Why your body ages rapidly in two 'bursts'
Have you ever woken up in the morning and suddenly felt old? There might be a good reason. A series of studies has found that, rather than ageing gradually on a linear timescale, we might have significant "bursts" of getting old during our adult years, said National Geographic.
These two bursts usually happen in our mid-40s and our early-60s, according to a research team at Stanford University, who tracked thousands of different molecules in people aged 25 to 75. The researchers found that 81% of the molecules didn't change continuously, as you'd expect, but actually transformed significantly around certain ages.
Their "provocative" findings seem to "fly in the face" of current models of ageing, said David Sinclair, a molecular geneticist, longevity researcher, and professor at Harvard Medical School.
A separate study by a team in Germany last year found that sudden chemical modifications to DNA occurred in mice in early to mid-life and again in mid to late life, hinting that there were "three discrete stages of ageing", said The New York Times. And a 2019 analysis, which examined the blood plasma of over 4,000 people, found there were "significant jumps" in concentrations of proteins associated with ageing in the fourth, seventh and eighth decades of life.
This "sudden ageing" can come with "an acceleration in muscle wastage and skin decline", said New Scientist, along with an inability to metabolise alcohol, a swift dwindling of immune cells, and substantial increases in the risk of cardiovascular disease and of dying.
Although none of this sounds particularly enjoyable, the various findings "don't have to make you dread hitting your 40s and 60s", said National Geographic, because understanding "how and when we age" can help experts and the general public take "specific steps to prevent or at least prepare for" some of the "most undesirable" aspects of the process.
The pattern "fits with previous evidence" that the threat of many age-related diseases does not "increase incrementally", said The Guardian. Conditions such as Alzheimer's and cardiovascular disease tend to show a "steep uptick" after 60.
There is a note of caution to attach to the Stanford findings, said Sinclair, as other studies have found that people often experience a "mid-life crisis" in their late-30s and early-40s or a "late-life crisis" in their late-50s and early-60s – the two periods linked to the ageing "bursts".
To put it another way, it's possible "associated psychological and lifestyle changes may be responsible for these changes in ageing and not due to our inherent biology".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
Rethinking Work With AI: What Stanford's Groundbreaking Workforce Study Means For Healthcare's Future
AI systems should reduce cognitive load, clarify ambiguity, and work alongside teams as intelligent collaborators, not as black-box disruptors. What if the AI systems you're building solve the wrong problems and alienate the workforce you're trying to support? That's the uncomfortable reality laid bare by a new research study from Stanford University. While AI pilots race ahead across administrative and clinical functions, most are still built on a flawed assumption: that automating tasks equals progress. But for the people doing the work—clinicians, care coordinators, billing specialists—that's not what they asked for. The report, Future of Work with AI Agents, offers the most granular audit yet of how worker sentiment, task complexity, and technical feasibility collide in the age of artificial intelligence. Over 1,500 U.S. workers were surveyed across 104 occupations, producing the most detailed dataset yet on where AI could, and should, fit. Their preferences were paired with ratings from 52 AI experts to create a map of the true automation and augmentation landscape. For healthcare, the findings could not come at a more urgent moment. The healthcare sector faces a burned-out workforce, escalating administrative waste, and widespread dissatisfaction with digital tools that were meant to help. A majority of physicians report that documentation burden is a leading cause of burnout, with recent studies showing U.S. physicians spend excessive time on documentation tasks. Nurse attrition has also remained a concern since the pandemic. Meanwhile, AI adoption is surging, with the vast majority of health systems piloting or planning AI integration. However, there remains a lack of consistent frameworks to align these technologies with real-world clinical and operational dynamics. The result? Misplaced investment, fractured trust, and resistance from the very people AI is meant to assist. The