The Whitney restaurant celebrates 131 years as a mansion with a special dinner
In honor of its long-standing presence and preservation on Woodward Avenue in Midtown Detroit, and as a fine dining restaurant for decades, the Whitney is celebrating those 131 years.
Throughout May, the restaurant will offer a swanky steak and seafood dinner for two, priced at $131, exclusive of tax and gratuity. The dinner, available Sunday-Friday, also celebrates National Preservation Month with a portion of the dinner cost earmarked for preservation projects. Its projects aim to keep the Whitney's historic mansion beatuty, charm and opulence.
The mansion, completed in 1894, cost $400,000 at the time and is one of Detroit's most ornate and stately mansions, with a long history.
On Woodward Avenue at Canfield, David Whitney Jr. built the 22,000-square-foot mansion for himself and his second wife, Sara, the sister of his first wife, Flora Ann McLaughlin, who died in 1882.
Years after the couple's deaths, the mansion's carriage house was home to the Visiting Nurse Association offices, and the mansion was home to the Wayne County Medical Society. By 1941, the Whitney family had given the house to the Wayne County Medical Society.
In 1986, after extensive renovations, the legendary mansion became the Whitney restaurant and was known for its fine dining amid the mansion's first and second floors. It is also known as one of Detroit's most haunted places; its popular Ghost Bar is on the third floor, and the restaurant features paranormal tours and special dinners throughout the year.
This month, The Whitney, owned by Bud Liebler since 2007, is celebrating its long history in honor of May's dedicated National Preservation Month, which reflects on protecting historical landmarks, buildings, and artifacts.
While the restaurant has long celebrated its historic roots and haunted past, this is the first time they are pegging it to National Preservation Month as one of Woodward Avenue's long-standing mansions. The Whitney is featured as a Top Pick in the recently published Michelin Detroit Green Guide and also received accolades as a Michigan Best Classic Restaurant by Food & Wine Magazine.
'We're hoping diners will take advantage of this special dinner and experience for themselves what 'the good old days' must have been like on Woodward Avenue,' said Liebler in a news release. 'While we celebrate the mansion's first 131 years, we're doing everything we can to keep it standing and thriving for another 131.'
The Whitney mansion is one of Detroit's most iconic mansions, and that in itself is a reason to celebrate it.
But according to a July 8, 1928, Free Press article titled 'City's Old Mansions Fast Disappearing,' spacious and elegant estates that lined Woodward Avenue were being torn down.
'March of progress spells doom for stately homes of earlier days,' read another headline.According to the article, mansions were wrecked to make room for a 'busier Detroit.''One by one Detroit's storied old mansions are coming down,' according to the article by I.T. Martin. Lumber used for interiors of many of these mansions, Martin wrote, came from Michigan timber.
Replacing these mansions, Martin wrote, were 'modern homes and apartment hotels.' Being 'too close to the city to suit the owners' was a reason cited by Martin for mansions on the market.
Luckily, the Whitney mansion didn't succumb to the wrecking ball. Martin described the Whitney mansion as having an 'interior finish that is practically impossible to reproduce' and possibly the reason for it 'escaping the wrecking crew.'
Throughout May, Sunday-Friday, the restaurant celebratory dinner for two, features a 24-ounce bone-in ribeye carved tableside and paired with four jumbo shrimp. The celebratory ribeye is sourced from Fairway Packing in Fraser, where it is dry-aged inside the meat distributors' impressive Himalayan salt wall aging room.
Served with mashed potatoes and asparagus, and a choice of soup or salad and dessert, the dinner for two is $131 (tax and gratuity are extra). The special dinner honors the 131 years the mansion has stood on Woodward Avenue. With each dinner for two, the restaurant says $31 is earmarked toward its restoration projects that help maintain the historic nature and future of the mansion. It's regular, a la carte menu will also be available.
