
Europe's raw material shortages threaten EV decarbonisation goals
Despite significant policy efforts, recent reports have underscored the gravity of raw material constraints and highlighted Europe's risk of falling behind global competitors in EV manufacturing.
Julia Poliscanova, Senior Director for Vehicles and E-mobility Supply Chains at the green transport NGO T&E, warned at a recent Euractiv event that though there was building attention on this issue in Brussels a few years ago, that focus seems to have been lost since publication of the Critical Raw Materials Act.
'Two years later, we have the act, but I think we lost some of this zeal and ambition,' she said. 'Maybe it's the change of the Commission, but the momentum is no longer there, and it would be good to get it back.'
'Generally, as we go toward all aspects of the energy transition – be it renewables, be it green hydrogen, be it electric vehicles – the cleantech behind it relies on some of those critical minerals,' she noted.
She said that more mining is needed, but it needs to be done strategically.
'I think everyone understands that, but then some people jump on that to say, well, this is also bad because we'll have more mining. But actually, the largest mining today is coal, then iron and then gold. So these critical materials that we need are different from the mining elements we've had in the past. And we require less [than those other mined substances], not more, we just need to focus.'
Europe doesn't have enough
Mark Mistry, Director of Public Policy and Sustainability at the Nickel Institute, an industry association, agreed. He pointed out there are three pillars of the Critical Raw Materials Act: increased mining, increased recycling, and making imports more strategic.
'We need to make sure we're supplied with raw materials, given the fact that in some cases, if I take the example of nickel, we will not be able to satisfy the growing demand, especially for EV batteries, with the nickel that we can mine or recycle in the European Union.'
Speaking at the event, Daniel Cios, the raw materials policy officer at the European Commission, said that the EU executive still views this as a critical issue. 'We haven't lost any energy in the Commission, we're devoted as much as we were before or even more with the hard work of implementing the act and selecting the strategic projects,' he said.
There has been a 'learning by doing' experience with the first round of strategic projects, which the act enables to get special funding and permitting procedures because the minerals they're mining are critical.
'We see actually after the first projects were selected that they get a lot of attention in the media, in the discussions with the governments of those countries and third countries, and many companies came to us and said they got a lot more interest from financial institutions, off-takers and suppliers after being selected,' he said. 'So we see this has really changed the discussion around raw materials projects. This is a very tangible result.'
Poliscanova said she views the strategic projects as being one of the most important parts of the act. 'The critical raw materials act as agreed is a really great framework,' she said.
'I was in a meeting last year in Canada, which is a mining jurisdiction, and people from the Canadian government were saying Julia, we would love the strategic projects in the act, that's such a great requirement, we're going to repeat something like that. Strategic projects is really the way to go. And permitting is a great compromise where we're going faster, but we're not compromising on environmental safeguards.'
Environmental concerns
However, there have been concerns raised about whether the easier permitting and financing procedures given to these strategic projects could lead to environmental damage from new mining activities, where the materials could have been obtained instead through recycling or imports.
Benedetta Scuderi, an Italian Green MEP who sits on the European Parliament's industry committee, said at the event that we need a balance going forward.
'It's important that we make the circular economy sector more competitive in terms of being able to substitute some of the needs that we have for critical raw materials,' she said.
Scuderi warned that 'even if we increase the access to critical raw materials, we have a problem in actually manufacturing [the cars].' The core issue lies in the cost disparity: 'We are struggling to add capacity or compete with batteries coming from third countries like China when the cost of batteries there is around 50% less than the cost in Europe.'
Europe's battery manufacturing industry is under mounting pressure as it struggles to compete with significantly cheaper imports from China, raising concerns over the bloc's ability to sustain a domestic supply chain for electric vehicles.
This price gap is proving detrimental to the viability of European battery producers. 'This is making our battery industry incapable of surviving,' she added, underscoring the urgency for a comprehensive strategy to bolster the sector.
The call is not only for increased production but also for a systemic approach to stimulate internal demand and competitiveness.
'We need to look at the whole battery chain, how to increase internal demand and make it competitive without negatively impacting end-user prices,' she said. The goal, she stressed, is to ensure consumers are not forced to 'pay more for European batteries' while still encouraging the use of 'those that are more sustainable and better sourced.'