Stanford study confirms it: the majority of tasks that healthcare workers want automated—like documentation, claims rework, or prior auth form generation—are not where AI tools are being focused. In fact, less than 2% of those high-desire tasks are showing up in actual LLM usage today. Instead, attention and venture funding are often diverted toward automating interpersonal communication, appeals, or triage. These are areas where trust, nuance, and empathy matter most. This is more than a technical oversight. It's a strategic miscalculation. This study clarifies that the future of AI in healthcare isn't about replacing human judgment—it's about protecting it. Leaders must pivot from automation-at-any-cost to augmentation-by-design. That means building AI systems that reduce cognitive load, clarify ambiguity, and work alongside teams as intelligent collaborators, not as black-box disruptors. And, most critically, it means listening to the workforce before you deploy. A New Lens on Work: Automation Desire vs. Technical Feasibility Stanford's framework introduces two powerful filters for every task: what workers want automated and what AI can do. This produces a four-quadrant map: This approach is especially revealing in healthcare, where: Critically, 69% of workers said their top reason for wanting AI was to free up time for higher-value work. Only 12% wanted AI to fully take over a task. The takeaway? Augmentation, not replacement. Green Light (Automate Now): R&D Opportunity (Invest in Next-Gen AI): Red Light (Approach with Caution): Y Combinator is one of the world's most influential startup accelerators, known for launching and funding early-stage technology companies, including many that shape the future of artificial intelligence. Its relevance in this context comes from its outsized role in setting trends and priorities for the tech industry: the types of problems YC-backed startups pursue often signal where talent, investment, and innovation are headed. The Stanford study highlights a striking disconnect between these startup priorities and actual workforce needs. Specifically, it found that 41% of Y Combinator-backed AI startups are developing solutions for tasks that workers have little interest in automating—referred to as 'Red Light Zones' or low-priority areas. This reveals a substantial missed opportunity: if leading accelerators like Y Combinator better aligned their focus with the real needs and preferences of the workforce, AI innovation could deliver far greater value and acceptance in the workplace. The Human Agency Scale: AI as a Teammate To move beyond binary thinking (automate vs. don't), the Stanford research team introduces a more nuanced framework: the Human Agency Scale (HAS). This five-tier model offers a conceptual scaffold for evaluating how AI agents should integrate into human workflows. Rather than asking whether a task should be automated, the HAS asks to what extent the human remains in control, how decision-making is shared, and what level of oversight is required. The scale ranges from H1 to H5, as follows: The Stanford study reveals a clear pattern across occupations: the majority of workers—particularly in healthcare—prefer H2 or H3. Specifically, 45.2% of tasks analyzed across all industries favor an H3 arrangement, in which AI acts as a collaborative peer. In healthcare contexts—where judgment, empathy, and contextual nuance are foundational—H3 is even more critical. In roles such as care coordination, utilization review, and social work, tasks often require a mix of real-time decision-making, human empathy, and risk stratification. A system built for full automation (H5) in these contexts would not only be resisted—it would likely produce unsafe or ethically problematic outcomes. Instead, what's required are AI agents that can surface relevant information, adapt to the evolving contours of a task, and remain responsive to human steering. John Halamka, President of Mayo Clinic Platform, reinforced this collaborative mindset in February 2025: 'We have to use AI,' he said, noting that ambient listening tools represent 'the thing that will solve many business problems' with relatively low risk. He cited Mayo's inpatient ambient nursing solutions, which handle '100% of the nursing charting without the nurse having to touch a keyboard,' but was clear that these tools are 'all augmenting human behavior and not replacing the human.' These insights echo a broader workforce trend: automation without agency is unlikely to succeed. Clinical leaders don't want AI to dictate care pathways or handle nuanced appeals independently. They want AI that reduces friction, illuminates blind spots, and extends