
Voters in Taiwan reject bid to oust China-friendly lawmakers in closely watched poll
China
Election securityFacebookTweetLink
Follow
TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — Taiwanese voters rejected a bid to oust about one-fifth of their lawmakers, all from the opposition Nationalist Party, in a recall election Saturday, dampening hopes for the ruling party to flip the balance of power in the self-ruled island's legislature.
The independence-leaning ruling Democratic Progressive Party won last year's presidential election, but the China-friendly Nationalists, also known as the KMT, and the smaller Taiwan People's Party have enough seats to form a majority bloc.
Official preliminary results showed that the recall efforts failed to remove any of the two dozen KMT lawmakers. The scale of the recall elections is unprecedented, with another seven KMT lawmakers facing a similar vote on Aug. 23.
The KMT currently holds 52 seats, while the ruling DPP holds 51 seats. For the DPP to secure a legislative majority, at least six KMT lawmakers would need to be ousted, and the ruling party would need to win the by-elections, which must be held within three months of the announcement of results.
For the recall to pass, more than a quarter of eligible voters in the electoral district must vote in favor of it, and the total number of supporters must exceed those voting against.
The poll closed at 4 p.m. local time. Taiwan's Central Election Commission will announce the official results on Aug. 1.
If next month's poll results are also unfavorable to the DPP, it would mean that the government of Taiwan President Lai Ching-te could continue to face strong resistance from within the legislature before elections expected to take place in 2028.
KMT chairman Eric Chu told reporters that voters had used their ballots to prove Taiwan's democracy is mature and great, calling for an apology from Lai.
'All Taiwanese people chose stability, chose that the government should focus on getting things done, rather than engaging in bitter political fighting,' he said.
Despite their huge effort, those backing the recall were facing an 'uphill battle' in trying to unseat lawmakers in well organized, strongly KMT districts, said Lev Nachman, a professor of political science at National Taiwan University.
The result is going to make it even harder for Lai to push his agenda forward, especially ahead of local elections next year, said Nachman, who is an expert on Taiwan's elections.
'At the moment, there is very little Lai can do other than try to think of other creative ways to appeal to the public,' he told The Associated Press.
Fu Kun-chi, one of the most powerful and controversial lawmakers targeted, said the result left Lai with no option other than to meet with the opposition and 'find a way for Taiwan to proceed in a more stable way in this chaotic world.'
DPP Secretary-General Lin Yu-chang said they humbly accepted the results, saying the recall should not be reduced to a victory or defeat for political parties and that it should be seen as a demonstration of civic power. He said his party has the responsibility to reflect on public sentiment more cautiously and adjust its approach to meet people's expectations.
Those who support removing the 24 lawmakers have criticized the KMT and its allies for blocking key legislation, especially the defense budget, and passing controversial changes that are seen as diminishing the power of the executive and favoring China, which considers the island its own territory.
The opposition parties' actions sparked concerns among some Taiwanese about the island's democratic integrity and its ability to deter Chinese military threats, leading to the recall campaigns.
But the KMT has accused the ruling party of resorting to political retaliation after it lost the legislative majority, saying the recalls were undermining and challenging Taiwan's democratic system.
The elections have intensified tensions between those backing the status quo and those favoring improved ties with Beijing.
Critics accuse China-friendly politicians of compromising Taiwan and take issue with their meetings with mainland Chinese politicians. But these Taiwanese politicians claim their connections are vital for dialogue given Beijing's refusal to interact with the DPP.
When asked about the recall election, China's Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian said in June that since the administration of Lai came into power, it has sought to achieve 'one-party dominance' and practiced dictatorship under the guise of democracy, state broadcaster CCTV reported. The office is a branch of China's ruling Communist Party government, which itself maintains strict one-party rule.
Zhu said that Lai's government has spared no effort in suppressing opposition parties and those who supported the development of cross-strait relations.
