logo
Rising food prices driven by climate crisis threaten world's poorest, report finds

Rising food prices driven by climate crisis threaten world's poorest, report finds

The Guardian2 days ago
Climate change-induced food price shocks are on the rise and could lead to more malnutrition, political upheaval and social unrest as the world's poorest are hit by shortages of food staples.
New research links last year's surges in the price of potatoes in the UK, cabbages in South Korea, onions in India, and cocoa in Ghana to weather extremes that 'exceeded all historical precedent prior to 2020'.
Such price jumps not only affect local food security and health, particularly for the poorest in society, but have knock-on effects around the world.
Unprecedented monthly temperatures in February 2024 after drought in late 2023 and early 2024 across Ghana and Ivory Coast, where 60% of the world's cocoa is grown, led to global prices for the commodity spiking by 300%.
The high price of staples can have an impact on public health as low-income households cut back on expensive fruit and vegetables, according to the report from a team including the UK's Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU), the European Central Bank (ECB), the Food Foundation, the Barcelona Supercomputing Center and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
The study investigated examples across 18 countries between 2022 and 2024 where price spikes were associated with heat, drought and heavy precipitation.
It found food price spikes can have a wider economic impact, making it harder for economies to keep down overall inflation and so, for example, bring interest rates down. A hot dry spring in the UK this year, for example, partly drove unexpectedly high UK inflation figures published last week, dampening expectations for further interest rate cuts this summer.
The report also suggests 'high rates of inflation can directly alter election outcomes in modern democracies'.
Maximilian Kotz, a Marie Curie postdoctoral research fellow at Barcelona Supercomputing Center and the lead author of the report, said: 'It is clear the cost of living played a role in last year's election in the US.'
He added: 'These effects are going to continue to become worse in the future. Until we get to net zero emissions extreme weather will only get worse, but it's already damaging crops and pushing up the price of food all over the world.
'People are noticing, with rising food prices No 2 on the list of climate impacts they see in their lives, second only to extreme heat itself.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
'Sadly, when the price of food shoots up, low-income families often have to resort to less nutritious, cheaper foods. Diets like this have been linked to a range of health conditions like cancer, diabetes and heart disease.'
Raj Patel, a research professor in the Lyndon B Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin, said: 'Food price inflation is always political.'
For example, people in Mozambique took to the streets when the price of bread shot up after extreme heat in Russia, a big wheat producer, prompted the country to block exports to protect meagre supplies in 2010 meaning the price of wheat soared globally.
The research is published ahead of the UN Food Systems Summit Stocktake on 27 July, where world leaders will meet to discuss threats to the global food system.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey hits back at Rachel Reeves over regulation
Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey hits back at Rachel Reeves over regulation

Daily Mail​

time3 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey hits back at Rachel Reeves over regulation

Andrew Bailey yesterday put himself at odds with Rachel Reeves over the Chancellor's outspoken attack on regulation. The Bank of England Governor made clear that he did not share Reeves' recent claim that the enforcement of red tape acted as a 'boot on the neck' of business. Speaking to MPs on the Treasury select committee, he urged caution over a proposed shake-up of the ring-fencing system that separates traditional lending and deposit-taking from riskier investment banking. The comments appear to be a shot across the bows of the Chancellor as she seeks to unravel some of the reforms put in place during the financial crisis in a bid to boost growth. They suggest she may face an unwanted battle with Threadneedle Street to add to friction with Labour backbenchers over spending cuts and the battle to balance the books, amid dismal economic growth and deteriorating public finances. Reeves took aim at regulators during her Mansion House speech to the City earlier this month. Cautious: Andrew Bailey (pictured) made clear he did not share Rachel Reeves's claim that the enforcement of red tape acted as a 'boot on the neck' of business But Bailey chose to dissociate himself from the 'boot on the neck' comments. He said: 'It's not a term I'd use. 'I think there are areas that we clearly should look at it – we've announced a whole range of things we're doing, and that's a good thing. But we can't compromise on basic financial stability and that would be my overall message.' Reeves has also promised 'meaningful reform' of the ring-fencing regime – something being demanded by the bosses of a number of major banks who say they are a drag on business. But Bailey said he favoured keeping the rules. He told MPs: 'I do think that the ring-fencing regime is an important part of the structure of the banking system.' Bailey said the rules make it easier to deal with banks that get into trouble in a way that spares consumers, businesses and households. He added: 'I'm sure there are things that can be improved and we will work constructively to get through that process. 'I think it has established itself as part of the system and to me it would not be sensible to take it away at this point.' Asked how he would respond if the Treasury seemed to be going 'too far' in stripping back regulation, Bailey said he and Bank officials would 'start by making our views very clear'.

