
Calls for Scotland-wide seagull summit amid warnings someone could be killed
A Scotland-wide summit to tackle 'deadly' seagulls must be held amid warnings someone could be killed, the Scottish Parliament has heard.
Former Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross, who called a debate on the issue at Holyrood, warned that Scots risk losing their lives over the 'growing problem' of 'nuisance' gulls.
Fellow Tory Rachael Hamilton said a nationwide summit must be held to tackle the issue as she warned that Scots are being left 'scared, attacked and traumatised'.
Agriculture minister Jim Fairlie had already promised to hold a seagull summit in the north of Scotland but Ms Hamilton, who represents the south of Scotland, said a summit for the whole country is needed.
The Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire MSP said 'aggressive' seagulls had attacked seven children in one month last year in Eyemouth, with one girl 'left with gashes to her scalp and blood running down her face'.
She called for action on the 'growing nuisance', which she said posed a health and safety risk to residents.
Despite rising complaints from locals, though, she said NatureScot's licensing system to control the birds was bureaucratic and failing to solve the issue.
'I think we need a summit,' she said. 'I don't think we just need a summit in Moray, we need a summit across Scotland.'
Ms Hamilton said the debate was 'important' as she criticised what she said was a lack of action from the Scottish Government.
She told MSPs: 'Absolutely nothing is getting done. I don't believe the Government are listening to us because the issue continues in my constituency in Eyemouth.
'Aggressive seagull behaviour continues to cause a real concern amongst businesses, amongst tourists, amongst everybody that has anything to do along the harbour.
'And it is not just a seasonal nuisance. It is a serious, growing health risk. It's a safety risk, particularly for children and elderly residents.'
She said one business owner had described the situation as 'people being scared, attacked and traumatised'.
MSPs debated the issue on Thursday, the last day of Parliament before the summer recess.
Opening the debate, Mr Ross said people often 'smirk' when hearing that the Scottish Parliament is debating the problems around gulls – but he said it was an 'extremely serious issue'.
The Highlands and Islands MSP said constituents have told him they are worried about leaving their homes for fear of being 'divebombed', while others have suffered mental health issues thanks to a lack of sleep caused by noisy gulls.
One resident, he said, is spending £2,000 a year to remove nests from her home.
'People should not have to keep living in fear of being divebombed by these menaces on a daily basis, and are crying out for action,' he said.
He accused NatureScot of having a conflict of interest as the body responsible for both the licensing to control birds and to conserve them.
He went on: 'The behaviour of the SNP's quango NatureScot confirms they have lost the plot. They have told people to protect themselves with umbrellas and even suggested dogs as a deterrent.
'The time has come to break up NatureScot. There is a clear conflict of interest in the fact they are responsible for considering licences to control gulls but are also responsible for protecting bird numbers.
'If the minister cannot see that is a problem, then he is divorced from reality.
'The strength of the cross-party support in my debate today should be all the SNP Government need to finally act before we see someone killed due to being attacked by a gull.'
Jim Fairlie, the minister for agriculture, said while people often 'chuckle and laugh' about the issue of gulls, he warned it was 'deadly serious'.
But he told MSPs that he could not intervene on NatureScot to change the licensing system because it would leave the Government open to judicial review.
He urged people to stop feeding the birds, which he said was the primary reason for the issue.
The birds have been an increasingly common site in urban areas as they leave their natural habitat in search of food.
He said: 'We have to work out what it is that is causing the issue in the first place.
'We are feeding them – it is quite simple. We are creating habitat, and we are creating feeding stations which are allowing gulls to inhabit our space, and that is now quite clearly coming into conflict.'
He added: 'We have got to try and limit food waste and public littering. We have got to take away these feeding opportunities.'
SNP MSP Christine Grahame warned against 'demonising' gulls, which she described as 'clever, adaptable' animals.
'Language such as 'mugging', 'menace' can be applied to us, our fellow counterparts,' she said, 'but it is not appropriate to demonise an animal simply looking for food.
'Anthropomorphising is tempting but not helpful.'
A NatureScot spokesperson said: 'We understand gulls can sometimes cause problems in our towns and cities.
'At the same time, gull populations are facing serious declines. NatureScot has a duty to balance health and safety concerns with gull conservation.
'Over the last five years we have supported many individuals, businesses and communities to better manage gulls without the need to kill the birds or destroy their nests.
'As a result, the number of licence applications to destroy nests and eggs and kill chicks has reduced, from 2,633 in 2023 to 1,601 in 2024.'
The spokesperson said in the longer term, Scots will 'need to find ways to live with gulls and other wildlife'.