Taiwan's mainland affairs council said Wednesday that the Chinese authorities and state media had tried to blatantly interfere with the vote.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
FCC chair urges for AI in America to be free of ‘woke' and ‘ideological bias'
FCC Chair Brendan Carr discusses the Trump administration's AI initiative, the tech race with China and more on 'Fox & Friends Weekend.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Global money chases world's hottest major stock market in Korea
(Bloomberg) — South Korean stocks, already this year's best performers among the world's major markets, are becoming a magnet for foreign investors as bold regulatory reforms to lift valuations and empower minority shareholders gain traction. Trump Awards $1.26 Billion Contract to Build Biggest Immigrant Detention Center in US The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Can This Bridge Ease the Troubled US-Canadian Relationship? Trump Administration Sues NYC Over Sanctuary City Policy Just this month, policymakers voted in favor of pivotal law changes to make board members legally accountable to all shareholders. They are now focusing on the next wave of reforms — including improvements to the voting system for selection of board members, and reducing treasury stock holdings — all with the goal of reining in the nation's many family-run conglomerates, or chaebols. From Wall Street to London, investors are taking notice. Overseas funds, which dumped Korean stocks for nine straight months through April, are piling back into the market. Strategists at global banks including Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)., JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), Citigroup Inc. (C) and Morgan Stanley (MS) are among those who have upgraded Korea since the start of June. The benchmark Kospi has surged 33% in 2025, helping propel the equity market's value above $2 trillion for the first time in three years. Reforms 'will contribute to the continuation of a culture shift already underway and will reduce the ability of controlling shareholders to compel restructurings that benefit them at the expense of minority shareholders,' said Jonathan Pines of Federated Hermes, whose $4.5 billion Asia Ex-Japan equity fund has beaten 92% of its peers over one year. 'We remain very significantly overweight Korean stocks.' South Korean authorities have been seeking to replicate the success seen in Japan, where a push for corporate reforms helped boost valuations and spur a world-beating equity rally. Optimism that the nation is serious about tackling the so-called 'Korea discount' has grown since newly elected President Lee Jae Myung made raising governance standards and improving stock-market returns one of his top priorities. Net inflows from foreign funds have crossed $3 billion in July alone. That's more than their combined purchases in the previous two months. 'We're seeing a big change in the corporate governance,' said Joshua Crabb, head of Asia Pacific equities at Robeco Hong Kong Ltd., noting more capital discipline, buybacks and dividends. 'This does not require a great global environment. These are things that are almost like a bit of self-help.' After having discussed the latest round of commercial code revisions earlier this month, lawmakers plan on voting for them on Aug. 4. During this round, they will be pushing to mandate a cumulative voting system for listed firms in an effort to promote board diversity. Cumulative voting has become a cornerstone of the ruling Democratic Party's corporate governance agenda. In such a system, a shareholder typically receives votes equal to the number of shares they hold multiplied by the number of board seats up for election. This would enable minority shareholders to pool votes and elect at least one board member aligned with their interest — such as advocating for more share buybacks or dividends. Another proposal that will be considered for this round would be to cap the number of audit committee members that major shareholders can nominate. Treasury Stock Then there is the issue of treasury shares, which have become a flashpoint in South Korea. Such stock can be transferred by companies to friendly parties, such as family members or affiliates — who then can vote with them to give the controlling family more power without increasing actual ownership. While not directly part of the agenda for this round of corporate code revisions, a proposal to mandate the cancellation of treasury stock remains a key focus for Lee and his allies as they pursue their ambitious goal of 'Kospi 5000.' The proposal has drawn strong opposition from conglomerates. It should be phased in 'to avoid instability,' Lee Han-joo, a senior aide to Lee and the head of the State Affairs Planning Committee, told Bloomberg in a recent interview. At a minimum, companies may push to preserve existing treasury shares while agreeing to cancel those acquired going forward, said Seokkeun Ha, chief investment officer at Eugene Asset Management. 'That would disappoint the market,' he said. Authorities are discussing various options in this regard, according to a person familiar with the matter. Options range from creating a model similar to that of Germany's to using a more stringent approach that requires all existing treasury shares to be retired within six months, the person said, asking not to be identified as negotiations are ongoing. The German model requires companies to sell treasury shares that exceed 10% of the capital stock within three years of purchase, according to information on a government website. 'If we're aiming for Kospi 5,000, I believe treasury share cancellation is essential,' Ha said. 