Solar panels 'to cut leisure centre running costs'
Workington Leisure Centre in Cumbria has been fitted with 160kW panels, which will provide about 20% of the site's electricity demand.
The installation is expected to save money on running costs and generate income by exporting electricity back into the National Grid during periods of low consumption.
Cumberland Council's executive member for vibrant and healthy places, Anne Quilter, said the solar panels were one way the council was working to "build a greener, more sustainable future for [its] communities".
She said their installation also aligned with the Labour-led local authority's "commitment to tackling the climate emergency and building environmental resilience" across the region.
The solar panels were paid for using capital grant funding from the Sport England Swimming Pool Support Fund, which also helped to pay for panels at The Sands Centre in Carlisle.
Tom Rice, partnership manager at Greenwich Leisure Limited, which runs the centre, said: "One of our key priorities is to futureproof leisure facilities across [the area] and champion environmental resilience."
He said the cost savings made from selling electricity back to the grid would be reinvested back into the leisure centre.
Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
£2.5m work to replace events space roof to begin
Crane brought in to remove Raac from venue's roof
Cumberland Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Germany unlikely to fall foul of EU deficit rules, official tells FT
VIENNA (Reuters) -The European Commission will probably not impose a so-called excessive deficit procedure on Germany for breaching the EU's budget deficit cap this year, Economic Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis told the Financial Times. Germany's new conservative-led coalition government has said it does not expect a planned spending spree, including on defence, to be found in breach of European Union rules that cap budget deficits at 3% of gross domestic product. Berlin's budget deficit is expected to come in at 3.3% of GDP this year, but since defence spending fully accounts for the amount over 3%, Germany "is likely not to end up in (the) excessive deficit procedure", Dombrovskis was quoted as saying in the FT interview published on Sunday. An excessive deficit procedure involves the Commission and EU finance ministers setting a corrective course to bring a member state's deficit back within the 3% limit. A country's failure to do so can in principle eventually lead to a fine. "We have to see the execution, because it's close (but) if everything holds, then it should not be the case for this year's budget," Dombrovskis said, adding that a final assessment would take place in the spring when data for 2025 is available. Under the EU's new fiscal rules, which the previous, more fiscally conservative German government helped negotiate, member states can exclude some defence spending from their deficits.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Voices: We can't afford to let London's ‘golden postcodes' go to the wall
The top end of London's property market usually eases into the year, but 2025 has got off to an unusually subdued start. The capital recorded just 34 sales of more than $10m during the first quarter of this year – about a third fewer than the same period in 2024, according to Knight Frank's latest Global Super-Prime Intelligence report. The slowdown stands in stark contrast to a global market that is gaining momentum. Worldwide, 527 super-prime properties changed hands in the first quarter, a six per cent year-on-year increase. By now, we all know what's behind the discrepancy. Labour's heavy-handed taxation of high earners has come at a time when there are more attractive alternatives than ever before. The Dubai lifestyle, light-touch tax in Italy, and the rising stock of true luxury homes in Paris and Madrid are all prompting high-net-worth individuals to hedge their bets on London. Meanwhile, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told the Financial Times that more than 70,000 people have applied for Donald Trump's new 'gold card' visa, which grants long-term residency to foreign investors willing to spend and stay in the US. It turns out that the small group of very wealthy individuals living in Britain are flightier than the Treasury expected, and the taxpayer will now have to foot the bill. The government has already lost more than £400m in stamp duty on sales above £5m – overwhelmingly in London's 'golden postcodes' such as SW1 and W1, including prime locations like Mayfair, Chelsea, St John's Wood and South Kensington – since the first non-dom reforms were announced by the previous government, according to analysis by Knight Frank UK research head Tom Bill. The real cost is likely to be much, much higher. Even the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) is coming around to that idea. A combination of reforms to the non-dom regime, first introduced under Jeremy Hunt in March 2024 and then expanded by Labour in October, were expected to raise £13.1bn from 10,000 individuals by 2027/28. Capital gains tax reforms were supposed to deliver another £2.5bn by the end of the decade. However, the behavioural assumptions underpinning those numbers haven't held. 'Higher earners' behavioural responses to tax changes are more uncertain and potentially higher than assumed,' the OBR conceded on July 8. 'A growing reliance on this small and mobile group of taxpayers therefore represents a fiscal risk.' The OBR isn't the first to issue that warning – yet, it's not clear whether the penny has dropped for those in Downing Street. Despite rumblings that Chancellor Rachel Reeves was considering reversing parts of her non-dom crackdown to stem departures of high net worth individuals, nothing has materialised so far. Former Labour leader Neil Kinnock also recently called for a two per cent wealth tax on assets above £10m, which may not have been endorsed, but it wasn't ruled out either. Even this kind of speculation is damaging – confidence is fragile, and the message from policymakers matters. Successive governments have treated high-net worth individuals as a dependable source of revenue, but trust has now been eroded. It will take years of predictable, measured policymaking to rebuild it. The silver lining is that many of the highest earners appear to be holding onto their London homes while they weigh up their options. Bill's analysis showed that the number of new sales instructions in the first six months of the year in prime central London (PCL) was 32 per cent higher than the five-year average (excluding 2020). Above £5m, there was an equivalent increase of 14 per cent and above £2m, there was a rise of 22 per cent. In other words, property listings in the first half of 2025 were skewed towards the lower price brackets. Crucially, lenders are playing their part – banks are working on very tight margins and taking a proactive approach to help borrowers reach decisions that work for them. London remains one of the world's most desirable cities, but desirability isn't destiny. The government can't afford to keep learning the same lesson: that you cannot bank on a mobile, globally-minded minority to fund massive imbalances in taxing and spending. What happens next will depend not just on rates and rules, but on tone. The sooner the government steadies the narrative, the faster London can reassert its position as Europe's foremost hub for private wealth. Simon Gammon is a managing partner at Knight Frank Finance
