logo
Judge Orders Release of Iranian Arrested in Louisiana After U.S. Bombed Iran

Judge Orders Release of Iranian Arrested in Louisiana After U.S. Bombed Iran

New York Times15-07-2025
A magistrate judge in Louisiana on Monday ordered the release of an Iranian doctoral student arrested in the immediate aftermath of the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities last month and barred officials from attempting to deport him, citing a 'grave risk' of irreparable harm.
The student, Pouria Pourhosseinhendabad, 29, appeared to be the first Iranian national that the Trump administration sought to deport while Iran was engulfed in a 12-day war with Israel that the United States briefly joined.
Mr. Pourhosseinhendabad, a student of mechanical engineering at Louisiana State University, was arrested along with his wife, Parisa Firouzabadi, on June 22, a day after President Trump announced that the United States had bombed three Iranian nuclear sites, thrusting the country directly into the war. He has since been held at the Central Louisiana ICE Processing Center, one of the agency's largest detention centers in the South. Ms. Firouzabadi appears to have been released; the petition mentioned her only briefly, and she is not listed in public records as an ICE detainee.
His lawyers said that the couple's arrest involved an 'unconstitutional ruse.' The couple had recently reported a hit-and-run collision that damaged their car, and state police officers knocked on the door of their Baton Rouge apartment, claiming they were investigating the collision. Instead, Mr. Pourhosseinhendabad's lawyers said, the police led the couple to a large group of masked ICE agents in tactical gear waiting downstairs.
Mr. Pourhosseinhendabad has an active F-1 student visa scheduled to expire in December 2030, according to his lawyers, and there was no warrant for his arrest. They argued in their petition for his release that 'a ruse is deemed unconstitutional where ICE tricks an individual to open their front door when they have not yet obtained a judicial warrant for arrest and no exigent circumstances exist.'
An assistant U.S. attorney representing the government in the case did not submit any evidence or counternarrative disputing the allegations before Magistrate Judge Joseph H.L. Perez-Montes of the Western District of Louisiana ruled in the case. The attorney did not respond to a request for additional details in the case.
Judge Perez-Montes granted the emergency petition for Mr. Pourhosseinhendabad's release and also enjoined the government from moving him to another jurisdiction. The Trump administration has previously moved people it is seeking to deport to more amenable legal jurisdictions.
'In these verified allegations,' the judge wrote 'petitioner has established that there is a grave risk he will suffer irreparable harm — specifically to include his possible continued detention and deprivation of liberty.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If the Upper Class Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Lower Class — Here's What it Said
I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If the Upper Class Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Lower Class — Here's What it Said

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If the Upper Class Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Lower Class — Here's What it Said

America's progressive tax system is based on graduated brackets that require higher earners to pay a larger percentage of their income than lower earners — at least on paper. I asked ChatGPT what would happen if the upper class paid taxes at the same rate as the lower class, and it explained that the rich would pay more, not less, if the law were changed to even the rates. In fact, it wrote that 'the U.S. economy and society would experience major shifts.' Here's what it told me. Find Out: Read Next: The Effective Rate Looks Nothing Like the Progressive Brackets ChatGPT explained that, thanks to loopholes and deductions, the effective tax rate — what people actually pay — looks more like the following table than the familiar IRS brackets that levy a 10% income tax on the lowest earners and 37% on the highest. Income Group Average Effective Tax Rate Bottom 20% (low income) 10% to 14% Middle 20% 15% to 18% Top 1% 25% to 27% Top 0.01% 23% or lower due to loopholes and capital gains ChatGPT summed it up with this: 'Despite progressive tax brackets, effective tax rates (what people actually pay after deductions) show that the wealthiest often pay less than their tax bracket — especially if their income comes from investments taxed at lower rates (e.g., capital gains, dividends, carried interest).' Discover More: What Would Change If Everyone Paid the Same Rate? The AI platform created a hypothetical scenario where all Americans paid the same effective rate of 20%. It came up with four dramatic changes that could result. The following is a verbatim recounting of its synopsis. 1. Massive Revenue Increase The ultra-wealthy would pay dramatically more. The top 1% currently hold over 20% of total income and over 40% of wealth. Equalizing their rates with lower earners could generate $500 billion to $1 trillion per year in added federal revenue. This alone could fully fund universal pre-K, child care and perhaps even universal health coverage — without raising anyone else's taxes. 2. Reduced Deficit and Debt The U.S. deficit would shrink significantly. Interest on debt could fall over time, freeing up more government funds for infrastructure, education or emergency reserves. 3. Simpler, Fairer Tax Code With fewer loopholes and income-type preferences (like lower capital gains rates), the tax code would become simpler and more equitable. 4. Behavioral and Economic Reactions Wealthy individuals and corporations might: Shift income offshore, increase tax avoidance Reduce investment (if capital gains are taxed higher) Lobby aggressively to reinstate preferential treatment It's Much Better To Be Rich Today Than 50 Years Ago The platform then provided historical context that puts today's tax framework in perspective with this verbatim response. In the 1950s-'60s, the top marginal tax rate in the U.S. was over 90%, and the economy grew rapidly. Today, the top 1% pay a smaller share of their wealth and income than they did 40 to 50 years ago. So the real impact is less about 'raising the rich to poor's rate' and more about closing loopholes that let the rich pay less than their tax bracket. Summary ChatGPT closed by summarizing its report with the following word-for-word synopsis. If the rich paid the same effective rate as the poor: Massive new federal revenue Potential for big public investments or deficit reduction Greater tax fairness Possible economic tradeoffs from investment shifts or tax planning More From GOBankingRates 7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If the Upper Class Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Lower Class — Here's What it Said Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Top DOJ official to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell on Thursday
Top DOJ official to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell on Thursday

CNN

time14 minutes ago

  • CNN

Top DOJ official to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell on Thursday

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche is expected to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell on Thursday, two people familiar with the meeting tell CNN, as President Donald Trump continues to face backlash over the Jeffrey Epstein saga. The meeting comes after the Department of Justice said earlier this week it had reached out to Epstein's former associate, with Blanche saying in a statement on Tuesday that if 'Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.' It comes as many of Trump's supporters have demanded the release of more information about the accused sex trafficker alongside growing concerns for transparency among Republicans on Capitol Hill. The House Oversight subcommittee voted Wednesday to subpoena the DOJ for files related to Epstein in a surprise move amounting to a show of defiance by some House Republicans against Speaker Mike Johnson. Johnson has attempted to tamp down on efforts to push the release of the so-called Epstein files and shut the door on the possibility of a House vote on releasing information on Epstein before the August recess. The subpoena calls for the Epstein files in the Justice Department's possession to be provided to Congress, but for the names of the victims to be redacted. It also calls for communications between former Biden officials and the Justice Department related to the Epstein matter, in addition to depositions among some major figures, including Bill and Hillary Clinton and former FBI Director James Comey. Last week, the Justice Department asked a federal judge to make public years-old grand jury testimony against Epstein, though a Florida federal judge on Wednesday declined to release additional grand jury documents from the criminal investigation into Epstein. Maxwell was sentenced in 2022 to 20 years in federal prison for carrying out a years-long scheme with Epstein to groom and sexually abuse underage girls. She has continued to appeal her conviction.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store