logo
Strait of Hormuz: What happens if Iran shuts global oil corridor?

Strait of Hormuz: What happens if Iran shuts global oil corridor?

BBC News23-06-2025
There is considerable speculation that Iran might retaliate for the US's strikes on its nuclear facilities by closing the world's busiest oil shipping channel, the Strait of Hormuz.
About 20% of global oil and gas flows through this narrow shipping lane in the Gulf. Blocking it would have profound consequences for the global economy, disrupting international trade and ratcheting up oil prices.
It could also inflate the cost of goods and services worldwide, and hit some of the world's biggest economies, including China, India and Japan, which are among the top importers of crude oil passing through the strait.
What is the Strait of Hormuz - and where is it?
The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most important shipping routes, and its most vital oil transit choke point.
Bounded to the north by Iran and to the south by Oman and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the corridor – which is only about 50km (31 miles) wide at its entrance and exit, and about 33km wide at its narrowest point – connects the Gulf with the Arabian Sea.
The strait is deep enough for the world's biggest crude oil tankers, and is used by the major oil and gas producers in the Middle East – and their customers.
In the first half of 2023 around 20 million barrels of oil went through the Strait of Hormuz per day, according to estimates from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) – that's nearly $600bn (£448bn) worth of energy trade per year.
That oil comes not only from Iran, but also other Gulf states such as Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
What would be the impact of closing the strait?
Former head of the UK's intelligence agency MI6, Sir Alex Younger, told the BBC his worst-case scenario in the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict included a blockade on the Hormuz Strait.
"Closing the strait would be obviously an incredible economic problem given the effect it would have on the oil price," he said.
It would be "uncharted terrain", according to Bader Al-Saif, an assistant professor at Kuwait University who specialises in geopolitics of the Arabian Peninsula.
"It would have direct consequences on world markets, because you're going to look at an uptick in the oil price, [and] you're going to see the stock markets reacting very nervously to what's happening," Mr Al-Saif told BBC Newshour.
It would, of course, hurt the Gulf countries whose economies rely heavily on energy exports.
Saudi Arabia, for instance, uses the strait to export around 6 million barrels of crude oil per day - more than any neighbouring country - according to research by analytics firm Vortexa.
Iran, by comparison, exports about 1.7 million barrels per day, according to the International Energy Agency. Iran exported $67bn worth of oil in the financial year ending March 2025 – its highest oil revenue in the past decade – according to estimates by the Central Bank of Iran.
Asia too would be hit hard. In 2022, around 82% of crude oil and condensates (low-density liquid hydrocarbons that typically occur with natural gas) leaving the Strait of Hormuz were bound for Asian countries, according to EIA estimates.
China alone is estimated to buy around 90% of the oil that Iran exports to the global market.
Any disruptions to that could increase fuel and production costs at a time when China is having to rely on manufacturing and exports. That's not just a domestic problem, either: rising manufacturing costs could eventually be passed on to consumers, fuelling inflation around the world.
The impact could also be outsized for other key Asian economies, which are among the biggest importers, after China. Nearly half India's crude oil and 60% of its natural gas imports pass through the Strait of Hormuz. South Korea reportedly gets 60% of its crude oil through the strait, and Japan nearly three-quarters.
How could Iran close the strait?
United Nations rules allow countries to exercise control up to 12 nautical miles (13.8 miles) from their coastline.
This means that at its narrowest point, the Strait of Hormuz and its shipping lanes lie entirely within Iran and Oman's territorial waters.
If Iran were to try and block the 3,000 or so ships that sail through the strait each month, one of the most effective ways to do it, according to experts, would be to lay mines using fast attack boats and submarines.
Iran's regular navy and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) navy could potentially launch attacks on foreign warships and commercial vessels.
However, large military ships may in turn become easy targets for US air strikes.
Iran's fast boats are often armed with anti-ship missiles, and the country also operates a range of surface vessels, semi-submersible craft and submarines.
Experts say Iran could block the strait temporarily, but many are equally confident that the US and its allies could swiftly re-establish the flow of maritime traffic through military means.
The US has done this before.
In the late 1980s, during the eight-year Iran-Iraq war, strikes on oil facilities escalated into a "tanker war" that saw both countries attacking neutral ships to exert economic pressure.
Kuwaiti tankers carrying Iraqi oil were especially vulnerable – and eventually, American warships began escorting them through the Gulf in what became the biggest naval convoy operation since World War II.
Will Iran block the strait?
While Iran has repeatedly threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz in past conflicts, it has never followed through.
Perhaps the closest call was during the tanker war of the late 1980s – but even then, shipping through the Strait of Hormuz was never seriously disrupted.
If Iran delivers on its threat, this time could be different.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has claimed that Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz would amount to "economic suicide", and called on China, an ally of Tehran, to intervene.
"I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them [Iran] about that, because they heavily depend on the Strait of Hormuz for their oil," Rubio said in an interview with Fox News on Sunday.
"We retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours."
Though China is yet to respond, Beijing is highly unlikely to welcome any rise in oil prices or disruptions to shipping routes, and could leverage its diplomatic weight to dissuade the Iranian government from going ahead with the blockade.
Energy analyst Vandana Hari said Iran has "little to gain and too much to lose" from closing the Strait.
"Iran risks turning its oil and gas producing neighbours in the Gulf into enemies and invoking the ire of its key market China by disrupting traffic in the Strait," Hari told BBC News.
Can alternative routes offset a blockade?
The persistent threat of a closure of the Strait of Hormuz has, over the years, prompted oil-exporting countries in the Gulf region to develop alternative export routes.
According to an EIA report, Saudi Arabia has activated its East–West pipeline, a 1,200km-long line capable of transporting up to 5m barrels of crude oil per day.
In 2019, Saudi Arabia temporarily repurposed a natural gas pipeline to carry crude oil.
The United Arab Emirates has connected its inland oilfields to the port of Fujairah on the Gulf of Oman via a pipeline with a daily capacity of 1.5 million barrels.
In July 2021, Iran inaugurated the Goreh–Jask pipeline, intended to move crude oil to the Gulf of Oman. This pipeline can currently carry around 350,000 barrels per day - although reports suggest Iran does not yet.
The EIA estimates that these alternative routes could collectively handle around 3.5 million barrels of oil per day - roughly 15% of the crude currently shipped through the strait.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Breakingviews - US-India standoff is about more than Russian oil
Breakingviews - US-India standoff is about more than Russian oil

