logo
How Social Media Trends Sway People To The Far Right

How Social Media Trends Sway People To The Far Right

Buzz Feed24-05-2025
Hot Topic
🔥 Full coverage and conversation on Politics
With President Donald Trump 's approval rating at its lowest (43%) since he took office this year and fears of a looming trade war, it's easy to wonder how we got here.
Lots of factors converged to get Trump elected, but we can't ignore the influence social media can have in swaying voters toward the right.
Online content creator Jess Britvich has posted multiple videos about the ' alt-right rabbit holes ' that target women on social media — just a few that she cites are clean eating, clean-girl makeup, girl dinner, and homesteading. In her video, she said they're the 'trends that can lead to the alt-right pipeline. Because while these things aren't inherently conservative or, dare I say, even fascist sometimes, they can be a starting point for a very slippery slope.'
Britvich's videos have received upward of a million views on both TikTok and Instagram.
Britvich told HuffPost she was inspired to make these videos after reflecting on how she, as a millennial, was told over and over that Gen Z was going to help make the country more progressive when they were able to vote.
'And then, it turns out this past election that Gen Z men were one of the big factors in getting Trump elected, and that kind of got me started to think, where did this shift come from?' Britvich said.
If the social media trends Britvich referenced don't go so far as encouraging the alt-right movement, which is against 'political correctness' and criticizes social justice as it's viewed as a 'threat' to white ideology, experts say they certainly do often lead users to right-wing content.
Here's what to know about these trends and how they relate to far-right politics, according to the experts we spoke to.
First — no one is saying that everyone who shops for clean beauty products or enjoys homesteading is on their way to far-right, or even right-wing, politics.
Lots of people shop for clean beauty products and opt for foods with fewer chemicals; no one is saying that everyone who does these things is on their way to the alt-right pipeline, stressed Britvich.
'That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about how the algorithm can indoctrinate you and radicalize you. One does not necessarily equal the other,' Brivitch said.
But the social media algorithm is now set up to push certain political agendas.
During the pandemic, 'people were hungrier than ever for agency in the information they were consuming and relying on for their own safety and their family's safety ... but ... you really weren't actually able to search for content without then having it lead you down pathways — some people will say rabbit holes,' said Jiore Craig, a resident senior fellow of digital integrity at the Institute of Strategic Dialogue. Craig studies how online content can harm society.
'A mom searching for what to do about her child's allergy, or a mom searching for her horoscope reading that day, would have equally been led, likely, to anti-vaccine content during COVID, just because of the way that the suggestions were being made, and how prominent the topic of vaccines and COVID became in the context of all these other cultural topics,' Craig noted.
We may be years out of lockdown, but this has only continued today.
'A lot of the groups that had stakeholders in the COVID conversation were political stakeholders, and the far right in particular took a position anti-science, anti-vaccine, and that has carried forward to this administration and their positions on many of these things,' Craig said.
Clean Beauty And Clean Eating
'I like to eat healthy, I'm expecting a kid, so you would not imagine the amount of stuff that is coming at me all the time about being 'clean,'' said Catherine Tebaldi, a linguistic anthropologist at the University of Luxembourg.
'What I'm noticing around clean beauty, first, is there's a lot of very much these eugenic discourses of purity, bodily purity, pureness in your food, pureness in your makeup, that is very closely aligned to white supremacists [and] eugenics,' Tebaldi noted.
It's also not clear what these terms like 'clean,' 'non-toxic,' and 'natural' mean.
'Even words that we're using, like clean, what does that even mean? And from there, just unregulated terms like saying things like, 'oh, bad chemicals.' Well, everything's a chemical. Water is a chemical,' said Brivitch.
'These are unregulated terms that don't really mean anything, but they get an emotional response,' Brivitch added.
While opting to use makeup that contains fewer chemicals is not a bad thing, where this could go via the social media algorithm is not ideal.
'This can kind of lead to this anti-science rhetoric and this distrust in our regulatory bodies, which then leads down this path of, 'OK, well, this is toxic. What else is toxic?' And the more you start rejecting science, it could trend closer and closer to what I think has a huge impact on what we're seeing with anti-vax, the rise of measles, etc. It just opens the gateway to these larger ideological shifts,' said Brivitch.
