Armenian PM make bizarre vow to 'prove' something about his penis
The prime minister of Armenia has vowed to prove his faith by dropping his trousers to the head of the church.
Nikol Pashinyan was challenged to 'prove' his member is uncircumcised in a bitter feud played out over social media.
An Armenian priest accused Pashinyan of being snipped on Monday, implying he was not Christian in the deeply religious west Asian country.
The priest, Father Zareh Ashuryan, said: 'I believe that our Apostolic Holy Church must immediately cleanse itself of those false 'believers' who are traitors to the nation, have dishonoured the memory of their ancestors, broken the vow of baptism, and replaced the seal of the Holy Cross with the sign of circumcision'.
This enraged the country's leader, who shot back with a fiery Facebook post on Tuesday, suggesting he'd be willing to show his penis to the Church's supreme leader Karekin II.
He addressed Karekin II by his birth name Ktrij Nersisyan, saying he was 'ready to accept Ktrij Nersisyan and his spokesperson [father Ashuryan] and prove the opposite' about being circumcised.
Pashinyan also shot back at the church's leader, asking: 'And let him finally answer the question of whether he has broken his vow of celibacy or not. Does he have a child or not?'
The extraordinary war of words comes as tensions rocket between Armenia's PM and the powerful clergy.
In late May, Pashinyan claimed that churches had become 'storerooms' and that priests were breaking their celibacy vows, according to OC Media.
The Armenian Church responded, saying Pashinyan's language was 'unbecoming of a statesman'.
They added: 'Political motives drive this anti-Church and represent an attempt to erode the standing of the Armenian Church and its clergy.' More Trending
On Wednesday, Pashinyan posted saying law enforcement had prevented a large and sinister plan by the 'criminal oligarchic clergy' to 'destabilise the Republic'.
Pashinyan has been Prime Minister of Armenia since 2018 as head of the Civil Contract party.
The party gained over 50% of the vote in 2021 election but faced allegations of fraud from the opposition.
Karekin II served as a bishop and Archbishop before being elected the supreme head of the Armenian Apostolic Church since 1999.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: 'Burglar' gets stuck in chimney trying to rescue his trapped dog
MORE: Inside New York's 'Pigeon Fest' where impersonators battle for title
MORE: Man 'urinates on $10,000 worth of Spam and sausages forcing them to be tossed'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
5 hours ago
- NBC News
Slain Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman laid to rest
Former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman will be laid to rest alongside her husband on Saturday, weeks after her "politically motivated assassination" stunned the nation. Hortman, a Democrat who served as the speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives from 2019 till her slaying, and her husband, Mark Hortman, were shot and killed in their Brooklyn Park home on June 14. Democratic state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette Hoffman, were also shot at their nearby home the same day. The Hoffmans survived the encounter. Hortman, 55, her husband and their golden retriever, who was also killed in the attack, lied in state at the Minnesota Capitol rotunda on Friday. Hortman was the first woman to receive the honor at the state's capital building, which drew thousands of mourners. The pair's funeral is expected to bring together some of the nation's most prominent politicians, including former President Joe Biden, former Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. The private services will be livestreamed on YouTube. The attacks were part of what authorities described as long list of planned political onslaughts. Authorities said that Vance Boelter, 57, the man charged in connection with the attacks, impersonated a law enforcement officer to carry out the shootings. Officials said he approached the lawmakers homes wearing a vest, a blue long-sleeve shirt and what appeared to be a badge, to gain access to the properties and throw the lawmakers off their guards. The shootings prompted the largest manhunt in the state's history, with the dispersement of more than 200 law enforcement officers. Authorities found Vance, who has pleaded not guilty to the charges, two days after the shootings occurred, armed and crawling in a field in a sparsely populated stretch of Minnesota, according to officials. Officials said they found a notebook that belonged to Boelter with a hit list of other politicians, particularly those who have vocally supported abortion. The list included politicians from states beyond Minnesota, including Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Nebraska and Iowa, according to authorities. Boelter's wife spoke out about the attacks for the first tim e on Thursday. "We are absolutely shocked, heartbroken and completely blindsided,' she said in a statement through her attorney. "This violence does not at all align with our beliefs as a family. It is a betrayal of everything we hold true as tenets of our Christian Faith. We are appalled and horrified by what occurred, and our hearts are incredibly heavy for the victims of the unfathomable tragedy." The United States has become more accustomed to acts of political violence in recent years. In 2020, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer was the subject of a kidnapping plot. Last year, President Donald Trump faced two assassination attempts while he was running for office. And in April, an attacker firebombed Gov. Josh Shapiro's residence because of his position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Hortman's slaying prompted a rare form of unity among Democratic and Republican leadership, with the highest members of both parties, including President Donald Trump, condemning the attacks.