They added: 'We will continue to work with local authorities to ensure that collaborative gull management plans are put in place for future years, with a focus on effective preventative measures, deterrents, changes to behaviour and guidance.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Edinburgh Live
an hour ago
- Edinburgh Live
Edinburgh Book Festival awarded £300k in taxpayer cash after Nicola Sturgeon ex-aide hired
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info The Edinburgh International Book Festival received £300,000 of taxpayer cash weeks after Nicola Sturgeon's ex-chief of staff was appointed as director. The former first minister, who is among the headliners for the event, will be promoting her new memoir - Frankly. Her former top adviser, Liz Lloyd, was hired as director of the festival in May, reports the Daily Record. A 'one-off' lifeline for the festival of £300,000 was announced by the Scottish Government in June. The event lost its chief sponsor Baillie Gifford last year, after campaigning from eco activists over fossil fuel ties. Lothian Tory MSP Sue Webber said: 'Taxpayers will be asking questions about how the SNP suddenly found this money a matter of weeks after Nicola Sturgeon's most senior former adviser was appointed a director of the festival. 'While the book festival is ultimately crucial for Scotland's culture and Edinburgh's economy, many will be thinking this is not a mere coincidence. The SNP was only scrambling to find this funding because Baillie Gifford was hounded out from its long-held sponsorship by climate activists. Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox "SNP ministers should come clean on how this funding was awarded and if there was any lobbying from former colleagues who were once at the heart of the nationalist government." Lloyd worked for the Scottish Government for nearly a decade as Sturgeon's top aide, working closely with current FM Swinney who was then deputy FM. Lloyd was Sturgeon's chief of staff from 2014 until 2021 then a strategic adviser until the ex-FM quit in 2023, when Lloyd also left her post. The book festival said it would be 'spurious' and 'misleading' to suggest any link between Lloyd's appointment and the announcement of the cash, which it said had been planned for months. The event's government funding has more than doubled in the past year to a record £820,000. Announcing the £300,000 grant on Wednesday, SNP Business Minister Richard Lochhead said it would help schoolkids continue to access free literary events. Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sent straight to your messages. The book festival had previously warned its ability to deliver a successful event had been 'severely compromised' by the ending of its relationship with finance firm Baillie Gifford. The deal was cancelled after activists with the Fossil Free Books campaign targeted book festivals across Britain. The Scottish Government said: 'The Edinburgh International Book Festival is one the country's most significant cultural institutions. Its schools programme has been crucial in fostering literacy and cultural engagement among young people. 'Supported by the increase in funding for festivals announced in the 2025-26 Scottish Budget, this funding secures those benefits for young readers across Edinburgh, helping schools that might otherwise struggle with travel costs' Glasgow's Aye Write literary festival had to cancel last year's event after its bid for funding from government quango Creative Scotland was turned down. It is set to be revived.


Scotsman
4 hours ago
- Scotsman
SNP's policy of 'unarmed' Armed Forces is sheer madness
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... As the UK yesterday marked Armed Forces Day – described as 'a chance to show your support' for the men and women in the military – SNP ministers will hopefully have been reflecting on their spectacularly bizarre stance on defence spending. While the nationalists have long opposed nuclear weapons, they are not a pacifist party. They support membership of Nato, pledging an independent Scotland would be a 'reliable and dedicated international partner' like Denmark and Norway. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad They also say our domestic defence industry 'will not just be welcome in an independent Scotland but will be a vital part of our ability to have a defence capability that matches an Independent Scotland's needs and threats' and criticise the UK Government for 'a failure to meet Scotland's specific defence needs'. Ukraine needs munitions and so does the British Army (Picture: Sergey Shestak) | AFP via Getty Images 'Russian threat is very real' So it is all the more difficult to understand why it is a 'long-standing position' of the SNP that government funding should not be provided for the 'direct manufacture of munitions'. So, for example, Scottish Enterprise and the Scottish National Investment Bank do not invest in companies that make weapons. Former SNP defence spokesperson Stewart McDonald has now rightly criticised the ban as 'a stupid policy' and called for a new debate. His comments followed a hint by John Swinney that the party's stance could change as 'we are living in a very different context today' and 'the Russian threat is very real'. However a Scottish Government source explained ministers were struggling with how to 'manage' the issue within the party. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But, with the UK set to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP, now is not the time to tip-toe around the subject. Not only is the manufacturing of munitions and weapons vital to defend this country and to help Ukraine fight off the Russian invasion, it is also a major economic opportunity.


