logo
The 59 Best Amazon Member–only Fourth of July Deals to Shop Before the Sale Ends—Up to 88% Off

The 59 Best Amazon Member–only Fourth of July Deals to Shop Before the Sale Ends—Up to 88% Off

If you missed shopping over the holiday weekend, don't worry—there's still time to score major savings from Amazon's Fourth of July sales. But act fast: these Prime member-only travel deals are ending soon. We dug through hundreds of markdowns to find the very best, from lightweight maxi dresses and breathable linen pants to sleek luggage sets and comfy walking shoes. Prices start at just $6, with discounts reaching up to 88 percent off, but they won't stick around much longer.
To access these limited-time deals, you'll need to be a Prime member, though you can still sign up for a free 30-day trial to shop these discounts today. Whether you're prepping for a long-haul flight, a last-minute road trip, or a weekend at the beach, these deals are your final chance to stock up on stylish, functional travel essentials at serious discounts.
Planning a last-minute getaway or stocking up for future trips? Amazon's Prime-exclusive Fourth of July deals include steep discounts on top-rated luggage and travel bags. Score 32 percent off the lightweight Samsonite Freeform 28-inch Checked Luggage, or save up to $308 on the editor-loved Delsey Paris Chatelet Air 2.0 Set. You'll also find deep markdowns on popular backpacks and duffels, ideal for carry-ons and quick weekend escapes. From full luggage sets to smart, packable bags, these deals won't last past the holiday. Samsonite Freeform 28-inch Checked Luggage, $98 (originally $280)
Delsey Paris Chatelet Air 2.0 2-piece Luggage Set, $441 (originally $750)
American Tourister Stratum 2.0 Expandable Carry-on Luggage, $54 (originally $90)
Matein Travel Laptop Backpack, $22 (originally $40)
Tilymol 3-piece Luggage Set, $114 (originally $150)
Nazhura 3-piece Luggage Set, $100 (originally $160)
Adidas Defender 5.0 Duffel Bag, $31 (originally $40)
Wildroad Waxed Canvas Duffel Bag, $50 (originally $70)
Lovevook Travel Duffel Bag, $29 (originally $40)
SwissGear 1900 Laptop Backpack, $54 (originally $99)
From in-flight comfort to streamlined packing, these Prime-only travel accessory and tech deals are arriving just in time for all of your summer getaways. Amazon slashed prices on top-rated bestsellers, including the Napfun Neck Pillow, snatched up by over 30,000 shoppers last month, and the Aobbow Magnetic Portable Charger, now a whopping 88 percent off. Also, score smart organizers like the OlarHike 10-set Packing Cubes for 37 percent off and the Fyy Travel Cable Organizer for just $10 to keep your next trip organized and stress-free.
Smileshe Travel Jewelry Box, $6 (originally $7)
Aobbow Magnetic Portable Charger, $25 (originally $200)
Lisen Airplane Phone Holder, $15 (originally $25)
Eachy Travel Makeup Bag, $24 (originally $29)
OlarHike 10-set Packing Cubes, $17 (originally $27)
Tocelffe 18-pack Travel Bottles, $10 (originally $13)
Napfun Neck Pillow, $16 (originally $22)
Travel Inspira Luggage Scale, $10 (originally $13)
Bagail 8-set Packing Cubes, $14 (originally $25)
Fyy Travel Cable Organizer, $10 (originally $13)
Amazon's Fourth of July Prime deals are full of stylish, travel-ready clothing—and every piece I handpicked is under $40. The Anrabess Midi Dress is just $25, while the Zesica Maxi Dress is 37 percent off; both are perfect for walking tours, date nights, or sunset cocktails. For breezy bottoms, you can't go wrong with linen pants like the Faleave Wide-leg Linen Pants for $26 or the Amazon Essentials Drawstring Pants, now 28 percent off. These comfortable, versatile staples belong in every summer suitcase—but they won't be on sale for long.