Good signs on the horizon
Sara Matthieu, another Green MEP on the committee from Belgium who was involved in the act's negotiations in the parliament, said at the event that there are good signs so far that the act is working.
'We can see from what the Commission has published that for Lithium, for instance, if all projects go ahead as planned, we would reach the recycling benchmark, and even 80% of self-sufficiency when it comes to extraction.'
'When you look at cobalt, we would actually surpass the recycling benchmark but not for extraction and processing. And on rare earths, there's only good news for processing. So it's quite a mixed picture, and in any case, these are the best-case scenarios; it could occur that not all of these projects make it.'
'We also need to focus on demand management,' she added. 'There's been a lot of focus on extraction. Yes, we will need more, but the question for me is really how much and what kind of impact is that going to have?'
Matthieu remarked, 'For mobility, for instance, if you invest in public transport and shared e-mobility, that could really drastically moderate the increase in demand. The act actually contains a clause to develop a clause for demand moderation, so I'm wondering if the Commission has actually worked on that yet.'
Complicated geopolitics
The speakers at the event also discussed the complicated geopolitical situation which makes the EU's dependence on third countries for raw materials imports precarious.
The 2024 Draghi Report, commissioned by the European Commission, paints a stark picture of Europe's supply chain vulnerabilities.
It emphasised that Europe's reliance on imported raw materials exposes its EV industry to significant risks, including price volatility, supply disruptions, and geopolitical dependencies. The report highlights that current European domestic extraction and processing capacities for critical minerals are insufficient to meet the growing demand projected for the coming decades.
'China has a competitive advantage simply out of the fact that these days China is one of the most mature markets when it comes to EV batteries, so there are the amounts available to recycle,' noted Mistry.
'What we need to make sure is that the materials that we put on the market here in Europe stay within the EU and are available for European recycling facilities. We see within our member companies that they start preparing or they're already active in recycling.'
The Competitiveness Compass put forward by the European Commission earlier this year reported that Europe is starting to lag behind emerging global hubs on EV manufacturing, particularly China, the United States, and parts of Latin America, and that part of the reason is those countries have heavily invested in raw material processing and battery manufacturing capacity.
The competitiveness gap could lead to increased import reliance, stranded investments, and diminished economic benefits from the EV supply chain, the compass warned.
[Edited By Brian Maguire | Euractiv's Advocacy Lab ]
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euractiv
a day ago
- Euractiv
FIREPOWER: Trump sparks NATO surveillance aircraft rethink
Take a free trial of Euractiv Pro to get FIREPOWER in your inbox. Good afternoon and welcome back to Firepower, This week, we look at a very concrete example of how US defence policy impacts European security. A Pentagon rethink of its planned purchase of surveillance aircraft is forcing NATO to reconsider its own options. We also dig into how much SAFE money EU countries are seeking - spoiler alert: more than is available. There's also a debrief on what we know (and don't know) about the EU-US trade deal's implications for the defence sector, and Germany's record €108 billion annual defence budget proposal. Plus, updates on the first EU country to ban arms trade with Israel. Exclusive: NATO taking another look at surveillance aircraft pick NATO is rethinking its choice to buy a fleet of Boeing E-7 surveillance aircraft by 2035 to be the alliance's eyes in the sky in Europe and replace the ageing AWACS, Firepower has learned. That comes after the Pentagon announced plans to cancel US orders for the E-7, citing high production costs and concerns about the jet's future survivability. As a result, a spokesperson for NATO's procurement agency, the NSPA, told Firepower that the plan as 'as a whole is being assessed'. The Pentagon's rejection of the E-7 for the US military raises questions about whether the Trump administration will still agree to contribute financially toward purchasing 14 of the aircraft for NATO – or if the bill will be left to the seven participating European allies . Lower total E-7 orders thanks to American cancellations would also likely drive up the price per aircraft for the remaining customers, including NATO. The NSPA plans to give an update 'towards the end of September' that will 'include the division of cost across the participating nations'. The spokesperson said that NATO and participating countries are 'evaluat[ing] the available options'. Buy local instead? The current scramble to figure out the E-7's future shows just how much Europe's security policy still hinges on political decisions in Washington. It remains unclear at this stage if the remaining NATO countries might be interested in picking a European aircraft instead of the E-7. Saab, which previously pitched its GlobalEye to the military alliance, told Firepower they remained confident their aircraft