Nelson woman avoids conviction for sharing image of partly naked woman
It was a 'salutary lesson' in how easy it was to end up facing criminal charges by sending digital material that could harm someone, police told NZME outside the Nelson District Court this week.
'This really was a perfect storm of factors that led to the offending,' defence lawyer Amanda Godwin said inside the court at the woman's hearing.
Judge Stephen Harrop said the 'real culprit' was the person who shared it initially. Photo / Lewis Mulatero
The defendant was charged after the victim complained to the police.
Judge Stephen Harrop said it was a serious charge, and the court recognised the serious harm caused to people by the posting of such material, but the defendant had since suffered 'serious abuse' online, making her a victim of harmful social media too.
She had suffered other consequences, including the loss of a contract linked to her business.
The court heard that in January this year, the defendant met on TikTok an Australian man, who had received the intimate image from the complainant via Snapchat.
He shared the image to a Messenger group of about 13 people, to which the defendant belonged.
Another member of the group 'doctored' the image to make it animated and shared it with the defendant, who sent it to the TikTok acquaintance to 'double check' that he had seen it.
The person who doctored the image and shared it has been charged and will be sentenced in a South Island court next month.
Judge Harrop said the 'real culprit' was the man who shared it initially, but he acknowledged that the victim was concerned about it having been reposted.
He said the circumstances were 'very different' to someone surreptitiously taking an image and posting it, and that the woman who had taken the image and sent it was part of the equation.
'We have a situation where the victim put it out in the first place, which was intended for one person but was then published to a group of 13,' Judge Harrop said.
'It does mean the seriousness of the offending is less than what appeared.'
He said the defendant had afterwards suffered a 'sustained campaign of harassment and abuse' online and that she too had become a victim.
She had since been diagnosed with a mental health condition that was likely to make her act impulsively, which was recognised by a psychologist in the pre-sentence report writing process.
The consequences of a conviction were therefore likely to be greater than they might be for someone more resilient, Judge Harrop said in granting a discharge without conviction.
The defendant was ordered to make a $200 emotional harm payment to the victim.
The judge also granted permanent name suppression.
He said the public 'may well conclude' that the woman should have been convicted and that it was unfair to discharge her and then allow her name to be published, even though that did not automatically follow.
'I'm satisfied for the reasons you were granted interim name suppression, and a discharge without conviction, the test for final suppression has been met,' Judge Harrop said.
Tracy Neal is a Nelson-based Open Justice reporter at NZME. She was previously RNZ's regional reporter in Nelson-Marlborough and has covered general news, including court and local government, for the Nelson Mail.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Consumer Watchdog Warns Fijians About Auckland-Based Tiktokker's Money-Making Scheme
Fiji's consumer watchdog is warning Fijians to stay away from a TikTok "business opportunity" run out of Auckland. The Consumer Council of Fiji (CCF) issued a warning on 11 July about a series of viral TikToks that encourage viewers to pay upfront "joining fees" with promises of instant earnings. The TikToker has amassed tens of thousands of views on videos promoting "LiveGood", a multi-level marketing (MLM) company based in Florida that sells nutrition supplements. "An individual named Ricky Nair LG, reportedly based in New Zealand, is actively promoting this scheme in Fiji. It promises high returns through 'matrix spillover' and encourages people to pay a US$49.95 joining fee and a monthly US$9.95 subscription." "It resembles a