logo
Bangladesh: 4 dead after Hasina supporters clash with police – DW – 07/17/2025

Bangladesh: 4 dead after Hasina supporters clash with police – DW – 07/17/2025

DW9 hours ago
Violence broke out after members of a newly formed student-led party arrived in Gopalganj to commemorate last year's uprising that led to Hasina's removal.
At least four people were killed and dozens injured in Bangladesh as security forces clashed with supporters of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina on Wednesday, authorities said.
The incident occurred in Gopalganj district, about 100 kilometers south-west of the capital Dhaka and the stronghold of Hasina's banned Awami League party.
Violence broke out after members of the newly formed student-led political party, National Citizen Party, arrived in a convoy to commemorate last year's uprising that led to Hasina's removal.
TV footage showed pro-Hasina activists attacking police with sticks and setting vehicles ablaze.
Since Hasina's ouster 11 months ago, Bangladesh has faced ongoing unrest.
Hasina's Awami League blamed the interim government for the violence.
"We urge the world to take note of this blatant use of security apparatus," an Awami statement on X said.
The government, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, condemned the "utterly indefensible" violence and promised action.
"Preventing young citizens from peacefully holding a rally to commemorate the one-year anniversary of their revolutionary movement is a shameful violation of their fundamental rights," he said, blaming Hasina's political party the Awami League and its student group for Wednesday's violence.
Last year, Yunus took the helm of the country, vowing to restore stability, three days after Hasina was ousted and fled to India.
However, critics say growing political polarization under him threatens prospects for a peaceful transition, despite promises of elections next April.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

All change or small change? Ukrainian government reshuffle  – DW – 07/17/2025
All change or small change? Ukrainian government reshuffle  – DW – 07/17/2025

DW

time18 minutes ago

  • DW

All change or small change? Ukrainian government reshuffle – DW – 07/17/2025

A day after the Ukrainian prime minister stepped down, he was appointed defense minister. His deputy Yulia Svyrydenko, who played a part in closing a minerals deal with the US, is Ukraine's new prime minister Rumors of a government reshuffle had been circulating in Ukraine for the past three years and now they have become reality. On Thursday, the Ukrainian parliament approved the nomination of Yulia Svyrydenko as prime minister. Svyrydenko is a former economy minister who was already deputy prime minister. On Wednesday, parliament had also approved the resignation of Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal. As a result, the cabinet was automatically dissolved. Shmyhal had been in office for more than five years — longer than any other Ukrainian prime minister before him. Svyrydenko, 39, had gained prominence during weeks of talks with the US about a minerals deal that was signed in Washington at the end of April. She had proven herself to be a tough negotiator. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said it was necessary to rearrange the executive branch in Ukraine to implement agreements reached with international partners. Under Ukrainian law, elections cannot be held while martial law is in place. Article 10 of the rules on martial law states that while it is in force, "the authority of the Supreme Council of Ukraine […], ministries, other central and local executive agencies, […] may not be terminated." Representatives of the opposition expressed their doubts about the legitimacy of the government reshuffle. "Parliament recently extended martial law and could now violate Article 10, even though everyone agrees that the legislation would first have to be clarified or amended," explained Yaroslav Zheleznyak from the opposition Holos ("Voice") faction. Zelenskyy was also criticized for offering Svyrydenko the post of prime minister in public and thus violating the existing order, whereby a head of government can only be appointed by the president on the parliament's recommendation, which in turn must be preceded by a proposal by the governing coalition. Zelenskyy's Servant of the People party currently has a majority in parliament. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Ahead of the vote on Thursday, Oleg Saakyan, a political scientist and co-founder of the National Platform for Resilience and Social Cohesion, predicted parliament would approve the nomination of a new prime minister for reasons of political expediency. The reshuffle was long overdue and had actually been planned for 2024. The main reasons for this were the ongoing tensions within the government and "a number of obvious management problems" in various areas, from the defense sector to infrastructure and social policy. "The government wants to defuse some of these tensions publicly. It wants to gain some new credibility," Saakyan argued. However, Volodymyr Fesenko, a political scientist and head of Penta, a political think tank in the Ukrainian capital Kyiv, doubted that the change of prime minister would trigger any major domestic changes. "The key political decisions will continue to be made by the president's office and Svyrydenko will implement them, as will the government," he suggested. Svyrydenko, who once served as the deputy head of the office of the president of Ukraine under Andriy Yermak, is a Zelenskyy confidante and considered to be a young and dynamic politician who can potentially bring new approaches to the table. Fesenko pointed out that she had the necessary "experience working in war conditions and dealing with international institutions." Petro Oleshchuk, a political scientist at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, told DW that despite a number of high-level corruption scandals, Zelenskyy wanted to demonstrate confidence in his team by reshuffling rather than changing ministers completely. "Shmyhal's transfer to another position within the government is intended to show that there is no internal conflict. These are merely personnel changes within a team,' Oleshchuk said. Saakyan thinks that the fact that the government reshuffle had not been extensive was actually a sign that there was an acute shortage of qualified and trustworthy candidates. He said that the new government would be forced to deliver quick results but remained skeptical about the future. "This is an adrenaline shot for the current government. But its quality will not change fundamentally," he predicted. Zelenskyy has already outlined the new government's key priorities, which include increasing domestic arms production, developing defense projects and deregulating the economy.