The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump team's ‘pocket rescission' idea runs into GOP opposition
Some Republicans in Congress are uneasy about the possibility the Trump administration will use a 'pocket rescission' to claw back already approved government funding as fears of a fall shutdown rise. The Trump administration has already clawed back funds through the use of a rescissions package that passed both chambers of Congress, and some GOP lawmakers are concerned about having to vote on a second, possibly politically tougher, package of cuts. But these lawmakers say the use of pocket rescissions, an idea floated by the White House's budget chief that could yank back money without input from lawmakers, could create bad feelings not only with Democrats, but also with Republicans. 'Pocket rescissions, I think, are unconstitutional,' said Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), a spending cardinal, this week. 'So, just like impoundment, I think, is unconstitutional.' 'So we'll see how it goes,' he said. Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought referred to pocket rescissions as 'one of the executive tools' that are 'on the table' earlier this month, as the administration continues a sweeping operation aimed at reducing federal spending. 'The president was elected to get us to balance, to deal with our fiscal situation, and we're going to use all of the tools that are there depending on the situation, and as we move through the year,' he said at an event. However, he also noted then that the administration hasn't yet 'made a determination to use it in part because we're making progress during the normal course of business with Congress.' Trump became the first president in decades to successfully claw back funds through the special rescissions process, with the GOP-led Congress agreeing to pull back about $9 billion in previously allocated funding for foreign aid and public broadcasting. The Impoundment Control Act (ICA) lays out rules governing that process and allows the administration to temporarily withhold funding for 45 days while Congress considers the request. If Congress opts not to approve the request in the timeframe, the funds must be released. Under a pocket rescission, however, experts say the president would send the same type of request to Congress, but do so within 45 days of the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30. The targeted funds could then essentially be held until the clock runs out and they expire. Vought has described the tactic as 'no different than a normal rescission, except for the timing of when it occurs.' 'A pocket rescission occurs later in the end of the fiscal year, within 45 days of the time that you have to hold the funding, and then the money evaporates at the end of the fiscal year,' he said. But some budget experts have strongly pushed back on the budget chief's characterization, arguing the tactic is 'illegal' and undermines the intent of the ICA. The Government Accountability Office also said during Trump's first presidential term that the law does not allow 'the withholding of funds through their date of expiration.' 'It is a method through which [Vought] would get to impound funds against congressional intent,' said Bobby Kogan, a former Senate budget aide and senior director of federal budget policy at the left-leaning Center for American Progress, in a recent interview. 'Pocket rescission says, 'Well, what if I send up a request 45 days before the end of the fiscal year, then even if Congress says no, I can still end all funding for the rest of the year, right?'' he argued. 'Like that's the concept behind a pocket rescission. Profoundly illegal because it would allow you to impound funds without congressional approval, which is illegal.' At the same time, other experts have argued impoundment law is murky on the matter and have described the tactic as a potential loophole. Some have defended the administration's interpretation of the law and argue lawmakers would have prohibited the maneuver over the years if they wanted to. Not all Republicans are certain about the legality of the use of pocket rescissions, however. 'I don't know. I haven't researched it,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a senior appropriator and former attorney, said this week when asked by reporters whether pocket rescissions were legal. 'I'd prefer that we not do it that way.' The Louisiana Republican, who has been pushing for the White House to work with Congress to get more rescissions packages out the door, instead said it 'wouldn't bother' him if the administration sent 'a rescission package a week and spell out in detail what they want to propose we cut.' There's been concern from members on both sides of the aisle that the administration's plans to continue to claw back federal funding with only GOP support could threaten bipartisan funding talks for fiscal 2026. But Republican rifts over the president's latest rescissions requests were also an issue. The party clashed over potential cuts to programs like the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and public broadcasting dollars that help fund not only PBS and NPR, but also local stations some Republicans say their constituents depend on. Under the pocket rescissions strategy, experts say the administration could reduce some funding by strategically holding up appropriations set to expire at the end of the fiscal year. If Congress chooses not to approve the administration's request for cuts, it could still provide funding for the program as part of a deal to keep the government open past September. Congress often opts to keep government funding levels mostly the same at the start of a new fiscal year to buy time for a larger deal updating funding levels. But experts have emphasized that would be 'new funding,' noting funding an account was denied at the end of the fiscal year as part of a pocket rescission likely would not roll over into the next. Asked whether another rescissions plan could worsen the outlook for a funding deal for fiscal 2026, House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) said this week that 'the only thing that would worry me is if Congress didn't get a chance to vote on it, that's the key thing.' 'I don't want to see things up here that get jammed where Congress doesn't vote.' Cole was asked whether he was referring to pocket rescissions. 'I don't care procedurally what you want to call it,' he responded. 'I expect Congress to vote on these things, and you know that would worry me, and I know that would worry my colleagues in the other chamber, on both sides of the aisle, certainly worry my Democratic colleagues here.' 'And there's a lot of Republican concern about this too,' he added.