Evaless Short Sleeve Blouse, $10 (originally $18)
Kkj 2-pack Tank Tops, $20 (originally $25)
Zesica Maxi Dress, $36 (originally $57)
Anrabess Jumpsuit, $20 (originally $30)
Amazon Essentials Linen Drawstring Pants, $18 (originally $25)
Lillusory Summer Vest, $25 (originally $37)
Sampeel Two-piece Matching Set, $27 (originally $35)
Anrabess Midi Dress, $25 (originally $33)
Anrabess Wide-leg Pants, $28 (originally $36)
Wiholl Crew Neck Waffle Tank Top, $6 (originally $10)
Anrabess Sundress, $28 (originally $45)
Faleave Wide-leg Linen Pants, $26 (originally $33)
Grace Karin Maxi Dress, $48 (originally $60)
Amazon's Fourth of July Prime sale is stepping up with deals on travel-friendly shoes, with prices starting at just $18. Score ultra-comfy picks like the Dr. Scholl's Women's Time Off Sneakers for long days of walking or the best-selling Bronax Pillow Slippers for just $20. Summer-inspired sandals like the Cushionaire Espadrilles and Reef Cushion Vista Sandals are perfect for dinner by the water, while supportive options like the Shevalues Orthopedic Sandals are built for all-day comfort. Whether you're heading to the airport or wandering cobblestone streets, these shoes are made to move.
Dr. Scholl's Women's Time Off Sneakers, $75 (originally $110)
Bronax Pillow Slippers, $20 (originally $36)
Kidmi Suede Sandals, $28 (originally $40)
Project Cloud Flip Flops, $30 (originally $50)
Rocket Dog Women's Cheery Sneakers, $28 (originally $50)
Athmile Sandals, $24 (originally $33)
New Balance Women's 608 V5 Sneakers, $60 (originally $75)
Reef Cushion Vista Sandals, $50 (originally $65)
Adidas Women's VL Court 3.0 Sneakers, $56 (originally $75)
Cushionaire Espadrille Sandals, $36 (originally $45)
Clarks Women's Breeze Step Li Loafers, $48 (originally $65)
Shevalues Orthopedic Sandals, $18 (originally $30)
Eqaudes Platform Slip-on Espadrille Sandals, $40 (originally $50)
If your summer plans include hikes, camping trips, or beach days, Amazon's outdoor deals are packed with essential travel-ready gear at major discounts. Stay sun-safe with the Baleaf UPF 50+ T-shirt for $20, or grab the breathable Viodia Hiking Cargo Shorts for warm-weather trail days. The Toumett UPF 50 Long Sleeve Shirt is up to 35 percent off, and the HiiPeak Sleeping Pad is now just $28—perfect for overnight adventures. You'll also find big savings on top-rated hiking footwear like the Teva Hurricane XLT2 Sandals and Merrell Moab 3 Hiking Boots. Whether you're camping in the woods or lounging at the park, these deals are built for the outdoors.
Baleaf UPF 50+ T-shirt, $20 (originally $25)
Toomett Women's Hiking Pants, $37 (originally $49)
Coleman Big-n-tall Camping Chair, $44 (originally $70)
Teva Women's Hurricane Xlt2 Sandals, $61 (originally $75)
Merrell Women's Moab 3 Hiking Boots, $99 (originally $150)
Toumett UPF 50+ Long Sleeve Shirt, $36 (originally $40)
Baleaf Sun Protection Hoodie, $30 (originally $40)
Viodia Women's Hiking Cargo Shorts, $27 (originally $30)
Ubfen Women's Hiking Sandals, $40 (originally $50)
Campros CP Tent 8-person Camping Tent, $128 (originally $180)
UNP Camping Tent, $100 (originally $130)
Coleman Classic Series Rolling Cooler, $83 (originally $110)
HiiPeak Sleeping Pad, $28 (originally $35)
Love a great deal? Sign up for our T+L Recommends newsletter and we'll send you our favorite travel products each week.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mayor Brandon Johnson open to future Chicago NASCAR race, suggests date change
Mayor Brandon Johnson open to future Chicago NASCAR race, suggests date change