France Court Orders Release Of Lebanese Militant After 40 Years In Jail
France Court Orders Release Of Lebanese Militant After 40 Years In Jail

Int'l Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Int'l Business Times

France Court Orders Release Of Lebanese Militant After 40 Years In Jail

A French appeals court Thursday ordered the release of pro-Palestinian Lebanese militant Georges Ibrahim Abdallah, imprisoned for 40 years for the 1982 killings of two foreign diplomats. Abdallah, 74, is one of the longest-serving prisoners in France, where most convicts on life sentences are freed after less than 30 years. He has been up for release for 25 years, but the United States -- a civil party to the case -- has consistently opposed him leaving prison. Abdallah was detained in 1984 and sentenced to life in prison in 1987 for his involvement in the murders of US military attache Charles Robert Ray and Israeli diplomat Yacov Barsimantov in Paris. Lebanese of Maronite Christian heritage, he has always insisted he is not a "criminal" but a "fighter" for the rights of Palestinians, whom he said were targeted, along with Lebanon, by the United States and Israel. The Paris Appeals Court ordered he be freed from a prison in the south of France on July 25, on condition that he leave French territory and never return. It said the length of his detention had been "disproportionate" and that he no longer represented a danger to the public. Several sources before the hearing said that it was planned for him to be flown to Paris and then to Beirut. Prosecutors can file an appeal with France's highest court, the Court of Cassation, but any such request is not expected to be processed fast enough to halt his release next week. The detainee's brother, Robert Abdallah, in Lebanon told AFP he was overjoyed. "We're delighted. I didn't expect the French judiciary to make such a decision nor for him to ever be freed, especially after so many failed requests for release," he said. "For once, the French authorities have freed themselves from Israeli and US pressure," he added. Lebanese authorities have repeatedly said Abdallah should be freed from jail, and had written to the appeals court to say they would organise his return home. Abdallah's lawyer Jean-Louis Chalanset also welcomed the decision, calling it a "political scandal he was not released earlier". Israel's embassy in Paris meanwhile released a statement saying it regretted the decision to release Abdallah. "Such terrorists, enemies of the free world, should spend their life in prison," it said. Lebanon's charge d'affaires in Paris, Ziad Taan, told AFP the country was "extremely satisfied" by the decision, adding that Abdallah will be "welcome" in Lebanon. In November last year, a French court ordered Abdallah to be released on condition that he leave France. But France's anti-terror prosecutors, arguing that he had not changed his political views, appealed the decision, which was suspended. A verdict was supposed to have been delivered in February, but the Paris appeals court postponed it over compensation payments. The court re-examined the latest request for his release last month. During the closed-door hearing, Abdallah's lawyer told the judges that 16,000 euros had been placed in the prisoner's bank account at the disposal of civil parties in the case, including the United States, according to several sources who attended. Abdallah was wounded as a teenager when Israel invaded Lebanon in 1978 in the early years of the country's civil war. As an adult, he founded the Lebanese Armed Revolutionary Factions (LARF), a Marxist pro-Syria and anti-Israel group that has now been dissolved. After his arrest in 1984, French police discovered submachine guns and transceiver stations in one of his Paris apartments. The appeals court in February however noted that the FARL "had not committed a violent action since 1984" and that Abdallah "today represented a past symbol of the Palestinian struggle". Lebanon hosts tens of thousands of Palestinians, according to the United Nations, most descendants of those who fled or were expelled from their land during the creation of Israel in 1948. He is to be released from the Lannemezan prison in southern France next week AFP Georges Abdallah, here seen in 2010, had been denied multiple previous requests for release AFP

