with that. Not in our advertising campaigns, not in our communication, and also not the way that I would like to convey it to you,' says Hatton. 'It can become preachy in some markets. That message is resonating less right now. There are people that are in panic but also completely exhausted by the climate crisis or questions of ethics.' So … is it time to de-woke Fairphone? That seems too blunt an interpretation, because there's no indication that Fairphone plans to dilute its standards. It's just not going to harp on about them quite as overtly. Turning Down the Volume 'Fairphone was founded 12 years ago, basically to tackle the social and environmental issues embedded in the electronics industry,' says Van Eck. 'What we also saw is that Fairphone was quite situated around telling that story … which meant that the Fairphone was for a lesser addressable market.' This new approach also involves not having too bold a take on things like AI, which owing to its environmental impact could be seen as antithetical to one part of the old Fairphone message. 'I don't think it is pragmatic, if you start more revolutionary thinking saying, 'OK, we're totally against it, and we're going to do nothing with it,'' says Ven Eck. AI is 'part of our industry, right? It's part of the everyday use of customers. So it will be almost naive to say we're not going to do anything with it. It's part of everyday life.' The Fairphone 6 doesn't have its own AI assistant, but does feature Google's Gemini AI. Turning down the volume on the environmental and ethical messaging might be compared to how some vegetarian food brands now consider people cutting down on meat, or meat-eaters looking for a healthy choice, as important a part of their audience. CTO Hatten would rather you tell a friend to think of the Fairphone 6 as 'the last phone that they'll have to buy for a while' rather than dwell on the ethics of the mining operations used to harvest the cobalt for its battery. But there's a big problem here, too. In 1924, the American automobile market began reaching saturation point. To maintain sales, General Motors executive Alfred P. Sloan Jr. suggested annual model-year design changes to cajole car owners into buying replacements each year. This strategy came to be referred to as planned obsolescence. In an ideal world, Fairphone wants their phones to be 'the last phone that you'll have to buy'—and they'll try their darnedest to make sure you've the software and spare parts to make this happen. There's no planned obsolescence here. None at all. Now, that's laudable, but this also means that, once Fairphone has tapped that global market of the relatively tiny number of phone users who really care about our planet above the wonders of Apple's Dynamic Island, very few will need to rebuy or upgrade on their initial ethical purchase. Not for many, many years, anyway. How can you significantly grow a business like that? Will Fairphone's new strategy of diversifying its offering with the 6's breezy lifestyle angle work? Thanks to the company's wonderful transparency we can all find out once Fairphone drops its 2025 Impact Report some time in early 2026.
WIRED
10 hours ago
- WIRED
I Let AI Agents Plan My Vacation—and It Wasn't Terrible
The latest wave of AI tools claim to take the pain out of booking your next trip. From transport and accommodation to restaurants and attractions, we let AI take the reins to put this to the test. Photo-Illustration: Wired Staff/Victoria Turk The worst part of travel is the planning: the faff of finding and booking transport, accommodation, restaurant reservations—the list can feel endless. To help, the latest wave of AI agents, such as OpenAI's Operator and Anthropic's Computer Use claim they can take these dreary, cumbersome tasks from befuddled travelers and do it all for you. But exactly how good are they are digging out the good stuff? What better way to find out than deciding on a last-minute weekend away. I tasked Operator, which is available to ChatGPT Pro subscribers, with booking me something budget-friendly, with good food and art, and told it that I'd prefer to travel by train. What's fascinating is that you can actually watch its process in real time—the tool opens a browser window and starts, much as I would, searching for destinations accessible by rail. It scrolls a couple of articles, then offers two suggestions: Paris or Bruges. 'I recently went to Paris,' I type in the chat. 