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mayor Brandon Johnson open to future Chicago NASCAR race, suggests date change

CHICAGO — Mayor Brandon Johnson is open to NASCAR returning to Chicago, but hinted Tuesday the city may need a better deal before stock car drivers again race through its streets. NASCAR has 90 days to request a contract extension with the Chicago Park District. If the racing authority wants to win city leaders over, it could need to change race dates, the mayor said Tuesday. 'The Fourth of July is already, quite frankly, it is a heavier burden for our law enforcement because of so much activity,' Johnson said at a City Hall news conference. 'It's something that will be part of the larger discussion if, in fact, NASCAR returns, what is the optimal time.' Pressed on what else the city might need to approve another race, Johnson stayed tight-lipped, promising only that 'there will be a lot of things that we will discuss.' Whether the city and NASCAR can find dates that fit into both schedules is a key question. A NASCAR spokesperson declined comment Tuesday. The 2026 and 2027 races, the prior contract negotiated by former Mayor Lori Lightfoot said, would be held on mutually agreeable dates. But the park district did confirm in the original contract that the 2023 event and staging window — July 4th weekend — 'is acceptable for potential 2026 or 2027 events.' NASCAR is reportedly in separate negotiations with officials in San Diego to host a street race there in 2026. The potential San Diego race may be in addition to Chicago, or supplant it. A negotiation window with Chicago officials could be narrow: NASCAR announced last year's cup schedule last August. It featured 38 races between February and November, breaking briefly in May and June. Considered the city's front lawn, Grant Park already has a packed schedule in the warmer months, including Lollapalooza, Suenos, Blues and Jazz fests, Taste of Chicago, the half marathon, and various other festivals. Downtown aldermen say moving the race is critical to winning their approval. The Fourth of July is a 'family-oriented' weekend when Chicagoans should have free access to Grant Park, Ald. Bill Conway, 34th, said. 'If you're going to have it again, please don't have it on July 4th weekend,' Conway said. 'We should choose to do it a different weekend if we choose to do it at all.' Conway also said the city should recoup costs tied to the event 'at a minimum' and added that he hopes construction and tear-down times continue to improve. The racing authority has become more efficient in its set-up and communicated well with residents to resolve initial concerns, he added. 'If we can get those things ironed out, I think it would be good to have NASCAR back. Chicago shines on the world stage, and it's clear Chicago gives NASCAR that platform,' he said. Conway said Johnson previously told him a city decision on the event's future would come after this year's race. The mayor on Tuesday promised 'far more people are going to be involved' as future races are considered. 'We should have input, we should be involved in this process,' Ald. Brian Hopkins, 2nd, said. Hopkins argued Lightfoot failed to bring in others when she landed the deal to bring the race to Chicago. He declined to cast judgement on whether the race should continue. It seems the city comes out slightly ahead financially, but weeks-long street closures still make the race hard to justify, he said. The city's cut has long been a point of contention with NASCAR skeptics. The 2025 payment includes a $605,000 base permit fee, plus $2 per ticket sold and 25% of net commissions on food, drinks and merchandise sold at the event. NASCAR must pay the non-permit cut within a 90-day window after the event. In the fall of 2023, Johnson and NASCAR also memorialized an additional $2 million payment for 2024 and 2025. That payment was supposed to help compensate the city for public safety and other costs. NASCAR also agreed to continually slim down its setup and takedown window to reduce inconvenience to drivers and downtown residents. The city came out slightly ahead last year, thanks in large part to that $2 million payment and fewer roadwork improvement costs. NASCAR officials point to the broader economic impact as a point in their favor — plus added amusement taxes that flow to the city and county. Leslie Recht, who leads the Grant Park Advisory Council, said she's urged Park District Superintendent Carlos Ramirez Rosa, a close Johnson ally, to push for more money from the company and an even quicker set-up and takedown. 'For me, it's still too long,' Recht said, stipulating that other advisory council members don't mind it. 'All the disruption in Grant Park, if you compare it to Lollapalooza or Suenos or some of the other events, they come, they go. They're a much less impactful situation in Grant Park than NASCAR and they don't pay enough … Lolla and Suenos together pay $12 million. It's ridiculous.' The city must be careful with how it uses Grant Park, because 'it is for everyone,' Ald. Lamont Robinson, 4th, said. But NASCAR has so far been a 'good neighbor,' he added. 'I think we need as much revenue as we can get in the city of Chicago,' Robinson said. ____

Walmart ramps up e-commerce to rival Amazon's Prime Day event
Walmart ramps up e-commerce to rival Amazon's Prime Day event

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Walmart ramps up e-commerce to rival Amazon's Prime Day event

