
The grammar of courage — Shazlin Niza Ab Razak
JUNE 23 — In the heart of Xi'an, a city steeped in history and culture, I stepped into a classroom filled with university students eager to learn English.
I was there on academic duty, representing University of Malaya to teach English as part of an international collaboration.
Their spoken sentences were far from flawless.
Vocabulary was often misused, tenses were inconsistent, and their expressions occasionally bore the marks of direct translation.
Yet they spoke.
They asked questions, participated freely, and engaged without inhibition.
As a Malaysian English lecturer, I found the experience both stirring and eye opening.
These students lacked native fluency and grammatical finesse, yet they wielded a far greater asset, unshakable confidence.
They spoke with earnestness and audacity, embodying the truth that language is not a measure of precision, but a conduit for authentic communication.
This experience illuminated a poignant contrast with what I often witness in Malaysia.
English is embedded early in our national curriculum.
It is taught from preschool and rigorously assessed in public examinations such as the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) and the Malaysian University English Test (MUET).
English is present in signage, media, and entertainment.
We are, in many ways, surrounded by it.
According to the EF English Proficiency Index 2024, Malaysia ranks 25th globally among 113 countries, placing us among the most proficient English users in Asia.
This is no small feat.
Yet ironically, a pervasive hesitation still clouds our collective ability to speak the language.
Why does this contradiction exist?
The answer lies in our educational culture.
In Malaysia, English is primarily treated as an academic subject rather than a living, breathing means of communication.
From a young age, students are trained to memorize grammar rules, compose structured essays, and ace multiple-choice tests.
Speaking, however, is often limited to rehearsed oral assessments and rarely fostered in everyday classroom interaction.
Mistakes, rather than being seen as natural stepping stones to fluency, are often met with correction, criticism, or even ridicule.
A mispronounced word can provoke laughter.
A grammatical error may attract scorn.
This climate of judgment silences learners long before they have the chance to find their voice.
In China, I saw a different philosophy in practice.
Despite English not being widely used in their daily lives, students were consistently encouraged to speak.
They were not waiting to be perfect before participating.
Teachers there emphasised the importance of interaction and self-expression, welcoming flawed attempts as part of the learning process.
There was space to make mistakes, and more importantly, space to grow from them.
This stark divergence revealed an essential truth: fluency is not born out of faultlessness.
It emerges through courage, through practice, and through repeated efforts to be understood.
A speaker who dares to try, even imperfectly, is already progressing.
The fear of speaking, by contrast, halts learning before it begins.
If Malaysia is to advance meaningfully in English communication, we must interrogate our own priorities.
We need to ask whether our classrooms nurture expression or merely enforce compliance.
Do our students learn to speak with clarity and confidence, or are they simply learning to pass?
The time has come to reframe our goals.
We must shift the focus from linguistic exactness to communicative competence.
Our students should not be conditioned to believe that errors signal failure.
On the contrary, they must be taught that every attempt is a sign of progress, and every mistake a mark of courage.
To encourage Malaysians to speak English more confidently, we must cultivate supportive environments in both educational and social contexts.
Classrooms should integrate more spontaneous speaking tasks, role-playing, and peer conversations.
Teachers should model patience, rather than perfectionism.
Parents too can play a role, by allowing English to be spoken freely at home without correction becoming a source of shame.
Public campaigns and national media could highlight relatable stories of everyday Malaysians using English, celebrating authenticity over accent, and effort over elegance.
Workplaces, too, have a role to play.
By fostering bilingual expression during meetings and investing in English upskilling programs that prioritise real-time communication over rote drills, they can help dismantle the culture of linguistic fear.
We must begin to normalise learning through experience, not just through textbooks.
Yet, despite our efforts, the fear still lingers.
Why?
Malaysia has never been starved of English lessons, textbooks, or media exposure.
What we lack is the freedom to falter.
To encourage Malaysians to speak English more confidently, we must cultivate supportive environments in both educational and social contexts. — Unsplash pic
For too long, we have taught our learners that a misplaced verb or a mispronounced word is something to fear, something shameful.
The result is a generation that knows the rules but hesitates to speak.
Not because they are incapable, but because they are afraid of being laughed at, corrected, or dismissed.
This fear is not a reflection of one's intellect, but of a system that punishes imperfection.
It is a failure of how we have made English feel like a test of worth instead of a bridge to be crossed.
For that, I am deeply grateful.
Teaching in Xi'an did more than show me how language is learned.
It reminded me of what it means to try without fear.
My students there, with all their imperfections, taught me courage in its purest form.