The Whitney also offers a loyalty membership to its Preservation Partner and Social Club. Now in place for more than five years, for a $100 initial and annual membership payment, members receive exclusive benefits, offering opportunities to access events, special discounts, and promotional items throughout the year. Details are at thewhitney.com. plus:
$25 gift card
Complimentary steak and lobster tail combination entrée on your birthday.
Ongoing 10% discount on your total food check.
A $20 discount on all bottled wine from the restaurant list priced at $50 or more.
Guaranteed VIP (Very Important Partner) reservations with 24 hours' notice.
Invitation to two complimentary annual partner appreciation social events.
Starting May 15, The Whitney's popular weekly garden parties return. A full schedule of bands and musicians performing is at thewhitney.com.
Contact Detroit Free Press food and restaurant writer Susan Selasky and send food and restaurant news and tips to: sselasky@freepress.com. Follow @SusanMariecooks on Twitter. Subscribe to the Free Press.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Dry-aged bone-in ribeye highlights a month long Whitney special
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Straight Women Share The Exhausting Reason They Are Stepping Away From Dating Men
Ava, 27, seemed unbothered by her partner's inability to communicate his emotions. 'We have enough to think about,' she told me as she slid her laptop out of her tote bag, still dressed in her tweed blazer from work. It wasn't serious, anyway. She'd been dating Max for a few months when it struck her — mid-conversation with a friend — that she had no idea what he felt about her or their future. So she stopped asking. There was a time, she said, when she would've tried harder. Sara, 21, recalled sitting on her bed while her boyfriend begged her to hear him out. He wasn't remorseful for cheating, he just no longer wanted to sit with his shame. 'I was done,' she said. And yet, he expected her to comfort him. 'I had to help him find the words for his feelings, not his actions,' — long silences, teasing through shame and self-hatred. 'He didn't know what he wanted to say,' she said. 'And then I made him feel OK about it'. These stories reflect a shift among young women in which more and more of them are 'quiet-quitting' these relationships. Women are now 23% less likely to want to date than men, not because they don't care, but because they feel they've invested too much emotional labor without support in return. Mind The (Emotional Intelligence) Gap In intimate relationships, young women are taking on a disproportionate load of invisible emotional labor, often supporting men through intense feelings of failure and isolation from friends. Many men described feeling 'weird or like a waste of time' when opening up to male friends, instead reserving vulnerability for their relationships with women. While men consider this unburdening to women a 'natural part' of their relationships, those same women describe it as work— what researchers at Stanford University call 'mankeeping.' Over the past two years, I've interviewed dozens of young men and women about their relationships. What's emerged is a sense that women are absorbing the emotional fallout of a crisis they didn't create. The anxieties surrounding what it means to be a man in 2025 should matter to everyone. They're reshaping not just our politics, but the very fabric of how women and men interact — shaping how we love, how we vote, and whether we can build a future together at all. Telling the other side of the 'masculinity crisis' is key to solving it. The crisis is especially acute for younger men — with two-thirds reporting that 'no one really knows them.' Christopher Pepper, co-author of Talk To Your Boys, notes that Gen Z is the first generation to rely mostly on their phones to communicate. 