Walmart (WMT) is trying to outpace Amazon (AMZN) this year with "Walmart Deals Week," a six-day savings event (two days longer than Amazon's Prime Day sales event). Yahoo Finance Senior Reporter Brooke DiPalma breaks down Walmart's latest push to grow its e-commerce and grocery businesses. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination here. Amazon's Prime Day deals will take front and center stage for most shoppers this week, as it extends its signature shopping period to four days for the first time. But this year, as in recent years, it is not alone. Yahoo Finance's Brooke DiPalma joins us now with more, Brooke. Good afternoon to you both. Certainly what we've seen in recent years is really Amazon get taken on by their retail rivals. Think Target, think Walmart specifically, but so many others are looking to get in on this big splash of savings like Target, Home Depot, Lowe's, Best Buy, even Tractor Supply and Ulta Beauty. Well, they're looking to get in on the action, too. But let's take a closer look at one of their biggest competitors, Walmart. Well, Walmart, they're really upping their ante when it comes to their e-commerce business. In the last quarter, that e-commerce business here in the U.S. just turned profitable, and now they're really doubling down on their offering this week. They're instead of just having a four-day event like Amazon Prime, they're looking to do it bigger. And so Walmart's having a six-day event from July 8th to July 13th. That's trumping Amazon Prime's Day event from July 11th, or July 8th rather, to July 11th. Now, some sources tell me that Amazon is clearly the big winner this week. And sure, customers, just top of mind, they'll go to Amazon first, they'll look at the prices. But then ultimately, what they might be doing is going elsewhere in this environment where consumers are so conscientious about how much things cost. They really are conscientious about where exactly they want to spend here. And so they'll go elsewhere. They'll go to that Walmart, they'll go to these other retailers. But this could be a prime opportunity for Walmart. That's what some analysts tell me. Specifically, what they really want to gain here is memberships. The Walmart Deals Week, they're ultimately enticing those Walmart Plus customers, something that launched back in 2020, to sign up. They're saying, hey, through mid-July, we're going to offer 50% off, and that could be a big opportunity for Walmart. But when you really look at another business that Walmart's winning on, that's Walmart Grocery business here. Of course, they've been touting that on recent earnings calls that they're gaining more high-income shoppers, and that Walmart Plus membership also tends to be higher income as well. But when you take a look at the numbers, guys, Walmart's e-commerce business is far, far lower than Amazon's business here when it comes to just how much money they're bringing in. If you take a look at last year right here, you could see that Walmart brought in around $121 billion when it comes to their e-commerce business. That's of course, far lower than Amazon's e-commerce business online stores. And also, when you think about just how much membership fees they bring in, Amazon also surpasses by a landslide how much Walmart Plus brings in when it comes to membership fees. And also, the top side here is that Walmart Plus subscription is far lower than Amazon Prime. Also, they're offering that half off right now. And so it could entice customers. That's ultimately what Walmart wants here. They want to take the eyes away from Amazon. Will there be certain categories, Brooke, where Walmart would think, okay, we have maybe some type of competitive advantage here? Would it be, you know, for example, would it be food sales? Yeah, certainly. So 60% of Walmart's U.S. sales is grocery. And that's what ultimately Amazon has to worry about here. One analyst telling me that one of the biggest things that Amazon, or rather Walmart has to look out for, is if Amazon gets competitive on their grocery business. And what we've seen in recent months is really Amazon invest, look around, see exactly how they could really integrate and grow that Whole Foods acquisition that happened back in 2017, just a few years ago now, it seems like with the pandemic. But really, they're trying to entice consumers here with that.

Fact check: Debunking 11 of Trump's false claims at Cabinet meeting
Fact check: Debunking 11 of Trump's false claims at Cabinet meeting

