The end of a confrontation or just a break?
https://arab.news/py9tu
Every side in the war has declared victory. Donald Trump announced the US attack with 14 bunker-busting bombs and the destruction of three Iranian nuclear facilities, before calling for a peace deal.
Israel described its campaign as historic. It assassinated leaders and experts and destroyed half of its adversary's ballistic missile capability. Iran, which named its operation 'True Promise III,' inflicted unprecedented destruction on greater Tel Aviv and Beersheba. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei wrote: 'It was a strong slap to America.'
What happened over the past two weeks was not just a clash, but a unique and dangerous military development — the first direct war between the US and Israel on one side and Iran on the other. It has stopped for now, but the current halt is no more than a pause — unless we see an agreement between the three parties. That is how wars end.
With all sides claiming victory, who among them will offer concessions? Only the Americans quickly proposed a peace plan — exposed after President Trump grew angry at the supreme leader's rhetoric. Trump said he had prevented Israel from carrying out an assassination plot and that he would agree to release $6 billion in frozen Iranian funds.
He is also ready to allow the immediate lifting of some sanctions. These are rumored to be goodwill gestures to ease the atmosphere for negotiations. And it is said that Washington offered to help Iran rebuild its nuclear program for civilian purposes only.
The Israeli military's chief of staff Eyal Zamir said the war is not over and that the list of remaining targets is long. Regardless of what he says, we know that Tel Aviv's decisions are tied to the White House. A key event took place — Trump rushed to save Benjamin Netanyahu, who was on the verge of falling, and rescued him from the noose of his trial. He declared solidarity with 'Bibi' and said Israelis should neither isolate nor prosecute him. This intervention carries a price that the prime minister must repay to Trump, who is eyeing a grand peace deal between the two enemies.
To end the confrontation, Iran must accept the principle of regional coexistence and join the train of regional countries.
Abdulrahman Al-Rashed
In any case, the key to this crisis lies in Tehran — not in Washington or Tel Aviv. It holds the power to say no and continue the conflicts, or to say yes. To end the confrontation that has lasted since 1980, Iran must accept the principle of regional coexistence and join the train of regional countries. All of them have now either entered into bilateral agreements with Israel or have abandoned any confrontational project. Syria was the last passenger — thus ending the so-called axis of resistance. With Hezbollah and Hamas weakened and the fall of Bashar Assad's regime, the resistance front has collapsed, leaving Iran alone to face Israel.
Backing down from 45 years of confrontation will not be easy for the Iranian regime, but the results of the 12-day war with Israel may hasten that retreat and increase the pressure on Tehran.
Regardless of the toll, Iran still retains some elements of power. It possesses enriched uranium — important whether for building a rudimentary nuclear weapon or to negotiate over. It quickly replaced the leaders it lost and managed to regain control of the internal situation.
Israel's gains include winning over Trump, who carried out what Israel alone could not: the destruction of key nuclear facilities. So, if Tehran holds the key to peace, the upper hand in war belongs to Tel Aviv, which has succeeded in eliminating the Iran-aligned regional threats.
And who knows, perhaps this confrontation is the final chapter in these wars.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
30 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
G7 urges talks to resume for deal on Iran nuclear program
Foreign ministers from the Group of Seven nations said on Monday they supported the ceasefire between Israel and Iran and urged for negotiations to resume for a deal to address Iran's nuclear program, according to a joint statement. Since April, Iran and the US have held talks aimed at finding a new diplomatic solution regarding Iran's nuclear program. Tehran says its program is peaceful, while Israel and its allies say they want to ensure Iran cannot build a nuclear weapon. 'We call for the resumption of negotiations, resulting in a comprehensive, verifiable and durable agreement that addresses Iran's nuclear program,' the G7 foreign ministers said. Last week, Trump announced a ceasefire between US ally Israel and its regional rival Iran to halt a war that began on June 13 when Israel attacked Iran. The Israel–Iran conflict had raised alarms in a region already on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. Before the ceasefire was announced, Washington struck Iran's nuclear sites and Iran targeted a US base in Qatar in retaliation. The G7 foreign ministers said they urged 'all parties to avoid actions that could further destabilize the region.' US Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff has said talks between Washington and Tehran were 'promising' and that Washington was hopeful for a long-term peace deal. The G7 top diplomats denounced threats against the head of the UN nuclear watchdog on Monday, after a hardline Iranian newspaper said IAEA chief Rafael Grossi should be tried and executed as an Israeli agent. On June 12, the UN nuclear watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in almost 20 years. Israel is the only Middle Eastern country believed to have nuclear weapons and said its war against Iran aimed to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. Iran is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. The UN nuclear watchdog, which carries out inspections in Iran, says it has 'no credible indication' of an active, coordinated weapons program in Iran.
Al Arabiya
34 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Iranian FM rules out quick resumption of US–Iran talks
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Monday ruled out a quick resumption of talks with the United States and said Tehran will first need assurances it will not be attacked again. Araghchi, in an interview with CBS Evening News, was asked about US President Donald Trump's remarks that nuclear negotiations with Iran could resume as early as this week. 'I don't think negotiations will restart as quickly as that,' the Iranian foreign minister said. 'In order for us to decide to reengage, we would have to first ensure that America will not revert back to targeting us in a military attack during the negotiations,' Araghchi said. 'I think with all these considerations we still need more time,' he said, although 'the doors of diplomacy will never slam shut.' Araghchi was also asked about an assessment from the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog that Iran would likely be able to begin to produce enriched uranium in a matter of months. 'One cannot obliterate the technology and science for enrichment through bombings,' he said. 'If there is this will on our part, and the will exists in order to once again make progress in this industry, we will be able to expeditiously repair the damages and make up for the lost time.' The Iranian foreign minister said Tehran was prepared to defend itself if attacked again. 'We showed and proved during this 12-day imposed war that we have the ability to defend ourselves and we will continue to do so should any aggression be launched against us,' he said. Trump said Monday he was not offering Iran anything nor engaging in talks since the country's nuclear facilities were 'totally obliterated.' 'I am not offering Iran ANYTHING, unlike Obama,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'Nor am I even talking to them since we totally OBLITERATED their Nuclear Facilities.' The United States and Iran were in talks over Tehran's nuclear program when Israel hit Iranian nuclear sites and military infrastructure, with the United States joining by bombing three nuclear sites — Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan — on June 21. Israel claims that Iran's nuclear program is close to producing a bomb, whereas Tehran says it is for peaceful purposes. Under a 2015 deal, Iran was allowed to enrich uranium below 3.67 percent purity for fuel used in commercial nuclear power plants. Trump abandoned the agreement in 2018 and Iran responded by producing uranium enriched to 60 percent — above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade. That material, if further refined, would theoretically be sufficient to produce more than nine nuclear bombs.
Asharq Al-Awsat
4 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Elon Musk Renews Criticism of Trump Spending Bill, Calls for New Political Party
Billionaire Elon Musk reiterated his criticism of US President Donald Trump's spending legislation on Monday, arguing that it underscores the need for a new political party. The Tesla chief slammed the "insane spending" of the bill, particularly the measure that increases the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. "It is obvious ... that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!! Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people," Musk wrote on X. Musk has repeatedly expressed frustration with what he sees as bipartisan indifference to ballooning government debt. Earlier this month, he publicly clashed with Trump over the bill, before backtracking later. The bitter public feud has led to volatility for Tesla, with shares of the company seeing wild price swings that erased approximately $150 billion of its market value, though it has since recovered. The dispute underscores growing tensions between the administration and prominent business leaders over fiscal policy priorities.