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Joe Rogan's dystopian theory about why Mark Zuckerberg could transform America into 'dictatorship'
Joe Rogan laid out a nightmare scenario where social media giants turn the US into an oppressive dictatorship, and warned that the first steps have already taken place. During an interview on his podcast with professional mixed martial artist Cory Sandhagen, Rogan steered the conversation towards social media and his fears, triggered by recent attempts to censor speech in America. The host of the Joe Rogan Experience singled out Mark Zuckerberg 's Facebook as one of the platforms silencing people he said were posting 'factual information' during the COVID-19 pandemic. 'That was scary to me. Because that's very, very un-American,' Rogan declared. The podcaster revealed that his friend and new owner of X, Elon Musk, told him about the social media platform allowing the US government to censor posts from private citizens. He then unveiled his vision of a 'dangerous' future where platforms like Facebook work together with the government to eliminate all forms of protesting online. Rogan claimed that the entire tech world leans toward a 'very progressive left-wing ideology,' and feared that if the same thing happened during a conservative right-wing presidency, democracy would be lost forever. 'The problem is then what if the f****** right gets in place and they use the same rules that you used on them. Now we don't have a country anymore. I know now we're f*****. Now we're just like every other dictatorship,' Rogan exclaimed. Rogan has previously revealed how the US government, scientists, and social media critics allegedly attempted to 'cancel' him over his support for controversial COVID medicines like ivermectin. He also claimed that CNN edited a video to make his face look green after taking ivermectin, something the podcast host said made him consider suing the media outlet in 2021. 'Because I'm friends with Elon, I knew what was going on at Twitter behind the scenes. I knew how the government was stepping in and silencing posts,' Rogan said during the interview released on Thursday. In March, House Republicans issued subpoenas to officials at Google, demanding the tech giant turn over company information tied to the censorship of Americans during the Biden presidency. Republicans have long accused the Biden Administration of pressuring major companies into censoring free speech during and after the coronavirus pandemic. Republicans launched an investigation into government censorship after reclaiming the House majority in early 2023. Before Biden left office in January, Zuckerberg publicly confessed that both Meta and Facebook censored conservative opinions on an industrial scale during this time. Zuckerberg said the Biden Administration 'repeatedly pressured' the company to remove posts government officials claimed were 'COVID misinformation,' even if the posts were just humor or satire. Rogan compared the shocking levels of censorship in the US during the pandemic to other countries, which have been accused by nonprofit watchdogs of suppressing free expression. According to the political advocacy group Freedom House, 45 countries arrested their citizens for their COVID-related speech online. Twenty-eight countries were found to have censored websites or social media posts during the pandemic, a list that has now been confirmed to include the US. Other nations confirmed to have silenced public discourse included China, India, Turkey, Egypt, and Thailand. Countries in the European Union, like Germany and the UK, have also been accused of censoring online speech through regulations like the EU Digital Services Act. 'This is f****** dangerous man,' Rogan said Thursday. 'If they get a real grip on social media... you no longer can protest about things and express yourself about things, including a lot of things that happened to be true,' he added. That's when the podcast host, who publicly endorsed President Trump in 2024, focused his argument on the progressive left. 'All tech is primarily left and they have a very strong ideology,' Rogan claimed. He alleged that Democrats in the Biden White House and tech giants justified their actions by claiming that anyone who disagreed with the administration's COVID policies was not just wrong, but also attacking democracy. 'When they were in control and they were silencing things, I think the attitude was this is good because we're right and we need to stop these fascists or whatever we want to call them,' Rogan explained. At this point, President Trump and Republicans have not made any public statements that support the censorship of Americans on social media. Musk added in 2024 that he wanted X to 'maximize free speech' and opposed any form of content suppression unless the comments were explicitly illegal. Since Zuckerberg's admission about Facebook, the social media platform has officially shut down its third-party fact-checking program in the US on April 7. Meta also adopted Community Notes, a crowdsourced content moderation feature that allows users to add context, corrections, or clarifications to posts online, just like X does. Zuckerberg also promised to move the social media platform's content moderation teams from California to Texas to address perceptions of bias. However, former Facebook employees told The Guardian their teams were already in Texas before January 2025 and the promise was made to win over President Trump.