their cognitive reach, without erasing professional identity or judgment. As such, designing for HAS Level 3 (equal partnership) is emerging as the gold standard for intelligent systems in healthcare. This model balances speed and efficiency with explainability and oversight. It also offers a governance and performance evaluation framework that prioritizes human trust. Building AI for HAS Level 3 requires features that go beyond prediction accuracy. Systems must be architected with: Healthcare doesn't need one-size-fits-all automation. It requires collaboration at scale, grounded in transparency and guided by human expertise. These perspectives align perfectly with the Stanford findings: workers don't fear AI—they fear being sidelined by it. The solution isn't to slow down AI development. It's to direct it with clarity, co-design it with the people who rely on it, and evaluate it not just by outputs but also by the experience and empowerment it delivers to human professionals. The true ROI of AI is trust, relief, and time reclaimed. Outcomes like 'claims processed' or 'notes generated' aren't enough. Metrics should track cognitive load reduced, time returned to patient care, and worker trust in AI recommendations. While throughput remains a necessary benchmark, these human-centered outcomes provide the clearest signal of whether AI improves the healthcare experience. Measurement frameworks must be longitudinal, capturing not just initial productivity but long-term operational resilience, clinician satisfaction, and sustainable value. Only then can we ensure that AI fulfills its promise to elevate both performance and purpose in healthcare. Dr. Rohit Chandra, Chief Digital Officer at Cleveland Clinic, gave voice to this idea in June 2025: 'It's made their jobs a ton easier. Patient interactions are a lot better because now patients actually engage with the doctor,' he said, referring to 4,000 physicians now using AI scribes. 'I'm hoping that we can keep building on the success that we've had so far to literally drive the documentation burden to zero.' Build With, Not For This moment is too important for misalignment. The Stanford study offers a blueprint. For healthcare leaders, the message is clear: If you want AI to scale, build with the workforce in mind. Prioritize the Green Light Zones. Invest in agentic systems that enhance, not override. Govern AI like a trusted partner, not a productivity engine. The future of AI in healthcare won't be determined by the size of your model. It will be defined by the quality of your teaming.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
I've tested all the viral hacks for sleeping in the heat - this 'obvious' one was the worst
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The caveman cooling method has been causing a stir online during the recent heatwaves. The viral trend recommends closing windows and curtains during the day to keep the hot air hot. It's often used in bedrooms to create a cooler environment for sleep, similar to the dark of a cave. Fairly obvious, right? The caveman method is less a sleep 'hack' and more the advice your grandparents passed on. But while the caveman method comes recommended by experts (and a fair few Tom's Guide comments), I won't be using it this summer. And no, it's not just that the heat has gone to my head... Why I won't be using the caveman method The caveman method is a very sensible (and as Tom's Guide readers have pointed out, "obvious") method to keep your room cooler in a heatwave. And I'm a pretty sensible person so I've surprised myself by turning my nose up at this not-exactly-a-hack-it's-so-obvious sleep hack. Full disclosure: I have tried the caveman method before. While calling it 'caveman' might be a modern viral trend, shutting your windows and blinds has long been a popular method to cool down your house. Which brings me to my first problem: it didn't make my room feel much cooler. My room was now both dark and hot My room is on the east of the house, so I get a great dollop of sunlight to wake me up in the morning. This is normally a good thing — I wake up fresher when there's sunshine to help me along — but in a heatwave it means my bedroom is stifling by early morning. I leave my windows and curtains open in the night to let cold air in but that's followed by heat as soon as the sun rises. Even if I close my curtains once my alarm goes off, the damage is done. Instead of the cool cave I'm dreaming off, it just leaves me in a warm, dark room. Which brings me to the next problem... It sends me circadian rhythm out of sync Against all good advice but as a necessity of space, I have to work in my bedroom. To prevent work