Reuters

time25 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Breakingviews - US-India standoff is about more than Russian oil

HONG KONG, Aug 5 (Reuters Breakingviews) - The standoff between the U.S. and India may well get worse before it gets better. Having slapped a 25% tariff on goods the South Asian country sends to America, Donald Trump is vowing to ratchet up the rate over the $4 trillion economy's purchases of Russian oil. New Delhi calls the threat unjustified and unreasonable. A deal with Washington is possible, but diffusing the situation looks tricky. Far from being a winner in the U.S. president's global trade war, India is rapidly emerging as a big loser alongside China. Trump's desire to isolate the People's Republic - and its exporters routing goods through Southeast Asia - was initially expected to benefit India, which sent $87 billion of goods to the U.S. last year. His sudden cooling on Russia, though, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's reluctance to open up his country's agriculture market out of a desire to protect millions of poor farmers, have put India in his firing line. India's economy can withstand Trump's aggressions, for now. Nomura, a Japanese bank, reckons the 25% U.S. tariff on imports from India might shave 20 basis points off its 6.2% GDP growth forecast for the country's current financial year. Sure, New Delhi argues its purchases of cheap Russian oil, which comprise 40% of its crude imports, are a "national compulsion" and keep global prices in check. But India can manage without it: at 2.1%, its consumer price inflation is at the lowest level since January 2019, so giving up the roughly $4 discount per barrel on Russian supplies would not cause too much domestic pain at current prices. Yet India has a lot more besides oil to lose from giving Russia the cold shoulder. The duo's longstanding relationship may be undergoing a managed decline, opens new tab as New Delhi diversifies its weapons supplies, but Moscow remains a reliable partner to India and relations with the country buttress its multipolar foreign policy. Trump's decision to work with Pakistan to develop its oil reserves, and his subsequent taunt that it perhaps will sell oil to neighbouring India one day, further underscore why New Delhi may always keep some distance from Washington. India can perhaps afford to wait and see what the U.S. agrees with China. Beijing has vowed to protect its energy sovereignty in response to similar U.S. threats over Russian oil purchases. That poses a major obstacle for Trump to strike any grand bargain with the world's second-largest economy. Ultimately the U.S. may see value in preserving a warm relationship with India as a counterbalance to China. The wait, however, will be awkward. Follow Una Galani on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.