The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘It breaks my heart': how a refinery closure is hitting jobs and politics
Every morning in Grangemouth, chemists at Celtic Renewables's small factory feed a vial of microbes with a precisely tailored cocktail of food – liquid residues from the scotch whisky industry. In vessels surrounded by a web of metal pipes and gleaming stainless steel valves, the microbes multiply into something other than drink: a starter solution for batches of acetone, butanol and ethanol – chemicals essential for countless everyday products. Celtic Renewables wants more: a plant 10 times its current size. That could form part of plans to sustain Scotland's chemicals industry after Grangemouth sustained a crushing blow: the closure of the 100-year-old refinery in April, with the loss of 400 jobs. The huge complex will be reduced to a fuel import terminal, staffed by only 75 people. As many as 4,600 jobs in the refinery's supply chain could also be affected. That closure has made Grangemouth one of the earliest tests of a 'just transition': the idea that the economy can move relatively painlessly from fossil fuels to net zero, helped along by judicious government interventions to spur new jobs in place of the old. The Labour government fears that failure could mean voters turn their backs on it – and on the pledge to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050 – throughout what remains of Scotland's largely fossil fuel-dependent industry. Climate action by government remains popular in Britain, but parties on the right, and particularly Nigel Farage's Reform UK, believe opposition to net zero can win them power. As the government this week unveiled a new industrial strategy, this article – the second in a series on the battle for Britain's deindustrialised areas – looks at the future for one of Scotland's industrial icons. After the second world war, deindustrialisation wiped out much of the coal mining, shipbuilding and steelmaking that dominated employment in Scotland's central belt from Glasgow to Edinburgh. While those industries all but disappeared, Grangemouth held out, refining crude oil to feed Scotland's cars and planes taking off from Edinburgh and Glasgow. Grangemouth's refinery traces its history back to 1924, making it the second oldest in Europe, but since 2005 it has been part of Jim Ratcliffe's Ineos chemicals empire. Ratcliffe's investments bolted together assets that others did not want, and generated huge profits. Ineos agreed a deal in 2011 for Chinese state-owned PetroChina to partner in a joint venture, Petroineos. Petroineos executives argued in Scottish parliamentary hearings that Grangemouth was not able to compete with newer, more efficient plants in the Middle East and Africa. UK chemicals output has slumped 42% since peaking in March 2020, according to the Office for National Statistics. Ratcliffe has faced significant criticism for cutting jobs in chemicals and at Manchester United Football Club – which he took control of last year. But he has claimed that it was UK energy policy, not his decisions, that made Grangemouth unviable. Chemicals companies report UK energy costs are five times higher than in the US and well over double those in the EU, according to the Chemical Industries Association, a lobby group. Ratcliffe is also a staunch opponent of carbon taxes on businesses. 'We are witnessing the extinction of one of our major industries as chemical manufacture has the life squeezed out of it,' Ratcliffe told the Financial Times in January. Deindustrialising Britain achieves 'nothing for the environment,' he said. 'It merely shifts production and emissions elsewhere.' Cutting energy costs was the flagship measure of the government's industrial strategy, with exemptions for chemicals businesses for the costs of renewable energy programmes and discounts for levies to fund the grid. The measures did not include short-term help on driving down wholesale prices, the key complaint of big energy users. What do you do with a tangle of pipes, furnaces and crackers like the Grangemouth refinery? A Scottish government-funded study, known as Project Willow, described nine options for chemical industries that could happen on the site, including plastics recycling, making chemicals from wood, or – perhaps most ardently desired – making so-called sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). Westminster has set aside £200m to support private sector investments at Grangemouth, plus £25m from the Scottish government, to support projects. Senior government sources said more money could be available if the right projects come up. Yet each of those options comes with a price tag, ranging from the relatively manageable (£15m for turning organic waste into methane, with up to 70 jobs) to the truly enormous (up to £2.1bn for a SAF plant, and 270 jobs). The transition does not feel pain-free in Grangemouth town centre, with the refinery chimneys visible from the end of the road. A pleasant park, rows of sandstone homes and later semi-detached houses evidence the prosperity of the early 1900s and the boom times of the 60s and 70s, but the town also has several areas counted among the 10% most deprived in Scotland. Manufacturing in 2023 accounted for 11.1% of jobs in the broader Falkirk council area. That compared with 6.9% across Scotland that year – down from 35% in 1951. Mohammad Saleem, the shopkeeper at Sweet Talk, is already feeling the effects of the refinery closure, and has cut back opening hours, with fewer workers passing through to grab chocolate or a paper on the way to work. 'Quiet,' is his description of business in recent months. 'It used to be good before corona. After corona, that's it. This time, lunchtime, you would see crowds. Now you don't see anybody.' 