ruining my sleep, I have strict boundaries. I make time for breakfast every morning to define the start of the day and I go for a walk every evening to separate work from relaxation. And the final crucial element is that I keep my room bright when I'm working, pitch black when I'm sleeping. I have a SAD lamp and an eye mask to ensure I can achieve this no matter the conditions outside. But the caveman method plunged my workspace into 'bedtime' mode. My SAD lamp brightened things up but within a few minutes it started pumping out its own heat. My dim overhead lamp is cooler but the low light just made me feel sleepy. And I was also miserable. That's what a stuffy, dark room will do to you. My circadian rhythm was all over the place, further confused by the still-bright conditions of my evening walk. I crawled into bed with my head firmly stuck in 'work' mode. In my only slightly cooler room I tossed and turned with a racing mind. When I did fall asleep, I dreamt of mattress deals. Should you use the caveman method? The caveman method is undoubtedly an effective way to cool down your house, as evidenced by the fact people have been using it for eons. However, while cooling might seem top priority when trying to sleep in a heatwave, our circadian rhythms have their own demands. For me, that means a clear separation between my workspace and my sleep space, even though they're in the same room. This was something the caveman method worked against. So for cooler sleep I'll be leaving the Stone Age to jump forward a few millennia and leaning on ye olde electric fan method. 3 methods for cooler sleep I'll be using instead 1. Making my own air con A few years ago I bought a mini fan on a whim and it has since become one of my prized possessions. Despite a small size it packs a cooling punch during warm weather, especially when combined with a frozen bottle of water. To make your own air con, all you need is a fan and some ice. Simply face the fan towards your bed, place a bowl of ice (or a bottle of frozen water) in front of the fan and turn it on. The fan will blow the cold towards you. 2. A warm shower before bed In the morning vs evening shower debate I tend to fall on the side of 'whatever's most convenient' but during summer a warm shower can help me cool down before bed. Moving from the warmth of the shower into a cooler bedroom causes my core temperature to drop, bringing me closer to the perfect temperature to sleep. It also washes off the sweat, sun screen and allergens that threaten to ruin my mattress and my sleep when I go to bed in summer without an evening shower. 3. Ditch the duvet and use a top sheet While I swap my winter bedding for lighter, airier options at some point in mid-spring, during a heatwave even my most breathable duvet is too much. I'd kick off my covers entirely except I like the weight of even a thin blanket. So in summer, I'll switch my duvet for a top sheet. It's snuggly but not warm. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Foundation season 3: release date, trailer, confirmed cast, story details, and more about the Apple TV+ show's return
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Foundation season 3: key information - Launching on Apple TV+ in mid-July- Contains 10 episodes- Trailers unveiled in May and June- Key cast members set to return- Other actors confirmed to have joined the cast- Plot synopsis revealed- Draws from Isaac Asimov's 'Foundation and Empire' and 'Second Foundation' books- Fourth season reportedly in development with a new showrunner Foundation season 3 is just days away from airing on Apple TV+. The critically-acclaimed space opera returns on July 11, so you don't have long to read up on everything we know about it. Before you proceed, check out my Foundation season 3 review to see what I thought of its first five episodes. Once you've done that (or bookmarked it for later), you can read on to learn more about Foundation's third season, including more on its confirmed cast, story specifics, trailers, and the sci-fi series' future. Full spoilers follow for Foundation season 2. Potential spoilers also follow for this season and Isaac Asimov's book series namesake. Foundation season 3 release date Foundation season 3 arrives TV+ on Friday, July 11. It'll debut with a one-episode premiere and new chapters will drop every Friday until the finale on September 12. Initially, its cast and crew declined to comment on the sci-fi series' season 3 renewal when I asked them about this in July 2023. Thankfully, Foundation season 3 was confirmed to be in the works by Apple later that year. Development didn't always go as planned, though. Last February, Foundation season 3 faced