The Herald Scotland
15 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Obamacare Supreme Court decision: What it means for RFK Jr.
The suit started in Texas where two Christian owned business and individuals argued that health insurance plans they buy shouldn't have to cover medical tests and drugs they object to on religious grounds, such as the HIV-prevention drug PrEP. But the legal issue at the heart of the Supreme Court case was whether USPSTF is so powerful that, under the Constitution, its members must be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the 6-3 majority that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. can remove task force members at will and can review their recommendations before they take effect. "The Task Force members are removable at will by the Secretary of HHS, and their recommendations are reviewable by the Secretary before they take effect," he wrote. "So Task Force members are supervised and directed by the Secretary, who in turn answers to the President preserving the chain of command." The Health and Human Services Secretary has always appointed USPSTF members and ratified their recommendations, said MaryBeth Musumeci, teaching associate professor of health policy and management at George Washington University's Milken Institute School of Public Health. But the ruling expanded on that authority by clarifying that the secretary could also remove members and block recommendations, she said. Given that Kennedy had recently fired all 17 original members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, another expert panel that issues health recommendations, Musumeci said "there is reason to be worried." The secretary has never removed access to preventive services that have been proven to help people stay healthy nor have they "sought to shape the membership of our expert panel in any way," USPSTF chair Dr. Michael Silverstein said in a statement emailed to USA TODAY. "While the HHS Secretary has long had authority over the USPSTF, historically they have only acted to increase access to preventive care, occasionally going beyond the evidence to secure enhanced coverage for preventive services," he said. "Given our shared focus on preventing cancer and chronic disease, we certainly hope that the Secretary will allow our current work to continue unimpeded, as it has thus far." Surprise move? RFK Jr.'s vaccine committee votes to recommend RSV shot for infants Katherine Hempstead, senior policy officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a health nonprofit, praised the SCOTUS decision because it meant that millions of Americans still have access to preventive care such as mental health screenings, cancer screenings, STI testing and important medications. But she also called the ruling both an "ending and a beginning." "It's the ending of the challenge but now it's the beginning of something that's going to unfold where we're going to see someone exercise control over this expert panel that has very strong opinions about... many aspects of medical care," she said. More details: Supreme Court rejects conservative challenge to Obamacare health coverage If Kennedy plans to target USPSTF, it's unclear what preventive services could be at risk, Musumeci said. But insurance companies ultimately have the final decision. Even if the secretary vetoes a new recommendation or revokes an existing one, insurance companies can still decide to cover the preventive service. America's Health Insurance Plans, a trade association representing health insurance companies, plans to closely monitor the ongoing legal process but affirms that the SCOTUS ruling will not impact any existing coverage, according to an emailed statement sent to USA TODAY. Contributing: Maureen Groppe and Bart Jansen, USA TODAY; Reuters. Adrianna Rodriguez can be reached at adrodriguez@