remains an 'excellent' option. Douglas Barrie, an aerospace analyst at the IISS think tank, told Firepower that other options include sticking with the existing AWACS for now and following the US in their future choice sometime in the mid-2030s, going for a new 'clean-sheet design' or taking a 'wait-and-see' approach, since the potential E-7 cancellation hasn't passed the US Congress yet. On your radar: EU countries want almost €200 billion from SAFE; UK still sidelined This week, 18 EU countries have put in initial requests for SAFE funds by Tuesday's initial soft deadline . Firepower dug into what capitals are asking for, and some initial ideas of how to spend it. According to our sources and estimates, the club of 18 actually asked for a good bit more than the €150 billion total available for loans, when considering the top end of the requests they sent in. Gone are the days where the Commission was not sure they'll spend the whole pot. The Commission put the total requested at € 127 billion on Wednesday. But submissions included a minimum and maximum range, and Euractiv understands that the Commission's figure was based on the low end of their requests. The EU executive is not stopping there, though. It is sending out a letter to nudge the club of countries which have not given in their request to do so fast. The SAFE programme is also making waves across the pond, with EU Defence Commissioner Kubilius telling Firepower that he saw 'strong interest among American industry' during his recent US visit. Canada has reportedly shown interest in participating . However, the process is not that easy, as the UK's efforts to negotiate access demonstrate. The Commission could send a proposal next week to the EU countries as a basis to start negotiations with the UK, but don't expect those to start in peak holiday season, we're told. Israel-EU tensions rise Slovenia became the first EU country to impose a full ban on weapons trade on Israel on Thursday. The ban also prohibits the transit of any weapons through Slovenia on their way between Israel and elsewhere. Meanwhile on the European level, Israel's potential exclusion from key parts of the EU Horizon Europe research fund now hinges in large part on Germany and Italy. Neither have taken a position on the Commission's proposal, which would cut funding to Israel for dual-use technologies that have potential military applications. Israeli state-owned arms maker Rafael notably attracted attention by posting a video on X where a drone killed a person in Gaza. As the EU Observer highlighted , that could cause Israel to get kicked out of the EU programme. Germany, Europe's largest arms exporter to Israel and the buyer of Israeli-made air defence systems, wants more time to consider its position. A decision to back the Commission would move the needle towards a qualified majority – but that's unlikely to come before Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul returns from a visit to Israel later today. A decision on whether to partially exclude Israel from Horizon Europe could be taken later this summer, one diplomat said.


Euractiv
a day ago
- Euractiv
The Brief – 1 August 2025: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Good Friday afternoon, and welcome to the penultimate GBU before Euractiv newsletters have a two-week summer break. Many dear readers will have already swapped desks for deck chairs; others might be en route , joining the throngs on Europe's busiest traffic weekend of the year. The month of mass transit gives many of us a chance to test the limits of free movement – whether impeded by border checks or infrastructure in need of upgrades. Transport Commissioner Apostolos Tzitzikostas warned this week that billions of euros must be spent to ensure the bloc's roads and rail are fit for defence forces. And whether for leisure or strategic purposes, the continent's grand rail vision is losing momentum, held up by a patchwork of regulatory standards, poor cross-border connections, and the high cost of laying new tracks. On top of which, passengers are lured away from the green transport mode by flights that are often much cheaper, and do away with the complicated business of changing between national networks. But for all the convenience it brings, boarding a plane weighs increasingly on our consciences, as our travel choices are one of the main contributors to personal carbon emissions. Those flying within the EU, however, needn't let the burden of climate guilt spoil their vacation: in fact the bloc's Emissions Trading System means that the CO2 cost is already factored into tickets, Niko Kurmayer explains. The system isn't perfect – other pollutants than CO2 are not yet covered – but it goes some way in accounting for a notoriously un-eco travel option. Deal or no deal? The hotly anticipated EU-US trade "deal" that President Trump and President von der Leyen agreed in Scotland last Sunday generated enormous commentary throughout the week. Panned by most EU pundits as capitulation of the highest order, the general revulsion at von der Leyen's bootlicking was widely seen as the abdication of European values, international trade laws, and an outrageous disregard for national sovereignty in matters of defence. Then again, others have pointed to the imperative of avoiding the crushing 30% tariffs that Trump was poised to launch. It could have been worse, they note, and many sectors let out a tentative sigh of relief. If ostentatious obeisance is what it