
The aftershocks of L.A.'s summer of ICE will live on
An estimated 14,000-20,000 people lived in those tent cities, and many were Latino immigrants who had nowhere else to go.
Noel Mendoza, a migrant from Nicaragua who spent two weeks camping at one park because she didn't feel safe in her crack-filled Canoga Park apartment, told The Times back then: 'I was a refugee there and now I'm a refugee here.'
It's one thing to seek safety in public spaces, as one tent city dweller said, to have nothing between oneself and the stars.
But what if being out in public is the thing that places you at risk?
This forgotten piece of seismic history came to mind as I listened this week to experts talking about how L.A.'s summer of ICE has brought waves of emotional struggles to immigrant families. There are so many facets to the raids — the legal issues, questionable tactics, protests, economic impacts, political fallout — that the emotional fallout easily gets lost.
We are now nearly two months into President Trump's immigration crackdown, which has led to more than 3,000 arrests in Southern California alone. The raids have upended countless lives.
But we've reached that inevitable moment in the story when some begin to turn away. What shocked in June seems like just part of the new normal in August. It's summer. Vacations. Jeffrey Epstein, the tsunami that wasn't.
Parts of Los Angeles are moving on, as we do no matter the calamity. But for those in the middle of the story, there is no escape. Just ask someone who lost their home in January. Or someone who lost a job, who had to go underground or whose loved one was deported after a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid.
I attended a forum this week on mental health and the raids put together by Boyle Heights Beat, the community news site that has been aggressively covering the ICE operations with news and resource guides. Experts offered a sober window into how the raids have impacted the mental health, individually and collectively, of immigrants and their communities. Some quotes that stayed with me:
The forum particularly illuminated secondary traumas, such as the burden on children who are here legally helping their parents; the new, sudden role of caregiver for people who must now look out for others whose lives are on hold; and the increased irritability, drinking and guilt that come with all this stress.
The message of the experts was clear: These times require strong coping skills and a keen sense of your own limits, even if that sometimes means turning off the news and finding moments of joy amid the uncertainty.
In the days after the Northridge quake, the tent cities became a source of fascination to me and so many others trying to make sense of what had just happened. I remember being deeply moved at the way large extended families set up little cul-de-sacs under the trees of a neighborhood park, taking comfort in having all their loved ones safely in one place as the earth beneath them rumbled. As someone who cowered alone each night in my tiny apartment, wondering whether that vibration was a new quake or my upstairs neighbor rewatching 'Star Wars' on his VCR, their peace brought me comfort.
The camp became one symbol for some political activists who charged officials were not paying enough attention to quake victims in poorer, Latino communities. There were protests and news stories, and more aid flowed to the east Valley.
Eventually even the great quake receded from the news. The aftershocks lessened. The broken freeways were repaired. The tents disappeared. Life moved on.
The end remains elusive for those dealing with the ICE sweeps. And this uncertainty is why the experts urged people to pace themselves and accept what they can and cannot do.
As one said, 'If you can't take care of yourself, you can't take care of other people.'
A selection of the very best reads from The Times' 143-year archive.
Jim Rainey, staff writerDiamy Wang, homepage internIzzy Nunes, audience internKevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newsletters
How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@latimes.com. Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on latimes.com.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Trump on seeking third term: ‘Probably not'
President Trump said Tuesday he would 'probably not' seek a constitutionally prohibited third term. 'No, probably not,' Trump said with a chuckle when asked about the idea on CNBC's 'Squawk Box.' 'I'd like to run. I have the best poll numbers I've ever had,' Trump added. The president and some of his allies have repeatedly floated the idea of seeking a third term. At times, those comments have been dismissed as a joke, though Trump has at other points appeared more serious about the idea. 'People are asking me to run. I don't know, I never looked into it. And they do say there's a way you can do it, but I don't know about that,' Trump said earlier this year. The 22nd Amendment prohibits an individual from being elected to more than two terms as president. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) in January proposed an amendment to the Constitution that would effectively allow Trump to vie for another term in the White House by creating a carve-out for those who served nonconsecutive terms to run for a third time. The proposal has essentially no chance of passing Congress. While many Democrats have waved away Trump's comments as a distraction from kitchen table issues, the president's refusal to acknowledge his legitimate defeat in the 2020 election has sparked fears that he may not leave office in 2029 when his current term ends. Some political strategists have suggested that Trump's talk of a third term also helps keep a lid on chatter about the 2028 presidential race, taking the spotlight away from the president's administration.