an agonizing filming delay amid multiple issues, including apparent disputes over its budget. Less than two weeks later, things seemed rosy again, with principal photography starting up again on Foundation's next installment. However, one week later, rumors quickly spread that showrunner David S. Goyver had stepped back from the Apple TV+ sci-fi series, with fellow executive producer Bill Bost reportedly stepping in to fill the gap. Suffice it to say, the road has been a bumpy one for Foundation's third season. Foundation season 3 trailer Foundation season 3's official trailer was released on June 11, and it not only revealed the Apple TV+ show's most dangerous villain yet, but also teased an unexpected alliance between the show's main factions. Missed season 3's first teaser, which arrived in mid-May? Check it out below: Foundation season 3 confirmed cast Major spoilers follow for Foundation season 2. Here's who we'll see in Foundation season 3: Jared Harris as Hari Seldon Lee Pace as Brother Day Lou Llobell as Gaal Dornick Laura Birn as Demerzel Cassian Bilton as Brother Dawn Terrence Mann as Brother Dusk Cassian Bilton as Brother Dawn Alexander Siddig as Doctor Ebling Mis Troy Kotsur as Preem Palver Pilou Asbaek as The Mule Cherry Jones as Foundation Ambassador Quent Synnøve Karlsen as Bayta Mallow Cody Fern as Toran Mallow Brandon P Bell as Han Pritcher Tómas Lemarquis as Magnifico Giganticus Yootha Wong-Loi-Sing as Song Leo Bill as Mayor Indbur The first seven actors return from seasons 1 and 2, while the rest are all newcomers for the latest 10-episode installment. That includes this season's villain, aka The Mule, who'll be played by Pilou Asbaek after a season 3 cast shake-up last year. Speaking to me ahead of this season's launch, Asbaek explained why The Mule "needs to be [seen as] a big threat" to both Empire and The Foundation. Flashback sequences notwithstanding, it's incredibly unlikely that we'll see any other actors return from season 2. Its follow-up is set over 150 years after the series' sophomore outing, so the likes of Ella Rae Smith's Queen Sareth and Kulvinder Ghir's Poly are surely dead by this point. One major character who definitely won't return is Leah Harvey's Salvor Hardin. She sacrificed herself to save Gaal in 'Creation Myths', aka season 2's final episode. Foundation's universe has the potential to bring people back from the dead – we're looking at you, Hari – but, considering Salvor was cremated, she's officially dead and gone. Foundation season 3 story synopsis and rumors Major spoilers follow for Foundation season 2. Here's Foundation season 3' story synopsis: "Set 152 years after the events of season 2, The Foundation has become increasingly established far beyond its humble beginnings while the Cleonic Dynasty's Empire has dwindled. "As both of these galactic powers forge an uneasy alliance, a threat to the entire galaxy appears in the fearsome form of a warlord known as The Mule whose sights are set on ruling the universe by use of physical and military force, as well as mind control. It's anyone's guess who'll win, who'll lose, who'll live, and who'll die as Hari, Gaal, the Cleons, and Demerzel play a potentially deadly game of intergalactic chess." That's just enough to go but, if you want on where this season could go narratively, my Foundation season 2 ending explainer looks at the possible storylines and subplots that could set up this season. If you don't want to click away from this page, though, I'll give you an in-depth, spoiler-filled breakdown from this point on. Let's start with Empire. Season 2's incarnations of its three Emperors – Dawn, Day, and Dusk, all clones of Cleon I – no longer sit on the throne (or thrones, if you will). Day suffocated in space, Dusk was killed by Demerzel, and Dawn fled with Queen Sareth after Demerzel threatened to execute Sareth for her alleged failed assassination attempt on Day in season 2's opening episode. Demerzel hired the Blind Angels to murder Day because he wanted to marry Sareth and father his own children, which would've ended the Cleonic Dynasty. This plan went against the directives Cleon I gave Demerzel – remember, she's a robot – centuries earlier, which included maintaining his clone-based blood line. Long story short: Demerzel planned to set up Sareth as Day's would-be murderer and execute her to preserve the status quo. With season 2's Emperors deceased or on the run, Demerzel had to decant new versions of all three clones – something she's never had to do before. With season 3 set over a century later, these new iterations aren't the current incumbents on the throne, so she's had to carry out the process once more since. We'll