They spoke not to impress, but to connect.
And in doing so, they rekindled my hope that Malaysian learners, too, can find their voices, if only we create the space for them to speak.
So, fellow Malaysians, step beyond your comfort zone.
English should never be a gatekeeper.
It should be a gateway.
And it is time we opened that gateway wide, not just with knowledge, but with empathy, patience, and the audacity to speak.
* Shazlin Niza Ab Razak English Language Lecturer at the Centre for Foundation Studies in Science (Pasum), Universiti Malaya, and may be reached at [email protected]
** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Malay Mail
12 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Our pre-U system is broken. Pretending otherwise will not fix it — Vanessa Scully and Sean Thum
JUNE 30 — Every year, thousands of Malaysian students sit for their SPM exams. And every year, graduates are given a plethora of options post-SPM. Some choose to take A-levels, international baccalaureate, AUSMAT or others. Some begin working. Others, who opt for public higher education, are sorted, by choice or by circumstance into one of several public pre-university pathways: STPM, matriculation, or Asasi (foundation). In theory, all three aim to prepare students for the same thing: a place in a public university. But in reality, the system isn't just disjointed. It's deeply unfair. When it comes to the UPU system, Malaysia's centralised public university intake, all CGPAs are treated as equal. A 4.0 from STPM is viewed the same as a 4.0 from Matrikulasi or Asasi. On paper, that may sound efficient. In practice, it erases a crucial truth: not all pre-U tracks are created equal. Let's not kid ourselves. STPM is objectively the most academically rigorous of the three. Spanning 18 months, with a curriculum benchmarked against international standards, STPM students face national-level exams, external assessments, and grading that is anything but lenient. Perfect scores are rare, not because these students lack ability, but because the bar is incredibly high. Meanwhile, Matrikulasi and Asasi programmes, both governed internally by the Ministry of Education or individual universities, have consistently produced far more students with a perfect 4.0. That gap in academic difficulty is not something we should gloss over. It matters. And ignoring it in the UPU selection process is not just bad policy, it's a quiet betrayal of the very idea of meritocracy. The authors say Malaysia needs a single nationalised pre-U standard: one that treats students equally, regardless of where they studied. — Bernama pic If fairness is what we claim to uphold, then it's time for transparency. The Ministry of Higher Education should release, publicly, the annual breakdown of how many students achieve 4.0 CGPAs in each stream. The data will allow us to confront what many students and educators have known for years: we have a system that punishes those who choose the harder path. Let's be clear: this is not about dismantling Matrikulasi or Asasi. They serve a purpose, and an important one. As a Matrikulasi alumna ourselves, we will be the first to say it provided us with structure, financial support, and a safe, focused learning environment. For students from low-income families, it's a lifeline. For some, it's the first real chance they've had to focus solely on education. But the issue isn't the existence of these programmes. It's that we have three separate systems, with different standards, all feeding into the same university pipeline without any harmonisation. Moving forward, what we need is to standardise the syllabus, unify the assessments, and calibrate the grading. Essentially, Malaysia needs a single nationalised pre-U standard: one that treats students equally, regardless of where they studied. Much like the SAT in the US or the gaokao in China, we need to create a system that is consistent, credible, and transparent. Only then can we say, honestly, that this country values merit. The longer we avoid this conversation, the more credibility we lose as a country that claims to uphold both excellence and equity. If we don't fix this, we'll keep repeating the same debates: who deserves to enter Matrikulasi, who got left out of medicine, who was 'unfairly' denied a spot in law school. We cannot put the blame on brain drain when we do not create a safe environment for quality minds to develop and thrive in this country. This is more than education policy. It's about rebuilding trust in public institutions. It's about giving our youth across all races, income levels, and regions a system they can believe in. We cannot build a future on uneven ground. We cannot keep gaslighting our students into thinking this system is fair when so many of them know it's not. And we cannot afford to lose our brightest minds to broken processes and quiet injustices. We owe them better. And we owe this country a future built not on bureaucracy, but on actual, meaningful merit. * Vanessa Scully & Dr Sean Thum are co-chairs of a youth non-governmental organisation (NGO) called Vokal Sejiwa. Aside from that, Scully is a criminal lawyer and Thum is a policy officer in the Ministry of Communications. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.


