logo
Mark Zuckerberg on the stand: ‘Crazy,' ‘scary' ideas led him to buy Instagram and WhatsApp

Mark Zuckerberg on the stand: ‘Crazy,' ‘scary' ideas led him to buy Instagram and WhatsApp

Yahoo16-04-2025
It's too bad there are no cameras allowed in federal courtrooms, because I really would like to see Mark Zuckerberg testify.
He was the leadoff witness in the Federal Trade Commission's antitrust lawsuit against Meta, and that in itself was news.
The clash is the most sweeping attempt to dismember the world's biggest social network, and goes to the heart of how competition is defined.
Hawley Demands Zuckerberg Testify On Alleged Ties Between Meta, China
Not since the government broke up AT&T more than four decades ago has a mega-corporation faced the prospect of being torn apart.
The suit was filed in the first Trump term (the president couldn't stand Facebook at the time), aggressively pursued by Joe Biden, and now has finally come to trial in a Washington courtroom.
Read On The Fox News App
Trump once told me Facebook was such a threat to society that he used it as justification for flip-flopping on his effort to ban TikTok.
But since he won a second term, Zuck, like many tech bros, has been cozying up to the new sheriff in town, including a $1-million donation to the president's inaugural.
There are reports that when the man who runs Facebook recently met with Trump, he asked about the possibility of dropping the lawsuit. Obviously, it didn't work.
The focus of the trial is Zuckerberg's decision to buy Instagram and WhatsApp when they were small start-ups.
Fact-checking Director Warns Of 'Crisis' As Meta, Trump's Doge Cuts Threaten Their 'Honorable, Patriotic' Work
The FTC's lead lawyer questioned Zuckerberg about a platform meant to foster ties between family and friends to a concentration on showing users interesting third-party content through its news feed.
"It's the case that over time, the 'interest' part of that has gotten built out more than the 'friend' part," Zuckerberg said. He added that "the 'friend' part has gone down quite a bit, but it's still something we care about."
Translation: Screw the friends. Very 2010s. We've moved on.
Zuckerberg spoke slowly – at least according to reporters who were there – and he was back on the hot seat yesterday. FTC lawyers pressed him on a stack of emails he had sent:
"We really need to get our act together quickly on this since Instagram's growing so fast.
"Instagram has become a large and viable competitor to us on mobile photos, which will increasingly be the future of photos."
Whistleblower Tells Senate Committee That Meta Undermined Us National Security To Cozy Up To China
"If Instagram continues to kick ass on photos, or if Google buys them, then over the next few years they could easily add pieces of their service that copy what we're doing now." Which was a flop called Facebook Camera.
In yet another message, Zuck called Instagram's growth "really scary," saying "we might want to consider paying a lot of money for this." Facebook bought Instagram for $1 billion in 2012, and two years later spent $19 billion on WhatsApp.
In an email to Tom Alison, head of Facebook, Z offered alternatives:
"Option 1. Double down on Friending. One potentially crazy idea is to consider wiping everyone's graphs and having them start again."
Alison responded: "I'm not sure Option #1 in your proposal (Double-down on Friending) would be viable given my understanding of how vital the friend use case is to IG."
Now we come to the fascinating part.
It's not breaking news that Mark's judgment can be flawed. Remember when he insisted that virtual reality would be the next big thing?
But he argues that Meta has all kinds of rivals in the "entertainment" area, such as X, TikTok and YouTube – and he easily could have added Snap, Netflix, Amazon Prime Video and HBO's Max. It's all about the battle for eyeballs now. There are only so many hours in the day. Mindshare is everything.
Subscribe To Howie's Media Buzzmeter Podcast, A Riff On The Day's Hottest Stories
And with group chats all the rage, Meta doesn't do well on that kind of interaction, with Instagram as a possible exception.
Now of course it's in Zuckerberg's self-interest to testify that he competes with anything that has a screen. But it's not that far off the mark. Keep in mind that Meta has 4 billion active monthly users.
I sure wish we could see the embattled CEO making the case that he's awash in a vast sea of rivals.Original article source: Mark Zuckerberg on the stand: 'Crazy,' 'scary' ideas led him to buy Instagram and WhatsApp
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump touts U.S. as "most respected country" as he marks six months in office
Trump touts U.S. as "most respected country" as he marks six months in office

