logo
Lewis Hamilton's team radio sass lays bare the big issue facing Ferrari in F1 2025

Lewis Hamilton's team radio sass lays bare the big issue facing Ferrari in F1 2025

New York Times05-05-2025

MIAMI — Arriving in the media interview pen under the Hard Rock Stadium, Lewis Hamilton cut a very different demeanor after the Miami Grand Prix than his radio messages to Ferrari mid-way through Sunday's race otherwise conveyed.
Frustration over the time it took Ferrari to get Hamilton and teammate Charles Leclerc to swap positions during the race, and then, later, being asked to swap those places back, sparked some rather clipped radio messages from the seven-time world champion.
Advertisement
Hamilton felt he was losing too much time being stuck behind Leclerc while on fresher, quicker tires, which, if he'd stayed behind his teammate for too long, would've been past their best and any chance of catching the cars ahead lost.
Ferrari initially thought that by keeping Leclerc within one second ahead, Hamilton could use the Drag Reduction System (DRS) overtaking aid to gain more straight-line speed that would help him defend from a chasing car close behind. 'In China, I got out of the way,' Hamilton reminded his engineer, who then said they would indeed swap the order.
But Hamilton interjected: 'Have a tea break while you're at it!'
Then, after Ferrari reversed the call in the race's closing stages, Hamilton was informed of the remaining threat from Williams driver Carlos Sainz behind.
'You want me to let him past as well?' Hamilton asked, his voice laced with sarcasm.
Was it the first sign of major tension between Ferrari and Hamilton, the star driver F1's most famous team had sensationally swooped to sign for 2025? A crack in a relationship only in its sixth race weekend?
Apparently not. Hamilton insisted after the race that was simply not the case. Although he was the last of the 20 drivers to complete their media duties after opting to change out of his race overalls — and after a chat with Ferrari team principal Fred Vasseur — Hamilton's tone was light. The message was clear, as he claimed he 'genuinely enjoyed' the race.
But questions about the radio exchanges were inevitable.
'I didn't think the decision came quick enough,' Hamilton admitted. 'And for sure, in that time you're like, 'come on!' But yeah. That's really kind of it. I have no problems with the team or with Charles.'
This is not the first time Hamilton's radio messages with Ferrari have faced scrutiny this season. During his Ferrari debut in Australia, a chaotic wet weather race that would make a start to life with any team tricky, there were a few tense moments with his race engineer, Riccardo Adami. But Hamilton felt the messages were overblown in the media. It was all part of the getting-to-know-you stage of any new driver/engineer partnership.
But what Hamilton said in Miami seemed more pointed. It wasn't a mix-up in communication or asking for clarity. The team had all the data to make a decision, and he was pressuring Ferrari to make a call. For Hamilton, it was about creating a sense of urgency for the good of his race. He described what occurred as being 'in a panic' trying to keep the car on the road while wanting the call that would decide his race to be made.
Advertisement
'It was like, make a decision, let's go,' Hamilton said. He was asked about the 'tea break' comment. 'It was kind of like, 'we'll get back to you, mate.'' Hamilton then theatrically turned his wrist while speaking to reporters in the pen and stared at his watch. 'Well… OK!' He added that he'd 'definitely' made similar comments to his engineer at Mercedes, Peter Bonnington, plus that team's senior engineers, including Andrew Shovlin, in the past.
Hamilton did not speak to Adami during the cool-down lap once the Miami race had concluded, only receiving a couple of instructions to pick up rubber on his tires and to change some engine settings. Vasseur came to his driver's room immediately after the race for their chat.
After the race, Vasseur told reporters he could 'perfectly understand the frustration' from Hamilton. In fact, he thought Ferrari 'did a good job' managing the situation — also noting the potential for delays in F1 broadcasts when playing radio messages versus when they are happening live, direct from driver to team.