'There's no responsibility for what's on the receiving end [of online communication],' he said, with online spaces often devolving into slurs and death threats 'that wouldn't be acceptable in other situations.' For the 60% of men who engage with masculinity influencers, friendship itself is evolving: ambition, wealth and popularity are prioritized over trust. In individualist countries like the U.K. and U.S., this shift is more pronounced — perhaps owed to the glamorization of lone-wolf masculinity, in which vulnerability is discouraged. When 'The Costs Of Caring' Are Too Much Meanwhile, young women are rejecting patriarchal expectations that previous generations internalized. Once expected to shoulder emotional labor as a normal part of relationships, they are now more aware of the 'costs of caring,' including suppressing their own needs. They're less inclined to date, with 56% saying 'it's hard to find someone who meets their expectations,' compared to 35% of men. From 'I'm Not Your Therapist' to 'I'm literally Joan Baez,' Gen Z women are resisting the notion of offering up too much to men. While some women told me that men without emotional fluency are unattractive, others hesitate to expect it, fearing they'll be labelled 'controlling'. Several women I spoke with expressed concern over how dating men affects their economic futures. The role of women as invisible drivers of men's success isn't new, but with young people struggling to find jobs at unprecedented rates, it's taken a new form. From job hunting to burnout, 'women tend to provide increased emotional support to men who do not have it elsewhere.' Mankeeping is typically tied to thinner social networks, but for Gen Z, it's more about men's inability to share their struggles with other men. All men I spoke with felt they couldn't be as honest about their jobs with their male friends. In contrast, most young women I interviewed described how stepping in during'unsettled times' negatively impacted their work and well-being. This labor has become an invisible workplace obstacle, as instant communication has erased the natural boundaries that once separated work and emotional caregiving. COVID-19 only exacerbated these dynamics, with many surprised by how quickly they 'played house' during lockdown — over-focusing on their partner's needs instead of their own. A default response learned in their teens and early 20s, it's been challenging to unlearn. Some have gone further: writing partner's college essays, preparing scholarship presentations, coaching them on job interviews. In some cases, their partners actively diminished their career success. 'When he heard where I worked, he looked at me predatorily,' one woman said. He later pressured her to refer him to her company, convincing her it would be best for their relationship. Some men seek proximity to success without realizing the toll it takes on their self-esteem. A Job Women Didn't Sign Up For Broader beliefs about gender equity are shaping how much support partners expect — and feel entitled to — from each other. Women feel as though men aren't doing enough to support gender equality, whereas 60% of men believe they're expected to do too much. The stereotype suggests that women require more support in relationships, but Gen Z's 'emotion work' — the labor required to bridge the gap between expectations and reality — is especially stark in a generation that expects so much of young men while providing them limited support. Across hundreds of hours of interviews, distinct forms of emotional labor have emerged — confirming what researchers have long observed: Women are more often expected to carry this emotional load in relationships. Like Ava, many women are stepping back from this distinct form of work, from dating, and from committed relationships. They report that dating is harder than 10 years ago, and are twice as likely as men to cite physical and emotional risk as reasons why dating has become more challenging — 62% of single women report they're not looking to date at all, compared to 37% of men. Even before entering relationships, a young woman is likely to have experienced emotional and physical abuse. Among teenage girls, 80% report that sexual assault is 'normal and common' in their friendship groups — before they even finish high school. About half of Gen Z women report feeling disrespected by men, compared to 18% of men; 42% of women report being pressured into sex on a date, and intimate partner abuse has now been cited as an indicator of attitudes that underpin extreme violence. Both these realities might partially explain why young men are dating less than previous generations. Gen Z men are more than twice as likely as Boomers to report that they didn't have a significant other as teenagers, and women are increasingly opting to date older men to avoid having to 'mother' their significant other. 'Unless you're really in love,' one Gen Z woman told me, 'then it's not your problem if they're not emotionally available.' Millennials have a different lens: 'It's a feminism thing,' Becca, 31, told me. 