Axios

time4 minutes ago

  • Axios

Trump touts U.S. as "most respected country" as he marks six months in office

President Trump touted the U.S. as the "hottest" and "most respected country in the world" on Sunday as he reached the six-month mark of his second White House term. The big picture: Trump's second term has come with a series of challenges both at home and abroad, though he has seen some successes with the passage of the " big, beautiful bill" and the Supreme Court ruling in his favor in several significant cases. In a Truth Social post Sunday, the president claimed his second term is "being hailed as one of the most consequential periods of any President." "In other words, we got a lot of good and great things done, including ending numerous wars of Countries not related to us other than through Trade and/or, in certain cases, friendship," he continued. "Six months is not a long time to have totally revived a major Country. One year ago our Country was DEAD, with almost no hope of revival. Today the USA is the 'hottest' and most respected Country anywhere in the World. Happy Anniversary!!!" he wrote. Zoom out: Trump's administration has negotiated three ceasefire deals between six countries since he took office in January, but efforts to generate an agreement between Russia and Ukraine, as well as Israel and Hamas haven't materialized. During his 2024 campaign, Trump repeatedly said he would end the Russia-Ukraine war within 24 hours if he returned to the White House. Between the lines: In a separate Truth Social post, Trump touted his approval ratings, claiming that his numbers among Republicans have gone as high as 95% in "various polls." It's unclear which polls the president was referring. According to Gallup, Trump's June approval rating was 40% among voters across both parties, down from 47% when he took office in January. When broken down by party, 86% of Republicans approved of Trump's job as president in June. 36% of Independents and 1% of Democrats agreed. A CBS News/You Gov poll published Sunday showed similar numbers. Overall, the president had a 42% approval rating, with 89% of GOP, 32% of Independents and 5% of Democrats giving their approval. Zoom out: Trump said in his post that his numbers had been boosted by "Radical Left Democrats" exposing the "Jeffrey Epstein hoax."

FEMA uncertainty hangs over hurricane season
FEMA uncertainty hangs over hurricane season