pyramid scheme, where earnings are based solely on recruiting others. It promises unrealistic weekly payments of up to $1000 for simply signing others up." Council CEO Seema Shandil told RNZ Pacific that they want to prevent Fijians from falling for online scams before too much money is lost. "We are trying to raise [awareness]...we have experienced it, and we know that eventually this is going to fall apart and people are going to lose heaps." LiveGood's MLM structure involves sellers who improve their ranking by selling products, getting customers to pay for a US$9.95 a month membership, and by recruiting, or "sponsoring", more sellers. The sellers earn a 2.5 percent commission on products sold, passing the rest of their revenue up to their sponsor, who would in turn pay a share up to theirs, and so on. In his videos, Nair often refers to "matrix spillover" as a means of earning income through Livegood. The "matrix" refers to a hierarchical structure of sellers, with their sponsors above them. Members may then recruit their own, or on their downline, that they did not personally recruit. Thus, the top seller is generating income without having to do anything. "How many he has recruited, I don't know, but he's using all these techniques to lure the vulnerable," Shandil said. While there are sellers based in New Zealand, it is unclear how popular LiveGood is among Kiwis. Shandil said that the fact NZ-based sellers are appealing to Fijians is a major red flag. "They are people sitting in New Zealand, and they are aggressively marketing it to the people of Fiji. So why do you think that doing that?" Consumer watchdog 'hasn't got a clue' - TikTokker When RNZ Pacific contacted Nair, he denied any wrongdoing. "The Consumer Council [of Fiji] hasn't got a clue," he said. Nair said that there are "heaps" of sellers in New Zealand, most using TikTok and Facebook to sell worldwide. "I'm just sending the referrals. If they want, they join. If they don't want, they don't join." He said that he receives a commission for every member that he refers, and that he has 47 members in his downline, with 21 from Fiji. He said he does not profit from their sales. But Nair has publicly boasted his "Gold ranking", which, according to LiveGood rules means he has at least 100 people, and at most 499 people, below him on his "enroller tree". Despite posting that new members could make "$1000 a week" if they sign up under him, Nair said they have to work for it by recruiting new members themselves. "Everybody are doing their own way of marketing, right? I'm just posting that. But if people gonna contact me, then I gonna explain them how it gonna work (sic)." According to Scam Detector, the TikTokker's storefront website has a score of 45.8/100, meaning it has a low-to-medium trust score, and is likely a scam. "This website has a pretty low score, which means caution is advised," it states. Proceed with caution - Commerce Commission The New Zealand Commerce Commission says that it is aware of LiveGood's presence in New Zealand, and they are keeping a close watch. The Commission's general manager of competition, fair trading and credit Vanessa Horne said it received two enquiries about the multi-level marketer (MLM) in 2023. "While MLMs are not prohibited under the Fair Trading Act, businesses and individuals operating MLMs could still breach the Act if they make misleading or false claims about either the benefits of signing up to the MLM scheme and/or the goods or services the MLM sells." Horne said that an essential element of a pyramid scheme is that the return depends on the continued recruitment of new members, not product sales. Another is that they offer financial return based on recruitment fees. "Some promoters of pyramid schemes do try and make their schemes sound lawful. Consumers should be careful to ensure that a scheme is genuinely a multi-level marketing scheme, and not an illegal pyramid selling scheme before becoming involved with it." "The Commission encourages anyone who believes a business has breached the Fair Trading Act or one of the other laws we enforce, to report it, using the 'report a concern' form on our website."