Chinese firm helps supply Myanmar junta with bombs — report – DW – 07/17/2025
Chinese firm helps supply Myanmar junta with bombs — report – DW – 07/17/2025

DW

time5 hours ago

  • DW

Chinese firm helps supply Myanmar junta with bombs — report – DW – 07/17/2025

With the Myanmar military rulers increasingly dependent on Beijing, a new report claims a state-owned Chinese company is helping the junta produce aerial bombs used against both rebels and civilians. Bombs made with Chinese support are "widely used by the Myanmar Air Force in indiscriminate attacks on civilians," according to a new report by the Special Advisory Council for Myanmar (SAC-M), an independent group founded by three UN officials and comprised of international experts. The report focuses on the links between the state-owned China South Industries Corporation, also known as China South, and weapons factory DI 21 in Magway, central Myanmar. The researchers used publicly available information, testimonials, official documents, expert estimates and other sources of information to compile the document. China South and its subsidiary Hunan Vanguard have been "essential to establishing the majority of the factory's current production lines," according to SAC-M findings. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video This includes sending Chinese engineers across the border, training DI 21 staff in China, as well as supplying key components for the bombs. According to the report, the Chinese company still provides remote technical assistance to the production site in Myanmar. The junta's defense industry is "entirely dependent on foreign material supplies — including micro-electronics — for many of the components used in bombs manufactured at DI 21," the report says. Yanghee Lee, a former UN special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, and one of the founders of the SAC-M, said China must end military support to the Myanmar junta. "China South is a state-owned company — it answers to the government of China. By providing aerial bombs and technical production assistance to the OCDI, China South is complicit in the junta's grave violations against civilians. China must immediately end all support for Myanmar's military arms manufacturing." Marzuki Darusman, former attorney general of Indonesia and another co-founder of the SAC-M, said memories of bombs will stay with Myanmar people long after the end of the civil war. "When the Myanmar people look to China, they hope to see a force for genuine peace and stability. Instead they see the sponsor of their suffering. The bombs laying to waste to their communities are manufactured with China's help in DI 21," Darusman said in a press release. "Is this the legacy China wants in Myanmar?' The junta has lost control of vast swathes of Myanmar territory in the years following the military coup of 2021. As a result, the military leaders have been relying on air strikes to target what they argue are terrorist groups. But many have questioned this narrative, especially after the infamous 2023 bombardment of Pa Zi Gyi village in the Sagaing region which killed 155 people, including many children, according to the UN. The bombings have continued since then, with 23 people killed in an air strike on a Buddhist monastery in Sagaing last week. "Countrywide data confirms the use of fighter jets, helicopters and UAVs to bomb locations across Myanmar at unprecedented rates," SAC-M said in the report published on Wednesday. "Local researchers estimate that, in the final four months of 2023 alone, the military carried out 750 airstrikes across 11 regions in Myanmar, with an average of six airstrikes nationwide every day." Khin Ohmar, a Burmese peace and security advocate, says the SAC-M report is more evidence that shows China is interfering in Myanmar's affairs. "China's arms industry is enabling the junta's thousands of aerial bombings that massacre civilians, including internally displaced people, elderly, children and women," she told DW. "At the UN Security Council, China uses its veto power to prevent global arms embargo and protect the war criminal junta, ensuring arms keep flowing. This is the meddling of China in our country's affairs, that has severely violated international human rights and criminal law, and there needs to be accountability under law," she added. Beijing has supplied the Myanmar military with arms for decades, while also investing billions into the country's crucial oil and gas sector. After years of civil war, China is also one of the junta's few remaining international allies. While the EU, the US, the UK and Canada have all imposed sanctions on the military regime, the Chinese support seems only to be growing stronger — especially since the devastating Myanmar earthquake in March. After traveling to China in November 2024, the junta boss Min Aung Hlaing met with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Moscow two months ago. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "Xi Jinping's frequent meetings and interactions with Min Aung Hlaing since the Myanmar earthquake send a strong signal that China is supporting his regime at the highest level," Jason Towers, the former Myanmar country director at the United States Institute of Peace, told DW. "Decision-makers in (the border province of) Yunnan and powerful Chinese state-owned enterprises have also aligned more closely with the junta since the earthquake, and are angling to lock in new economic deals just as they are providing the regime with new technologies that are strengthening its position on the battlefield," he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store