CNN

time15 minutes ago

  • CNN

Fact check: Debunking 11 of Trump's false claims at Cabinet meeting

President Donald Trump again turned a Cabinet meeting into a wide-ranging conversation with reporters – and again uttered a whole bunch of false claims in the process. Trump's Tuesday remarks at the White House included inaccurate assertions about inflation, immigration, his tariff policy, the massive domestic policy bill he signed last week, China's use of wind energy, US and European aid to Ukraine, the US relationship with South Korea, and other subjects. Here is a fact check of 11 of the president's false claims. This is not a comprehensive list. Inflation: As he has repeatedly, Trump falsely claimed Tuesday, 'We have no inflation.' The US does have inflation – an annual inflation rate of 2.4% in May, an uptick from a 2.3% annual rate in April. That April rate was the lowest since early 2021, and lower than some economists expected for April after Trump imposed significant new tariffs, but it's not 'no inflation' whatsoever. (And on a month-to-month basis, US consumer prices increased 0.1% in May and 0.2% in April.) Tax on Social Security: Touting the new domestic policy legislation, Trump repeated his false claim that it achieves his campaign promise of 'no tax on Social Security.' It does not. The legislation does create an additional, temporary $6,000-per-year tax deduction for individuals age 65 and older (with a smaller deduction for individuals earning $75,000 per year or more), but the White House itself has implicitly acknowledged that millions of Social Security recipients age 65 and older will continue to pay taxes on their benefits – and that new deduction, which expires in 2028, doesn't even apply to the Social Security recipients who are younger than 65. Trump's tariff letters: Trump spoke of the letters he sent to various foreign leaders announcing the tariff rates he plans to impose on their countries beginning in August – and said, 'I just want you to know - a letter means a deal.' That's just not true. Multiple letters the White House revealed on Monday announced tariff rates Trump said he plans to unilaterally place on imports from foreign countries; those letters did not describe negotiated deals. Who pays tariffs: Trump repeatedly spoke of how his new tariffs mean other countries will have to 'pay' the US for the privilege of doing business in the US. Contrary to Trump's frequent assertions, it is the US importers who buy foreign products, not foreign countries themselves, who make the tariff payments to the US government. Tariff history: Trump repeated his regular false claim that the US was 'proportionately' at its 'wealthiest' between 1870 and 1913, when tariff revenue made up a much larger share of federal revenue before the reintroduction of the income tax. Trump didn't explain what he meant by 'proportionately' or 'the wealthiest,' but economists say that by any standard measure, the US is far wealthier today than it was in the early 20th century and prior; per capita gross domestic product is now many times higher than it was then. China and wind power: Trump, asserting that 'smart countries' don't use wind and solar energy, repeated his recent false claim that China, the world's biggest manufacturer of wind turbines, barely uses such equipment itself - wrongly saying, 'They don't have a lot of wind farms, I'll tell you; very, very few.' In reality, China is the world leader in the generation of wind power and has massive wind farms onshore and offshore; it continues to install additional wind capacity much faster than the US. California and energy: Trump, reviving a previous inaccurate complaint about California's use of renewable energy sources, falsely claimed: 'They have blackouts and brownouts every week.' The state simply does not; its power system has improved significantly since the rolling blackouts of a 2020 heat wave. Daniel Villasenor, a spokesperson for Gov. Gavin Newsom, said in a Tuesday email that Trump is again 'lying about California.' Villasenor wrote: 'The state has not experienced any rotating outages since 2020 – and in the last three years, no Flex Alert calling to conserve power has even been issued. Not only has our grid been increasingly resilient, it's also cleaner than ever – clean energy provided for 100% of demand on our grid for at least some part of the day 167 out of the first 180 days of the year.' US and European aid to Ukraine: Trump repeated his frequent false claim that the US has provided 'far more' wartime aid to Ukraine that Europe has, saying the US is 'in there for over $300 billion; Europe's in there for over $100 billion.' Those numbers are not close to accurate. According to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a German think tank that closely tracks international aid to Ukraine, the US had committed about $139 billion in military, financial and humanitarian aid to Ukraine from late January 2022, just prior to Russia's full-scale invasion, through April 2025 – well short of about $298 billion committed by European countries and the European Union. The gap was much narrower in terms of aid actually allocated through April 2025 – about $183 billion for Europe to about $134 billion for the US – but even those figures clearly disprove Trump's claim. South Korea's military cost-sharing: Trump repeated his false claim that South Korea convinced former President Joe Biden to let it stop making payments to help cover the cost of the US military presence in South Korea, saying Biden 'cut it down to nothing.' In fact, Biden's administration signed two cost-sharing agreements with South Korea, one in 2021 and one in 2024, that included South Korean spending increases – meaning South Korea agreed to pay more than it did during Trump's first term. US troops in South Korea: Trump again exaggerated the US troop presence in South Korea, falsely saying, 'You know, we have 45,000 soldiers in South Korea.' Official Defense Department data, published online, says the US had 26,206 military personnel in South Korea as of March 31, 2025, with 22,844 on active duty. Migration and mental health: Trump falsely claimed that unnamed foreign countries 'released their insane asylum – the insane asylum population into our country.' Even Trump's own presidential campaign could not produce any evidence for his frequent claims, which he has repeated for more than two years, that foreign countries deliberately emptied their mental health facilities to somehow get patients to migrate to the United States.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store