'But also a way of processing the outsized support we gave them' — a kind of paying it forward to another woman's future boyfriend. The more women are left to shoulder the burden of the masculinity crisis, the more likely they are to withdraw. But the more they do, the more boys feel rejected. Loneliness leaves boys vulnerable to voices that reframe their abandonment. One in six boys aged 6-15 have a positive impression of Andrew Tate, and across 30 countries, Gen Z men are 30% more conservative than other generation has a gender divergence — social and political — at this scale. If we want to interrupt this spiral, we must stop asking women to keep absorbing the damage. We need to offer boys a healthier model of masculinity that speaks to their needs — but doesn't come at girls' expense. That means listening to why women are pulling away and creating pathways for boys to grow without leaning on women. A recent survey exploring young men's health in a digital world, 55% of the young men who watch masculinity influencers believe that women don't care about men. My research shows that women do care. They just want relationships that don't lean on traditional gender roles. Meanwhile, boys deserve better than a culture that mocks their confusion without showing them a path through it. That path begins with both sides recognizing what the other is carrying — and letting go of narratives that cast boys as aggressors before they even reach adolescence. Instead, as Pepper puts it, it's 'fine to give boys and men some homework.' This homework begins with fostering self-awareness, emotional literacy and responsibility for your actions. What Men Can Do To Fix It Men often lack these emotional skills precisely because they've rarely been expected — or permitted — to develop them. Instead, young women have been tasked with practicing and perfecting emotional labor. Traditional masculine norms like pride often keep men from extending their expressions of vulnerability beyond the comfort of romantic relationships. Many fear that admitting they're overwhelmed will diminish their self-worth. Emotional fluency will take practice. And because expectations of manhood haven't evolved as quickly as those for women, that practice must be met with patience. Our understanding of masculinity must also shift to make space for emotional connection between men. Vulnerability is often taught by women and associated with intimacy — leaving little room to express it in male friendships. But men need friendships grounded in trust, mutual honesty and shared vulnerability. Nearly every man I spoke to said his male friendships left him feeling worse about himself. This not only deprives men of the full range of support they need in tough times, but limits nuance in emotionally complex situations. As several male interviewees pointed out, their friends were often quick to 'hate' or 'blame' women after breakups. Instead of emotional language that deepens the gender divide, it can instead be used to bridge it, helping men move through hurt with reflection and toward growth. Finally, we need to redefine what it means for men to be a 'provider.' Caring for others should be central to what masculinity can mean. We must also rethink what it means to 'protect,' as many men I spoke to believed withholding their emotions was a form of care. Dating teaches us many things: how to take emotional risks, how to fail, how to communicate. Above all, relationships teach us how to be vulnerable. But with 29% more men than women in Gen Z currently single, a gender skills gap will only continue to widen. As more women step back from relationships, many men may never get the chance to learn. Those who took on this homework — who shared their burdens with friends, practiced self-awareness and showed up with emotional fluency — weren't just more attractive to the women they dated. They also became better partners. If we are to love each other, masculinity has to evolve to hold that vulnerability, for everyone's sake. Related... Men Are Trimming Their Eyelashes To Be Shorter, And The Reason Is Baffling Opinion: Jerry Seinfeld And Conservatives Want To Make America Masculine Again — And It's Destroying Men My Family Needs Me For Everything — And I Never Saw The Emotional Fatigue From That Coming Why Men Are Bad At Friendship (And What To Do About It)
Boston Globe
16-07-2025
- Boston Globe
Tests used to be hard. That was the point.