see completely different iterations of the Cleonic trio, then, with Lee Pace speaking t us about The Big Lebowski-style transformation that Day's undergone since we last saw him. Meanwhile, in season 2 episode 9, aka 'Long Ago, Not Far Away', the Vault-based version of Hari Seldon – you didn't forget there were two of him, did you? – showed Demerzel how to operate the Prime Radiant. Essentially a data storage device, the Prime Radiant contains all of Hari's psychohistory-based math, which is being used to help guide humanity through its darkest age yet. The Prime Radiant also exists in a state of supposition, allowing it to exist in two places at once. That means the living Hari (the one working with Gaal) possesses one and, unfortunately for The Foundation, the other is now in Demerzel's hands. Once she can read Hari's math, she'll be able to use it and get a reading on how the galaxy's future is supposed to play out. Speaking of the Vault, 'Creation Myths' revealed that the mysterious 4D structure survived the destruction of Terminus. Expect it to continue playing a big role in Foundation's overarching plot. The Foundation's survival isn't the only thing Empire has to contend with. For starters, Dawn and Sareth's absconsion is a worrying prospect – Sareth is pregnant with Dawn's child, meaning their firstborn has a claim to the Empire's throne. With Foundation season 3 featuring a major time jump, we could see their child's next of kin make a play for the royal seat if this particular narrative is followed up on. After all, in the second half of 'Foundation and Empire', the second novel in Asismov's Foundation book trilogy, the Empire is engulfed by civil war. This plot point could be adapted for a showdown between Dawn and Sareth's bloodline and the Cleonic dynasty. Elsewhere, Gaal and Hari's successful recruitment of the Mentalics, a race with psychic abilities, means The Foundation is stronger than ever. Add the Mentalics to the Foundation's seven planetary bodies, plus the Empire losing the ability to hyperjump – the genetically engineered Spacers are no longer enslaved by them – and, as this season's story synopsis points out, the playing field is more level than ever before. Hari, Gaal, and company shouldn't expect to walk all over Empire now, however. The emergence of The Mule – a powerful Mentalic who begins conquering worlds in Asmiov's book series – will surely give rise to the Third Seldon Crisis. These crises are fixed points in humanity's existence that determine whether The Foundation succeeds or fails. So far, The Foundation has navigated two potential calamities: surviving in the galaxy's outer reaches and bypassing a full-blown war with the Empire. The Mule, though, will pose the biggest threat – and that's saying something – to The Foundation's existence. To combat him, Gaal and Hari have entered cryosleep on the Mentalics' sanctuary of Ignis. That way, they can reawaken when The Mule shows up and help lead the fight against him. The rest of the Mentalics will hone their abilities and learn about psychohistory in the interim 150-year period so they're ready to battle The Mule and his forces when the time comes. Is Foundation season 4 in the works? Not officially. However, a fourth season is reportedly in the works with a new showrunner in Fear the Walking Dead alumnus Ian Goldberg. For what it's worth, Llobell and Harris told me they don't know if Foundation season 4 has been secretly greenlit. However, by the time season 3 ends, Foundation will have only covered the first two main novels in Asimov's book series – 'Foundation' and 'Foundation & Empire', plus the first half of the third novel titled 'Second Foundation'. There are two prequel novels and two sequel books that expand on Foundation's unique universe, too, so there's plenty more storytelling ground to cover. Ahead of the first season's launch, Goyer (per Decider) revealed he had an eight-season outline for the series. It's deviated somewhat from the story told in Asimov's books so, alongside adapting parts from the wider source material, a more complete narrative could be told in the seasons to come. As long as Foundation continues to draw in a big enough audience to justify its financial outlay, Apple should continue to bankroll its development. If this season struggles to draw to do that, though, the tech titan has shown it isn't afraid to cancel shows before their time. The jury is out on whether Foundation season 3 will be the show's latest or final chapter, then. For more Apple TV Plus-based coverage, check out our guides on Presumed Innocent season 2, Severance season 3, Ted Lasso season 4, and Slow Horses season 5. Solve the daily Crossword