Chinese government has 'final say' in Dalai Lama reincarnation, Tibetan official says
Chinese government has 'final say' in Dalai Lama reincarnation, Tibetan official says

Reuters

time25 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Chinese government has 'final say' in Dalai Lama reincarnation, Tibetan official says

BEIJING, Aug 5 (Reuters) - The discovery of the next Dalai Lama will be carried out by the Chinese government, and not under the current Dalai Lama's directions, a Chinese Communist Party committee official for Tibet said on Tuesday. China considers the Nobel laureate Dalai Lama a separatist and wants to bring Tibetan Buddhismunder its control,, opens new tab but the Dalai Lama and his huge following have been obstacles to that ambition. At his 90th birthday celebration last month, he assured followers that he would be reincarnated, and a non-profit institution he has set up will have the sole authority to identify his reincarnation. But Gama Cedain, the deputy secretary of the Chinese Communist Party committee in Tibet, said the Dalai Lama's reincarnation would be found using a domestic search and approval by the central government. "The central government has the indisputable final say in the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama," he told reporters at a press conference about the socioeconomic development in Tibet. He said that was the creed devotees adhered to, and the government's process follows the strict religious rituals and historical customs of the reincarnation of living Buddhas. "The reincarnation has never been decided by the Dalai Lama himself," he said. The current Dalai Lama, 14th in the line of spiritual leaders for Tibetan Buddhism, has said his reincarnation will be born outside China and ruled out Beijing's role in choosing his successor. China installed a Tibetan Buddhist monk picked by Beijing as the faith's No. 2 leader, the Panchen Lama, three decades ago after a six-year-old chosen by the Dalai Lama for the position disappeared in 1995.

Gold hovers near 1-week high as weak US jobs data lifts rate cut bets
Gold hovers near 1-week high as weak US jobs data lifts rate cut bets

Reuters

time26 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Gold hovers near 1-week high as weak US jobs data lifts rate cut bets

Aug 5 (Reuters) - Gold prices steadied on Tuesday, hovering near a more than one-week high hit in the last session, as a softer U.S. jobs bolstered hopes of a Federal Reserve rate cut in September, weighing on the dollar and Treasury yields. Spot gold held steady at $3,371.40 per ounce as of 0432 GMT. Bullion hit its highest since July 24 on Monday. U.S. gold futures was unchanged at $3,425.30. The dollar index (.DXY), opens new tab traded near a one-week low, making gold more affordable to holders of other currencies. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note also hit a one-month low. "Short-term momentum has improved for the bullish side of the story... fundamental narrative supporting gold prices is that the Fed is still in the mode to actually cut rates in September," OANDA senior market analyst Kelvin Wong said. U.S. employment growth was softer than expected in July, while non-farm payroll figures for May and June were revised down by a massive 258,000 jobs, suggesting a deterioration in labor market conditions. Traders now see a 92% chance of a September rate cut, per the CME FedWatch tool. Gold, traditionally considered a safe-haven asset during political and economic uncertainties, tends to thrive in a low-interest-rate environment. Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump has again threatened to raise tariffs on Indian goods over its Russian oil purchases. New Delhi called his remarks "unjustified" and vowed to protect its economic interests, deepening the trade rift. Still, gold faces some technical resistance. "I still do not see traders pushing up aggressively above the $3,450 level. Unless we have a very clear catalyst for gold price to actually pick up this level" Wong said. Elsewhere, spot silver fell 0.1% to $37.37 per ounce, platinum lost 0.4% to $1,324.05 and palladium shed 0.4% to $1,201.47.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store