Axios
a few seconds ago
- Axios
Early data shows major homicide drops in 2025 so far
Homicides declined in major U.S. cities — by more than 50% in some communities — during the first six months of the year, according to new data from an organization of law enforcement executives. Why it matters: The stats are the latest signs that violent crime in America is falling from the COVID crime wave, and that drop appears to be accelerating during President Trump's first months in office. The big picture: Violent crime ticked up early in President Biden's term, but reports show it's dropped significantly since then as law enforcement agencies responded to the pandemic surge and adopted more detailed recordkeeping. The recent downward trend in crime also counters Trump's false claims that immigration had sparked rising crime nationwide — a reason he gave for his mass deportation plan. By the numbers: Reports from 68 law enforcement agencies showed a 19% drop in homicides in the first six months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, according to stats compiled by the Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA). An Axios analysis of the MCCA data found that Denver, Honolulu, Orlando, Portland and Tampa all had a 50% or more decrease in homicides during that period. Chicago, Dallas, Las Vegas, Louisville, Pittsburgh, San Francisco and Seattle all had declines in homicides of more than 30%. The intrigue: Aurora, Colorado — a city Trump repeatedly and falsely singled out as being overrun by Venezuelan immigrant gangs during the 2024 election — saw a 16% drop in homicides. Phoenix, another city Republicans claimed was besieged by violent crime because of undocumented immigrants, had an 11% decline in homicides during the first six months of this year. The data from MCCA's self-reported agencies included New York City in this report. Its previous reports didn't have New York City, which saw a 27% drop in homicides. Yes, but: Some communities did see a jump during this period. Boston experienced a 143% surge in homicides during the first six months of 2025. Cincinnati, El Paso, Fort Worth, Kansas City, Mo., and Milwaukee also saw increases, the Axios analysis found. Zoom in: Overall, violent crime appears to be falling in every category. Rape was down 9%, robbery decreased 18% and aggravated assaults fell 10%. What they're saying: "President Trump is delivering on his promise to Make America Safe Again — and the results speak for themselves," White House Assistant Press Secretary Liz Huston told Axios. "The safety of the American people is President Trump's top priority, and he's taking decisive action to protect our communities, including removing dangerous illegal aliens from our streets." The other side: "The only thing the Trump administration deserves credit for is attempting to kneecap Baltimore's progress," Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott's office said in a statement to Axios. Baltimore saw a 23% decline in homicides. "Earlier this year, the Trump Department of Justice cancelled more than $800 million in violence prevention grants." The mayor's office credited the city's Comprehensive Violence Prevention Plan and investments in new parks, playgrounds, rec centers, schools and libraries. "These historic lows are the result of a comprehensive public safety strategy that treats gun violence as a public health issue." Zoom out: The quarterly reports from MCCA typically have been a good measure of trends that are reflected in the annual FBI crime data released a year later. What we're watching: Trump has said he will tie federal grants to local police departments based on a requirement that they participate in his plans to deport millions of undocumented immigrants.


USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
Donald Trump's newest CBS foe is 'no talent' Gayle King
Weeks after CBS announced the cancellation of Stephen Colbert's "Late Show," Donald Trump has ideas for the next program to axe. Responding to a New York Post article claiming Gayle King's "CBS Mornings" faces an uncertain future amid parent company Paramount's merger with Skydance Media, the president claimed the news host had "no talent." King, 70, has been with CBS for over a decade, after leaving longtime friend Oprah's OWN network. "Gayle King's career is over. She should have stayed with her belief in TRUMP," he wrote in a post to Truth Social. "She never had the courage to do so. No talent, no ratings, no strength!!!" The president's comments follow a major win for his administration. In late July, Paramount settled a lawsuit with Trump over a claim of deceptive editing he brought following a "60 Minutes" interview with his then-political rival Kamala Harris. In the settlement, the entertainment giant agreed to pay $16 million toward Trump's future presidential library. The settlement came as Paramount eagerly awaited a green light on an $8.4 billion merger with Skydance Media, which required approval from the U.S. Federal Communications Commission. The merger has since been approved, a move some critics characterized as a quid pro quo. Gayle King dishes on her SI Swimsuit cover, how bestie Oprah accommodates her needs Gayle King on 'disrespectful' space flight backlash, celebrity friends 'throwing shade' Now the president, seemingly emboldened by the settlement, is taking aim at one of CBS's most storied journalists. King is a staple on morning television, bringing both hard news acumen and a light-hearted flair to the day's first headlines. Rumors of a new vein of news judgment post-merger have also begun to swirl following the cancellation of Colbert's show, where the host frequently critiques Trump. While Paramount said the decision to pull the plug on the "Late Show" was purely financial, voices from in and outside the industry argued it was a sign of political acquiescence as the White House cracks down on dissenting voices.