Malay Mail
14 hours ago
- Malay Mail
George Town's ‘mini Mecca': Acheen Street Mosque opens its doors for cultural harmony and heritage
GEORGE TOWN, June 30 — Over the past several years, the Acheen Street Mosque here has opened its doors to the general public during Ramadan to host buka puasa with non-Muslims. The historical mosque, located along Acheh Street, also has a sign on its gate welcoming non-Muslims to visit it. According to mosque committee member Mohd Norhisham Mohd Abdul Kadir, this is a way for them to spread the peaceful teachings of Islam so that non-Muslims can understand the religion better. 'We don't want people to misunderstand us so our doors are always open to everyone, for them to better understand Islam and the beauty of our religion,' he said. He said during Ramadan, they will have a harmony iftar by inviting leaders from other communities including priests from the churches in George Town and members from the Chinese kongsi and temples. He said it is a way to promote harmony among the communities in the heritage city while also encouraging better understanding among different religious groups and cultures. 'It is why we have a signboard that welcomes non-Muslims to visit our mosque,' he said. He said the mosque is open to visitors as long as it is not during prayer times and visitors are only required to dress appropriately if they want to enter. Traditional 'kampung' houses within the mosque compound remain today and the mosque committee is planning to restore the one vacant house and turn it into an Islamic religious school. — Picture by Opalyn Mok There are still five kampung houses within the compound of Acheen Street Mosque, also known as Masjid Lebuh Acheh, that are still occupied by tenants who have been living there for decades. These are half-mansonry and half-timber bungalows that were built in the 19th century. 'Only one of these houses is vacant as we are planning to restore it and turn it into a religious school,' Mohd Norhisham said. The Acheen Street Mosque was built in 1808 by a Muslim leader and trader from Acheh, Indonesia, Tunku Syed Hussain Al-Aidid. It is one of the earliest mosques in Penang and formed an important part of the island's Islamic history. A photo of Muslim pilgrims stopping over at the Acheen Street Mosque before continuing on to Mecca. — Picture from Penang Postcard Collection 1899-1930 The area surrounding the mosque used to be known as the Malay town, and was called the 'mini Mecca' in the 19th century when Muslim scholars and pilgrims used to stop there on their way to Mecca for the Haj. It was a hub for Muslims to gather and it was also a centre of Islamic education that attracted students and religious teachers from across the region. The mosque also played an important role in spreading Islamic teachings and culture even as Penang grew into a major trading port. The mosque features unique architectural styles such as a weather vane on top of its minaret to show the direction of the wind. At that time, the minaret of the mosque stood tall above the houses and served as a beacon for ships. The minaret itself showcases influences of Yemenis or Egyptians, Chinese pagoda and Mughal buildings while the tiered roof featured Hokkien-style swallowtail ridges that were common in 18th to 19th century mosques throughout the Malay Peninsula, Sumatra and Java. The mausoleum of Tunku Syed Hussain and his family members is next to the mosque. — Picture by Opalyn Mok Next to the mosque is the mausoleum of Tunku Syed Hussain and his family. The Acheen Street Mosque will be one of the eight buildings to conduct open house tours as part of the Historic Building Open House programme during heritage celebrations on July 7.

Barnama
a day ago
- Barnama
Scout Movement A Platform For Regional Diplomacy, Leadership Development
KUALA LUMPUR, June 29 (Bernama) -- The scout movement offers more than just badges and campfires, it is a quiet but powerful engine of diplomacy and leadership across the region, according to Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Dr Johari Abdul. He said that through scouting, young people are not only exposed to leadership skills but also to the cultural diversity, which helps shape a more cooperative and compassionate generation of future leaders. Far from being merely about knots and survival, he said scouting brings together young people from across the region to learn about each other's cultures and, in doing so, foster mutual respect and the ability to coexist. 'If our future leaders cannot understand their neighbours or recognise that no nation lives in isolation, then we are failing them. We must stand together to create a better, more connected world,' he told reporters here today. Johari was speaking after officiating the closing ceremony of the Asia-Pacific Region (APR) Social Impact and Advocacy Workshop 2025, which was also attended by National Chief Scout Maj Gen (Rtd) Prof Datuk Dr Mohd Zin Bidin. A member of the National Scouts Council, Johari believes youth leadership must begin early in schools, through what he described as 'scouting diplomacy', a concept that should extend into community life and beyond. 'Regional cooperation through scouting is not a ceremonial exercise. It should be seen as a long-term investment in building global leadership that is inclusive, empathetic and prepared,' he said. The four-day programme, which began Thursday, was co-organised by the World Organisation of the Scout Movement (Asia-Pacific Region) and the Malaysian Scouts Association. More than 50 participants from 15 national scout organisations across the Asia-Pacific region took part in the workshop, which focused on strengthening leadership, expanding social awareness and designing inclusive, sustainable solutions.