'It's always much easier to do it (make a call) two hours later,' Vasseur said. 'We asked them to do it. They did it. Now, the frustration, when you are in the car, I can perfectly understand this. And we had a discussion, and it was much more relaxed.'
Hamilton also suggested it had been a positive discussion with Vasseur. 'I just put my hand on his shoulder and (was) like, 'dude, calm down, don't be so sensitive,'' Hamilton said – a hint that Vasseur may not have been impressed initially. 'I could have said way worse things on the radio. You hear some of the things others have said in the past. Some of it was sarcasm.
'You've got to understand we're under a huge amount of pressure within the car. You're never going to get the most peaceful messages coming through in the heat of the battle. And yeah. It was fine.'
Advertisement
Hamilton knocked back a suggestion he had been 'feisty' on the radio, noting that everything he said was PG. 'I've still got my fire in my belly,' he said. 'I could feel a bit of it really coming up there.'
The other party involved in the radio calls, Leclerc, was eager to avoid discussing the matter when he spoke over half an hour before Hamilton. 'I think the story is going to be big enough already, and we need to do better, that's for sure,' he said. But Leclerc does feel there should have been more of a discussion before deciding to swap the Ferrari cars around in the first place.
Hamilton joined Ferrari hoping to fight for his elusive eighth world championship. A teammate as good as Leclerc would always pose close competition, which would likely warrant some uncomfortable conversations.
What made all of this difficult for Hamilton and Ferrari was that it took place over seventh and eighth place on the Miami track, far away from where either party wants to be. At the inaugural race here in 2022, Ferrari started 1-2 on the grid, although Max Verstappen beat it that day.
This year's Ferrari car is not easy to drive, and hasn't enjoyed the same performance step year-on-year as the team's rivals. Hamilton snared third in the sprint on Saturday thanks to a bold strategy call — one he pushed for — to come in early to change from wet to dry tires and then felt more positive about his main race potential despite struggling to only 12th in qualifying.
Ferrari knew it wouldn't be fighting with McLaren and Red Bull at the very front in Miami. But to be languishing also behind Mercedes, Hamilton's former team, and instead be using these tactics to fend off a Williams — a team confined to the lower midfield for much of the past decade — was a damning reflection of Ferrari's struggles in Miami.
The car simply hasn't been there this season, but to be so far out of the picture, two weeks on from Leclerc wrestling the car to the podium in Jeddah, was a big step backwards.
Advertisement
Vasseur even interrupted a follow-up question about the team orders radio discussions, claiming it was 'not the story of the day.' He stressed the greater worry for Ferrari was its lack of car performance. 'I would be much more keen to speak about why we finished one minute behind McLaren.'
But Hamilton did seem more upbeat than at the past three races about the possibility of light being at the end of the tunnel for Ferrari with its car issues. 'I truly believe that when we fix some of the problems that we have with the car, we'll be back in the fight with the Mercedes, with the (Red) Bulls,' Hamilton said. 'It just can't come quick enough.' Upgrades are expected to be added to the SF-25 cars at the next round at Imola.
Until then, there will be that added degree of frustration and urgency in Hamilton, fueled by a hunger and desire to win, which has driven him to statistically the most successful career in F1 history.
What's important for the relationship between him and Ferrari is that the understanding remains in place. That these messages, regardless of tone, were all down to that: A frustration with the situation both sides find themselves in, and not with each other.
'I'm not going to apologize for being a fighter,' Hamilton said. 'I'm not going to apologize for still wanting it.'
(Top photo of Lewis Hamilton: CHARLY TRIBALLEAU/AFP via Getty Images)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