NZ Herald
3 days ago
- NZ Herald
Govt's 500 police target delayed again as Australia poaching campaign considered
Associate Police Minister Casey Costello and Police Commissioner Richard Chambers appear at select committee. Photo / Mark Mitchell When the policy was first announced, it had a two-year deadline from late November 2023 to increase NZ Police's constabulary force from 10,211 to 10,711 by November 2025. Government ministers had gradually accepted the initial deadline was unlikely to be met after Police Commissioner Richard Chambers indicated June 2026 was more realistic, given his commitment to training standards. As of July 21, NZ Police had added just 23 extra officers. About 90 recruits were due to graduate at the end of the month. Associate Police Minister Casey Costello, who was responsible for the policy, said in February she was 'even more confident' the target would be reached in November this year amid a boost in applications. In a statement this week, Costello said projections shifted from month to month based on the timing of graduations and the number of officers leaving or retiring. 'We always knew it was an ambitious timeline.' Labour police spokeswoman Ginny Andersen is criticising the Government's ability to deliver. Photo / Mark Mitchell Labour police spokeswoman Ginny Andersen condemned the delay as an example of Luxon's 'inability to deliver'. 'Meanwhile, meth use is surging and our communities are suffering,' she said. 'The Government shouldn't promise what it can't deliver on.' Police keep latest projections under wraps In an interview with the Herald yesterday, Penny wouldn't provide NZ Police's latest estimate when the target would be reached, saying it was 'pretty hard to be accurate' given the variable nature of training numbers and attrition. Asked whether she could guarantee it would be achieved before the 2026 election, Penny wouldn't speculate. About 370 recruits were currently progressing through NZ Police's 20-week training course, while another 340 would begin training by the end of the year. That was offset by an attrition rate of 5.4% and an aging workforce, according to Penny. She acknowledged police had been a 'bit sluggish in the beginning', but a dedicated team had since been set up to improve recruitment efforts. 'There are some things we can do to maybe deliver it a little bit sooner and that's why last week I was with all the district commanders and asking ourselves the question around what are we doing now that's working and what are we not doing so we can move things faster. 'We are going to deliver it, but we will get there when we get there.' Police Assistant Commissioner Tusha Penny said training standards wouldn't be compromised to hit the target. Photo / Jason Oxenham One of those measures to boost recruitment could be an effort to poach Kiwi cops now in Australia and possibly Australian officers as well. Penny said Chambers had asked senior leaders to assess whether an Australian recruitment drive would be useful. A decision hadn't yet been made. It followed several attempts from Australian police officials to attract New Zealand officers across the ditch, most recently by members of Northern Territory Police. While any recruitment drive would likely focus on New Zealand officers, Penny said it was being discussed whether to broaden the campaign. 'We have had a number of conversations that we should maybe say, 'Hey, bring one of your Aussie work besties back with you', but that's in negotiation.' Adam Pearse is the Deputy Political Editor and part of the NZ Herald's Press Gallery team based at Parliament in Wellington. He has worked for NZME since 2018, reporting for the Northern Advocate in Whangārei and the Herald in Auckland.
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Shared intimate image, but not convicted
A woman ended up in court for sharing an image of a partly naked woman which had been sent to a social media chat group she was part of. The action of sharing the image resulted in the 52-year-old woman being charged, but ultimately she avoided a conviction because of her lesser involvement in the reposting "equation". For that reason her name was also permanently suppressed. The charge of posting an intimate visual recording carries a maximum two-year prison term or a $50,000 fine. "This really was a perfect storm of factors that led to the offending," defence lawyer Amanda Godwin told the court. The defendant was charged after the victim complained to the police. Judge Stephen Harrop said it was a serious charge, and the court recognised the serious harm caused to people by posting such material, but the defendant had since suffered "serious abuse" online, making her a victim of harmful social media, too. She had suffered other consequences, including the loss of a contract linked to her business. The court heard that in January this year, the defendant met an Australian man on TikTok. The man had received the intimate image from the complainant via Snapchat. He shared the image to a Messenger group of about 13 people, to which the defendant belonged. Another member of the group "doctored" the image to make it animated and shared it with the defendant, who sent it to the TikTok acquaintance to "double check" he had seen it. The person who doctored the image and shared it has been charged and will be sentenced in a South Island court next month. Judge Harrop said the "real culprit" was the man who shared it initially, but he acknowledged the victim was concerned about it having been reposted. "We have a situation where the victim put it out in the first place, which was intended for one person but was then published to a group of 13," Judge Harrop said. "It does mean the seriousness of the offending is less than what appeared." He said the defendant had then suffered a "sustained campaign of harassment and abuse" online and she too had become a victim. She had since been diagnosed with a mental health condition that was likely to make her act impulsively. The consequences of a conviction were, therefore, likely to be greater than they might be for someone more resilient, Judge Harrop said in granting a discharge without conviction. The defendant was ordered to make a $200 emotional harm payment to the victim.