'That's how return-on-equity increases and higher ROE drives up the price-to-book ratio.' Lee's crusade to protect minority shareholders' rights relies on lawmakers delivering substantive changes at a credible pace while resisting pushback from entrenched interests. With markets having rallied so hard on expectations, the bar for disappointment is low. In a recent survey of 300 listed companies released by the Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry, about 77% said further commercial code revisions could have 'negative impact on business growth.' 'Big bang gains were quite a bit driven by sentiment, and that's gone,' said Xin-Yao Ng, investment director at Aberdeen Investments. 'Going forward, we'll need better delivery of legislation to incentivize value-up and companies themselves delivering actual changes.' —With assistance from Charlotte Yang. Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Confessions of a Laptop Farmer: How an American Helped North Korea's Wild Remote Worker Scheme Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Effort continues to fix South Dakota elections that don't need fixing
In the past few years, a certain segment of South Dakota society has become adamant about making specific improvements in the way we live. Is this a citizen quest for more education funding? No. Is it a movement to put often overlooked Native American issues at the front of the state agenda? No. Is it a grassroots effort to revamp the way South Dakotans pay taxes? No. This effort is aimed at cleaning up the state's elections. 'Hold on,' you might say. 'I didn't know there was a problem with our elections.' Well, there isn't. But that isn't keeping the issue from being front and center at the Legislature and in county commission meetings across the state. In the last legislative session there were more than 50 election-related bills introduced. About half of those had to deal with 'election integrity' in the areas of voter qualification, technology and security. That's a great deal of attention being paid to a part of government that, in the past, has been noted for working just fine. Some of these bills may be duplicates. It has become a practice in the Legislature to introduce similar bills in the Senate and in the House. That way, if cooler heads prevail in the Senate, there's still a similar bill in the House, where bad ideas go to flourish. Spurring on the quest for election integrity is an entity called South Dakota Canvassing Group. The group's mission statement is on its website: 'We are a volunteer organization working to restore free, fair, transparent and secure elections in South Dakota, now and for future generations.' Their work to 'restore' elections in South Dakota implies that voting here has gone off the rails. If the Canvassing Group wants to ferret out corruption and illegalities in elections, they're best off moving to another state. South Dakota, with a history of fair elections, doesn't need their help. According to a story by The Dakota Scout, many of the election integrity chasers in this state got their inspiration at a three-day event in Sioux Falls. It turns out that their North Star, their inspiration, their muse, is none other than Mike Lindell. He's not just the My Pillow guy; he's the My President's Election was Stolen guy. Lindell was, and continues to be, one of the staunchest supporters of the idea that Donald Trump was somehow cheated out of victory in the 2020 election. At his 2021 'Cyber Symposium' in Sioux Falls, Lindell spent so much time offering false claims about Dominion Voting Systems throwing the election to Joe Biden that he was recently sued for defaming one of the company's executives. The jury awarded the executive $2.3 million in damages. Some bills backed by the Canvassing Group were approved by the Legislature and signed by the governor: assigning a federal-only ballot to people who don't live permanently in the state, changing the definition of resident eligibility, designating county voter registration files as public records, changing the process for challenging someone's residency status, increasing the penalty for voting illegally, placing citizenship status on driver's licenses, and sending a constitutional amendment to voters clarifying that a person must be a U.S. citizen to vote in the state. However, just as Lindell continues to spout his falsehoods about the 2020 election, look for the Canvassing Group to keep up the pressure on legislators for more election integrity laws that aren't needed. On its website, the top issue on the group's want list is an effort to make Election Day a holiday. In the last session, this came to the Legislature in a bill sponsored by Dell Rapids Republican Tom Pischke. Pischke explained to the Senate State Affairs Committee that a holiday was needed because in some communities there are not enough poll workers nor enough polling places. He said he hoped to work on solutions to those problems without legislation, asking the committee to table the bill. Creating a Tuesday Election Day holiday might free up more people to work on the elections, but it could just as easily cut down on voter participation. Instead of looking ahead to how they'll mark their ballots, citizens could just as easily be looking ahead to using a vacation day on Monday to create a long weekend. South Dakota has a long history of running fair, accurate elections. For all their finger-pointing and hand-wringing, the Canvassing Group and the legislators who indulge them can't change that. Election integrity legislation amounts to nothing more than solutions in search of problems, trying to fix a system that doesn't need fixing. Dana Hess spent more than 25 years in South Dakota journalism, editing newspapers in Redfield, Milbank and Pierre. He's retired and lives in Brookings, working occasionally as a freelance writer. This article was originally published on South Dakota Searchlight. This article originally appeared on Sioux Falls Argus Leader: Effort continues to fix South Dakota elections that don't need fixing