Advertisement The Massachusetts test, known as MCAS, wasn't a cakewalk; it called for a fair amount of time, study, and classroom preparation. But Yet despite those standout results, Bay State voters couldn't resist joining the flight from high standards. The Massachusetts Teachers Union — which prioritizes the interests of teachers over the interests of students — Advertisement It isn't only graduation tests that have been diluted or abolished. Across the country activists argue that standardized tests like the SAT are too stressful, too discriminatory, or simply irrelevant — and should therefore be made easier or dumped altogether. Yet when one looks at what students a century ago were expected to master in order to graduate from high school — or in some cases to get into high school — today's complaints about standardized tests seem almost comical by comparison. The historical record makes one thing clear: Today's test-takers don't know how easy they have it. Consider some questions from the Here are a dozen of the questions those Kansas teens were expected to answer: What are the following? Give examples: trigraph, subvocals, diphthong, cognate letters, linguals. Use the following in sentences: cite, site, sight; fane, fain, feign; vane, vain, vein; raze, raise, rays . A wagon box is 2 feet deep, 10 feet long, and 3 feet wide. How many bushels of wheat will it hold? Find the interest on $512.60 for 8 months and 18 days at 7 percent. What is the cost of 40 boards, 12 inches wide and 16 feet long, at $.20 per inch? What are the principal parts of a verb? Give principal parts of do, lie, lay, and run . Who were the following: Morse, Whitney, Fulton, Bell, Lincoln, Penn, and Howe? Name the events connected with the following dates: 1607, 1620, 1776, 1789, and 1865. Why is the Atlantic Coast colder than the Pacific in the same latitude? Name all the republics of Europe and give capital of each. Too tough? Tell that to the New Jersey kids who sat down to be tested a decade earlier. In 1885, the Advertisement What is the axis of the earth and what is the equator? What is the distance from the equator to either pole in degrees and in miles? Name four principal mountain ranges in Asia, three in Europe, and three in Africa. Name the states on the west bank of the Mississippi and the capital of each. Name the capitals of the following countries: Portugal, Greece, Egypt, Persia, Japan, China, Canada, Cuba. And here are five from the history portion: Name the thirteen colonies that declared their independence in 1776. Name three events of 1777. Which was the most important and why? What caused the War of 1812? Who was president during that war? Name four Spanish explorers and state what induced them to come to America. Related : These weren't impossible questions. They weren't pitched to the smartest kids in the class. On the contrary — they covered information that most students of normal ability could reasonably be expected to master. And There is no such expectation today. According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress — commonly referred to as 'the nation's report card' — the reading and comprehension skills of American kids are worse than they have ever been. 'The percentage of eighth graders who have 'below basic' reading skills according to NAEP is the largest it has been in the exam's three-decade history — 33 percent,' Given such terrible results, you might imagine that policymakers and parents would be pressing urgently to raise academic standards and insisting that teachers and school administrators meet them. But nearly all the movement is in the other direction. Especially disturbing is the way the SAT — for decades a consistent barometer of academic readiness and Advertisement To begin with, the test is now administered in a digital format that calibrates the difficulty level of the questions to the performance of the test-taker. 'If a student struggles in the first section, the test adjusts to become easier; if they excel, it becomes harder,' the Manhattan Institute's Vilda Westh Blanc and Tim Rosenberger recently There are other changes. The SAT now lasts two hours instead of three. Students are allowed to use calculators for all math questions. Passages in the The upshot is that students are no longer required to parse complex or historically significant texts. Instead, the reading assignments are being made almost childishly easy. 'Instead of engaging with the great works of literature and foundational documents that have shaped Western civilization, students are asked to interpret snippets akin to tweets or memes,' Blanc and Rosenberger observe. If students are never required to read anything more challenging than short texts, how will they ever learn to wrestle with ambiguity, to shape thoughtful arguments, or to make sense of complex sentences and difficult syntax? Advertisement Amid the current vogue for weakening tests and lowering expectations, it is worth asking: Why did educators a century (or more) ago set such high standards? Perhaps it was because they saw education not just as a means to get a job, but as a moral and civic duty — a way to form responsible citizens who understood their history, could articulate their thoughts, and would therefore be better able to contribute to society. Testing was viewed as a tool of accountability — not as the enemy of learning, but as its natural culmination. It sent the message that knowledge mattered and