Going back to the 'ancestor's way of living,' tradwives, homesteading, and a more 'natural' life are more social media rabbit holes that often come up via gardening videos, cooking content, and more. While these topics have some admirable qualities, they, too, can lead to some of these problematic pipelines.
'It's an ideological construction of, what is natural, that uses this idea of nature and beauty to signal what? You're meant to be desired,' said Tebaldi.
'It's propaganda ... you're supposed to be glowing and look really healthy and beautiful and this is sort of signaling that you're worthy,' Tebaldi said.
It also feeds into this idea of looking at medicine and health care as 'unnatural,' Tebaldi added.
More, going back to the way the ancestors lived is a very privileged, very white idea — Black people with enslaved ancestors, Japanese people whose ancestors were wrongly imprisoned and forced to do labor in the U.S., or Jewish people with ancestors who died during the Holocaust.
'Nobody should want to return to that, but I think that the returning to a time before women had the right to vote, returning to a time before the abolition of slavery, this is definitely a feature of it,' said Tebaldi.
'Girl Dinner' And 'Girl Math'
When it comes to comes things like 'girl dinner' and 'girl math' it's a little more nuanced — having a snacky dinner of your favorite foods is fun, and finally purchasing a pair of shoes you've been eyeing is equally fun, but Brivitch noted that categorizing these types of things as 'girl' can be problematic.
'Just the overall trend promotes the infantilization of women in a time when our reproductive rights are on attack ... and this infantilization almost kind of promotes this idea of like, 'Oh yes, it's girl math. We don't understand this, we don't know what's best for us,'' Brivitch added, 'and it can be a dangerous way to go and just a way to shift public opinion.'
It also erases nonbinary folks and promotes gender essentialism, Brivitch said, meaning women have certain traits while men have certain traits, and there's no in-between (which we know is not true). More, this is reflected in politics, as Trump recently signed an executive order that states the U.S. will only recognize two sexes.
'One of the things I'm consistently frustrated with is the way in which people who try to tackle some of these challenges miss the fact that a lot of what makes these challenges possible is the systemic problems that people are facing in their real, offline lives,' said Craig.
Many women deal with burnout, loneliness, and frustration when it comes to finding a partner, which makes these alternatives — things like homesteading, clean beauty, and finding a community of like-minded folks online — appealing, and is why these alternatives to these problems get popular, according to Craig.
'So, whenever I see any of this, let's take clean beauty, or let's take raw milk, I think about the ways that the system has failed people in terms of them feeling confident that the system is going to keep their kids safe, or that the system is going to keep chemicals out of their kids' food,' Craig said.
These social media trends also put the onus on the individual, which is not actually how a healthy society operates.
'To be healthy, you shouldn't, say, have a better environment, better social determinants of health, better medical care, but instead, it's about the practices that you do that make you the most healthy, or your 'innate better genetics,' said Tebaldi.
Until some of the systemic reforms necessary for the health of Americans happen, there will continue to be versions of this, added Craig.
Craig said there are a few helpful things to keep an eye out for when using social media. Remind yourself that what you're seeing in your social media feed is designed to keep you online, and that's true across the board, whether you're looking at left-leaning or right-leaning content. More, know that creators want you to watch videos to the end because it helps them make money.
'Ideally, we'll sort of get folks' guards up,' Craig added.
Craig also recommends that you click through to bios and websites to learn more about the influencers you follow and see who's involved in their content or who's paying for their account. For these influencers who are trying to sell you a certain political message, they'll be funded by organizations that lean a certain way.
'And then any opinion that you are hearing about that is making you close to changing a part of your lifestyle, you should double check. You should check multiple sources, not just with your friends. You should look for, is there anyone out there who has said anything about this being a trap before? Have you really done enough research to warrant a behavior change?' Craig added.
It's hard to give very specific advice as this content shows up differently depending on the platform you're on and depending on what content you're consuming, but these blanket reminders can be useful for building up resistance overall, Craig said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps
Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps

San Francisco Chronicle​

timea minute ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A federal appeals court ruled Friday night to uphold a lower court's temporary order blocking the Trump administration from conducting indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests in Southern California. A three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing Monday afternoon at which the federal government asked the court to overturn a temporary restraining order issued July 12 by Judge Maame E. Frimpong, arguing it hindered their enforcement of immigration law. Immigrant advocacy groups filed suit last month accusing President Donald Trump's administration of systematically targeting brown-skinned people in Southern California during the administration's crackdown on illegal immigration. The lawsuit included three detained immigrants and two U.S. citizens as plaintiffs. In her order, Frimpong said there was a 'mountain of evidence' that federal immigration enforcement tactics were violating the Constitution. She wrote the government cannot use factors such as apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, presence at a location such as a tow yard or car wash, or someone's occupation as the only basis for reasonable suspicion to detain someone. The Los Angeles region has been a battleground with the Trump administration over its aggressive immigration strategy that spurred protests and the deployment of the National Guards and Marines for several weeks. Federal agents have rounded up immigrants without legal status to be in the U.S. from Home Depots, car washes, bus stops, and farms, many who have lived in the country for decades. Among the plaintiffs is Los Angeles resident Brian Gavidia, who was shown in a video taken by a friend June 13 being seized by federal agents as he yells, 'I was born here in the states, East LA bro!' They want to 'send us back to a world where a U.S. citizen ... can be grabbed, slammed against a fence and have his phone and ID taken from him just because he was working at a tow yard in a Latino neighborhood,' American Civil Liberties Union attorney Mohammad Tajsar told the court. The federal government argued that it hadn't been given enough time to collect and present evidence in the lawsuit, given that it was filed shortly before the July 4 holiday and a hearing was held the following week. 'It's a very serious thing to say that multiple federal government agencies have a policy of violating the Constitution,' attorney Jacob Roth said. He also argued that the lower court's order was too broad, and that immigrant advocates did not present enough evidence to prove that the government had an official policy of stopping people without reasonable suspicion. He referred to the four factors of race, language, presence at a location, and occupation that were listed in the temporary restraining order, saying the court should not be able to ban the government from using them at all. He also argued that the order was unclear on what exactly is permissible under law. 'Legally, I think it's appropriate to use the factors for reasonable suspicion,' Roth said The judges sharply questioned the government over their arguments. 'No one has suggested that you cannot consider these factors at all,' Judge Jennifer Sung said. However, those factors alone only form a 'broad profile' and don't satisfy the reasonable suspicion standard to stop someone, she said. Sung, a Biden appointee, said that in an area like Los Angeles, where Latinos make up as much as half the population, those factors 'cannot possibly weed out those who have undocumented status and those who have documented legal status.'

Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps
Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps

Associated Press

time2 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A federal appeals court ruled Friday night to uphold a lower court's temporary order blocking the Trump administration from conducting indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests in Southern California. A three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing Monday afternoon at which the federal government asked the court to overturn a temporary restraining order issued July 12 by Judge Maame E. Frimpong, arguing it hindered their enforcement of immigration law. Immigrant advocacy groups filed suit last month accusing President Donald Trump's administration of systematically targeting brown-skinned people in Southern California during the administration's crackdown on illegal immigration. The lawsuit included three detained immigrants and two U.S. citizens as plaintiffs. In her order, Frimpong said there was a 'mountain of evidence' that federal immigration enforcement tactics were violating the Constitution. She wrote the government cannot use factors such as apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, presence at a location such as a tow yard or car wash, or someone's occupation as the only basis for reasonable suspicion to detain someone. The Los Angeles region has been a battleground with the Trump administration over its aggressive immigration strategy that spurred protests and the deployment of the National Guards and Marines for several weeks. Federal agents have rounded up immigrants without legal status to be in the U.S. from Home Depots, car washes, bus stops, and farms, many who have lived in the country for decades. Among the plaintiffs is Los Angeles resident Brian Gavidia, who was shown in a video taken by a friend June 13 being seized by federal agents as he yells, 'I was born here in the states, East LA bro!' They want to 'send us back to a world where a U.S. citizen ... can be grabbed, slammed against a fence and have his phone and ID taken from him just because he was working at a tow yard in a Latino neighborhood,' American Civil Liberties Union attorney Mohammad Tajsar told the court. The federal government argued that it hadn't been given enough time to collect and present evidence in the lawsuit, given that it was filed shortly before the July 4 holiday and a hearing was held the following week. 'It's a very serious thing to say that multiple federal government agencies have a policy of violating the Constitution,' attorney Jacob Roth said. He also argued that the lower court's order was too broad, and that immigrant advocates did not present enough evidence to prove that the government had an official policy of stopping people without reasonable suspicion. He referred to the four factors of race, language, presence at a location, and occupation that were listed in the temporary restraining order, saying the court should not be able to ban the government from using them at all. He also argued that the order was unclear on what exactly is permissible under law. 'Legally, I think it's appropriate to use the factors for reasonable suspicion,' Roth said The judges sharply questioned the government over their arguments. 'No one has suggested that you cannot consider these factors at all,' Judge Jennifer Sung said. However, those factors alone only form a 'broad profile' and don't satisfy the reasonable suspicion standard to stop someone, she said. Sung, a Biden appointee, said that in an area like Los Angeles, where Latinos make up as much as half the population, those factors 'cannot possibly weed out those who have undocumented status and those who have documented legal status.' She also asked: 'What is the harm to being told not to do something that you claim you're already not doing?'

Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps
Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps

Hamilton Spectator

time15 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A federal appeals court ruled Friday night to uphold a lower court's temporary order blocking the Trump administration from conducting indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests in Southern California. A three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing Monday afternoon at which the federal government asked the court to overturn a temporary restraining order issued July 12 by Judge Maame E. Frimpong, arguing it hindered their enforcement of immigration law. Immigrant advocacy groups filed suit last month accusing President Donald Trump's administration of systematically targeting brown-skinned people in Southern California during the administration's crackdown on illegal immigration. The lawsuit included three detained immigrants and two U.S. citizens as plaintiffs. In her order, Frimpong said there was a 'mountain of evidence' that federal immigration enforcement tactics were violating the Constitution. She wrote the government cannot use factors such as apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, presence at a location such as a tow yard or car wash, or someone's occupation as the only basis for reasonable suspicion to detain someone. The Los Angeles region has been a battleground with the Trump administration over its aggressive immigration strategy that spurred protests and the deployment of the National Guards and Marines for several weeks. Federal agents have rounded up immigrants without legal status to be in the U.S. from Home Depots, car washes, bus stops, and farms , many who have lived in the country for decades. Among the plaintiffs is Los Angeles resident Brian Gavidia, who was shown in a video taken by a friend June 13 being seized by federal agents as he yells, 'I was born here in the states, East LA bro!' They want to 'send us back to a world where a U.S. citizen ... can be grabbed, slammed against a fence and have his phone and ID taken from him just because he was working at a tow yard in a Latino neighborhood,' American Civil Liberties Union attorney Mohammad Tajsar told the court. The federal government argued that it hadn't been given enough time to collect and present evidence in the lawsuit, given that it was filed shortly before the July 4 holiday and a hearing was held the following week. 'It's a very serious thing to say that multiple federal government agencies have a policy of violating the Constitution,' attorney Jacob Roth said. He also argued that the lower court's order was too broad, and that immigrant advocates did not present enough evidence to prove that the government had an official policy of stopping people without reasonable suspicion. He referred to the four factors of race, language, presence at a location, and occupation that were listed in the temporary restraining order, saying the court should not be able to ban the government from using them at all. He also argued that the order was unclear on what exactly is permissible under law. 'Legally, I think it's appropriate to use the factors for reasonable suspicion,' Roth said The judges sharply questioned the government over their arguments. 'No one has suggested that you cannot consider these factors at all,' Judge Jennifer Sung said. However, those factors alone only form a 'broad profile' and don't satisfy the reasonable suspicion standard to stop someone, she said. Sung, a Biden appointee, said that in an area like Los Angeles, where Latinos make up as much as half the population, those factors 'cannot possibly weed out those who have undocumented status and those who have documented legal status.' She also asked: 'What is the harm to being told not to do something that you claim you're already not doing?' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store