'Let's do Bruges!' Armed with my decision, Operator goes on to look up train times on the Eurostar website and finds a return ticket that will take me to Brussels and includes onward travel within Belgium. I intervene, however, when I see the timings: It selected an early-morning train out on Saturday, and an equally early train back on Sunday—not exactly making the most of the weekend, I point out. It finds a later return option. So far impressed, I wait to double-check my calendar before committing. When I return, however, the session has timed out. Unlike ChatGPT, Operator closes conversations between tasks, and I have to start again from scratch. I feel irrationally slighted, as if my trusty travel assistant has palmed me off to a colleague. Alas, the fares have already changed, and I find myself haggling with the AI: can't it find something cheaper? Tickets eventually selected, I take over to enter my personal and payment details. (I may be trusting AI to blindly send me across country borders, but I'm not giving it my passport information.) Using ChatGPT's Operator to book a train ticket to Bruges. Courtesy of Victoria Turk Trains booked, Operator thinks its job is done. But I'll need somewhere to stay, I remind it—can it book a hotel? It asks for more details and I'm purposefully vague, specifying that it should be comfy and conveniently located. Comparing hotels is perhaps my least favorite aspect of travel planning, so I'm happy to leave it scrolling through I restrain myself from jumping in when I see it's set the wrong dates, but it corrects this itself. It spends a while surveying an Ibis listing, but ends up choosing a three-star hotel called Martin's Brugge, which I note users have rated as having an excellent location. Now all that's left is an itinerary. Here, Operator seems to lose steam. It offers a perfunctory one-day schedule that appears to have mainly been cribbed from a vegetarian travel blog. On day 2, it suggests I 'visit any remaining attractions or museums.' Wow, thanks for the tip. The day of the trip arrives, and, as I drag myself out of bed at 4:30AM, I remember why I usually avoid early departures. Still, I get to Brussels without issue. My ticket allows for onward travel, but I realize I don't know where I'm going. I fire up Operator on my phone and ask which platform the next Bruges-bound train departs from. It searches the Belgian railway timetables. Minutes later, it's still searching. I look up and see the details on a station display. I get to the platform before Operator has figured it out. Bruges is delightful. Given Operator's lackluster itinerary, I branch out. This kind of research task is perfect for a large language model, I realize—it doesn't require agentic capabilities. ChatGPT, Operator's OpenAI sibling, gives me a much more thorough plan, plotting activities by the hour with suggestions of not just where to eat, but what to order (Flemish stew at De Halve Mann brewery). I also try Google's Gemini and Anthropic's Claude, and their plans are similar: Walk to the market square; see the belfry tower; visit the Basilica of the Holy Blood. Bruges is a small city, and I can't help but wonder if this is simply the standard tourist route, or if the AI models are all getting their information from the same sources. Various travel-specific AI tools are trying to break through this genericness. I briefly try MindTrip, which provides a map alongside a written itinerary, offers to personalize recommendations based on a quiz, and includes collaborative features for shared trips. CEO Andy Moss says it expands on broad LLM capabilities by leveraging a travel-specific 'knowledge base' containing things like weather data and real-time availability. Courtesy of Victoria Turk After lunch, I admit defeat. According to ChatGPT's itinerary I should spend the afternoon on a boat tour, taking photos in another square, and visiting a museum. It has vastly overestimated the stamina of a human who's been up since 4:30AM. I go to rest at my hotel, which is basic, but indeed ideally located. I'm coming around to Operator's lazier plans: I'll do the remaining attractions tomorrow. As a final task, I ask the agent to make a dinner reservation—somewhere authentic but not too expensive. It gets bamboozled by a dropdown menu during the booking process but manages a workaround after a little encouragement. I'm impressed as I walk past the obvious tourist traps to a more out-of-the-way dining room that serves classic local cuisine and is themed around pigeons. It's a good find—and one that doesn't seem to appear on the top 10 lists of obvious guides like TripAdvisor or The Fork. On the train home, I muse on my experience. The AI agent certainly required supervision. It struggled to string tasks together and lacked an element of common sense, such as when it tried to book the earliest train home. But it was refreshing to outsource decision-making to an assistant that could present a few select options, rather than having to scroll through endless listings. For now, people mainly use AI for inspiration, says Emma Brennan at travel agent trade association ABTA; it doesn't beat the human touch. 'An increasing number of people are booking with the travel agents for the reason that they want someone there if something goes wrong,' she says. It's easy to imagine AI tools taking over the information gateway role from search and socials, with businesses clamoring to appear in AI-generated suggestions. 'Google isn't going to be the front door for everything in the future,' says Moss. Are we ready to give this power to a machine? But then, perhaps that ship has sailed. When planning travel myself, I'll reflexively check a restaurant's Google rating, look up a hotel on Instagram, or read TripAdvisor reviews of an attraction, despite desires to stay away from the default tourist beat. Embarking on my AI trip, I worried I'd spend more time staring at my screen. By the end, I realize I've probably spent less.