'It's a disgrace,' said another shopkeeper in the centre. 'But what can you do?' Marilyn McIlvaney, the secretary of the Kersiebank Community Project, a volunteer-run charity shop that runs a food bank, said they had seen more people under pressure in the weeks since the closure of the refinery. Redundant workers got a relatively generous 18 months of pay, but they are still tightening belts. 'They're cutting back,' she said. 'It's having a knock-on to the other businesses. It's getting worse. Food banks are queueing out the doors – some of them [users] are working.' The question now for workers is whether Project Willow jobs come through before they have to look elsewhere. Those hopes are looking increasingly forlorn, according to Cliff Bowen, who has worked at Grangemouth for 33 years, and is now a convener for Unite, a union. He argues that the political implications will be huge. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion 'All we asked for is another couple of years until these technologies come online,' Bowen said. 'It breaks my heart. Labour are done for a generation in this area.' Bowen, a lifelong Labour supporter whose anger is palpable, believes that Reform UK will benefit from the loss of jobs at Grangemouth, and throughout Scotland's oil and gas economy, because it appears to offer a chance for those businesses to continue to operate. 'They're talking sense when it comes to energy supply,' said Bowen. 'People are going to vote for that, regardless of the colour on their rosette.' Reform's support is notably strong in areas around other refineries: near Stanlow refinery it won the Runcorn Westminster byelection, while Reform is leading Westminster polls in each of the constituencies that host the UK's other refineries at Fawley in Hampshire, Pembroke in west Wales, and the plants at Humber and Lindsey in Lincolnshire. Richard Tice, the Reform deputy leader, said: 'Reform will scrap net zero which will enable lower energy costs and investment in the chemicals and refining industries, thus creating jobs and leading to the reopening of Grangemouth.' That prescription is not seen as realistic by industry experts, even if big subsidies were offered. It would also lead to continued UK carbon emissions: the refinery was responsible for more than a quarter of all Scotland's carbon. Yet the pledge may resonate with people struggling to find work. Labour managed a surprise victory in a Scottish parliamentary byelection earlier this month in Hamilton – leaving the Scottish National party (SNP) in second and Reform a close third. Yet Brian Leishman, who won Grangemouth back for Labour only last year in the Westminster general election, said the closure was a 'failure from the political class' – including Labour, after it failed to live up to a pre-election pledge by the Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sarwar, to 'step in to save the jobs at the refinery'. The SNP is keen to win back an area it held for nearly a decade at Westminster, but also has limited room for manoeuvre because of its nearly two decades leading the Scottish government. Leishman argued that the government should take ownership stakes in return for Project Willow funding, to prevent the area being vulnerable to the whims of distant bosses in the future. He said that Labour needed to invest in Scotland if it wanted to hold on to its previous gains. 'If you give people good jobs, good life chances, that's now you get a second term,' he said. 'If you do the basics of government well and you improve people's living standards, you'll beat Reform.' Scottish Enterprise, the lead agency on Project Willow, is hopeful that some of the interest will translate into action soon. Jane Martin, the managing director for innovation and investment, said she was 'aware of the need for short-term wins to turn the narrative around'. The agency is working to triage projects, and work out which will be most likely to succeed. They are a mix of 'inside the fence' at the refinery, and others outside. 'Project Willow is a really important lever but we are not only focused on those technologies,' Martin said. 'We're not shutting anything down at this stage.' It does appear increasingly unlikely that a single employer will emerge to replace the refinery's jobs. One much vaunted possibility was an investment to produce SAF to meet the UK's mandate of 10% of all aviation fuel by 2030. However, Michael Liebreich, a clean energy expert, said SAF was still seen as too risky for investors. SAF production (either from biological sources or using green hydrogen) is still several times more expensive than refining oil into kerosene, and nobody has dared to make the huge investment needed without a cast-iron guarantee that the product will be bought. There does not appear to be much hope for a neat solution. The question now appears to be whether smaller projects can let the town retain a chemical industry. That could allow it to salvage something from the devastation of the refinery's closure – and prove whether a messy transition can also be just. 'We've got a redundant petrochemical facility that has land, utilities and access to great people, if we can be courageous,' said Mark Simmers, the chief executive of Celtic Renewables. 'And it does require bravery and courage, particularly for governments to say, 'We're going to create these low-carbon manufacturing jobs, and repurpose all that land and utilities and people to do something which is all about the future'. 'That then becomes an example for the world. So I really believe if people are brave and courageous and say 'let's do this', it will provide a blueprint for lots refineries in the UK and the world.'