AstraZeneca set to invest £37bn in US: Move fuels fears firm with ditch UK listing
AstraZeneca set to invest £37bn in US: Move fuels fears firm with ditch UK listing

Daily Mail​

time3 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

AstraZeneca set to invest £37bn in US: Move fuels fears firm with ditch UK listing

AstraZeneca has outlined plans to invest £37billion in the US as Donald Trump's pharmaceutical tariffs loom – fuelling fears that it will ditch its London listing. The FTSE 100 drug maker announced yesterday that it is accelerating its expansion in America with an investment that will create tens of thousands of new jobs. Analysts said 'the Government will be kicking itself' over the company's decision to plough money into the US rather than the UK – and added bosses are 'losing patience' with Labour. The move intensified concerns that AstraZeneca will shift its primary stock market listing from London to New York – a move that would strike a hammer blow to the City. Trump has threatened the sector with new import levies to pressure drug makers to move factories to the US. The President warned last week that he would impose tariffs 'probably at the end of the month' – and has previously said they could be as high as 200 per cent. The US is Cambridge-based AstraZeneca's largest market, accounting for 42 per cent of sales – a figure boss Pascal Soriot wants to boost to 50 per cent by the end of the decade. Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said: 'The more business it does in the country, the greater the likelihood that investors might push for AstraZeneca to switch its main stock listing to the US. 'That would be bad for the UK stock market as it is one of the biggest names in the FTSE 100.' AstraZeneca's pledge to invest in the US comes as an embarrassing snub to the Government just days after ministers unveiled a long-awaited plan to boost the UK's life sciences sector. Relations between AstraZeneca and the Government have become more strained since Labour came to power last year. In January, the firm axed plans for a £450million vaccine factory near Liverpool amid a funding row with ministers. And while Soriot has slammed the UK as 'a very unattractive place to do business', he yesterday said the push into the US 'underpins our belief in America's innovation in biopharmaceuticals and our commitment to the millions of patients who need our medicines in America and globally'. Rival manufacturers have also ramped up spending in the US as fears over tariffs swirl, including Swiss giant Roche, French firm Sanofi and FTSE 100 business Hikma. AJ Bell's Mould said: 'The Government will be kicking itself that AstraZeneca has decided to invest in the US as Blighty will miss out on associated economic benefits.' £1.2bn Sanofi swoop A French pharmaceuticals giant has agreed to buy a privately owned British biotech firm for up to £1.2billion. The deal sees Sanofi take control of Vicebio's early-stage combination vaccine candidate for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human metapneumovirus (hMPV). Vicebio's vaccine candidate complements Sanofi's existing range, and allows it to offer a wider range to doctors and patients. Emmanuel Heron, Vicebio's boss, said Sanofi's 'global scale and deep expertise in vaccine development provide the ideal environment to fully realize the potential of our innovative technology. 'We look forward to advancing our platform.'

Home Office U-turn as it agrees to share location of asylum seeker hotels with Deliveroo and Just Eat to crack down on illegal workers
Home Office U-turn as it agrees to share location of asylum seeker hotels with Deliveroo and Just Eat to crack down on illegal workers

Daily Mail​

time3 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Home Office U-turn as it agrees to share location of asylum seeker hotels with Deliveroo and Just Eat to crack down on illegal workers

The Home Office has finally agreed to share the location of asylum hotels with food delivery companies to help crack down on migrant illegal working. Deliveroo said last week it had asked civil servants for the hotel addresses so it could block accounts operating from these locations, only to be refused due to 'safety concerns' for hotel occupants. But the Home Office has now changed its stance and will share this information with Deliveroo, as well as its competitors Just Eat and Uber Eats. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, said tonight: 'Illegal working undermines honest business, exploits vulnerable individuals and fuels organised immigration crime. 'By enhancing our data sharing with delivery companies, we are taking decisive action to close loopholes and increase enforcement. 'The changes come alongside a 50% increase in raids and arrests for illegal working under the Plan for Change, greater security measures and tough new legislation.' Last month it emerged that migrants living in taxpayer-funded asylum hotels – including those who arrived by small boat – are securing work as fast food delivery riders within hours of entering Britain. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said he had found evidence of asylum seekers breaking rules which bar them from working while their claim is processed by the Home Office. The Tory politician visited an asylum hotel in central London and posted a video showing bicycles fitted with delivery boxes for Deliveroo, Just Eat and Uber Eats parked outside. Days later, the Home Office said it had called in all three companies for a dressing down – and the meeting led to pledges to introduce 'facial recognition' systems on rider apps, such as those used by banks to confirm someone's identity. However, Deliveroo was refused access to hotel location data despite assurances it would be treated confidentially, the Times reported. Shadow Home Office minister Katie Lam said at the time: 'The fact that the Home Office is refusing to help them just shows how topsy-turvy this country's approach to migration has become. 'Crossing the Channel illegally is a crime. Working here illegally is a crime. 'Too many people are brazenly breaking the rules and it's a disgrace that the Home Office is aiding and abetting them.' Eddy Montgomery, Director of Enforcement, Compliance and Crime at the Home Office, said following tonight's u-turn: 'This next step of co-ordinated working with delivery firms will help us target those who seek to work illegally in the gig economy and exploit their status in the UK. 'My teams will continue to carry out increased enforcement activity across the UK and I welcome this additional tool to disrupt and stop the abuse of our immigration system.' The Government has also announced the trialling of AI-powered facial recognition technology to determine whether Channel migrants are being wrongly identified as children. The Home Office announced testing on new technology will begin later this year with the hope it could be fully integrated into the asylum system in 2026. Ministers admitted that assessing the age of asylum seekers is 'an incredibly complex and difficult task' but said AI might soon provide quick and cost-effective results. More than 23,000 migrants have crossed the Channel so far this year, up more than 50 per cent on the same point last year and the highest number in the first six months since figures began in 2018. The Home Office says there are 32,345 asylum seekers being put up at taxpayer expense in hotels, with another 66,683 in houses and flats. These have regularly been the target of protests, some of which have turned violent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store