The Hill

time4 minutes ago

  • The Hill

FEMA uncertainty hangs over hurricane season

Uncertainty is hanging over this year's hurricane season as meteorologists predict 'above-normal' activity and the Trump administration sends shifting signals over the future of the federal government's role in natural disaster response. Despite talk of eliminating the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in its current form, the administration says it remains 'laser focused on disaster response and protecting the American people.' But red and blue states alike say they aren't sure what the future of FEMA looks like. In June, at a hurricane preparedness news conference, Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry (R) was asked whether the state could take on more responsibilities amid the administration's push for states to take a bigger role. 'I don't know what added responsibilities that would be,' he responded. A handful of states have set up task forces or commissions to prepare for changes being discussed in Washington. A bipartisan coalition of Georgia state lawmakers led by state Rep. Clint Crowe (R) created a study committee on disaster mitigation. Kentucky's state Legislature passed a law creating a task force to prepare for potential changes in FEMA funding. Republican state Sen. Matthew Deneen, who co-sponsored the Kentucky bill, said the panel would make sure the state is prepared for whatever comes. 'Well, I think that any time that we're going to have change coming out of Washington, D.C., on the federal level, you know, we don't know exactly what those numbers are going to be, and so it's very important for us to be agile, to be responsive and to be prepared,' he told The Hill. Trump administration officials and some Republicans on Capitol Hill argue the agency is inefficient and should take a more supportive role, with states taking the lead in disaster response. 'Federal emergency management should be state and locally led rather than how it has operated for decades,' Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem said earlier this month. 'This entire agency needs to be eliminated as it exists today and remade into a responsive agency,' she added. But rhetoric from President Trump's officials shifted toward reforming FEMA, rather than axing it entirely, following the devastating floods in Texas this month. Noem faced criticism over reports of botched disaster response efforts, and the Houston Chronicle editorial board even slammed Noem's leadership, comparing FEMA's response to the Texas floods to the Hurricane Katrina debacle. The Texas floods killed at least 120 people, with more than 100 still missing. A preliminary estimate from AccuWeather projects the disaster to cost between $18 billion and $22 billion. Still, Trump has praised Noem's handling of the floods and brushed off reports that her changes to funding decisions slowed down the federal response in Texas. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) is forecasting 13 to 19 named storms this hurricane season, including three to five major hurricanes in the Atlantic basin. 'As we witnessed last year with significant inland flooding from hurricanes Helene and Debby, the impacts of hurricanes can reach far beyond coastal communities,' acting NOAA Administrator Laura Grimm said in May. A FEMA spokesperson said in a statement there is 'no uncertainty about what FEMA will be doing this Hurricane Season.' 'The old processes are being replaced because they failed Americans in real emergencies for decades,' a spokesperson said. Stretching state budgets States, however, are facing a barrage of new budget demands as federal lawmakers cut spending on issues ranging from health care to natural disasters. In April, FEMA suspended its Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program, eliminating $882 million in federal funding. The program helped communities reduce risk hazards by providing economic support for states to improve disaster prevention. Twenty states sued FEMA this past week, alleging unlawful termination of congressionally approved grants. The lawsuit highlighted that many projects, in the works for years and meant to prevent devastating damage, are left unfinished or paused. The FEMA spokesperson said BRIC was a 'wasteful and ineffective FEMA program.' Two-thirds of the counties that received grants under the program voted for Trump in 2024, according to a CBS analysis of FEMA data. Colin Foard, director of the Pew Charitable Trust's fiscal risk project, said the latest moves are compounding existing pressures on state budgets. 'States were already facing challenges of rising disaster costs, and our research shows that their traditional budgeting approaches were beginning to fall short in the face of those rising costs,' Foard said. 'So, as states are deciding how they can more proactively budget for disasters, that will come at the cost of trade-offs in other policy areas,' he added. States are already bracing for sweeping federal cuts to Medicaid services. About 16 million Americans are expected to lose their health insurance by 2034 under Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' likely leaving states to pick up more of the slack to cover increasing medical costs. 'If states lost FEMA reimbursement on top of the hole they just blew in their health care budget because of the lack of federal funding … there are states that are just a ticking time bomb,' Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.), a former Florida emergency management director, told The Hill. Preparing for the worst Mathew Sanders, a senior officer at Pew, said states should focus their resources on proactive measures. 'I would argue the states need to increase their spending on long-term risk reduction. It's always cheaper to reduce risk, to avoid risk, than it is to recover from a disaster,' Sanders said. 'One thing that I think is absolutely true, is that, across the disaster spectrum, the federal government is the predominant funder,' he added. 'And so, you know, whatever the federal government may not provide in the future, states, localities, that's a gap that's going to need to be filled from other sources.' When it comes to where those gaps might be, or whether states can fill them, there are more questions than answers. Last fall's Hurricane Helene prompted some forward thinking on these questions in states that were hit. The study committee in Georgia recommended building code updates and a reforestation tax credit. The tax credit was signed into law in May. Both North Carolina's and South Carolina's emergency agencies are seeking to foster more private sector collaborations and connections with other state emergency management organizations. A spokesperson from North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein's (D) office said eliminating FEMA entirely would be a 'man-made disaster.' 'We need FEMA to help us address natural disasters. Let's work together to improve FEMA so we are ready for future disasters,' the spokesperson added. It's not only hurricane-prone states that are bracing themselves for change and looking for clarity on what's ahead. Republican South Dakota Lt. Gov. Tony Venhuizen helms a state task force established in June to prepare for potential changes at FEMA. 'I … understand that the federal government has a spending problem and needs to tighten the belt in some areas. And so, we are sympathetic to that, but we really need to know what the details are,' Venhuizen told The Hill.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store