British and Irish Lions dominate Force in the opening game of their Australian tour
British and Irish Lions dominate Force in the opening game of their Australian tour

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

British and Irish Lions dominate Force in the opening game of their Australian tour

PERTH, Australia (AP) — Dan Sheehan made the perfect start on debut for the British and Irish Lions. The Ireland hooker led the Lions for the first game of their Australian tour, scored in the second minute and steered the team to a commanding 54-7 win over the Perth-based Western Force on Saturday. Advertisement After an arm-wrestle of a first half where the Lions led 21-7 despite having only 40% of possession and spending most of the time in their own half, the bigger, more polished British and Irish lineup opened up and put five unanswered tries on a tiring defense in the second. Scrumhalf Tomos Williams scored a pair of tries before limping off with a left hamstring issue, fullback Elliot Daly scored two tries and flyhalf Finn Russell created two tries with his spur-of-the-moment judgement. He also kicked five goals. Henry Pollock, the 20-year-old England No. 8, played an integral hand in two tries and also spent 10 minutes in the sin-bin in his eventful debut start for the Lions. Early exchanges Advertisement The Lions made changes after a 28-24 loss to Argentina in a warmup last week in Dublin, putting more emphasis on short, sharp passing. The Lions had the ball for 11 phases until Russell kicked high and wide to the right touchline where Sheehan took the ball high and tapped infield for winger James Low, who flicked an inside pass back to him to score. The Force equalized quickly after 14 phases of attack with veteran Wallabies scrumhalf Nic White sniping over from the base of a ruck in the fifth minute. The Force opted against taking penalty goals in order to keep up attacking intensity but the Lions held firm and relieved pressure with some crucial turnovers. Advertisement Flyhalf Russell set up the first try with his pinpoint kick wide and the third with a quick penalty tap and go in the 35th, scooting up to the five-yard line before popping up a ball off the ground for fullback Daly to score. In between, Pollock was instrumental in the Lions' second try, bursting onto a sharp inside ball from openside flanker Josh van der Flier, stepping inside and out and going to ground before popping a ball up to scrumhalf Williams to score. The tourists went into halftime with a man down after Pollock was yellow carded for a ruck infringement deep inside his own quarter. The Force crossed the line from the resulting penalty but were held up. A key moment Advertisement Williams finished off an 80-meter counter-attacking try seven minutes into the second half. Both wingers were involved, with Lowe making an initial break and then exchanging passes with Williams at the end. Williams limped off after scoring, and was replaced by Alex Mitchell. The Lions' attacking intent led directly to Garry Ringrose's try soon after that gave the Lions a 33-7 lead. Pollock, the youngest member of the Lions squad, was back in the attack quickly, chipping over the defense, regathering and almost scoring himself before the Lions shifted it quickly through the hands for lock Joe McCarthy to score out wide in the 55th. Advertisement Daly scored in the 71st minute after sustained attack to help the Lions take a 40-point buffer. It was extended to 47 when Mitchell scored after the siren, taking the last pass from Australian-born Ireland winger Mack Hansen to put the final touches on the victory. The Lions are playing nine games in their first tour to Australia since 2013, including tests in Brisbane on July 19, in Melbourne on July 26 and in Sydney on Aug. 2. ___ AP rugby: The Associated Press

How should we react to the Boston Celtics taking University of Kentucky big man Amari Williams?
How should we react to the Boston Celtics taking University of Kentucky big man Amari Williams?

USA Today

time20 minutes ago

  • USA Today

How should we react to the Boston Celtics taking University of Kentucky big man Amari Williams?

How should we react to the Boston Celtics taking University of Kentucky big man Amari Williams? The Celtics upset some of the team's fans by trading back in the second round of the 2025 NBA draft on Thursday night. Using the No. 32 overall pick to secure a pair of future second round draft picks on top of the pair they used to take Virginia Commonwealth University guard Max Shulga and Williams at nos. 46 and 57 overall, respectively, turned heads as Boston took players few non-NCAA basketball addicts had heard of. What does Williams bring to Boston as a likely two way big man? The hosts of the CLNS Media "How Bout Them Celtics!" podcast, Jack Simone and Sam LaFrance, took a closer look on a recent episode of their show. Check it out below! If you enjoy this pod, check out the "How Bout Them Celtics," "First to the Floor," and the many other New England sports podcasts available on the CLNS Media network:

F1 penalty points: How they work and why they're needed even though drivers have doubts
F1 penalty points: How they work and why they're needed even though drivers have doubts

New York Times

time29 minutes ago

  • New York Times

F1 penalty points: How they work and why they're needed even though drivers have doubts