that everyone, regardless of background, could rise to the occasion. The cultural context then was very different. Students understood that passing the eighth-grade exam might be their only chance to prove themselves before entering the workforce. Lowering standards may feel like a kindness in the short term, but it comes at a steep cost: a diminished sense of what students are capable of achieving and a weaker intellectual foundation for society. The young Americans of 1895, often sitting in one-room schoolhouses, did not have smartphones, calculators, Google, or AI — but they rose to demanding expectations and built a thriving nation. Today's students, with far more resources at their disposal, should not be sold short. The Advertisement Are you astonished that teenagers a century ago could handle questions like the ones above? Don't be. The real shocker isn't that high school students then could meet such a challenge. It's that students today are no longer expected to. This article is adapted from the current , Jeff Jacoby's weekly newsletter. To subscribe to Arguable, visit . Jeff Jacoby can be reached at
Yahoo
11-07-2025
- Yahoo
Norris Burkes: Wrong numbers and the search for love — a chaplain offers dating advice
Are you familiar with a business named Chispa? No, I'm not talking about Chispa Project, the nonprofit my daughter Sara founded in 2015 to establish children's libraries in Honduras. Just now, they are working on library No. 100. No small feat for their small but powerful Honduran team. But the Chispa I'm referring to is the No. 1 Latino dating app. According to their website, they are 'Fluent in Amor.' This Chispa claims to have made 'the perfect dating app for single Latina women and single Latino men.' 'Chispa' is Spanish for 'spark,' which is why both the dating app and a literacy organization chose the name. Both organizations are appropriately named. After all, your love life and the books you read can radically light up your life and change your future. I only mention Chispa, the dating app, because Chispa Project, the non-profit, takes many misdirected phone calls from lovelorn folks asking: 'Why is my account blocked?' 'Why isn't SHE calling me?' 'I haven't found anyone, can I get a refund?' The incredulous part isn't how they find Sara's number in the first place, but how crazy-certain they are that they've reached the right number — no matter how many times Sara tells them otherwise. She's tried clarifying her opening line to avoid confusion: 'Hello, this is Sara at Chispa Project, the non-profit in Honduras!' 'Hi, I'm trying to access my account and …' 'Ooh, so sorry!' Sara says in perfect Spanish, 'You've reached Chispa Project, the non-profit in Honduras.' 'I really need to get on your site ASAP …' insists the caller. 'Sorry, we're not related to the Chispa dating app. Wrong number.' They beg her, 'Can't you connect me to the right person?' Listening to Sara patiently explain — again and again — that she's not tech support for a dating app reminds me of how often Jesus had to clarify his mission for those who misunderstood him. People sought a political savior or miracle worker, but Jesus kept emphasizing a different purpose. Despite all the parables, analogies, metaphors, and symbols Jesus used, he was clear and repetitive about one thing in particular — love — the chispa that lights everything else. When he said to 'love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind,' and to 'love your neighbor as yourself' (Matthew 22:37–39), he pointed to the fire that kindles true connection, purpose, and transformation. Like a single chispa that can ignite a flame, love sets everything in motion — whether it's changing a life through a children's book, finding a life partner, or growing closer to God by following Jesus' example. To be clear, this columnist does not endorse the dating app in question. I'm already locked into a lifetime subscription with my wife, Becky. It's not the fleeting spark of romance I'm looking for, but a different kind of spark: one that ignites compassion, healing, and humility. These days, I find myself affirming the love that kindles true connection, purpose, and transformation — like Jesus taught. How can we all become more fluent in the amor that demonstrates empathy? An amor that humbles us across differences? In Greek, this type of amor is described as agape — a love that is unconditional, selfless, sacrificial. It's the choice to love regardless of circumstances or feelings. In English, it might seem that Chispa, the app, and Chispa Project, the non-profit, offer the same thing — a spark of love. Make no mistake, both are important and necessary, but they are different. Chispa, the app, offers a chance at romantic love. Chispa Project, the non-profit, encourages the agape love for our neighbors. I keep telling Sara that she should charge a minimum donation for each of the crisscrossed Chispa calls she gets, but she always mutters something about honesty and goofy dad ideas. But now the choice is yours — what will you do to spark agape in whatever Chispa you end up calling? What chispa will you ignite in your community? Celebrate Chispa's 100th library with me by donating $100 today at or send a check made out to Chispa Project at 10556 Combie Road, Suite 6643, Auburn, CA 95602. Learn more at Email Norris at comments@ This article originally appeared on Springfield News-Leader: Dating advice from former chaplain Norris Burkes