takes to avoid a ruinous trade war, so be it. But the devil's in the lack of detail, and as Thomas Moller-Nielsen writes, it's hard to judge the "biggest trade deal ever' when so many aspects of the agreement remain unknown. Despite Trump's crowing celebrations as if all was done and dusted, this is really just the start of negotiations. And the stakes are high, with key sectors – such as steel and digital markets – the focus of hard-nosed bargaining. With so much still tba, Trump delayed the new tariffs by a week (now due 7 August, rather than today). Let's see where we are next week. Pendulum swings on Gaza Europe's attitude towards Israel grew notably cooler this week, as the blockade on aid deliveries has led to severe starvation in Gaza. Having been extremely hesitant to take action against Israel, the dial is now moving as European leaders face public outcry and more countries announce plans to recognise the Palestinian state. Within the Commission's ranks, executive vice-president Teresa Ribera has been most outspoken as she denounced the EU leadership's inaction over the "catastrophic humanitarian situation" in the Gaza Strip. Former foreign policy chief Josep Borrell went further on Friday, accusing EU leaders of being complicit in the "genocide of Palestinians". But despite expressing 'great concern over the catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza,' Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz has so far resisted pressure to suspend EU research ties with Israel. Meanwhile, France, Germany and Spain have started airlifting aid into Gaza – though this is far less effective than opening up secure land deliveries. European defence procurement 18 countries have applied for funds under the EU's SAFE programme, which aims to mobilise €150 billion in loans for defence procurement. After initial hesitation (partly because defence spending is a national competence that has historically been beyond the Commission's remit), a total of €127 billion was claimed – a figure that will likely rise once the United Kingdom and others are accounted for. Countries have until November to submit their proposals to Brussels, with breakdowns of what exactly they will do with the loans. Want to get The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly in your inbox? Subscribe to The Brief.


Euractiv
a day ago
- Euractiv
France says it can't stop destruction of US contraceptives
France says it has no authority over the fate of a large, still-usable stockpile of USAID-funded contraceptives that are set to be destroyed on French soil. In a statement to AFP on Friday, the French health ministry said it had 'no means to requisition' the contraceptives, which belong to USAID, the US international aid agency. 'Since contraceptives are not considered essential medicines and this is not a case of supply shortages, we have no means to requisition the stock', the ministry said. On 23 July, press reports revealed that the US administration planned to destroy a stockpile of contraceptives worth an estimated €10 million, which had been stored in Geel, Belgium. The products are now being transported to France for incineration by specialist waste companies. The contraceptives were part of USAID's global reproductive health programmes, which were drastically scaled back after the Trump administration cut the agency's operational budget earlier this year. Consequently, many of its aid activities, including the distribution of contraceptives, have ceased to function, rendering its role in this field largely defunct, according to NGOs familiar with the matter. Calls to stop the incineration On Thursday, Sarah Durocher, president of France's Family Planning Association, said that part of the stockpile may already have left Belgium. 'We were informed 36 hours ago that the removal of these boxes of contraceptives had begun', she said on Thursday. Durocher has called on incineration companies to refuse to destroy the stock and 'to oppose this senseless decision.' Several NGOs have tried in recent weeks to negotiate with the US government to purchase or repurpose the contraceptives, some of which remain usable until 2031. "We were informed by the US administration that our offer had been rejected, and we learned then that the government had decided to destroy the products - meaning that offers from our partners were also declined", International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) told Euractiv. The cost of incinerating the contraceptives is estimated at €150,000, a price the US government appears willing to pay rather than opt for donation or resale. "We've been aware of these stockpiles since April and have worked tirelessly to find a solution and negotiate with the US, but our efforts have been blocked at every turn. This leads us to believe that the decision is not about money, but is instead driven by an extreme ideological stance. It's about power and control", IPPF added. The French delegation of the Greens/EFA group in the European Parliament has called on the European Commission to intervene and prevent the destruction, questioning its legality under EU treaties and legislation. While the Commission confirmed that it had taken note of the letter and was monitoring the situation, it did not answer Euractiv's question on whether it would intervene in this case. The European Commission should be more outspoken about the senseless destruction of life-saving contraceptive supplies", IPPF concluded. (bms, de)