Between the Racing Lines | Formula One is complicated, confusing and constantly evolving. This story is part of our guide to help any fan — regardless of how long they've watched the sport or how they discovered it — navigate the pinnacle of motorsports. 'I don't like how we're racing at the moment,' Williams' Alex Albon said ahead of the 2025 Austrian Grand Prix weekend. His comment, part of a longer answer, was not in regards to how his team was performing as Formula One neared the halfway mark of the 2025 season, but rather about the racing guidelines documents shared publicly by the FIA for the first time ever ahead of the race weekend. Advertisement The purpose of F1's penalty and driving standard guidelines is to help stewards 'with fair and consistent decision making,' and the latter document is a set of rules about how the drivers can go wheel-to-wheel racing. The publication of these comes at a time when the FIA faces calls for more transparency and questions about the current officiating system. The specific penalty point system, in particular, has come under fire in recent years, with drivers arguing it needs to be changed. Infringements beyond just dangerous driving can result in penalty points, and they can add up quickly, putting some drivers in the past on the brink of a race ban, which Max Verstappen reached at the 2025 Spanish GP. 'I think it's a little bit harsh to see drivers getting race bans for trying to create action,' Haas' Ollie Bearman said. Penalty points are just one of the numerous punishments that the stewards can hand to the drivers for various infractions, ranging from some safety car and virtual safety car infringements to causing a collision with another driver. The system was introduced at the start of the 2014 season and a limit does exist. Once drivers reach 12 points in any 12-month span, they receive an automatic one-race ban. The slate is wiped clean after the ban is served, or if they avoid a race ban, penalty points will start dropping off a driver's super license once the 12-month mark of each infringement passes. For example, heading into the 2025 Austrian Grand Prix weekend (June 27-29), Verstappen had 11 penalty points. But two points were set to drop off his license on June 30th, a year since he received two penalty points for causing a collision with Lando Norris at Red Bull Ring. The most recent case of a driver receiving a one-race ban for accumulating too many penalty points within the 12-month stretch was Kevin Magnussen, who was sidelined during the 2024 Azerbaijan GP. Advertisement 'You get punished, and then you come back, and you're all ready to… f— s— up now!' Magnussen joked when he returned to the paddock during last year's Singapore GP weekend. 'It's funny how that works.' Penalties as a whole are left up to the discretion of the stewards, a rotating panel of volunteers from the motorsport world. Ahead of the 2025 Austrian GP weekend, the FIA made two documents public that are there to help stewards 'with fair and consistent decision making': the 2025 F1 Penalty Guidelines and the 2025 Driving Standard Guidelines. It was released ahead of the next FIA presidential election in December. The penalty guidelines document alone covers around 100 common infringements, as well as what penalties and penalty points should be given out depending on the situation occurring in practice, qualifying and the grand prix. A caveat to highlight is that some of the penalty points listed in the guidelines are 'the Maximum Number of Penalty Points depending upon the severity of the infringement,' and it is ultimately up to the stewards' discretion how many might actually be dished out. For instance, a driver can receive a maximum of three penalty points for 'causing a collision with no immediate and obvious sporting consequence' during practice, qualifying or the grand prix, but they could get less depending on exactly what happens in each incident. But when an incident results in a fine or a reprimand, penalty points cannot be given. 'The points indicated are intended to be the norm for a particular offence. The Stewards may vary these, taking into account mitigating or aggravating circumstances,' the FIA noted at the bottom of the guidelines document. 'However, the authority of the Stewards to increase the points assessed is intended to be used only in exceptional circumstances.' With the way the current penalty point system is set up, in certain circumstances a driver can end up on the brink of a race ban without making a particularly dangerous maneuver. 'We saw Kevin (Magnussen) last year get a race ban. Although it obviously helped me, I felt like he was really hard done by to have that race ban from all of these tiny infractions,' said Bearman, who filled the seat at Haas when Magnussen had his race ban. 'At the end, he tries an overtake, and it doesn't work. They both cut the corner. It's no harm, no foul. Everyone keeps going, no dangerous maneuvers, no damage, and two penalty points. Advertisement 'Those add up quickly, so it's a shame.' It's a tricky balance to strike because, as Bearman noted, 'drivers need to be punished in some way to stop them from doing some things.' But is the current penalty system going too far with the types of infractions that can result in penalty points being added to super licenses? There is a difference between making a mistake and dangerous driving, the latter of which is only when Fernando Alonso feels penalty points should be used as a sanction. He gave a few different scenarios that he considers driving mistakes, such as crossing the white line at the exit of a pit lane. The Aston Martin driver said mistakes should result in five-second or drive-through penalties only. 'When you are pushing someone into the grass in the middle of the straight, or when you are doing different things, that should be a penalty point, because it's a dangerous driving,' said Alonso. Both Isack Hadjar and Pierre Gasly of Alpine stressed during the Austrian GP FIA news conference that they don't like penalty points, with the Racing Bulls driver going as far as to say, 'I think it's very clean field. It's not very needed.' And it's unlikely that the drivers will change their approach to racing, a question Verstappen faced after reaching the brink of a ban. 'You're joking? Is this like a trap?' the Red Bull driver said in Austria, having faced similar questions at the previous race in Canada. 'I'm getting this question every single time, every weekend.' Motorsport will always be inherently dangerous, as drivers race at fast speeds and make daring moves en route to fighting for points, podiums and wins. It's clear where the limit is, but mistakes do happen. But should penalty points apply for those moments or only when a truly dangerous move does occur? It's clear what the drivers think, but deterrents such as this have become necessary as rows over stewarding decisions became ever more common place in the modern era. Advertisement 'I think the level we have in Formula One – we are professional in what we do,' Gasly said. 'We obviously push things to the limits, but to have a race ban potentially… I was (once) in that situation, and I don't think I was a dangerous driver on track. So, for me, it's something that can be reviewed. Maybe there's another way of applying some sort of penalty without getting into the risk of having a driver missing a race.' Illustration: Dan Goldfarb / The Athletic; David Ramos, Rudy Carezzevoli / Getty Images

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store